Welcome to the Webinar! We hope you are logged in properly, if you are having trouble call 949-824-5828 We hope you are logged in properly, if you are.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chemical Fume hood or Biosafety Cabinet
Advertisements

1 Procuring a Design Project engineers perspective on starting the design process and establishing the A/E scope of work Frank C. Quigley General Engineer.
Guidelines and Required Codes That Affect Building Design
New York Life Building 20 West Ninth Street Mike Thome Hoss & Brown.
April 23, 2015Committee for Sustainability Building Systems and Energy Use Drexel University April 24, 2008.
Innovative Air Distribution for Healthcare Facilities.
NJ SmartStart Buildings New Jersey Higher Education Partnership for Sustainability (HEPS) January 20, 2012 Presenter: BPU President Robert Hanna.
DATA ONE, EUROPEAN OPERATIONS CENTRE, ST. PETERSBURG, RUSSIA Presentation of Design Proposal.
T OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AT TRIBAL GAMING FACILITIES.
Engineering Controls and Laboratory Design Session 4 Laboratory Safety Training.
Lab Energy Management Big Ten Mechanical & Energy Conference October
BRE Energy Efficient Office of the Future
Providing services that help make The University of Memphis a safe and healthful place to learn and work Environmental Health and Safety.
When Do Variable Flow Fume Hoods Save Energy? Implications for lab design and behavior modification Michael Gevelber, Robert Choate, Kevin Sheehan, Brian.
Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. ED&G 100 Design Project Fume Hood Face Velocity Control Spring 2004.
Cleanrooms and Laboratories for High-Technology Industries Dale Sartor, P.E. Bill Tschudi, P.E. July 1999 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Environmental.
1 FUME HOOD SAFETY Environmental Energy Technologies Division Safety Topic July 12, 2012.
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Wendell C. Brase Wendell C. Brase Chair, University of California Chair, University of California Climate Solutions Steering Group.
ENERGY EFFICIENCY FOR END-USERS.  CSU Chancellors office coordinates the efforts to accomplish the goals established by Assembly Bill 32 for green house.
NARAGHI HALL 3 rd FLOOR VENTILATION MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT BEST PRACTICE AWARD HVAC DESIGN/RETROFIT 2014 CALIFORNIA HIGHER EDUCATION SUSTAINABILITY CONFERENCE.
Chemistry Teaching Laboratory Fume Cupboard Refurbishment – University of Leeds Bob DouglassEnergy Officer.
Chemical Fume Hood  A type of local ventilation device that is designed to limit the user's exposure to hazardous or noxious fumes, vapors or dusts.
Industrial Ventilation - A major control measure Dr. AA, UTM.
Lab Energy Management. Fume Hoods/ Safety Cabinets One fume hood uses enough energy annually to power 3.5 households. Keeping a sash completely closed.
Active beams versus VAV with Reheat Analysis of May 2013 ASHRAE Journal article Ken Loudermilk Vice President, Technology & Developement.
UTSW Thermal Energy Plants, Power Generation and Electrical System What do we do to meet the Emission Reduction, Energy usage Reduction and Electrical.
Bowie State University Fine and Performing Arts Center Zachary Lippert Faculty Advisor: Dr. Stephen Treado.
ENERGY CONSERVATION & BUILDING STANDARDS Brian Deal, Fred Hahn, Karl Helmink, Claire McConnell, Dhara Patel, Claudia Szczepaniak, Scott Willenbrock.
Safety Meets Sustainability Rob Klein, MS, CIH Environmental Health & Safety Yale University New Haven, CT Making Universities Sustainable Copenhagen,
Auraria Higher Education Center Case Study John Ismert & Frank Ellis Auraria Higher Education Center Facilities Management.
Implementing Demand Controlled Ventilation to Meet ASHRAE Standard By Klas C. Haglid, P.E., R.A., CEM 1.
1 Progress Toward Sustainability at Williams College.
Examples of Commissioning Cost Savings Commissioning for Sustained Building Performance September 29, 2011 Marriott Birmingham, AL.
Energy Efficiency Opportunities in Biotech, Medical, and Pharmaceutical Lab Facilities William Tschudi October 13,
Green Building Demonstration Project Adam Saling City of San Diego.
HVAC for Educational Facilities
Using the Design-Build Approach to Meet Energy Reduction Goals March 2012.
Ductless Heat Pumps Ventilation Gary Nordeen Bill Kingrey, P.E. 11/5/08 AFE Webinar.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona What We’ve Learned From a Challenging Efficiency Goal Solution ShowcaseBetter Buildings Wendell Brase University.
Name of Building(s) or Project Speaker(s) Organization(s)
The EWZ building Presentation of the building Presentation of the building The design issue The design issue The building concept The building concept.
Commissioning of New and Existing Buildings Alexander P. Boucher, P.E., CEM, LEED BD+C.
Rating Laboratories Results from the Labs21 Program Paul Mathew, Dale Sartor Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Otto van Geet National Renewable Energy.
UNIFIED SCIENCE CENTER THE UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON SCRANTON, PA DALE E. HOUCK MECHANICAL OPTION.
November Top Ten Approaches to Lowering Fan Energy in Cleanrooms.
The lawrence berkeley national laboratory: a case study Revised 12/2/04.
Whitman-Hanson Regional High School Energy Efficient Systems: HVAC All fans and pumps are VFD controlled with fully reactive controls Condensing gas-fired.
Greening Your Lab Responsible Conduct of Research Duke University October 8, 2013.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: A NIH Overview.
Energy Design of Buildings using Thermal Mass Cement Association of Canada July 2006.
Testing Fan Filter Units
The Sunshine Elementary School Redesign Proposal Pennsylvania State University AE Senior Thesis Nicholas Scheib Mechanical Option- IP.
Greenbriar East Elementary School Fairfax, Virginia Michelle L. Siano Mechanical Option Spring 2005 Senior Thesis.
Labs21: Improving the Performance of Laboratories Optimizing Air Changes – one of the Big Hits September 21, 2006 Dale Sartor, P.E. Lawrence Berkeley National.
Cleanrooms: Can They Be Energy Efficient? William Tschudi – LBNL Peter Rumsey – Rumsey Engineers November 4, 2004.
AASHE CONFERENCE 2008 | BNIM Architects | people. innovation. design. Fayez S. Sarofim Building Institute of Molecular Medicine University of Texas Health.
Data Center Energy Use, Metrics and Rating Systems Steve Greenberg Energy Management Engineer Environmental Energy Technologies Division Lawrence Berkeley.
Green Labs Symposium | March 15, 2016 Travis Wanat, Senior project manager Department of Facilities Efficient building design and operation Fueling high.
Copyright © 2015 Optimum Energy LLC. All Rights Reserved. Proprietary & Confidential Incorporating Energy Conservation Strategies into University Research.
Energy Efficient Laboratories for the 21 st Century: Five Big Hits Dale Sartor, P.E. Group Leader, Applications Team Building Technologies Department Lawrence.
Michael Reilly, Jr. – Mechanical Option Advisor – James Freihaut, PhD & Dustin Eplee The Pennsylvania State University Nassau Community College Life Sciences.
AstraZeneca R&D Boston Waltham Energy Reduction Initiative 2016 Green Labs Symposium.
Implementing Wind Responsive VAV Exhaust Systems at NREL's ESIF Building: A Four-Year Follow-Up Otto VanGeet, PE, NREL Brad Cochran, CPP I2SL -August 29,
Successful Energy Conservation Projects at University Research Labs
Integrate Lighting, Daylighting and HVAC Control in the Laboratory Room Duane Ranski Siemens Industry Inc.
SCHOOL OF FOREST RESOURCES BUILDING
GVSU Case Study Analysis of HVAC filter using MERV 13 filter with low pressure drop design. 1.
تهیه و تنظیم: مهندس همت جو
أجهزة الشفط في المختبرات الكيميائية: كيف تعمل ومتى لا تعمل
Creating a Smart Labs Program I2SL CO Education Day
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to the Webinar! We hope you are logged in properly, if you are having trouble call We hope you are logged in properly, if you are having trouble call We have your audio muted, so we cannot hear you We have your audio muted, so we cannot hear you We can read your comments under the “chat tab” (conversation) We can read your comments under the “chat tab” (conversation) If you have a question for the panel, instead of using the “raising your hand” button, use the chat tab and preface your comment with “Question for Panel” If you have a question for the panel, instead of using the “raising your hand” button, use the chat tab and preface your comment with “Question for Panel” We will take questions during the Q&A session We will take questions during the Q&A session

Inter-University Energy and Safety Coalition Marc Gomez, CIH, CSP, ARM, Interim Assistant Vice Chancellor, Facilities Management / Environmental Health & Safety Lisa Mahar, Senior Manager, Occupational Health and Safety, EH&S Matt Gudorf, LEED-AP, Campus Energy Manager, Facilities Management

Meeting Agenda Introductions – Getting to know one another Introductions – Getting to know one another Review of Existing Codes Governing Laboratory Ventilation Review of Existing Codes Governing Laboratory Ventilation Challenges to Energy Conservation/Sustainability Challenges to Energy Conservation/Sustainability UCI Low-Flow (High Performance) Fume Hood Permanent Variance Application UCI Low-Flow (High Performance) Fume Hood Permanent Variance Application Overview of Studies and Variance Application Process Overview of Studies and Variance Application Process Next Steps – Variance Hearing, Purchase and Installation Plan, Expansion of Permanent Variance within UCI and other UC Campuses Next Steps – Variance Hearing, Purchase and Installation Plan, Expansion of Permanent Variance within UCI and other UC Campuses UCOP “Center of Excellence” for Energy Conservation and Sustainability UCOP “Center of Excellence” for Energy Conservation and Sustainability Discussion Discussion

University of California, Irvine Large research university $16M annual utilities budget Lab buildings consume 2/3 of campus energy Many energy initiatives to reduce carbon footprint

Campus Energy $avings Team Synergy Safety Management Visionary & Supportive Upper Management Engineers Facility Managers Patience Supportive Users/ Researchers

Balancing Lab Safety & Climate Safety Create lab buildings that out perform ASHRAE 90.1 / CA Title 24 by 50% Combine energy initiatives such as Centralized demand controlled ventilation (CDCV) Low flow (high performance) fume hoods Reduced building exhaust stack airspeeds Energy-efficient lighting

Meeting Agenda Introductions – Getting to know one another Introductions – Getting to know one another Review of Existing Codes Governing Laboratory Ventilation Review of Existing Codes Governing Laboratory Ventilation Challenges to Energy Conservation/Sustainability Challenges to Energy Conservation/Sustainability UCI Low-Flow (High Performance) Fume Hood Permanent Variance Application UCI Low-Flow (High Performance) Fume Hood Permanent Variance Application Overview of Studies and Variance Application Process Overview of Studies and Variance Application Process Next Steps – Variance Hearing, Purchase and Installation Plan, Expansion of Permanent Variance within UCI and other UC Campuses Next Steps – Variance Hearing, Purchase and Installation Plan, Expansion of Permanent Variance within UCI and other UC Campuses UCI “Smart Lab” Concept UCI “Smart Lab” Concept Discussion Discussion

Meeting Agenda Introductions – Getting to know one another Introductions – Getting to know one another Review of Existing Codes Governing Laboratory Ventilation Review of Existing Codes Governing Laboratory Ventilation Challenges to Energy Conservation/Sustainability Challenges to Energy Conservation/Sustainability UCI Low-Flow (High Performance) Fume Hood Permanent Variance Application UCI Low-Flow (High Performance) Fume Hood Permanent Variance Application Overview of Studies and Variance Application Process Overview of Studies and Variance Application Process Next Steps – Variance Hearing, Purchase and Installation Plan, Expansion of Permanent Variance within UCI and other UC Campuses Next Steps – Variance Hearing, Purchase and Installation Plan, Expansion of Permanent Variance within UCI and other UC Campuses UCI “Smart Lab” Concept UCI “Smart Lab” Concept Discussion Discussion

CA Ventilation Code Requirements: Code in Effect Ventilation Requirements Comments California Building Code 2001 B Labs: 6 ACH H-8 Labs: 1 cfm/sf 12 ft ceiling = 5 ACH 10 ft ceiling = 6 ACH 8 ft ceiling = 7.5 ACH In effect through December, 2007 In effect through December, 2007 Existing Construction Existing Construction California Mechanical Code 2007 B “Research” Labs: 0.43cfm/sf 12 ft ceiling = 3.5 ACH 10 ft ceiling = 4.2 ACH 8 ft ceiling = 5.25 ACH B“Science Classroom”/L (H-8): 1 cfm/sf Effective 1/2008 Effective 1/2008 Refers to ASHRAE Refers to ASHRAE New Construction New Construction No category for university research labs No category for university research labs *Need “Alternative Means of Protection” from CA State Fire Marshal for less than minimum required ventilation

Meeting Agenda Introductions – Getting to know one another Introductions – Getting to know one another Review of Existing Codes Governing Laboratory Ventilation Review of Existing Codes Governing Laboratory Ventilation Challenges to Energy Conservation/Sustainability Challenges to Energy Conservation/Sustainability UCI Low-Flow (High Performance) Fume Hood Permanent Variance Application UCI Low-Flow (High Performance) Fume Hood Permanent Variance Application Overview of Studies and Variance Application Process Overview of Studies and Variance Application Process Next Steps – Variance Hearing, Purchase and Installation Plan, Expansion of Permanent Variance within UCI and other UC Campuses Next Steps – Variance Hearing, Purchase and Installation Plan, Expansion of Permanent Variance within UCI and other UC Campuses UCI “Smart Lab” Concept UCI “Smart Lab” Concept Discussion Discussion

Challenges to Energy Conservation and Sustainability The inability to reduce fume hood face velocity below 100 fpm (Cal-OSHA) The inability to reduce fume hood face velocity below 100 fpm (Cal-OSHA) CBC/CMC Laboratory Ventilation Requirements CBC/CMC Laboratory Ventilation Requirements ANSI Z9.5 requirement minimum fume hood flow ANSI Z9.5 requirement minimum fume hood flow Others? Others?

Question: Is Increased ACH Safer? “Specification of Airflow Rates in Laboratories” by Tom Smith, Exposure Control Technologies, Conclusions: “Specification of Airflow Rates in Laboratories” by Tom Smith, Exposure Control Technologies, Conclusions: ACH as a metric for dilution is “too simplistic”. ACH as a metric for dilution is “too simplistic”. Must consider other factors that lead to exposure, (i.e. contaminant generation rate, air mixing, etc.) Must consider other factors that lead to exposure, (i.e. contaminant generation rate, air mixing, etc.) “Increased airflow [may increase] contaminant generation and distribution throughout the space” “Increased airflow [may increase] contaminant generation and distribution throughout the space” May lead to “false sense of safety” May lead to “false sense of safety”

Answer: Not Necessarily Alternatives to simply increasing ACH: Alternatives to simply increasing ACH: Base air exchange rate on contaminant generation Base air exchange rate on contaminant generation Review lab practices Review lab practices Attain proper air mix ratios Attain proper air mix ratios Reduce overall ACH to save energy and increase ACH as needed via “smart controls” Reduce overall ACH to save energy and increase ACH as needed via “smart controls”

Meeting Agenda Introductions – Getting to know one another Introductions – Getting to know one another Review of Existing Codes Governing Laboratory Ventilation Review of Existing Codes Governing Laboratory Ventilation Challenges to Energy Conservation/Sustainability Challenges to Energy Conservation/Sustainability UCI Low-Flow (High Performance) Fume Hood Permanent Variance Application UCI Low-Flow (High Performance) Fume Hood Permanent Variance Application Overview of Studies and Variance Application Process Overview of Studies and Variance Application Process Next Steps – Variance Hearing, Purchase and Installation Plan, Expansion of Permanent Variance within UCI and other UC Campuses Next Steps – Variance Hearing, Purchase and Installation Plan, Expansion of Permanent Variance within UCI and other UC Campuses UCI “Smart Lab” Concept UCI “Smart Lab” Concept Discussion Discussion

Sash Airfoil Work Surface Exhaust Plenum Baffle Increased Hood Depth Operate safely at lower face velocities (i.e. 70 FPM rather than 100 FPM) Low Flow (high performance) Fume Hoods

UCI Low Flow Fume Hood Study 2008 Both traditional and low flow fume hoods were subjected to 168 ASHRAE 110 tests Both traditional and low flow fume hoods were subjected to 168 ASHRAE 110 tests Low flow hoods performed better than standard hoods at 80 & 100 fpm - fully open sash Low flow hoods performed better than standard hoods at 80 & 100 fpm - fully open sash Tracer gas results were well below the 0.1ppm “as used” ASHRAE criteria Tracer gas results were well below the 0.1ppm “as used” ASHRAE criteria Low flow hoods save energy, particularly in constant volume systems Low flow hoods save energy, particularly in constant volume systems Low flow hoods may also be a good solution in buildings with limited HVAC capacity Low flow hoods may also be a good solution in buildings with limited HVAC capacity

Flow & Cost Comparison HVAC System Type and Fume Hood Equipment Flow at 100 fpm nominal face velocity Annual Cost at $5 per CFM Flow at 80 fpm nominal face velocity Annual Cost at $5 per CFM Flow at 70 fpm nominal face velocity Annual Cost at $5 per CFM Constant Air Volume 900 CFM $ CFM $ CFM $3150 Variable Air Volume (VAV) Good: 682 CFM/$3410 Poor: 851 CFM/$4255 Good: 568 CFM/$2840 Poor: 686 CFM/$3430 Good: 511 CFM/$2555 Poor: 604 CFM/$3020 VAV with ZPS Good: 492 CFM/$2460 Poor: 558 CFM/$2790 Good: 470 CFM/$2350 Poor: 539 CFM/$2695 Good: 462 CFM/$2310 Poor: 530 CFM/$2650 VAV with ASC 361 CFM $1, CFM $1, CFM $1,675 VAV with Perfect Sash Management 343 CFM $1, CFM $1, CFM $1,625 Institute of Environmental Sciences designation: IES-RP-CC

Flow & Cost Comparison HVAC System Type and Fume Hood Equipment Flow at 100 fpm nominal face velocity Annual Cost at $5 per CFM Flow at 80 fpm nominal face velocity Annual Cost at $5 per CFM Flow at 70 fpm nominal face velocity Annual Cost at $5 per CFM Constant Air Volume 900 CFM $ CFM $ CFM $3150 Variable Air Volume (VAV) Good: 682 CFM/$3410 Poor: 851 CFM/$4255 Good: 568 CFM/$2840 Poor: 686 CFM/$3430 Good: 511 CFM/$2555 Poor: 604 CFM/$3020 VAV with ZPS Good: 492 CFM/$2460 Poor: 558 CFM/$2790 Good: 470 CFM/$2350 Poor: 539 CFM/$2695 Good: 462 CFM/$2310 Poor: 530 CFM/$2650 VAV with ASC 361 CFM $1, CFM $1, CFM $1,675 VAV with Perfect Sash Management 343 CFM $1, CFM $1, CFM $1,625

Study #1 Conclusions Face Velocity & Sash Height All hoods - performed best at 18” sash height All hoods - performed best at 18” sash height All tracer gas results were well under 0.1ppm “as used” ASHRAE criteria All tracer gas results were well under 0.1ppm “as used” ASHRAE criteria At 100, 80, and 60 fpm At 100, 80, and 60 fpm All low flow hoods performed better than standard hood at 80 & 100 fpm full open sash All low flow hoods performed better than standard hood at 80 & 100 fpm full open sash

Study #2 – Exposure Monitoring Low flow fume hoods again passed ASHRAE 110 tests Low flow fume hoods again passed ASHRAE 110 tests ASHRAE 110 Tests Confirmed Findings from Study #1 ASHRAE 110 Tests Confirmed Findings from Study #1 All samples were below published Cal-OSHA limits All samples were below published Cal-OSHA limits

Meeting Agenda Introductions – Getting to know one another Introductions – Getting to know one another Review of Existing Codes Governing Laboratory Ventilation Review of Existing Codes Governing Laboratory Ventilation Challenges to Energy Conservation/Sustainability Challenges to Energy Conservation/Sustainability UCI Low-Flow (High Performance) Fume Hood Permanent Variance Application UCI Low-Flow (High Performance) Fume Hood Permanent Variance Application Overview of Studies and Variance Application Process Overview of Studies and Variance Application Process Next Steps – Variance Hearing, Purchase and Installation Plan, Expansion of Permanent Variance within UCI and other UC Campuses Next Steps – Variance Hearing, Purchase and Installation Plan, Expansion of Permanent Variance within UCI and other UC Campuses UCI “Smart Lab” Concept UCI “Smart Lab” Concept Discussion Discussion

Permanent Variance – Next Steps Permanent Variance was requested for 3 UCI research buildings Permanent Variance was requested for 3 UCI research buildings Must make presentation before the Cal-OSHA Standards Board Must make presentation before the Cal-OSHA Standards Board Awaiting hearing date – make take up to 1 year Awaiting hearing date – make take up to 1 year Future plan: Expand permanent variance to cover all of UCI Future plan: Expand permanent variance to cover all of UCI Stretch goal: Extend permanent variance to cover all UC campuses. Stretch goal: Extend permanent variance to cover all UC campuses.

Meeting Agenda Introductions – Getting to know one another Introductions – Getting to know one another Review of Existing Codes Governing Laboratory Ventilation Review of Existing Codes Governing Laboratory Ventilation Challenges to Energy Conservation/Sustainability Challenges to Energy Conservation/Sustainability UCI Low-Flow (High Performance) Fume Hood Permanent Variance Application UCI Low-Flow (High Performance) Fume Hood Permanent Variance Application Overview of Studies and Variance Application Process Overview of Studies and Variance Application Process Next Steps – Variance Hearing, Purchase and Installation Plan, Expansion of Permanent Variance within UCI and other UC Campuses Next Steps – Variance Hearing, Purchase and Installation Plan, Expansion of Permanent Variance within UCI and other UC Campuses UCI “Smart Lab” Concept UCI “Smart Lab” Concept Discussion Discussion

Building Exhaust System Labs w/CDCV real time lab air monitoring 4 ach occupied 2 ach unoccupied Energy efficient lighting Labs with low flow fume hoods (as appropriate ) Smart Lab Building Concept

Smart Lab Parameters Current Best Practice Smart Lab Parameters Air-handler/filtration airspeeds 400 ft/min. max 350 ft/min. max Total system (supply + exhaust) pressure-drop 6 in. w.g. <5 in. w.g. (incl. dirty filter allow.) Duct noise attenuators Few None Occupied lab air-changes/hr. (ACH) 6 ACH 4 ACH w/contaminant sensing Night air-change setback (unoccupied) No setback 2 ACH w/occupancy + contaminant sensing + no thermal inputs during setbacks Low-flow/high-performance fume hoods No Yes, where hood density warrants Fume hood face-velocities 100 FPM 70 FPM (low-flow hoods) Fume hood face-velocities (unoccupied) 100 FPM 40 FPM (low-flow hoods) Fume hood auto-closers None Where hood density high Exhaust stack discharge velocity ~3,500 FPM Reduce or eliminate bypass air, wind responsive controls Lab illumination power-density 0.9 watt/SF 0.6 watt/SF w/LED task lighting Fixtures near windows on daylight sensors No Yes Energy Star freezers & refrigerators No Yes Out-perform CA Title % 50%

Bill & Sue Gross Hall A Smart & Sustainable Design

Gross Hall Features Centralized Demand Controlled Ventilation - real-time indoor air quality monitoring, varies the ventilation rate Centralized Demand Controlled Ventilation - real-time indoor air quality monitoring, varies the ventilation rate Occupancy Based Controls - controls both ventilation system & lighting Occupancy Based Controls - controls both ventilation system & lighting Natural Ventilation - operable windows linked with mechanical ventilation Natural Ventilation - operable windows linked with mechanical ventilation Smart Lighting Controls - daylighting sensors used with perforated blinds Smart Lighting Controls - daylighting sensors used with perforated blinds Energy Star Equipment - freezers, refrigerators, ice machines & copiers Energy Star Equipment - freezers, refrigerators, ice machines & copiers Air Handling System - larger air handlers accommodate low pressure-drop filtration Air Handling System - larger air handlers accommodate low pressure-drop filtration Building Exhaust - right sized exhaust system eliminates bypass air Building Exhaust - right sized exhaust system eliminates bypass air

Exceeding Title 24 Exceeding Title 24 Gross Hall Project Exceeded Title 24 By Time Dependant Value As Submitted to Utilities 38% TDV Office Bldg Using Code Chiller 50% TDV 24/7 Using UCI Central Plant with TES 57% TDV 24/7

Estimated annual energy savings: 890,080 kWh electrical with 193 kW demand reduction 22,464 therms of natural gas Estimated annual energy cost savings: $110,980 at $0.105/kWh and $0.78/therm Savings by Design payment of $397,836 Exceeding Title 24 by 50% Bid as a LEED New Construction (NC) Silver Design Build contractor proposed to increase the sustainable features to achieve LEED NC Gold certification

Meeting Agenda Introductions – Getting to know one another Introductions – Getting to know one another Review of Existing Codes Governing Laboratory Ventilation Review of Existing Codes Governing Laboratory Ventilation Challenges to Energy Conservation/Sustainability Challenges to Energy Conservation/Sustainability UCI Low-Flow (High Performance) Fume Hood Permanent Variance Application UCI Low-Flow (High Performance) Fume Hood Permanent Variance Application Overview of Studies and Variance Application Process Overview of Studies and Variance Application Process Next Steps – Variance Hearing, Purchase and Installation Plan, Expansion of Permanent Variance within UCI and other UC Campuses Next Steps – Variance Hearing, Purchase and Installation Plan, Expansion of Permanent Variance within UCI and other UC Campuses UCI “Smart Lab” Concept UCI “Smart Lab” Concept Discussion Discussion

As A Reminder… We have your audio muted, so we cannot hear you We have your audio muted, so we cannot hear you If you have a question for the panel, instead of using the “raising your hand” button, use the chat tab (Conversation) and preface your comment with “Question for Panel” If you have a question for the panel, instead of using the “raising your hand” button, use the chat tab (Conversation) and preface your comment with “Question for Panel”

Thank You!