Case Study/History Ft Hood, Texas. Ft. Hood, Texas III Corps (-) 1st Cavalry Division 4th Infantry Division (-) Corps Support Command Other Corps Units.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. ECOLOGICAL TRAINING INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION SURVEY SURVEY LITERATURE REVIEW LITERATURE REVIEW FIELD SURVEY METHODS.
Advertisements

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG and Taking Care of People! Ecosystem Restoration Along the Los Angeles River: Creativity within Concrete Dan.
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
Current Conservation Issues in DoD L. Peter Boice OSD Conservation Team Leader Presented to NMFWA, Dallas TX March 2002.
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
Virginia Department of Forestry 2014 SWCD Annual Meeting.
This document is contained within the Fire Management Toolbox on Wilderness.net. Since other related resources found in this toolbox may be of interest,
New England Cottontail Conservation Efforts Anthony Tur US Fish and Wildlife Service New England Field Office Concord, New Hampshire.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Coordinating U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Permits with Species Conservation Plans November 16,
Flood Management Dealing with Floodplains in Missouri.
EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Thomas Russell, P.E. U.S. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence Partnership for Peace Conference,
Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan Development on Navy Installations in Southern California Coralie Cobb Natural Resources Specialist Southwest.
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
The Field Office Technical Guide and Other Technical Resources CNMP Core Curriculum Section 2 — Conservation Planning.
2009 CONTRACTOR –ENGINEER CONFERENCE “Environmental Responsibilities in Construction” Dan Scudder – WI DOT Cameron Bump – WI DNR.
BUILDING STRONG ® US Army Corps of Engineers – Norfolk District SAME Industry Day Richard Klein Chief, Programs Branch Norfolk District 21 October 2010.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Fort Bliss Army Growth and Force Structure Realignment Draft Environmental Impact Statement Public Meeting November 2009.
Fort Bliss Mission and Master Plan Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) PUBLIC SCOPING MEETINGS December 2005.
Base Wars: Fighting the Fort Carson Base Expansion in Colorado The Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site Expansion By: Kimmi Clark Lewis, Rancher R-CALF USA Property.
Viewgraph 1 Vision Statement The Army will be a national leader in environmental and natural resource Stewardship for present and future generations as.
CPT Scott M. Winter / SFIM-AEC-TSS / / DSN / 1 of MAR2005 Future Range Mission Analysis Process.
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
Sustainable Development
State Wildlife Action Plans Alternatively Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategies (CWCS), State Comprehensive Wildlife Plans (SCWP), Etc. Created.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
MISSION FIRST…PEOPLE ALWAYS…ONE TEAM Fort Lewis Installation Sustainability Program.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
LCA Comprehensive Study Louisiana Coastal Area, Louisiana- Comprehensive Coastwide Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study.
1 DoD Sustainable Ranges Initiative Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative (REPI) Bruce Beard ODUSD(I&E) Land Trust Alliance Rally October.
Solutions on the Horizon: Integrated Planning in the 21 st Century Trisha White Defenders of Wildlife.
Sikes Act Coordination Workshop - Army Army Orientation: Mission/Organization/Issues Bill Woodson HQDA Staff , FAX ,
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Fort Bliss Mission and Master Plan Draft Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) Public Meetings November 2006.
Improving Outdoor Classrooms for Education and Recreation 91-C MN DNR SCHOOL FOREST PROGRAM CONSERVATION CORPS MINNESOTA.
Emerging T&E Issues L. Peter Boice Conservation Team Leader 23 March 2003.
Installation Sustainability Program (ISP) - a model for ARNG Training Centers LTC Jeffrey G. Phillips US Army War College Fellow US Army Environmental.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
By CPT Robert L. Crabtree
Environmental Factors In this module, we will discuss: Environmental legislation Environmental hazards Due diligence Conducting an environmental.
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
Combat Arms Combat Support Combat Service Support.
III Armored Corps and Fort Hood
Environmental Science Chapter 8 Land Use Notes #2.
Biodiversity The variety of life in an area
16.3. Bellringer The Environmental Impacts of Mining Because of the potential environmental impact of mining on a large scale, mining is one of the most.
EMS Takes Root in the Forest Service Federal Environmental Symposium East 2009 EMS Takes Root in the Forest Service Kurt Gernerd Assistant Director of.
The Sage-Grouse Plan Tripp Parks Policy Analyst. GREATER SAGE-GROUSE The Greater Sage-Grouse (GrSG) is a large ground-dwelling bird that inhabits 186.
Proven Management – Proven Gold Districts – Safe Jurisdictions Symbol:PG Exchange:TSX Hardrock Project Environmental.
TNMP Avian Protection Plan
Current Event Brief!.
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
SAME Industry Day Richard Klein BUILDING STRONG®
Combat Arms Combat Support Combat Service Support.
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
Objectives Describe seven important potential environmental consequences of mining. Name four federal laws that relate to mining and reclaiming mined land.
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
Objectives Describe seven important potential environmental consequences of mining. Name four federal laws that relate to mining and reclaiming mined land.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Vision Statement The Army will be a national leader in environmental and natural resource Stewardship for present and future generations as an integral.
Base Wars:  Fighting the Fort Carson Base Expansion in Colorado The Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site Expansion   By: Kimmi Clark Lewis, Rancher R-CALF USA Property.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Case Study/History Ft Hood, Texas.
Presentation transcript:

Case Study/History Ft Hood, Texas

Ft. Hood, Texas III Corps (-) 1st Cavalry Division 4th Infantry Division (-) Corps Support Command Other Corps Units 49 th Armored Division, ARNG 199,541 acres not including the cantonment area

The Evolving Brigade Battlefield 50Km Ft. Hood WW II 12 Km 8 Km 65Km Desert Storm Internal Pressures

Ft. Hood, Texas No Dig Area 127,546 acres 64% of tng land No digging vehicle fighting positions, survivability positions, obstacles, or individual fighting positions. No digging within 50 m of riparian areas. Units must gain environmental division approval before they dig anywhere. Clean Water – Erosion Control

Ft. Hood, Texas Core Habitat Golden Cheeked Warbler Black Capped Vireo 52,269 acres 26% of tng land MAR thru AUG No vehicle or dismounted maneuver Vehicles stay on established trails 2 hour limit on trails in habitat No arty firing, smoke ops, or chem Grenades within 100 m of habitat No use of camo nets in habitat No bivouac in habitat YEAR ROUND No digging No open fires No tree or brush cutting No destruction of habitat Endangered Species

Ft. Hood, Texas Non-Core Habitat Golden Cheeked Warbler Black Capped Vireo 19,005 acres 10% of tng land No digging No open fires No tree or brush cutting No destruction of habitat Core and non-core totals 71,274 or 36% of tng land This could increase if Army exceeds allowable “take” for species habitat. Take upper limit is 1,850 acres of core/ non-core Habitat per year over 5 years. Fire is threat. Endangered Species

Ft. Hood, Texas Cultural Sites 1,178 Sites No digging Others currently being negotiated Archeology

Ft. Hood, Texas Smoke Restrictions 46,215 acres 23% of tng land No use of smoke, flares, chem grenades, or pyrotechnics. Clean Air

Ft. Hood, Texas Noise Restrictions 1,082 acres No artillery or MLRS firing. 154,053 acres with training restrictions- 77% of tng land 30,827 acres of maneuver land without training restrictions Population Density - Noise

Ft. Hood, Texas 33 Small Arms Ranges 24 Major Weapons Ranges + FA/Mortar Firing Point UXO/Munitions Impact Areas Ranges FY01 STRAC Auth = 35.4M Rounds

Environmental Contamination (EC) Adverse impacts to natural resources my result from EC Installations have Restoration Programs to respond to EC/CERCLA releases INRMP not required to provide EC/CERCLA actions INRMP can provide a link (integration) Core Group is considering an acceptable INRMP statement

Land management effort multi-faceted in past Work now controlled through INRMP Contracted with NRCS Contractor coordinated with State and Federal agencies during development In-house expertise guided document Delivered draft product in October 1999 Staffed inside and outside Fort Hood Simultaneous development of INRMP document and EA Public review period in April 2000 Finial review with outside agencies in October 2000 USFWS concurred in January 2001 State has not replied Fort Hood INRMP

INRMP INRMP contains other plans and documents 1996 training fire Training continued Focused consultation away from training Influenced BO through negotiation of ESMP Continuing pro-active approach