Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Economic Impact Study Overview Study Objective –Establish the baseline economic impact of Lake Granbury-related activity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fifth-Forbes Economic Review Presentation to Downtown Planning Collaborative Fifth-Forbes Economic Review Presentation to Downtown Planning Collaborative.
Advertisements

1 Tourism Statistics Parry Sound District Tourism Research Unit Spring 2013.
Economic and Demographic Scan Towns of Madison & Mayodan November 15, 2012.
Housing New Hampshire’s Workforce Prepared for the New Hampshire Workforce Housing Council Presentation to Business & Industry.
Presented by: David Crowe – Chief Economist October 25, 2013 Lee County, Florida Home Building Impact in Lee County, Florida.
Presented by Elliot F. Eisenberg, Ph.D. National Association of Home Builders July 23, 2008 Bryan, TX THE METRO AREA IMPACT OF HOME BUILDING IN BRYAN &
Imagining the Future of Agriculture Robert Tse USDA Rural Development Yribarren Ranch Bishop, CA July 24, 2014.
Economic Analysis of Future Offshore Oil & Gas Development: Beaufort Sea, Chukchi Sea, and North Aleutian Basin A study to describe and quantify potential.
2005 Taxable Sales: Polk County Judith I. Stallmann University of Missouri Extension Professor of Agricultural Economics, Rural Sociology and Truman School.
Nevada County Conditions, Trends, and Forecasts 2007.
Are Ontario Casinos Effective Economic Development Tools? A Brief Summary.
Laclede County Economic Analysis and Baseline Anna Kovalyova Program Coordinator University of Missouri, Columbia.
Tri County Economic Forecast 2007 BMU January 11, 2007.
Lebanon and Laclede County Retail Sales Analysis Anna Kovalyova Program Coordinator Lucy Zakharova Research Assistant.
Dr. David Gallo Department of Economics Center for Economic Development California State University, Chico.
Vision Funds to Support Tulsa Non-Profit Arts Organizations.
1 Demand Feasibility Study For a Multi-Purpose Event Center in Texas.
The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas 2012 Analysis.
1 Fairfax County Fiscal Outlook Mount Vernon Town Meeting February 3, 2007 Edward L. Long Deputy County Executive
Understanding Your Local Economy Garen Evans. Outline –Anatomy of a local economy –Data Demographics Economics Fiscal –Issues Commuting Health.
Central Texas Water Coalition July 10, 2013 Request to Region K for Inclusion of the Highland Lakes Needs in Strategic Water Planning.
2014 Calendar Year Thousand Islands Focus The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York.
National Leaders in Real Estate Research Streetcar Economic Development Impact and Projected Ridership Ken Danter The Danter Company Streetcar Working.
ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.
Economic Value of Multipurpose Facilities in Community and Economic Development by Al Myles Community Resource Development Department Mississippi State.
Diversifying Your Economy – Post Disaster Identifying Emerging Industries GEDP is a private, non-profit 501(c)(6) organization that is membership based.
ECONOMIC IMPACT OF HOUSING Kate Little Georgia State Trade Association of Nonprofit Developers.
Sustainability of Sales Tax as a Revenue Source Economic and Demographic Effects in 2 Colorado Cities Wilson D. Kendall Center for Business and Economic.
2009 Economic Forecast Update & Three -Year Outlook.
July 2012 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Clark County, Ohio.
Understanding Retail Trade Analysis by Al Myles, Economist and Extension Professor Department of Agriculture Economics Mississippi State University November.
COCHISE COLLEGE Center for Economic Research Economic Review & Outlook Douglas, AZ.
Urban Sprawl. Urban Sprawl, outward spread of built-up areas caused by their expansion. It is the result of urbanization.
XUE JI (ZOE).  Pro: Brings in money  Helps to promote the region to outsider investors,  Puts you "on the map“  The region builds more attraction.
1 January 25, Nebraska Profile 2011 NEBRASKA PROFILE Ninth Edition  State, 8 Regions, 93 Counties, plus 18 Cities – Three Volumes  Demographic.
1. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS POPULATION 3 LABOR FORCE AND NONFARM EMPLOYMENT 3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS 4 YUMA COUNTY AREA EMPLOYMENT By SECTOR By YEAR 5 TAXABLE SALES.
Southwest Business Forum January 11, 2008 Fort Lewis College’s 16 th Annual Focus on Our Future: Business and Economics Sponsored by Wells Fargo San Juan.
Risk Management Association Long Island Economic Update What Lies Ahead? Dr. Martin R. Cantor, CPA Long Island Center for Socio-Economic Policy
David T. Taylor, Roger H. Coupal, Thomas Foulke, Benjamin Rashford and Desiree Olson 1 Prepared in support of the Bridger-Teton National Forest plan revision.
Economic and Demographic Scan Town of Siler City December 9, 2010.
1 January 27, Nebraska Profile 2010 NEBRASKA PROFILE Eighth Edition  State, 8 Regions, 93 Counties, plus 18 Cities – Three Volumes  Demographic.
Avalon Park Retail Market Analysis Fishkind and Associates, Inc Corporate Blvd. Orlando, FL December 12, 2008.
TYBEE ISLAND TOURISM STUDY, OUTLINE 1.Introduction 2.Survey of Tybee Island Visitors 3.Visitor Expenditure Patterns 4.Estimated Annual Visitation.
MissouriSenior Report ReportMissouriSenior July 25, 2007 Serving Southeast Missouri Seniors Cape Girardeau, Missouri July 2007 State of Missouri Department.
THE ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED TOURO UNIVERSITY VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT A Presentation to the Vallejo Chamber of Commerce June 13, 2007 Gruen.
The Impacts of the H.D. Lee Plant Closure in Laclede County: Anna E. Kovalyova Morgan M. Mundell University of Missouri, Columbia.
Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2014 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Finney County, Kansas.
Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County August 2015.
Calculating the Economic Impact of Your Housing Project Rachel Bates Governor’s Housing Conference November 19th, 2015.
Scoping and Suggested Approach. The team of Bleakly Advisory Group, PBS&J and Dr. Bruce Seaman were hired by the 1071 Coalition to prepare an analysis.
1 Economic Trends and Commercial Construction Indicators for Metropolitan Washington Cooperative Forecasting and Data Subcommittee September 11, 2007 Department.
Elizabeth Garner State Demography Office Colorado Department of Local Affairs Transitions Population and Economic Trends.
September 14, 2009 Review of General Fund Revenues and the Virginia Economy for Fiscal Year 2009 The Interim Economic Outlook and Revenue Forecast for.
Form & Function of Metropolitan America WALKABLE URBAN DRIVABLE SUB-URBAN WALKUPS: (Walkable Urban Places) DRVABLE EDGE CITIES WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOODS.
MPO DEMOGRAPHICS Public Meetings June 26 & 27, 2006 North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department.
CITY OF MENIFEE, CA. FY General Fund Mid-year Review Other Funds Mid-year Review National, State and Local economic conditions FY Budget Planning.
Basis of Scenario Changing Shopping Patterns –Evidence of a shift to shopping via out-of-state vendors –Out-of-state taxable retail purchases have almost.
1 Economic Trends and Commercial Construction Indicators for Metropolitan Washington Cooperative Forecasting and Data Subcommittee Meeting July 15, 2003.
Presentation of Findings Aran Ryan, Tourism Economics
ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Bob McKee Chief Economist Florida Department of Revenue
Strome College of Business
Economic Impact of Tourism in Kansas, 2016
Carpinteria Valley Economic Report
Municipal Services Feasibility Study Millcreek City, Utah
Joint Subcommittee to Evaluate Tax Preferences
The Economic Impact of Tourism in Kansas City
Data Report: Orillia January 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Economic Impact Study Overview Study Objective –Establish the baseline economic impact of Lake Granbury-related activity using as well as consider long-term implications of low lake levels Study Area –Water Adjacent Property: properties immediately adjacent to Lake Granbury –Water View Property: border lake adjacent properties and within 250 ft of water –Lake-Related Activity: the combination of water adjacent and water view Key Questions –How important is Lake Granbury-related activity to Hood County? –Do any economic indicators show the impact of lower lake levels? 1

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Social Impacts of Water Shortages Socioeconomic Impacts of Projected Water Shortages for the Brazos G Regional Water Planning Area (Region G) 2011 “As the name implies, the effects of water shortages can be social or economic. Distinctions between the two are both semantic and analytical in nature – more so analytic in the sense that social impacts are harder to quantify. Nevertheless, social effects associated with drought and water shortages are closely tied to economic impacts. For example, they might include… –demographic effects such as changes in population –mental and physical stress –loss of aesthetic and property values –reduced recreational opportunities ” 2

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Five Lake-Related Economic Indicators Real Estate Activity & Property Values –evaluates the distribution of households and price premium paid for lake- related properties Employment & Labor Force –considers the distribution of jobs throughout the county by industry sector Lake-Related Taxable Hotel Revenue –is the best indicator of water-related tourism Lake-Related Sales Tax Revenue –serve as a proxy for how water-related tourism ripples through the economy Lake-Related Mixed Beverage Tax Revenue –supplements other visitor datasets 3

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study 1. Real Estate Activity & Property 4

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Cities & Census Designated Areas 5

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Hood County Property Values (2013) 6 AreaAccountsAcres% of TotalTaxable Value% of Total Water Adjacent4,31616,4266.2%$1,149,155, % Water View2,8831,5590.6%$298,057,4117.4% Lake-Related6,03617,9856.8%$1,447,213, % Rest of Hood County37,433248, %$2,581,871, % In 2013, lake-related properties were approximately 6.8 percent of total land area but 35.9 percent of the tax base Lake-related single-family homes are 28.5 percent of net taxable value Between 2012 and 2013, the taxable value of lake-related properties declined 2.7 percent versus Rest of Hood decline of 1.6 percent

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Average Taxable Value per Single-Family Home 7 Area Water Adjacent $240,486$244,242$243,454$246,931$238,111 Water View $136,529$136,076$135,416$134,408$129,843 Lake-Related $211,671$214,370$213,563$215,775$207,932 Rest of Hood County $103,014$103,759$102,562$101,583$101,209 Area Water Adjacent $714.46$725.62$723.28$733.61$ Water View $405.62$404.27$402.31$399.31$ Lake-Related $628.86$636.87$634.48$641.05$ Rest of Hood County $306.05$308.26$304.70$301.79$ Estimated Hood County Property Tax Revenue

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Average Taxable Value (2013) of Residential Properties Built between 2000 and New Lake-Related Homes 2.5 x more $ than Rest of Hood

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study MLS Residential Sales from January 1 - July 18 9

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study 2. Employment & Labor Force 10

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study 3. Taxable Hotel Receipts 11 Year Water Adjacent Water View Lake- Related Hood County Lake-Related as % of Total 2008$1,856,832$654,112$2,510,944$8,650, % 2009$2,712,107$437,132$3,149,239$7,013, % 2010$3,052,213$409,649$3,461,862$7,042, % 2011$3,290,168$342,009$3,632,177$8,239, % 2012$3,069,122$338,568$3,407,690$7,702, % Change %-1.0%-6.2%-6.5%N/A Hotel occupancy revenue generated by Hood County businesses more than doubled since 2000, from $3.6 million in 2000 to $7.7 million in 2012 Lake-related lodging facilities generate approximately 44.2 percent of taxable hotel receipts in Hood County

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Total Tourism Spending By Year (Hood County) 12 Category Spending ($M)$67.5$57.3$55.0$60.4$61.8 Earnings ($M)$15.6$14.6$13.4$14.3$14.4 Employment Local Tax Revenue ($M)$1.2$1.0$0.9$1.0 State Tax Revenue ($M)$4.0$3.6$3.4$3.6$3.7 Hotel Occupancy51.0%35.4%34.3%43.6%43.2% Est. Room Rate$95.52$86.88$77.68$74.57$72.39 Local Tax Receipts Tax receipts collected by counties and municipalities, as levied on applicable travel-related purchases, including lodging, food and beverage service, retail goods and auto rental. Property taxes are not included. State Tax Receipts The state hotel/motel tax, sales tax, motor fuel tax and business franchise tax receipts attributable to travel expenditures.

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Total Tourism Spending By Year (City of Granbury) 13 Category Spending ($M)$54.7$44.0$39.6$44.2$42.9 Earnings ($M)$12.9$11.5$10.0$10.8$10.4 Employment Local Tax Revenue ($M)$1.1$0.9$0.7$0.8 State Tax Revenue ($M)$3.2$2.7$2.4$2.6$2.5 Hotel Occupancy50.6%36.2%34.2%43.2%42.7% Est. Room Rate$96.14$87.48$79.97$77.52$76.40 Local Tax Receipts Tax receipts collected by counties and municipalities, as levied on applicable travel-related purchases, including lodging, food and beverage service, retail goods and auto rental. Property taxes are not included. State Tax Receipts The state hotel/motel tax, sales tax, motor fuel tax and business franchise tax receipts attributable to travel expenditures.

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study 4. Lake-Related Sales Tax Revenue 14

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Sales Tax Revenue by Subarea 15

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Hood County Sales Tax Revenue 0.5%) 16 Year Lake- RelatedDowntown North of 377 South of 377 Hood County Lake- Related as % of Total 2008$628,323$210,285$313,565$2,219,647$4,594, % 2009$615,550$213,645$300,522$2,091,166$3,236, % 2010$627,599$222,944$284,411$2,065,621$2,989, % 2011$621,681$228,883$283,522$2,095,517$3,120, % 2012$608,096$238,381$326,836$2,415,277$3,877, % CAGR %2.5%0.8%1.7%-3.3%N/A Nearly 19.0 percent of all Hood County sales tax payers are lake-related and generated $0.6 million in Hood County sales tax revenue in 2013 Lake-related area was the only subarea to decline between 2011 and 2012

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study 5. Mixed Beverage Taxable Sales 17 Year Water Adjacent Water View Lake- Related Hood County Lake-Related as % of Total 2008$729,156$2,040,633$2,769,789$6,193, % 2009$507,356$1,784,751$2,292,107$5,505, % 2010$520,928$1,782,703$2,303,631$5,373, % 2011$800,887$1,725,519$2,526,406$5,954, % 2012$740,228$1,853,800$2,594,028$6,054, % Change %7.4%2.7%1.7%N/A Approximately 30.8 percent of all mixed beverage permit holders are within 250 feet of Lake Granbury Lake-related MB permit holders capture 42.8 percent of spending

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Texas State Data Center Population Forecast 18

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Undeveloped Land Surrounding Lake Granbury 19 Hood County’s population growth in driven by in-migration (people moving to Hood County from outside of the region) The natural increase in population is effectively flat so it is imperative that the region continue to attract new residents Approximately 27.9 percent of all single-family homes in Hood County are lake-related Since 2000, nearly 24.1 percent of single-family homes built were lake-related.

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Undeveloped Land Surrounding Lake Granbury 20 Low lake levels would likely impact no more than 25 percent of future residential growth The natural increase in population is effectively flat so it is imperative that the region continue to attract new residents Approximately 6,100 acres of undeveloped land around Lake Granbury Lake-related undeveloped property (land that is within 250 feet of the lake) accounts for roughly 1,500 acres

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Undeveloped Land Surrounding Lake Granbury 21

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Undeveloped Land Surrounding Lake Granbury 22 Lake-related property values could increase between $269.8 million and $652.4 million over the next 30 years This would translate into additional Hood County property tax revenue between $0.8 million and $1.9 million per year Scenario New Households Acres Developed Taxable Value ($2013) Hood County Property Tax 0.5 Scenario 1,402751$269,775,216$801, Scenario 3,3911,817$652,420,219$1,938,282

Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Report Findings 23 Proximity to water has a clear impact on key elements of the local economy: –tourism-related activity –property values –tax revenue Prolonged low lake levels undermines both: –lake is a key visitor attractor – fewer visitors means less jobs, income, and local sales, lodging, and mixed beverage revenue –housing values also decline if the water amenity is damaged – could have an impact on relocation, second homes, etc. Translation of above is a negative impact on the local economy, as well as lower tax revenue for all local jurisdictions