Limitation of Click-Evoked ABR: Lack of Frequency-Specificity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T HE S OUNDS OF L IFE C ENTER AT U MASS M EMORIAL Current Technique in the Audiologic Evaluation of Infants Todd B. Sauter, M.A., CCC-A Director of Audiology-
Advertisements

Antonia Brancia Maxon, Ph.D. Texas ENT Specialists, P.A.
Diagnostic Pediatric Audiology from Birth to Intervention
The Ethics of Serving Infants and Their Families Les R. Schmeltz, Au.D. NCHAM & Arizona School of Health Sciences Karen Munoz, M.S. NCHAM & Northern Illinois.
José Juan Barajas de Prat
Hearing and Deafness 2. Ear as a frequency analyzer Chris Darwin.
Hearing and Deafness Outer, middle and inner ear.
Intensity representation 1 Representation of the intensity of sound (or is it something else about efficiency?)
IAPA Summer School 2008 Neonatal Hearing Screening and Auditory Neuropathy Berlin, Germany April 10th and 11th UPDATING THE ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY IN NEONATAL.
Application of otoacoustic emissions in the diagnosis of hearing loss Bradley McPherson PhD Centre for Communication Disorders University of Hong Kong.
Hearing Disabilities.
Pre-operative evaluation and post-operative rehabilitation for paediatric cochlear implantation Han Demin, M.D., Ph.D. Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology.
Simulation of a Cochlear Model as a Descriptive Tool for Normal and Abnormal Auditory Functioning Miriam Furst-Yust Azaria Cohen, Vered Weisz, Noam Elbaum,
Understanding Students with Hearing Loss
Objective testing behavioral testing hearing screening auditory processing disorders objective testing behavioral testing hearing screening auditory processing.
ASHA 1997 HEARING SCREENING GUIDELINES ASHA Guidelines for Hearing Screening - Children 1997.
Hear and now: Chinese Health in NZ
Physiologic Measures Physiologic Tests in Audiology Otoacoustic Emissions Evoked Potentials Immittance Measures.
Measuring the brain’s response to temporally modulated sound stimuli Chloe Rose Institute of Digital Healthcare, WMG, University of Warwick, INTRODUCTION.
Hearing loss in children
SPED 537 ECSE Methods Multiple Disabilities Ch 6 & 7 Deborah Chen, Ph.D. California State University, Northridge April
1 Special Testing. 2 Site of Lesion Cochlear—sensory Nerve—neural (retrocochlear) Reliability vs. validity.
Audiological Evaluation A to Z
Hearing Impairment Hair cells are responsible for translating mechanical information into neural information. Thus, with damaged hair cells, the auditory.
Audiological Evaluation
Semiramis Zizlavsky Pre PITO 8, Sept 2,2013 Jakarta
James W. Hall III, Ph.D. Clinical Professor and Chair
Otoacoustic Emissions Low-level sounds produced by the cochlea and recordable in the external ear canal. Spontaneous Click-evoked Distortion Product Stimulus.
Test of Hearing And Pure tone Audiometry
Clinical Applications
CSD 2230 HUMAN COMMUNICATION DISORDERS Topic 5 Hearing Disorders and Hearing Loss Assessment.
Reading an Audiogram. Air vs. Bone Conduction A/C  Via TDH-50P headphones Placed on Pinna  Checks the validity of entire ear system  Tests that ipsilateral.
Test of Hearing And Pure-tone Audiometry
Hearing & Aging Or age brings wisdom and other bad news.
Need for cortical evoked potentials Assessment and determination of amplification benefit in actual hearing aid users is an issue that continues to be.
Chapter 11: Hearing.
Acoustic Immittance Otoacoustic Emissions Auditory Evoked Potentials Objective Tests.
Auditory Brainstem Response
Otoacoustic Emissions Low-level sounds produced by the cochlea and recordable in the external ear canal. Spontaneous Click-evoked Distortion Product Stimulus.
Dr. Supreet Singh Nayyar, AFMC For more presentations, visit Electrocochleography
CSD 2230 INTRODUCTION TO HUMAN COMMUNICATION DISORDERS Normal Sound Perception, Speech Perception, and Auditory Characteristics at the Boundaries of the.
Innervation Anteriorly auriculotemporal nerve V3 posterior superior CN 7 posterior inferior and floor CN 9 (Jacobsen) +10 (Arnold) clockwise EAC -2.5 cm.
Introduction to Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials (CAEP)
Otoacoustic Emission Test. What are otoacoustic emissions? These are low intensity sounds produced by the cochlea as the outer hair cells expand and contract.
AEPs Ahmed Khater, MD, PhD Ass. Prof. of audio-vestibular medicine
Otoacoustic Emissions Objective tests of Hearing.
Objective Tests of the Auditory System SPA 4302 Summer 2007.
AUDIOLOGY IN ORL DR. BANDAR MOHAMMED AL- QAHTANI, M.D KSMC.
Otoacoustic Emissions
Screening Tests for DISORDERS!!! Or Crusading the Clinic.
Objective Tests of the Auditory System SPA 4302 Summer A, 2004.
Introduction to Audiology How to Read an Audiogram Degrees of Hearing Loss Types, Causes and Prevalence of Hearing Loss Types of Tests.
Introduction to Audiology Ed Brown Consultant Clinical Scientist (Audiology) South of Tyne NHSP Local Director Royal Hospital Sunderland SR4 7TP
Chapter 11 Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Newborn Hearing Screening. R EPUBLIC A CT N O AN ACT ESTABLISHING A UNIVERSAL NEWBORN HEARING SCREENING PROGRAM FOR THE PREVENTION, EARLY DIAGNOSIS.
HEARING- 3. LEARNING OBJECTIVES LEARNING OBJECTIVES Discuss the principles used in performing tests of hearing Discuss the principles used in performing.
대학원 생체신호처리 - 4 이상민.
Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. 컴퓨터 구조 및 네트워크 연구실 Middle-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials : Basic Issues and Potentials Applications(3/3) 2009.
Diagnostic and Rehabilitative Audiology Danielle Rose, Au.D. Clinical Audiologist Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center.
Auditory Evoked Potential (AEP)Testing
김 진 욱 Chap 14. O VERVIEW OF A UDITORY E VOKED P OTENTIALS (3/3)
Interpretation Normal acoustic reflex threshold
Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. 컴퓨터 구조 및 네트워크 연구실 Auditory Brainstem Response : Differential Diagnosis(3/3) 윤준철.
Hearing Loss in Children up to age 1 By Amy Williams CD 315.
HEADS OF SERVICES TRAINING
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Audiological Evaluation A to Z
Sadegh jafarzadeh Ph.D Mashhad university of medical sciences
Objective tests of the auditory system
The Special Senses: Part D
Presentation transcript:

Limitation of Click-Evoked ABR: Lack of Frequency-Specificity Normal click ABR Abnormal or no click ABR

Estimation of Frequency-Specific Auditory Thresholds with Tone Burst ABRs: Initial Data Points for Hearing Aid Fitting

Frequency-Specific ABRs: Conventional Tone Burst Stimuli

Recording Frequency-Specific ABR Waveforms with Tone Burst Stimulation

Chirp Stimuli in ABR Measurement: A Valuable Supplement to Traditional Stimuli

Cochlear Excitation Patterns for Click versus Narrow Band Stimulation Upward spread of excitation Downward spread Apex Basilar membrane Round Window Stapes Scala Tympani Scala Vestibuli Continuous, narrow band stimuli Traveling Wave Transient, broad band stimuli

Temporal Compensation via Input Compensation (Courtesy of Claus Elberling) 500 Hz 1000 Hz 2000 Hz 4000 Hz Click ABR Stimulus

Chirp Temporal Waveform Low frequencies High frequencies

peRETSPLs: CE-Chirp Octave Bands vs. Tone Bursts ISO 389-6: 2-1-2 Tone Burst peRETSPLs (blue = tone bursts) 3A Insert Earphones using 711 ear simulator Range of 0.4 to 1.8 dB difference Reference: Gotsche-Rasmussen, Poulsen, Elberling, Reference Hearing Threshold Levels for Chirp Signals Delivered by an ER-3A Earphone, International Journal of Audiology, 2012, Early Online: 1-6 9

Acoustic Spectrum: CE-Chirp Octave Bands vs. Tone Bursts Courtesy of East Carolina University 10

Conventional Click versus CE Chirp Evoked ABR (1 year 4 month old boy with speech & language delay who failed hearing screening in nursery. Parents do not speak English) 85 dB nHL Click, rarefaction, 21.1/sec I = 1.46 ms V = 6.67 ms I-V = 5.21 ms 45 dB nHL Click 25 dB nHL Click 20 dB nHL Click 20 dB nHL CE Chirp 15 dB nHL Click 15 dB nHL CE Chirp

4000 Hz Chirp Evoked ABR Stimulus rate = 37 4000 Hz Chirp Evoked ABR Stimulus rate = 37.7/sec Total sweeps = 2622; Total test time = 69.5 seconds Right Ear 80 dB nHL 684 sweeps 40 dB nHL 456 sweeps 20 dB nHL 570 sweeps 15 dB nHL 912 sweeps

2000 Hz Chirp Evoked ABR Stimulus rate = 37 2000 Hz Chirp Evoked ABR Stimulus rate = 37.7/sec Total sweeps = 2318 ; Total test time = 61 seconds 80 dB nHL 722 sweeps 35 dB nHL 570 sweeps 25 dB nHL 456 sweeps 20 dB nHL

4000 Hz Conventional versus Chirp Evoked ABR Left Ear 85 dB nHL Tone Burst 40 dB nHL 30 dB nHL 30 dB nHL, Chirp Tone Burst 25 dB nHL, Tone Burst 25 dB nHL, Chirp Tone Burst 15 dB nHL, Chirp Tone Burst

Adults: CE-Chirp Amplitudes Wave V amplitudes were significantly greater at 60, 40, 20 dB nHL Greater amplitudes are consistent with previously published research Stangl S, Rentmeester L, Hood LJ.  (2013).  Auditory brainstem responses to clicks, chirps, tonebursts, and octave-band chirps.  Poster presented at the 2013 Meeting of the American Auditory Society, Scottsdale, Arizona. 15

Adults: CE-Chirp Octave Bands Stangl S, Rentmeester L, Hood LJ.  (2013).  Auditory brainstem responses to clicks, chirps, tonebursts, and octave-band chirps.  Poster presented at the 2013 Meeting of the American Auditory Society, Scottsdale, Arizona. 16

Adults: CE-Chirp Octave Bands Stangl S, Rentmeester L, Hood LJ.  (2013).  Auditory brainstem responses to clicks, chirps, tonebursts, and octave-band chirps.  Poster presented at the 2013 Meeting of the American Auditory Society, Scottsdale, Arizona. 17

ABR amplitude is larger for chirp stimulation Advantages of CE-Chirp Stimulation of the Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR): Advantages of Chirp Stimulation ABR amplitude is larger for chirp stimulation Larger amplitude contributes to: More confident identification of wave V Shorter test time is needed to identify wave V Reduced test time for each stimulus frequency permits more complete estimation of auditory threshold in speech frequency region More accurate thresholds are sometimes possible with chirp stimulation

Update on Auditory Electrophysiology Introduction to auditory electrophysiology … 85-years of research and clinical application Electrocochleography (ECochG) … Much more than just the diagnosis of Meniere’s Disease ABR … Over 4000 peer-reviewed publications in the past decade alone ASSR … Filling an important niche in children and adults Cortical auditory evoked responses … Now we’re really assessing hearing Summary, Questions & Answers

Limitation of Tone Burst Evoked ABR in Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss .50 8K .50 8K dB HL 20 40 60 80 100 No ABR > 80 dB HL AC BC No ASSR > 120 dB HL Frequency in Hz Frequency in Hz

Year 2007 JCIH Position Statement: Protocol for Evaluation for Hearing Loss In Infants and Toddlers from Birth to 6 months Child and family history Evaluation of risk factors for congenital hearing loss Parental report of infant’s responses to sound “Clinical observation of infant’s auditory behavior. Behavioral observation alone is not adequate for determining whether hearing loss is present in this age group, and is not adequate for the fitting of amplification devices.” Audiological assessment Auditory brainstem response (ABR) Click-evoked ABR with rarefaction and condensation single-polarity stimulation if there are risk factors for auditory neuropathy Frequency-specific ABR with air-conduction tone bursts Bone-conduction stimulation (as indicated) Otoacoustic emissions (distortion product or transient OAEs) Tympanometry with 1000 Hz probe tone Supplemental procedures, e.g., Electrocochleography (ECochG) Auditory steady state response (ASSR) Acoustic reflex measurement (for 1000 Hz probe tone)

The Auditory Steady-State Response: A Book and > 450 Medline Hits (www.nlm.nih.gov)

Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR): Clinical Devices

ASSR Stimulation: Amplitude and Frequency Modulation Carrier frequency (pure tone) changes in intensity and/or frequency over time 50% FM Frequency 100% AM Amplitude

Modulated Stimuli Produce Frequency-Specific Steady-State Responses at the Modulation Frequency Carrier at 1 kHz 100% AM 81Hz modulation frequency Activation at 1 kHz region of basilar membrane Steady-State response at the modulation frequency 81 Hz Frequency Spectra – EEG & ASSR Sound Cochlea Brain