Use of the Endangered Species Act in Alaska Doug Vincent-Lang, Special Assistant Alaska Department of Fish & Game 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
. Cetacean Conservation in the U.S. David Cottingham Division Chief, Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Conservation Office of Protected Resources NOAA Fisheries.
Advertisements

Signed on December 1973 and provides for the conservation of species that are endangered or threatened throughout all or significant portion of their.
Need for Revision to the New York State Endangered Species Regulations
Species at Risk Act : K O D A K January 7, 2004 Implications for Pacific Fisheries.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Amendments to Part 182: Endangered Species Regulations.
Beyond Fish and the Federal ESA Chris Maguire Terrestrial Biology Program Coordinator Oregon Department of Transportation Local Government Environmental.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Briefing on Proposed Amendments to Endangered Species Regulations.
Introduction to CESA Incidental Take Permits and Consistency Determinations Developed by Jennifer Deleon, Staff Environmental Scientist CESA Permitting.
ARRT Update January Workgroup Commissioned in FEB 2011 “to ensure the AK Unified Plan complies with ESA section 7 consultation requirements” ESA.
Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) Governance/Implementation September 4, 2013 Presentation Jonathan Garcia Senior Planner.
May 17 th,  Overview of endangered species regulations  Purpose of Habitat Conservation Plans  Review Balcones Canyonlands Conservation Plan.
THE ACTS What you need to know about MBTA, BGEPA, & ESA.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
Impacts of the Endangered Species Act Roundtable U.S. Chamber of Commerce Energy, Clean Air & Natural Resources Committee W. Parker Moore Beveridge & Diamond,
ESA, HCPs and Recovery Plans. Endangered Species Conservation Federal protection began with the limited Endangered Species Preservation Act of 1966 –Limited.
THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT of 1973 Cornell Scientific Inquiry Partnership Cornell University.
Endangered Species Act
Endangered Species US Fish and Wildlife Service. Endangered Species Endangered Species Act Passed in 1983 Purpose Conserve Endangered and Threatened Species.
Endangered Species Act Overview
NOAA’s Protected Resources Recovery Program Donna Wieting Director Office of Protected Resources MAFAC September 24, 2014 Silver Spring, MD.
Endangered Species Act GOALS: Prevent species extinctions Increase numbers to the point where a species has recovered and can be delisted.
Marine Mammal Exploitation & Conservation MARE 444 Dr. Turner Fall 2007.
Preventing Endangered Species Listings with the Tongass Conservation Strategy Steve Brockmann U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
404 Species Mega-petitioned from Center of Biological Diversity: Where are we now? Presented by: Channing St. Aubin US Fish and Wildlife Service Panama.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 Chapter 4, Module 3 1.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
 “ Wildlife conservation is the practice of protecting endangered plant and animal species and their habitats. Among the goals of wildlife conservation.
Endangered Species: Bison Bears and Wolves-the Science and the Policy Matthew A. Cronin, Ph.D. University of Alaska Fairbanks School of Natural Resources.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Overview Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2001.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
Biological Opinions & Endangered Species Act Consultation – A “How To” Guide for Working with Agencies on ESA Issues MATTHEW A. LOVE Partner- Seattle,
Endangered Species Objectives: Explain how fish and wildlife become extinct, rare, endangered, or threatened. Discuss recovery strategies used to manage.
Developing a Literature Database for the North Aleutian Basin of Alaska Elisabeth Ann Stull North Aleutian Basin Information Status and Research Planning.
The Endangered Species Act: Species Listings and Implications for Development in Alaska Presented by: Cherise Oram Stoel Rives LLP.
Marine Protected Species: Serving warm, fuzzy, and cute since 1972 Dr. Jason Turner Department of Marine Science, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo.
The Lesser Prairie Chicken Has Been Listed As Threatened: Now What!? The Lesser Prairie Chicken Has Been Listed As Threatened: Now What!? Jim Jones Power.
NOAA Fisheries (National Marine Fisheries Service) Office of Protected Resources.
WOLF CONSERVATION By Kachelle & Kayla. The Endangered Species Act The Endangered Species Act provides protection for the organisms placed on the endangered.
UNDERSTANDING THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT. What is the ESA? Federal Law : 1973 (USA), 1976 (Canada) protecting wildlife & plants Conserve & recover species.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 By Tristan Armstrong.
Species At Risk Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Legislation - Update on Status Bill C-5 currently before the Senate Has been given 1st and 2nd readings Bill.
Terrestrial Biology & Beyond… Chris Maguire Terrestrial Biology Program Coordinator Oregon Department of Transportation Local Government Environmental.
Monica L. DeAngelis Marine Mammal Biologist National Marine Fisheries Service Long Beach, CA The Marine Mammal Protection.
Endangered Species Act of 1973, 1982, 1985, and 1988 By: Nicole Wypychowski Period 6 President Nixon signed the bill December 28, 1973 ESA is administered.
THE SPECIES AT RISK ACT (SARA) CBA/Justice National Section Meeting National Environmental Energy Resources Law Group Ottawa – October 24, 2004.
The science of conservation planning Course objective: a free-ranging examination of some key scientific principles and research needs pertaining to conservation.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service The mission of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife,
Take & Incidental Take Permit Take: means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, collect or attempt to engage in such conduct.
Endangered Species Act Basics & Section 7 Consultation Strategies for Hydropower Relicensing & License Amendments Cherise M. Oram Stoel Rives LLP Hydropower.
National Flood Insurance Program ESA Consultation for Online Information Sessions May 11 th and 12 th 2016 Oregon.
Environmental Issues Update - Endangered Species 1.
Signed in to law on December 28, 1973 by President Richard Nixon. Under the ESA, the federal government has the responsibility to protect: Endangered Species.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife Wolf Plan Status DRAFT Gray Wolf Conservation Plan December 2015 Karen Kovacs Wildlife Program Manager Northern.
Endangered Species Act Application in New York State – What’s New? October 4, 2015 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Robyn A. Niver.
Damien M. Schiff Pacific Legal Foundation ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS.
Oil Spill Response and the Endangered Species Act RRT IX Meeting Oakland, California June 28, 2012 Elizabeth Petras- National Marine Fisheries Service,
California WaterFix Aquatic Science Peer Review Sacramento, California April 5, 2016.
Indiana Bats, Fire, and the Endangered Species Act Sue Cameron US Fish & Wildlife Service April 16, 2013.
Biodiversity: Preserving Species
Endangered Species Act
Endangered Species Act
The Endangered Species Act (ESA)
The Endangered Species Act 1973 ,1982,1985,1988
Whale Population and Conservation
Endangered Species Act
Endangered Species Act (1973, 1982, 1985, 1988)
Endangered Species.
Presentation transcript:

Use of the Endangered Species Act in Alaska Doug Vincent-Lang, Special Assistant Alaska Department of Fish & Game 1

THE FEDERAL ESA PROCESS  Public petition or agency initiation  90-Day finding  12-Month status review  Proposed decision  Final decision  Designation of critical habitat  Establishment of recovery team and development of recovery objectives  Uplisting, downlisting, or delisting. 2

Current Status of Listings in Alaska 3

Federally Listed Endangered Species Short-tailed albatross - USFWS Eskimo curlew – USFWS (likely extinct) Aleutian shield fern - USFWS Steller sea lion (western DPS) - NMFS Bowhead whale - NMFS Fin whale – NMFS Beluga whale (Cook Inlet DPS) - NMFS Humpback whale - NMFS Other rare species: North Pacific right whale, Blue whale, Sei whale, and the Leatherback turtle - NMFS 4

Federally Listed Threatened Species Spectacled eider - USFWS Steller's eider (AK breeding DPS) – USFWS Polar bear - USFWS Northern sea otter, southwest Alaska DPS - USFWS Steller sea lion, eastern DPS - NMFS 5

Species currently under federal consideration for listing Kittlitz’s murrelet – USFWS (candidate) Yellow-billed loon – USFWS (candidate) Pacific walrus – USFWS (candidate) Ice seals (2 species) – NMFS (proposed) SE Alaska herring – NMFS (candidate) Alexander Archipelago Wolf – USFWS (proposed) Flying Squirrel – USFWS (proposed) 6

State listed species under AS Eskimo curlew Short-tailed albatross Humpback whale Right whale Blue whale 6

WHAT HAPPENS AFTER LISTING?   Section 9: Prohibits the “take” of a listed species. Under Section 3 take includes “harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture or collect or attempt to engage in any such conduct”.   Section 7: For projects that have a federal “nexus”, federal agencies need to consult with NMFS or USFWS on any project that may affect a listed species or its critical habitat.   Biological assessment (“likelihood to effect” decision)   BiOp (with “JAM” finding and resultant incidental take statement and minimization measures).   Section 10: For projects that have “incidental take” but no federal nexus.   Habitat Conservation Plans (HCP) to minimize and mitigate impact of incidental take   Incidental take permits w/ approved HCP 20 These are applicable throughout a species’ range

Legal Considerations   All agency decisions are subject to citizen litigation, from listing decisions to critical habitat designations, to JAM authorizations.   This has the proven potential to slow resource development projects, and place decisions in the hands of judges.   Federal agencies have broad discretion. 23

Other Considerations   Under the ESA the Services have an obligation to work with the states during all aspects of the ESA process.   Unfortunately, this has become a formalized process.   We support a more open and transparent process where the state is involved early and often in all ESA processes, as Congress originally envisioned. 23

STATE APPROACH  The State supports appropriate use of the ESA to prevent species facing extinction within the near term and to recovery them to remove this risk.  We do not support use of the act as a precautionary management tool to protect species facing long-term risks and low near term extinction probabilities.  We also do not support overly broad critical habitat designations.  We also feel the full costs of critical habitat designations should be accounted for.

Active State Lawsuits  Polar bear listing  Polar bear critical habitat designation  Cook Inlet beluga listing  Steller sea lion BiOp  Ribbon seal listing Notices of Intent  Cook Inlet critical habitat designation

Other Actions  Delisting petition filed for the eastern DPS of Steller sea lion

It is easier to list than delist a species   About 2,000 plants and animals are currently listed as threatened or endangered under ESA   An additional 500+ species are being considered for listing   To delist, the agency must determine that: – –a species must be no longer in danger of becoming extinct – –the threats facing it have been eliminated and are monitored   Since inception, only 46 species de-listed, of which only 20 have been recovered (~1%) 24

AA Wolf & Flying Squirrel  90-day findings are the first step  12-month status reviews –Not scheduled to begin until 2017 at the earliest  Time to conduct sound science to inform these status reviews

Thank you. Questions? 26