SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Model: Working Model Calibration Part 2: Results Renee Alsup DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data Collection Methods BluFax: vehicle identification using bluetooth MAC addresses – provides corridor traffic patterns (origin-destination data) and.
Advertisements

D2 Roadway Discussion Sound Transit Board September 22, 2011.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
Determining the Free-Flow Speeds in a Regional Travel Demand Model based on the Highway Capacity Manual Chao Wang Joseph Huegy Institute for Transportation.
Case Study 2 New York State Route 146 Corridor. This case study is about a Traffic Impact Assessment for a proposed site development in Clifton Park,
West Contra Costa Unified School District
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Simulating I-710 Corridor Presented in the Western ITE Annual Meeting Santa Barbara, California.
City of Portland SW 6 th Avenue & Jackson Street Intersection Solution Study 1 Presented By: Josh Crain Robert Acevedo Xiaowei Wu Chengxin Dai.
Reston Master Plan Thoughts on transportation. Focus is important Without the proper transportation groundwork other plans will fall through.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model July 22, 2003.
Redwood Road & 35th Avenue Traffic Study. Problems Observed: High collision rate along the corridor was found at McArthur Boulevard intersection, with.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Efficiency through technology and collaboration Road Diet (Roadway Reconfiguration) Every Day Counts 3 Innovative Safety Initiative.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
Archived Data User Services (ADUS). ITS Produce Data The (sensor) data are used for to help take transportation management actions –Traffic control systems.
Lec 24: Ch1.(T&LD): Urban transportation planning vs. Site planning Review the transportation-land use cycle (Read examples in Ch.1 & compare the development.
15 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, New Jersey Joyoung Lee, New Jersey Institute of Technology Byungkyu Brian Park, University.
Mario Fiorillo – Transportation – Civil Mario Fiorillo Present work experience Florida If you have any questions please me at
Third & Fourth Streets Traffic Calming Study Presentation to Transportation Commission May 14, 2015.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Project: Model Integration Options Greg Erhardt DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th,
©2009 Proprietary and Confidential DTA in practice: Modeling dynamic networks in the real world Michael Mahut, Ph.D. INRO Montreal, Canada.
Page Avenue What has it done for the region? A comparison of traffic volumes from Fall 2003 to Fall 2004 What has it done for the region? A comparison.
Investigation of Speed-Flow Relations and Estimation of Volume Delay Functions for Travel Demand Models in Virginia TRB Planning Applications Conference.
Keeping Wisconsin Moving: An Overview of WisDOT’s DMS Travel Times Kelly Langer, WisDOT, Freeway Operations Supervisor.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model Mobility Analysis November 7, 2003.
April 2010 Scott Smith Volpe Center / RITA / U.S. DOT Transportation Border Working Group Meeting Boston, MA An Integrated Regional Planning / Microsimulation.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Roosevelt Road: State to Columbus Public Meeting September 22, 2015.
1 Mississippi River Bridge An Analysis of Alternatives Expert Panel Review Sharon Greene & Associates.
Sydney Seufer, Owner and C.E.O Gorgeous Gardens 4175 Palm Avenue San Francisco, CA
DKS Associates. 2 Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) Travel Demand vs. Simulation Models Micro vs. Meso Simulation Models US-101 Corridor Modeling.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Model: Working Model Calibration Part 1: Process Greg Erhardt Dan Tischler Neema Nassir.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY DTA Anyway: Code Base & Network Development Lisa Zorn DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th, 2012.
City of Portland SW 6 th Avenue & Jackson Street Intersection Solution Study 1 Presented By: Josh Crain Robert Acevedo Xiaowei Wu Chengxin Dai.
Freeway Congestion In The Washington Region Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 15, 2006 Item # 9.
Assessment and Refinement of Real-Time Travel Time Algorithms for Use in Practice November 8 th, 2007.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Challenges in Using Paramics in a Secondary Plan Study – Case Study of Downsview, Toronto Paramics Users Group Meeting October 5, 2009.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
Company LOGO Ramp Meters. Company LOGO What are Ramp Meters? Part of NaviGAtor, Georgia DOT’s Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Also includes electronic.
Assessment and Refinement of Real-Time Travel Time Algorithms for Use in Practice September 6, 2007.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Easy Breezy Beautiful DTA: Modeling of the Geary Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Project Elizabeth Sall, Michalis.
Baltimore Red Line: Challenges of a Large Model Area Presented by: Mahmood Shehata, P.E. McCormick Taylor, Inc. Philadelphia, PA Presented to:PTV Users.
Bharath Paladugu TRPC Clyde Scott Independent Consultant
1 Congestion Measurement Mark Hallenbeck TRAC. 2 Historical Use of volume data –AADT –AWDT, –Hourly volumes To estimate delays Can produce a reasonable.
I-95 Access Study Fredericksburg Area Project Status Update February 12, 2010.
Modeling Various Tolling Schemes Using Emme: Seattle Experience Andrew Natzel, Parsons Brinckerhoff Bhanu Yerra, Parsons Brinckerhoff Craig Helmann, Puget.
8/7/02 Dane County Vandewalle & Associates Strand Associates William O’Connor Roadway Concept Select Link Traffic Modeling August 7, 2002.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY DTA Anyway Peer Review Panel Traffic Flow Model Parameters Estimation July 25 th, 2012.
2004 Transportation M etropolitan A tlanta P erformance Report – Congestion Measures Presentation to ITS Georgia August 29, 2005.
Village of Palmetto Bay
Rainier Avenue South Pilot Project Update Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board Project Manager Jim Curtin September 2, 2015.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
ATDM Analytical Methods for Urban Streets Urban Streets Subcommittee Meeting January 10, 2016 David Hale.
Evaluation of Hard Shoulder vs
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Arterial Loop+Racetrack No-Incident Model
YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
Friday, December 16th.
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Technical Advisory Committee
SERPM 8 NPMRDS SPEED DATA
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Downtown Valdosta Truck Traffic Mitigation Study
STATE SUEE AND ONE WAY CORRIDORS
L. Braemere is a Local street not a “Collector” and is not Compliant with ACHD Policy Manual Section 7 Regarding Local Streets “The primary function.
Current and proposed HOT facilities update
Presentation transcript:

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Model: Working Model Calibration Part 2: Results Renee Alsup DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th, 2012

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Agenda 9:00Background 9:30Technical Overview – Part 1 Development Process and Code Base/Network Development 10:15Break 10:30Technical Overview – Part 2 Calibration and Integration Strategies 12:00Working Lunch / Discussion 2:00Panel Caucus (closed) 3:30 Panel report 5:30Adjourn

Outline Summary Results Large Outliers Select Link Analysis Corridor Plots Key Findings 3 Results from July 11 Calibration Run ( pb_july11_300p_FT )

Summary Results

Link Volumes 5

Movement Volumes 6

Time-of-Day 7

Average Movement Volumes by Facility Type Facility Type Number of CountsObservedModeledDifference Percent Difference Percent RMSE Freeway %38% Major Arterial %61% Minor Arterial %94% Collector %109% Local %114% Total 1, %76% 8

Average Movement Volumes by Turn Type Turn Type Number of CountsObservedModeledDifference Percent Difference Percent RMSE Through %54% Left Turn %132% Right Turn %103% Total 1, %76% 9

Large Outliers

Worst Links with Volume too Low 11 LinkIDLabelFacility Type Num Lanes Start Time Count Volume Model Volume 15034HARRISON STMajor Art517: SUNSET BLVDMajor Art317: SUNSET BLVDMajor Art316: SUNSET BLVDMajor Art317: GEARY BLVDCollector117: HARRISON STMajor Art517: FOLSOM STMajor Art417: HARRISON STMajor Art516: GEARY BLVDCollector117: GEARY BLVDCollector116:

Worst Links with Volume too High 12 LinkIDLabel Facility Type Num Lanes Start Time Count Volume Model Volume 24936GEARY BLVDMajor Art316: GEARY BLVDMajor Art317: STOCKTON STMajor Art416: VAN NESS AVEMajor Art316: STOCKTON STMajor Art316: GEARY BLVDMajor Art316: TURK STMajor Art216: GEARY BLVDMajor Art316: GEARY BLVDMajor Art316: GEARY BLVDMajor Art316:

Speed Outliers Broadway Tunnel- Free-flow speed is 25mph-30mph. The actual speed limit in the tunnel is 40mph. Geneva from Ocean to Cayuga – Modeled free-flow speed is 10 mph higher than speed limit. Solution: Fix free-flow speeds by making sure they fall in the right area type. 13

Select Link Analysis

15 I-80 EB Select Link (1/2) As expected, much of the traffic comes from freeways. We also see a good amount of traffic taking Oak to get onto I-80 from the Western region and taking 1 st St and 2 nd St North of Market. Selected Link

16 I-80 EB Select Link (2/2) 1 st and 2 nd Street are heavily used by people going from CBD to get onto the freeway. Embarcadero is used, but less than 1 st or 2 nd St. There isn’t a lot of traffic moving Eastward to get onto the freeway between I-80 and Market. People have mostly entered the freeway by then, or they move East while they are North of Market. Selected Link

17 I-80 EB On-Ramps Most traffic gets to the on-ramps on 1 st St, 2 nd St and The Embarcadero Vehicles further North are more likely to take Embarcadero South to get onto I-80 than to use the local streets

I-80 WB Select Link 18 Selected Link Much of the traffic entering on I-80 is destined for the Southern region Freeways take much of the traffic, but some takes Freemont to Pine or 9 th St to Van Ness and Franklin

19 I-80 WB On-Ramps Most vehicles use the first ramp at Harrison & 4 th Because the first ramp isn’t congested very few vehicles continue on Harrison to second ramp Select Links

20 19 th Ave NB Most of the traffic on 19 th Ave is just straight through on Hwy 1 Very little traffic from here is going East or West – Sunset Blvd and Great Hwy used for traffic going West

21 19 th Ave SB Very similar to NB traffic pattern Picks up some traffic in the park headed South

22 Sunset Blvd NB Almost no traffic going to the Golden Gate Bridge Mostly trips from I-280 and Hwy 1 to local areas South of the park Need to figure out why so few people are using Sunset to go through the park

23 Sunset Blvd SB Almost no traffic coming from Golden Gate Bridge. Mostly comes from South of the park Significant amount of traffic from Lincoln Way coming over from the CBD on Fell

24 Golden Gate Bridge Outbound Origin of traffic seems evenly split between East and West regions Significant number of trips on Geary between Hwy 1 and Franklin/Van Ness to change which entry point to the bridge is used

25 Golden Gate Bridge Inbound East/West split is similar to outbound Don’t have people using Geary to move between East and West regions here Very few vehicles going Southwest use any other path besides Hwy 1

Corridor Plots

Ocean: Miramar to 19 th Ave 27 Big drop at Junipero Serra

Townsend: 2 nd St to 7 th St 28 Big drop at Junipero Serra Vehicles turn left at 4 th St to get to I-280 entrance ramps

Key Findings

The model is free from obvious gridlock There generally appears to be less congestion than anticipated—perhaps due to the removal of the bus- only lanes A number of outliers appear to be driven by specific network movements—such as freeway on-ramps 30

Next Steps Incorporate a network coding strategy for the bus-only lanes. Incorporate the effect of slope into the speed-flow parameters based on additional analysis of the data collected. Update the time-of-day profile of the demand to better match the higher volumes observed in the 5-6 pm hour. Identify origins - destinations markets where SF- CHAMP is over- or under-estimating vehicle demand. Deal with pedestrian/bicycle friction? 31

Questions?