The Towson University Learning Environment Results of the 2002 National Survey of Student Engagement Linda Suskie, Director Office of Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
Advertisements

1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Who is the Towson Freshman? Results of the 2003 Cooperative Institutional Research Program Survey Linda Suskie, Associate Vice President Assessment & Institutional.
New Faculty Orientation 12 August 2014 Dr. Idna M. Corbett Dean of Undergraduate Studies & Student Support Services.
Using the 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement in Student Affairs Indiana State University.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
First Year & Senior Student Experiences The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Achievement of Educational Outcomes: Seniors’ Self- evaluations from 2004 & 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement (NSSE) Cathy Sanders Director of.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Undergraduate Students at UMass Boston: A Presentation for the Student Educational Research and Advocacy Center April 4, 2007 Prepared by: The Office of.
NSSE – Results & Connections Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona October 2, 2013 – Academic Senate.
Student Engagement: Comparing Community College Students in the US and Canada Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Skagit Valley College, WA Karen Grigoleit Douglas.
Presentation of Results NSSE 2003 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Student Engagement at Towson: NSSE 2005 Telling and Selling the Story Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 11, 2006.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
IUPUI Council on Retention and Graduation – October 13, 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement Understanding IUPUI Students: National Survey of Student.
Student Engagement at Northeastern Illinois Analysis and Use of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2009.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
NSSE 2005: Student Perceptions of Enriching Educational Experiences Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 18, 2006.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Ms. Leslie Croot, Analyst.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
Primary Factors of Student Engagement at UTBTSC in 2002 Deborah Suzzane, Ph.D., Director Institutional Research & Planning.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Results from the National Survey of Student Engagement Margaret Harrigan Office of Academic Planning and Analysis University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Topic #4 - EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING Evidence: PowerPoint of Key Evidence Produced by AC Office of Outcomes Assessments 1.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
Measuring the Gap Between Faculty and Student Perceptions of Engagement: Results from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement University Assessment Office.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness April 25, 2011 QEP DATA ANALYSIS.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
Surveying the Freshman Class Eva Fernández Center for Teaching & Learning September 16, 2011.
A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE): Overview of 2008 Results for Rutgers University.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
NSSE Results for Faculty
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
Presentation transcript:

The Towson University Learning Environment Results of the 2002 National Survey of Student Engagement Linda Suskie, Director Office of Assessment

What is the NSSE? National survey of 200,000+ freshmen and seniors Measures student engagement in practices that achieve deep, lasting learning

Practices that Encourage Deep, Lasting Learning 1. High expectations & time on task 2. Coherent, synthesized curriculum 3. Active & collaborative learning 4. Student-faculty interaction 5. Enriching out-of-class experiences 6. Supportive campus environment

The Fine Print 47% of 700 students responded in 2002 Respondents representative in terms of gender and racial/ethnic status Too small a sample to study subgroups (transfers, commuters) In most respects, Towson is similar to other NSSE colleges, but this is a select group!

New in 2002: NSSE Urban Consortium Boise State Cleveland State DePaul (IL) IUPUI Metropolitan State (CO) Northeastern Illinois Oakland (MI) Pace (NY) Portland State Southern Illinois Edwardsville U Cincinnati U Colorado – Colorado Springs U Mass – Boston U Missouri – Kansas City U Missouri – St. Louis U Toledo U Wisconsin – Milwaukee Va. Commonwealth

Good News!

Most Seniors Have Learned a Lot Here! Say TU contributed at least quite a bit to… 83%Thinking critically and analytically. 81%Working effectively with others. 78%Acquiring a broad general education. 74%Using computing and information technology. 72%Acquiring work-related knowledge and skills. 70%Writing clearly and effectively. 69%Speaking clearly and effectively. 68%Learning effectively on your own. 62%Analyzing quantitative problems.

Students Increasingly Use Thinking Skills

Half of Towson Students Study at Least 11 Hours per Week. (12% of respondents are part-time)

Freshmen Have Increasing Experiences with Diverse Students

Towson Students Have Some Rich Learning Experiences Over 80% often work on assignments in which they integrate information from many sources. 60% often work harder than they thought they could to meet faculty expectations. Over half often discuss their course work with others. Half our freshmen often prepare at least two drafts of an assignment.

Towson Students Increasingly Find Students Friendly

Towson Students Increasingly Find Administrators Helpful

Towson is Distinctive in Providing a Residential Experience in an Urban Setting

Living on Campus Yields a Richer Experience Compared to freshmen at other urban campuses, Towson freshmen Participate more in co-curricular activities. Feel Towson emphasizes campus events more. Have better relationships with fellow students.

Living on Campus Lets Students Focus on Academics Compared to freshmen at other urban campuses, Towson freshmen Work less off campus Spend less time caring for family Are less concerned that work & family obligations will delay their degree

Other Differences Between Towson and Other Urban Institutions

Towson Freshmen Are More “Wired.”

Towson Freshmen Have Some Richer Academic Experiences. College contributed at least quite a bit to…

Towson Seniors Have Some Richer Academic Experiences.