Data-Driven, Personalized Acceleration & Intervention

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention: Linking Statewide Initiatives.
Advertisements

Leadership for Advancing Adolescent Literacy RESA-I 21 st Century Education Leadership Series October 21, 2008 Terry Reale, WVDE Coordinator Reading English.
Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Instructional Decision Making
The Teacher Work Sample
M eeting the Needs of All Students in a Collaborative Model: Co-Teaching The School District of Philadelphia A Collaborative Effort Office of Empowerment.
Differentiated Instruction
High School Literacy Don Deshler. LANGUAGE SKILLS STRATEGIES SUBJECT MATTER Building Blocks for Content Literacy HIGHER ORDER.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
Lexia Reading Core5 Launch Module
What Every SLMS Should Know about Collaborating with Other Literacy Professionals Prepared by the SLMS Role in Reading Task Force July 2009 July 2009.
1 Differentiated Instruction Massachusetts Reading First Plan and John Silber Early Literacy Initiative Advanced Seminar Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph. D.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
Robert McCabe, Chief Education Officer. Company Confidential A National Consensus.
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
Lexia Reading Core5 Diving Deeper into your Data
Honors Level Course Implementation Guide [English Language Arts]
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
MCCWDTA Sharing Blended Learning Strategies Barbara Treacy January 15, 2014 Massachusetts Community Colleges and Workforce Development Transformation Agenda.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
PCG Education Helping Florida Schools and Districts Successfully Transition to the Florida Standards Palm Beach Charter School Administrators.
West Virginia University Academic Innovation Next Generation Mathematics Communities of Practice Greg Strimel.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
Harry Wong Says Procedures are the Way to Go… Response to Intervention is a procedure-based system. It is also a problem solving system. Something isn’t.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Supports K–12 School Effectiveness Framework: A Support for School Improvement and Student Success (2010). The integrated process of assessment and instruction.
Literacy Programs System 44 Exit Criteria: SPI Advancing, 40+ Fluency Score, series 13 + READ 180 Exit Criteria: SRI 4th 595; 5th 760;
SETRC network guide for assessment of programs.  Assessing quality of district program and practice in areas of literacy  Determining priority need.
Chapter 1 –organizing principle
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
How to Write…… GIEP’s Best Practices Cheryl Everett PAGE Conference 2011.
RTI: Response to Intervention An Invitation to Begin… Rutgers Conference January 2015 Janet Higgins Reading Specialist East Amwell Township School Rutgers.
Collaborative Inquiry “Teachers possess tremendous knowledge, skill, and experience. Collaborative inquiry creates a structure for them to share that expertise.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Assessment and Differentiation of Instruction. Assessment for Learning.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
MERGING BALANCED LITERACY WITH BLENDED LEARNING Sally Schultz, Candi Craven, and Kathryn Bates Rowan Salisbury School System Hanford Dole Elementary.
1. 2  Share with your tablemates how you spent your $100.  After everyone has shared, have a discussion about the importance learners’ interests play.
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
1 Blended Learning Transforming the Classroom. 2 Purpose of this Session Define blended learning and understand how it meets the needs of 21 st century.
Leading Effective Intervention Objectives To give subject leaders an overview of the Strategy’s plans to refresh and develop intervention and targeted.
The Competency Education Toolkit for Curriculum, Assessment, Instruction, and Grading Rose Colby ASCD June 2014.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Department of Specialized Instruction & Student Services Strategic Plan – Initiative 1.
Response to Instruction and Intervention and how it could apply to High Achievers/Gifted Education Tanya Morret, Dr. Christine.
MCCWDTA Sharing Blended Learning Strategies Barbara Treacy January 15, 2014 Massachusetts Community Colleges and Workforce Development Transformation Agenda.
Q K-12 Blueprint Overview. 2 The K-12 Blueprint offers resources for education leaders involved in planning and implementing personalized learning.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Data Review Team Time Spring Purpose 0 This day is meant to provide school leadership teams with time to review the current status of their.
CAACE March 31, 2016 Greg Moore Account Executive
Supplemental Math Digital Tool: Dreambox
Competency Based Learning and Project Based Learning
Data Review Team Time Fall 2013.
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
Personalizing It just Right for Special Areas!!!
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
Blended Learning in the Competency Based Classroom
Presentation transcript:

Data-Driven, Personalized Acceleration & Intervention Chris Cook, Ph.D, National Curriculum/RTI Consultant

Seminar Objectives Discuss key elements for creating effective personalized learning environments Learn how the design of Core5 Supports Teacher Effectiveness Maximize the impact of Lexia’s Data System to differentiate/accelerate reading proficiency Network & share best practices

How Technology is Transforming Education Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the Worlds Learns (Christensen, Horn, Johnson; 2008) Technology will be the “disruptive force” in education by driving change in: Personalized learning Student-centered classrooms Blended learning

The Power of Embedded, Real-time Assessment “Save time and cost of repairing the mistakes.”

The “Disruptive” Effect of Real-time Assessment and Personalized Learning Traditional Assessment Time (fixed)  Results (variable/unpredictable) Embedded Assessment Time (variable)  Results (predictable success)

What is Personalized Learning?

Personalized Learning “…ensuring that a student’s path, curriculum, instruction, and schedule be personalized to meet their unique needs, inside and outside of school…through a wide range of resources and strategies appropriate for her learning style, abilities, and interests…as well as social, emotional and physical situation.” - Dr. Chris Dede, Harvard University (2014)

Blended Learning “Blended learning is not the same as technology-rich instruction. It goes beyond one-to-one computers and high-tech gadgets. Blended learning involves leveraging the Internet to afford each student a more personalized learning experience, meaning increased student control over the time, place, path, and/or pace of his or her learning.” “The definition of blended learning is a formal education program in which a student learns: at least in part through online learning, with some element of student control over time, place, path, and/or pace; at least in part in a supervised brick-and-mortar location away from home; and the modalities along each student’s learning path within a course or subject are connected to provide an integrated learning experience.” www.christenseninstitute.org (2014)

The Challenge We want to personalize, but in a group setting.

Literature Review: Pitfalls & Obstacles Inadequate technology Technology not adaptive (branching) Data for decision-making (time) Data for decision-making (actionable) Technology designed as a closed system Technology-delivered and teacher-delivered learning not integrated (no clear next steps for T)

Personalized Learning: Six Attributes of Enabling Contexts Technology (devices, infrastructure, access) Note: 1:1 ratio does not ensure personalized learning Lexia Reading Core5 provides a personalized, differentiated approach…. through a system of student-driven learning online, and targeted instruction by a teacher or paraprofessional. The key to this approach is a simple, real-time report on student performance. It serves as a data-driven action plan that tells the teacher which students need instruction, pinpoints the exact skill they need to teach, provides a lesson addressing that skill, and indicates the precise amount of time each student needs to spend on the computer. With this approach, teachers spend their time focused only where it’s needed, never where it isn’t.

Personalized Learning: Six Attributes of Enabling Contexts Formative / Diagnostic Assessment (vs. Summative Measures) provides more leverage for improvement richer and more accurate actionable linked to curriculum

Personalized Learning: Six Attributes of Enabling Contexts Formative / Diagnostic Assessment (vs. Summative Measures) provides more leverage for improvement richer and more accurate actionable linked to curriculum

Personalized Learning: Six Attributes of Enabling Contexts Able to happen in multiple settings classroom – whole group, small group, individual home community

Personalized Learning: Six Attributes of Enabling Contexts Differentiated , adaptive content through scaffolding and intelligent branching

Personalized Learning: Six Attributes of Enabling Contexts Strategic classroom monitoring and management

Personalized Learning: Six Attributes of Enabling Contexts Effective leadership and school climate goal clarity goal communication scheduling collaboration/collegiality

Introducing the Next Generation of Lexia…

Lexia Overview Acceleration for all ability levels Research Proven 2013 rev. to rigorous state standard 4. Adaptive (4 Levels) 5. Assessment Without Testing

Unparalleled Independent, Published Research Lexia’s scientific efficacy studies have been published in peer-reviewed reading journals: Reading Psychology (2008, 2011) Lexia Reading builds early reading skills Bilingual Research Journal (2011) Lexia Reading supports English language learners Journal of Research in Reading (2006) Lexia Reading helps students close the gap European Journal of Special Needs Education (2009) Lexia helps adolescent readers advance Perspectives on Language and Literacy (2007) Lexia’s computer assisted instructions helps enhance learning

Model of Data-driven, Personalized Learning

Lexia Reading Core5 Expanded coverage for PreK-5 students of all abilities (Tier 1,2, 3, Special Ed and ELL) Created to meet and exceed the Common Core State Standards Adaptive levels of instructional intensity Three levels of scaffolding Intensive/explicit instruction (computer and teacher-directed)

Scope & Sequence The Lexia Reading Core5 scope and sequence covers skills identified as essential for reading development across the grade range from preK to 5th grade.

Gradual Release of Responsibility model “You do” Student-driven “We do” Teacher and student Student Independence / Mastery “I do” Teacher-led Let’s take a look at the instructional model in most programs, as compared to Lexia Reading Core5. Many of you are familiar with the “gradual release of responsibility” model ( known as “I do, we do, you do”). In this commonly used approach…. the teacher begins by modeling the task or skill. This is known as the “I do” step. Next, the student performs the skill with scaffolding by the teacher. This is the “we do” step. Finally, when the student has developed mastery of the skill, he or she is ready to demonstrate the skill independently in the “You do” step.

Lexia Reading Core5 Instructional Model Standard Demonstrate mastery Independent Application Skill Builders® Paper and pencil: Develop automaticity & expressive skills Guided Practice Scaffolded support Guided Practice - Reduce choices/Remove stimuli Continue to struggle Direct Instruction Explicit teaching Lexia Lessons® Teacher-led instruction

To View A Live Demo Narrated Core5 Examples (by Reading Strand) http://www.lexialearning.com/strand-videos Self Guided Tour www.lexiacore5.com login: core5demo@lexiareading.com password: Core5

Lexia Data System for Maximizing the Impact of Lexia’s Assesment Without Testing Making data simple and actionable www.mylexia.com

Assessment Without Testing® Real-time, norm-referenced performance data Ongoing progress monitoring without a test event: Predict future performance and Prescribe Instructional Intensity Monitoring of performance toward meeting Common Core State Standards Saves teachers up to a month of instruction time across the year Assessment data is highly predictive of outcomes on commonly used assessments such as: DIBELS® – MAPS® AIMSweb® – GRADE® As students are working in the program, Lexia gathers real-time, norm-referenced and criterion-referenced performance data that informs the student-driven and teacher-led instruction in the program - and it is all done without stopping your instruction time to administer a test. This data helps you to: Predict future performance and prescribe instructional intensity Track performance on the Common Core State Standards And it saves teachers up to a month of instructional time. Lexia’s data are highly predictive of outcomes on commonly used assessments such as DIBELS, AIMSweb, MAPS and GRADE. Lexia’s data is used here because we do not yet have correlations with these assessments and Core5, but based on our correlations with Lexia Reading, we feel the data will correlate with these measures. And it is available on the ipad and iphone.

Goal of Assessment “The goal is to gain enough information about student progress to make effective decisions while minimizing the time spent administering assessments.” Torgesen, 2006 This quote by Dr. Joe Torgesen drives us to provide valuable data to planning instruction without taking your instructional time. Torgesen, J. K. (2006) A comprehensive K-3 reading assessment plan: Guidance for school leaders. Portsmouth, NH. RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.

Model of Data-driven, Personalized Learning Lexia Reading Core5 provides a personalized, differentiated approach…. through a system of student-driven learning online, and targeted instruction by a teacher or paraprofessional. The key to this approach is a simple, real-time report on student performance. It serves as a data-driven action plan that tells the teacher which students need instruction, pinpoints the exact skill they need to teach, provides a lesson addressing that skill, and indicates the precise amount of time each student needs to spend on the computer. With this approach, teachers spend their time focused only where it’s needed, never where it isn’t.

RESOURCES FROM THIS SEMINAR http://lexialearning.com/lexia-educational-seminar-resources