©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Kenexa EMPLOYEE SURVEYS: More than a temperature check? How can surveys affect the bottom line? 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QPSC Overall KDA Based on Q38 – Intention to Leave.
Advertisements

© Development Dimensions Int’l, Inc., MMIIX. All rights reserved. 1 You must be the change you wish to see in the world” -Gandhi.
2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
The Power of Employee Engagement
CREATING A CULTURE THAT ENGAGES AND RETAINS MILLENNIALS Like us and check in on facebook at DaleCarnegieNY Tweet during the workshop at #DaleCarnegie.
How Tapping a Candidate’s Can Do and Will Do Drives the Bottom Line Building the bottom line... one hire at a time © Copyright Growth Ventures, Inc. Can.
Your Speaker Today Mike Phillips Director of Feedback Strategy
QPSC Overall KDA Job Engagement. Contents  Introduction  What is Key Driver Analysis?  Methodology  Factor Analysis Solution  Results.
Building Trust: How Top Companies Drive Business Results with Trust, Leadership and Collaboration.
Performance Evaluation/Management Training
Employee Engagement Sample Results. 2 Defining Employee Engagement Employee Engagement is a critical measure of person-organization alignment Engaged.
Promoting a Positive Organizational Culture Prof. Brian Blume, Ph.D University of Michigan, Flint School of Management.
Why does employee engagement matter?
Kellogg: Organizational Development Dialogue Staff Engagement, Retention, and Recognition July 21, 2010.
Calculating ROI: & Ensuring that OD Initiatives Provide Measurable Results… May, 2005.
UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
Customer Loyalty Programs – Increasing Customer Loyalty throughout the customer base! Suhail Khan – Director of WW Customer Loyalty Program – FileNet Corporation.
Organizational Behavior MBA-542 Instructor: Erlan Bakiev, Ph.D.
© 2007 GiftCertificates.com Corporation. All rights reserved. SuperCertificate® Reward is a registered trademark of GiftCertificates.com Corporation. Merchants.
How to Find Out if Your Employees are Actively Engaged in Their Work
Human capital management
IMPACT OF SOFT SKILLS TRAININGS ON BOTTOM LINE. SKILLS GAP SKILLS GAP IS A SIGNIfiCANT GAP BETWEEN AN ORGANIZATION’S CURRENT CAPABILITIES AND THE SKILLS.
“Beyond HR Transformation: Seize New Opportunities Through Value Added HR” Asma Bajawa Managing Director, PeopleFirst 4 th August 2010.
TNS Proprietary: © Linking Employee Compensation to Survey Metrics High-Level Considerations and Best Practices January, 2006.
KPMG’s People Management Leader Program
HR Tools in Managing Knowledge Elena Dojranska Slabev HR & Administration Director September, 2007.
2010 Annual Employee Survey Results
Julia King Tamang, Senior Consultant LERN 2009 Annual Conference.
Driving profitability through HR Agenda: PepsiCo experience
SPE Engagement Survey Results Summary Digital Media Group Masek November 2012 Confidential 1.
What’s Bugging Employees? The Workers Index & Employee Engagement Alexandra Jones Associate Director, The Work Foundation 25 April 2006.
John M. White, Health Services 1 Building a Healthy Culture Key Elements of a Comprehensive Health Strategy John M. White, Ph.D. Global Health Promotion.
©2000, Michael A. Mische MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California High-Performance Organizations Key Indicators LECTURE 2 (Supplement)
Using Employer Image & Brand to attract talent
Turning the change of Globalisation into an Opportunity Understand reality then make reality better.
© 2007 Towers Perrin Does being a Top Employer make a difference in employee engagement? How - And Why - Top Employers Are Building An Oasis for Talent.
Gaining the Commitment of Others. AchieveGlobal Canada Operating in Canada since 1964 Research Based Training in: Leadership and Management Development.
QPSC Overall KDA Agency Engagement. Contents  Introduction  What is Key Driver Analysis?  Methodology  Factor Analysis Solution  Results.
Understanding our Results
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
Employee engagement Guide Global Human Resources June 2014.
Imran Ghaznavi Course Code: MGT557 COMSATS Strategic Human Resource Management.
1 The Benefits of a Constructive Culture Compiled by: Janet L. Szumal, Ph.D. and Cheryl A. Boglarsky, Ph.D. Copyright © 2011 by Human Synergistics International.
C ALCULATING ROI. Why do we Calculate ROI? TO ENURE THAT OD INITIAVES PROVIDE MEASUREABLE RESULTS!
It’s All About Engagement Positive Disruption Presenter: Paul Spencer, PMP 2.
C ULTURE & C LIMATE S URVEY. Sample Employee Survey Report Findings ACME Widgets.
HR Metrics That Matter Ward Christman Senior Consultant.
High Performance Work Systems (HPWS). HR Alignment Planning and Job Design Recruiting and Selection Training and Development Performance Management Compensation.
Part 3 UNDERSTANDING CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS. Company Perceptions of Consumer Expectations Expected Service CUSTOMER COMPANY Listening Gap Provider Gap.
Customer Loyalty Programs – Increasing Customer Loyalty throughout the customer base! Paul Knott– Customer Services Director EMEA Response Center Paul.
Aligning HR & Business Strategy. “The long-held notion that HR would become a truly strategic function is finally being realized.”
Linking Organizational Culture to the Bottom Line.
2005 All-Staff Survey: Survey Results Summary Presentation
OneVoice W Group Results 16 June 2014 Human Resources Employee Engagement.
Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 4-1 Chapter 4 Job Attitudes Essentials of Organizational Behavior, 10/e Stephen P.
People Priorities Framework
THE STATE OF ENGAGEMENT TOWN HALL
Employee Opinion Survey Results Highlights Lending Services 2012 Auth: People Research Associates Ltd Normative Values © PRA Ltd December 2012 GFS.
Trends and Drivers of Federal Employee Engagement
The Business Case for Executive Assessment : Why Assessment in Challenging Times Can Enhance Productivity and Be a Talent “Game Changer” Linda Sharkey,
© Copyright 2001, Spherion Pacific Enterprises, LLC, All Rights Reserved Assessment Services from Spherion Flash Intro Screen Attracting and Retaining.
Corporate Social Responsibility: Connecting to Employees and Creating Sustainable Business Anne E. Herman, Ph.D. Kenexa Research Institute October 2008.
0 Response to Request For Information Bergen Brunswig Corporation W W W. W A T S O N W Y A T T. C O M Financial Executives International Linking HR Practices.
SaaS or a Customized Solution: Which is right for your recognition program?
Unifying Talent Management. Harnessing the Power of Workforce Intelligence in Talent Planning to Drive Business Performance.
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education Chapter 2 Job Attitudes 2-1 Essentials of Organizational Behavior, 11/e Global Edition Stephen P. Robbins & Timothy A.
Employee Engagement Sample Results
High Performance Work Systems (HPWS)
Presentation transcript:

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Kenexa EMPLOYEE SURVEYS: More than a temperature check? How can surveys affect the bottom line? 1

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Agenda About Kenexa EMPLOYEE SURVEYS Why? Methodology Outcome 2

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Kenexa Overview Founded: 1987 Employee Population: 1,600+ Revenue: € 145M-€148M (FY 2008) NASDAQ Symbol: KNXA Expertise: Hire the very best employees Maximize their experience with the organization

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Global Locations

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Select Survey Clients

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Kenexa HR-Solutions Hiring the very best people Maximizing their performance Surveys are part of Kenexa‘s HR-Portfolio Recruiting Applicant Tracking Assessment Tools Interviews

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 SURVEYS… More than a temperature check?

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Employee Engagement Communication Future/vision Growth & development Involvement & belonging Leadership/trust Meaningful/challenging work Recognition & rewards Variable dimensions TBD Retain key talent Revenue growth Market share Customer loyalty Innovation Advocacy Commitment Pride Loyalty Discretionary effort Commitment Engagement Outcomes Organizational Performance Drivers of Engagement

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 How we measure Engagement? When individual employees are truly engaged, they can tolerate limited periods of lower work satisfaction and stay highly committed. Engagement is a combination of attitudes and priorities that has a consistent and predictable impact on behavior. KENEXA-ENGAGEMENT-ITEMS:  Overall, I am satisfied with > as a place to work. (Satisfaction)  I would gladly refer a good friend or family member to > for employment. (Advocacy)  I rarely think about looking for a new job with another company. (Commitment)  I am proud to work for >. (Pride) Engagement Index = Satisfaction + Advocacy + Commitment + Pride

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Linkage Analysis: Research Overview satisfaction attitudes commitment pride loyalty advocacy responsibility opinions Engagement Company/ Function Employee Engagement Accounts for: F500 transportation company  39% on-time delivery variance Telecommunications company  30% more favorable customer service ratings  15% more likely to reach Net Income Plan Retailer (field sales)  17% sales increase variance  22% net profit increase variance International beverage company  8% increase productivity/hour  20% decrease in absenteeism  22% reduction in waste costs  Total savings of $11M/year Higher Engagement  Quantifiable Business Results 10

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Linkage Analysis: Total Shareholder Return (TSR) Engagement Index Group 1-Year TSR5-Year TSR Top 10%12.09%11.13% Bottom 10%-2.36%-22.17% The average high-performing organization on employee engagement shows a 6 times greater shareholder return than does an average bottom-performing organization on employee engagement over a 1-year period The average high-performing organization on employee engagement shows a 3 times greater shareholder return than the average bottom-performing organization on employee engagement over a 5-year period Total Shareholder Return by Top and Bottom 10 % on Engagement Index Scores 11

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Copyright Kenexa ®, Linkage Analysis: Customer Satisfaction Engagement and Customer Satisfaction is significantly correlated. Only Stores for which 2007 Engagement data was available are included in this analysis (n=653). Store Engagement Level (by quartile) LowestLowerHigherHighest Overall Customer Satisfaction 12

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 METHODOLOGY IN PRACTICE

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Design AdministrationReporting Behaviour Change Measure what matters – clear understanding of a company’s objectives driving the survey process Factors that drive high performance Engagement and your culture Alignment with strategy and processes Involve appropriate key stakeholders

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Administration Reporting Behaviour Change Design

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Survey Management System

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Reporting Administration Reporting Behaviour Change Design

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Response Scale - Reporting 18 SURVEY REPORT

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 ES: Employee Engagement Priorities Fictitious Sample Data Only Results for Engagement Main drivers to improve Engagement

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008  Engagement priorities tell us which areas we can act on that will have the most impact on improving engagement.  What themes are most influential across the company.  What items provide the most leverage.  Statistical analyses performed to identify priority items with the strongest influence on engagement.  The natural tendency is to focus energy on the lowest rated items. Resist. How we indentify Drivers? Priority Items for Engagement Associate Engagement Index

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Behaviour Change Administration Reporting Behavior Change Design

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 CHANGE… Something that happens as a matter of course?

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Getting the Best Out of the Survey? 70% of enterprise companies conduct employee surveys on a regular basis ~ 20 – 30 % of employees are satisfied with the way in which the results are used for improvements ~ 50 – 60 % of employees think they receive sufficient information on the results of the survey high expectations disappointment frustration How to use the results effectively to gain a lasting effect? 23

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Copyright Kenexa ®, Stores scoring low on the Enterprise-focused item saw Engagement decrease. Those scoring in the top half saw Engagement improve by over 12% in one year! Action Planning Effectiveness One Senior Leadership/Enterprise Focused item Low Action Planning Ratings High Action Planning Ratings 0% 2% 4% 6% 10% 12% 14% -2% -4% 8% 24

©Copyright Kenexa ® BASIC-Elements* Of Successful Follow-Up Processes Project Management Commitment of the Top Management Qualification of Line Managers Inclusion of the Employees HR Acting as Internal Advisor Controlling/ Monitoring of the Procedures Communication/ Marketing of the Follow-Up Processes Action Plan/ Realization of the Procedures EIGHT Basic success factors *based on an interview study with companies conducting regular employee surveys 25

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Contacts Kenexa Germany GmbH Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60 D Munich Astrid Wammers (Program Director) Tel: +49 (0)

©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 THANK YOU! 27