Understanding Students with Intellectual Disabilities ED222 Fall 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Students with Intellectual Disabilities ED222 Spring 2011.
Advertisements

Understanding Students with Intellectual Disabilities Chapter 9.
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Review of Criteria for the EAP Disability Category of Intellectual Impairment (II) 2009 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING.
Los Angeles Unified School District Division of Special Education Schools for All Children Developmental and Learning Characteristics of Students with.
Parents as Partners in Education
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports (11th Edition) Marc J. Tassé, PhD Director, Nisonger Center - UCEDD Professor,
COGNITIVE DISABILITIES Definition and Eligibility Criteria August 2010.
May 26, 2003 Athens, Greece Deree College The American College of Greece Technology as a Tool for Persons with Mental Retardation Christine A. Macfarlane,
Activity. Lunch Time Activity Discuss at your table: –How is information about your district Special Education Services provided to parents? –Does your.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Consistency of Assessment
Understanding Students with Autism
Chapter 4 Mental Retardation Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 4 Intellectual Disabilities
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Students with Severe Disabilities Chapter 12.
Chapter 9 Objectives Severe and Multiple Disabilities Chapter Objectives At the end of this presentation, you should be able to: Define severe and multiple.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools Chapter 9.
Principles of Assessment
Children with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD)
Understanding Students with Visual Impairments
Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities or Mental Retardation
Assessment of Mental Retardation & Giftedness: Two End of the Normal Curve Lecture 12/1/04.
Special Education 547 Unit Two Educational Considerations Kevin Anderson Minnesota State University Moorhead 2006.
Understanding Students with Learning Disabilities
The Transition Process Vickie Kummer UNF SOAR Program Fall 2004.
Understanding Students with Learning Disabilities ED222 Psychology of the Exceptional Individual Fall 2009.
At the end of this presentation you should be able to: Define the characteristics of mental retardation. Describe different supports that may collaborate.
ECSE 602 Instructional Programming for Infants and Young Children with Disabilities ECSE 602 Instructional Programming for Infants and Young Children with.
Understanding Students with AD/HD ED 222 Fall 2009.
COGNITIVE DISABILITIES Definition and Eligibility Criteria Disproportionality Institute August 2007.
Chapter 13 Understanding Students with Traumatic Brain Injury.
University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Families As Partners Training Steps in the Special Education Process.
Autism Marked by severe impairment of communication, social, and emotional functioning Characteristics Apparent sensory deficit Severe affect isolation.
© 2013, 2009, 2006, 2003, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. William L. Heward Exceptional Children An Introduction to Special Education.
Chapter 4 Mental Retardation
Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN:
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 9 Understanding.
Transition Assessment Sue Severson, Ed.D. Minnesota State University Moorhead Minneapolis Career Fair March 4, 2005.
Understanding Students with Learning Disabilities
Understanding Students with Traumatic Brain Injury.
Individuals with Severe Disabilities Jessie Richards University of South Carolina Special Education MAT candidate.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Understanding.
DeAnn Lechtenberger — Principle Investigator Nora Griffin-Shirley — Project Coordinator Doug Hamman — Project Evaluator Tonya Hettler—Business Assistant.
Learners with Mental Retardation ED226 Fall 2010.
Chapter 3. Assessment Highlights of the Law:IDEA 1997 Strengthens the role of parents Ensures access to the general education curriculum Increases attention.
CHAPTER 9 Understanding Students with Intellectual Disability October 17, 2012 Judy Maginnis By PresenterMedia.comPresenterMedia.com.
Understanding Students with Intellectual Disabilities
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
 Is unique to Nebraska with its self- assessment process.  Is intended to be a component of your district’s School Improvement Process.  Is an ongoing.
Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum ED 222 Spring 2010.
Chapter 15 Understanding Students with Visual Impairments.
Ready schools... Ready schools... Ready Children... Ready Families... Ready Schools... Ready Communities Ready Schools Virginia’s Definition of School.
Age Appropriate Assessments: A Necessary Component to Transition.
Sept. 16, Session #2 PED3106 : Agenda - Housekeeping: Hardcopy course outlines, Assignment 1 (8:30AM-8:45AM) - Complimen-tree, Inclusion in I/S Schools.
Understanding Students with Learning Disabilities.
Collaboration. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Collaboration refers to “ongoing participation of two or more individuals who are.
Francis X. Short Individualized Education Programs chapter 5.
Understanding Students with Learning Disabilities ED222 Psychology of the Exceptional Individual Fall 2010.
Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.
تطور مصطلح الاعاقة العقلية Individuals with Mental Retardation or Intellectual Disabilities.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
Chapter 4 Intellectual Disabilities
Intellectual Disabilities
Special Education: Contemporary Perspectives for School Professionals
CHAPTER 9: Understanding Students with Intellectual Disability
Chapter 4 Mental Retardation
Presentation transcript:

Understanding Students with Intellectual Disabilities ED222 Fall 2009

Essential Outcomes Gaining factual knowledge (terminology, classifications, methods, trends) Learning fundamental principles, generalizations, or theories Developing a clearer understanding of, and commitment to, personal values

Important Outcomes Learning to apply course material (to improve thinking, problem solving, and decisions) Developing specific kills, competencies, and points of view needed by professionals in the filed most closely related to this course Acquiring skills in working with others as a team

Defining Intellectual Disabilities (MR) AAIDD definition – Intellectual disabilities is a disability characterized by significant limitations in both intellectual functioning and in adaptive behavior as expressed in conceptual, social and practical adaptive skills – This disability originates before age 18

5 assumptions Limitations in present functioning must be considered within the context of community environments typical of the individual’s age, peers and culture Valid assessment considers cultural and linguistic diversity as well as differences in communication, sensory, motor and behavioral factors. Within an individual, limitations often coexist with strengths An important purpose of describing limitations is to develop a profile of needed supports With appropriate personalized support over a sustained period, the life functioning of the person with mental retardation generally will improve

Intensities of Support Intermittent: “As needed” Limited: Consistent, but time limited Extensive: Regular involvement (daily), but time limited Pervasive: Constant, high intensity, potential life sustaining nature

Prevalence of ID Inconsistent rates reported US Department of Education reported 0.08% in ,041 students with ID, ages 6 to 21, received special education services

Characteristics of ID Limitations in Intellectual Functioning – Measured through IQ tests Memory (short term) Generalization Motivation (outer-directedness) Limitations in Adaptive Behavior – Three domains: Conceptual Skills, Social Skills, Practical Skills – Self-determination

Determining the Causes Causes by Timing Prenatal Perinatal Postnatal Causes by Type Biomedical Social Behavioral Educational

Evaluating Students with Intellectual Disabilities Determining the Presence – Evaluate intellectual functioning and adaptive skills Intellectual functioning: an IQ test Adaptive Skills: measures such as AAIDD’s Diagnostic Adaptive Behavior Scale (DABS) – Determining the Nature and Extent of General and Special Education and Related Services For the older students, the Transition Planning Inventory is useful

Partnering for Sp.Ed., and related services Transition Services key goals – To improve collaboration and links between systems to support student achievement of meaningful school and post-school outcomes – To promote the student’s self-determination and self-advocacy – To increase parent participation and involvement

Partnering for Special Education and Related Services Four levels of transition teams – A statement transition team that includes secondary educators, adult service providers, adults with disabilities, and family members – A communitywide team representing all of the key agencies involved – A school wide team consisting of key professionals and family members – An IEP team for each student

Determining Supplementary Aides and Services Paraprofessionals – Paraprofessionals can be important – More than 280,000 in the U.S. – Paraprofessionals add appropriate levels of support, they may isolate students, velcroed effect – Roles and Responsibilities

Planning Other Educational Needs Functional Skills may include: – Applied money concepts – Applied time concepts – Community mobility and access – Grooming and self-care – Leisure activities – Health and safety – Career Education Instruction in Inclusive Classrooms Instruction in Community Settings

Early Childhood Services Prelinguistic milieu teaching First, follow the child’s lead – Then, set the stage for communication – Finally, be strategic when using games like Pat-a- Cake and Peak-a-Boo

Early Childhood Students Steps in prelinguistic milieu teaching – Prompt the child to communicate – Prompt the child to initiate – Vocally imitate the child’s resultant vocalizations – Comply with the child’s requests – Recode the child’s communication act – Acknowledge the child’s communication act – Talk to the child

Elementary and Middle School Students Self-determined learning models of instruction – 12 student questions – Teacher objectives – Educational support – Three phases: 1.What is my goal? 2.What is my plan? 3.What have I learned?

Secondary and Transition Students Community Based Instruction – Teaching in the natural environment – Community-based instructional approaches Learn it where you’ll need to do it Teacher it where you want your students to practice it – Project TASSEL

Measure Students’ Progress Progress in the general curriculum – Date based monitoring: Requires teachers regularly to collect different types of data such as: Response by response data Instructional and test data Error data Anecdotal data

Measure students’ progress Progress in addressing other educational needs – Ecological inventory process Life Space Analysis – Gather information about the student’s daily environment – Conduct ecological inventories – Conduct a discrepancy analysis – Perform an Activity Task Analysis

Making Accommodations for Assessment Accommodations may include: – Dictating responses to someone – Having extended time – Having test items orally read – Clarifying test times