Kinetic properties of magnetic reconnection induced by the MHD-scale Kelvin-Helmholtz vortex: particle simulations 中村 琢磨 (T.K.M. Nakamura) Collaboraters:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Generation of the transpolar potential Ramon E. Lopez Dept. of Physics UT Arlington.
Advertisements

Anti-Parallel Merging and Component Reconnection: Role in Magnetospheric Dynamics M.M Kuznetsova, M. Hesse, L. Rastaetter NASA/GSFC T. I. Gombosi University.
Principles of Global Modeling Paul Song Department of Physics, and Center for Atmospheric Research, University of Massachusetts Lowell Introduction Principles.
Cluster, THEMIS, & Geotail Conjunction Event on 11 July 2008 Hiroshi Hasegawa ISAS/JAXA.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Near-Earth Magnetotail Reconnection and Plasmoid Formation in Connection With a Substorm Onset on 27 August 2001 S. Eriksson 1, M. Oieroset 2, D. N. Baker.
Magnetopause flow vortices revealed during high speed solar wind streams Mona Kessel (NASA GSFC), Yaireska Collado-Vega (University of Puerto Rico), Xi.
Anti-parallel versus Component Reconnection at the Magnetopause K.J. Trattner Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center Palo Alto, CA, USA and the Polar/TIMAS,
William Daughton Plasma Physics Group, X-1 Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented at: Second Workshop on Thin Current Sheets University of Maryland April.
SuperDARN Workshop May 30 – June Magnetopause reconnection rate and cold plasma density: a study using SuperDARN Mark Lester 1, Adrian Grocott 1,2,
Comparing the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction at Mercury and Saturn A. Masters Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration.
Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland Magnetic Reconnection Theory 2004 Newton Institute.
Plasma Transport and Entropy Considerations at the Magnetospheric Flanks Antonius Otto Outline: Basic Issues Basic processes Properties of the cold dense.
Alfvén-cyclotron wave mode structure: linear and nonlinear behavior J. A. Araneda 1, H. Astudillo 1, and E. Marsch 2 1 Departamento de Física, Universidad.
Plasma entry in the Mercury’s magnetosphere S. Massetti S. Massetti INAF-IFSI Interplanetary Space Physics Institute, Roma - Italy.
The Structure of the Parallel Electric Field and Particle Acceleration During Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake M.Swisdak M. Shay M. Hesse C. Cattell University.
Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling Magnetic reconnection In most solar system environments magnetic fields are “frozen” to the plasma - different plasmas.
Cutting-Edge Results from Formation Flying Observations Cutting-Edge Results from Formation Flying Observations near Earth’s magnetopause Hiroshi Hasegawa.
Phase Coherence on Open Field Lines Associated with FLRs Abiyu Nedie, Frances Fenrich & Robert Rankin University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 2011.
OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event Wenhui Li and Joachim Raeder University of New Hampshire Marit Øieroset University of California,
ASYMMETRIC THIN CURRENT SHEETS: A 1-D TEST PARTICLE MODEL AND COMPARISON WITH SW DATA J. Chen 1 and R. A. Santoro 2 1 Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research.
O. M. Shalabiea Department of Physics, Northern Borders University, KSA.
Lecture 3 Introduction to Magnetic Storms. An isolated substorm is caused by a brief (30-60 min) pulse of southward IMF. Magnetospheric storms are large,
Multifluid Simulations of the Magnetosphere. Final Equations Equations are not conservative except for the sum over all species Momentum is transferred.
In-situ Observations of Collisionless Reconnection in the Magnetosphere Tai Phan (UC Berkeley) 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive)
Hybrid simulations of parallel and oblique electromagnetic alpha/proton instabilities in the solar wind Q. M. Lu School of Earth and Space Science, Univ.
A Fermi Model for the Production of Energetic Electrons during Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake H. Che M. Swisdak M. A. Shay University of Maryland NRL.
Magnetic Reconnection in Multi-Fluid Plasmas Michael Shay – Univ. of Maryland.
Hamrin, M., Norqvist, P., Marghitu, O., et al. Department of Physics, Umeå University, Sweden Nordic Cluster.
Kinetic Modeling of Magnetic Reconnection in Space and Astrophysical Systems J. F. Drake University of Maryland Large Scale Computation in Astrophysics.
Tuija I. Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki, Finland
Benoit Lavraud CESR/CNRS, Toulouse, France Uppsala, May 2008 The altered solar wind – magnetosphere interaction at low Mach numbers: Magnetosheath and.
Structure and Detection of Rolled-up Kelvin-Helmholtz Vortices in the Tail Flank of the Magnetosphere H. Hasegawa, M. Fujimoto, T. K. M. Nakamura, K. Takagi.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under grants , , , the Specialized.
1 Cambridge 2004 Wolfgang Baumjohann IWF/ÖAW Graz, Austria With help from: R. Nakamura, A. Runov, Y. Asano & V.A. Sergeev Magnetotail Transport and Substorms.
Large-Amplitude Electric Fields Associated with Bursty Bulk Flow Braking in the Earth’s Plasma Sheet R. E. Ergun et al., JGR (2014) Speaker: Zhao Duo.
Reconnection rates in Hall MHD and Collisionless plasmas
PIC simulations of magnetic reconnection. Cerutti et al D PIC simulations of relativistic pair plasma reconnection (Zeltron code) Includes – Radiation.
Response of the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Pulse KYUNG SUN PARK 1, TATSUKI OGINO 2, and DAE-YOUNG LEE 3 1 School of Space.
Reconstruction of Reconnection Configurations From Spacecraft Data Bengt Sonnerup and Wai-Leong Teh Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA Hiroshi Hasegawa.
Conjugate response of the dayside magnetopause and dawn/dusk flanks using Cluster-THEMIS conjunctions and Ground based observations M W Dunlop, Q-H. Zhang.
PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING PHYSICS The Disruption Zone Model of Magnetospheric Substorms George Sofko, Kathryn McWilliams, Chad Bryant I SuperDARN 2011 Workshop,
Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland presented in honor of Professor Eric Priest September 8, 2003.
E.E. Antonova1,2, I.P. Kirpichev2,1, Yu.I. Yermolaev2
Simultaneous in-situ observations of the feature of a typical FTE by Cluster and TC1 Zhang Qinghe Liu Ruiyuan Polar Research Institute of China
Mass Transport: To the Plasma Sheet – and Beyond!
Particle Acceleration by Relativistic Collisionless Shocks in Electron-Positron Plasmas Graduate school of science, Osaka University Kentaro Nagata.
Global MHD Simulation with BATSRUS from CCMC ESS 265 UCLA1 (Yasong Ge, Megan Cartwright, Jared Leisner, and Xianzhe Jia)
H. Hasegawa(1), A. Retinò(2), A. Vaivads(3), Y. Khotyaintsev(3), M
A shock is a discontinuity separating two different regimes in a continuous media. –Shocks form when velocities exceed the signal speed in the medium.
Magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail: Geotail observations T. Nagai Tokyo Institute of Technology World Space Environment Forum 2005 May 4, 2005 Wednesday.
May 23, 2006SINS meeting Structure Formation and Particle Mixing in a Shear Flow Boundary Layer Matthew Palotti University of Wisconsin.
SEPT/STEREO Observations of Upstream Particle Events: Almost Monoenergetic Ion Beams A. Klassen, R. Gomez-Herrero, R. Mueller-Mellin and SEPT Team, G.
Analysis Methods for Magnetopause & Boundary Layer Studies Hiroshi Hasegawa ISAS/JAXA In collaboration with B. U. Ö. Sonnerup & W.-L. Teh.
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
Chapman Conference “Fundamental Properties and Processes of Magnetotails” 12 March 2013, Tuesday, p.m. Structure of Magnetic Reconnection in the.
Dynamics of the auroral bifurcations at Saturn and their role in magnetopause reconnection LPAP - Université de Liège A. Radioti, J.-C. Gérard, D. Grodent,
Plasma Wave Excitation Regions in the Earth’s Global Magnetosphere
Paul Song Center for Atmospheric Research
What influence the low-latitude boundary layer formation?
Global MHD Simulations of Dayside Magnetopause Dynamics.
Chapter 3 Plasma as fluids
THEMIS multi-spacecraft observations of a 3D magnetic
ESS 154/200C Lecture 19 Waves in Plasmas 2
Principles of Global Modeling
The Physics of the Collisionless Diffusion Region
Intense Coherent Emission in Relativistic Shocks
MHD Simulation of Plasmoid-Induced-Reconnection in Solar Flares
THEMIS Dayside Lessons learned from the coast phase and the 1st dayside season Current plans for the 2nd dayside season and the extended phases.
Presentation transcript:

Kinetic properties of magnetic reconnection induced by the MHD-scale Kelvin-Helmholtz vortex: particle simulations 中村 琢磨 (T.K.M. Nakamura) Collaboraters: H. Hasegawa, I. Shinohara, and M. Fujimoto STP seminar, 14,July, 2010

Plasma mixing of collisionless plasmas  In the MHD approximation, the frozen-in condition does not allow for plasmas to mix across magnetic field lines.  Solving the plasma mixing mechanism in the Earth’s magnetosphere leads to universal understanding of the plasma mixing in space.  BUT, for example, the Earth’s magentosphere contains plasmas of solar wind origin. ⇒ It means plasma mixing in fact occurs through the Earth’s magnetopause.

Dayside magnetic reconnection  Especially when IMF is southward, the solar wind plasmas can enter the magnetosphere relatively easily via dayside magnetic reconnection. [Dungey, 1961]  The plasma mixing through the Earth’s magnetopause occurs in any IMF (magnetic field of solar wind) conditions.

Earth’s Low-Latitude-Boundary-layer (LLBL)  Even when IMF is northward, the plasma mixing occurs in the low-latitude boundary layer (LLBL). [e.g., Mitchell et al., 1987; Hasegawa et al., 2003].

Kinetic properties of the LLBL  In the LLBL, mixed ions (and electrons) are observed accompanied with bi-directionally accerelated electrons.  Particle velocity distribution functions shows the existence of bi- directional electrons in the mixing region of the LLBL. [e.g., Hasegawa et al., 2003; Fujimoto et al., 1998] Hot magnetospheric ions Cold magnetosheath ions Bi Bi-directional electrons GEOTAIL

How to form the LLBL? [Song & Russell, 1992] [Hasegawa et al., 2004]  To explain how to form the LLBL under northward IMF, two major candidates have been given, 1. double lobe reconnection at the high-latitude ⇒ dayside LLBL? 2. Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices at the low-latitude. ⇒ tail-flank LLBL?  BUT, the exact mixing mechanism by KH vortices has not yet been solved.

The KH vortex 1: magnetosphere 2: magnetosheath  Generally, a velocity boundary like the magnetopause is also a magnetic boundary. ⇒ Past Linear analyses have shown that the Kelvin-Helmholtz vortex grows at the magnetopause almost always accompanied with magnetic reconnection (that is, the vortex-induced reconnection). [T.K.M. Nakamura et al., 2008]  The vortex-induced reconnection can lead to the plasma mixing along reconnected field lines. ⇒ The vortex-induced reconnection may form the LLBL. The vortex-induced-reconnection by two-fluid simulation [Nakamura et al., 2008] To understand the exact mixing mechanism by the KH vortex, we first performed kinetic simulations of the vortex-induced reconnection.

Initial conditions -Initial parameters- ・ N 0 =Ni 0 =const ・ Bz 0 =4*B 0 =const ・ Bx 0 =B 0* tanh(Y/D 0 ) ( current sheet ) ・ Vx 0 =V 0* tanh(Y/D 0 ) ( velocity shear layer ) ・ D 0 =4.0, 2.0,1.0 [λi] (MHD-scale boundary layer) ・ MA=V 0 /V A0 =2.5(weak KHI)~5.0(strong KHI) ( KHI can grow when MA>2 [Miura & Pritchett, 1982] ) ・ Lx=λ KH =20D 0 ( =fastest growing KH mode [Miura & Pritchett, 1982] ) ・ Ti/Te=1/8 ・ Mi/Me=25,100 ・ ω pe /Ω e =2.0 ・ 100 particles/cell method : 2.5-dimensional full electromagnetic particle ( EM-PIC ) simulation [Nakamura et al., 2010]

0 40 i -20 i 20 i 0 Y X 0 40 i X In-plane magnetic field linesIon flow vectors Results D 0 =2.0 (MHD-scale case),MA=4.375 (strong KHI case)  (T<50)The KHI grows and locally compresses the current sheet.  (T~50)Multiple reconnection occurs at the compressed thin current sheet.  (T~80)Finally, the KH vortex is highly rolled-up as a large magnetic island.

0 40 i -20 i 20 i 0 Y X In-plane magnetic field lines Multiple magnetic islands (T=60-80)  Multiple magnetic islands are formed and move toward the main body of the vortex. (T~80)  Multiple magnetic islands are incorporated in turn into the vortex body via the re-reconnection process. (T=30-50)  The strong vortex flow produces a thin and long current.

Generality of the multiple islands formation  When L cs >L island, more than one magnetic island can appear.  Since L cs ~5D 0, and L island ~12d min, the formation condition of magnetic islands is d min /D 0 <0.4.  As D 0, or M A decreases, d min /D 0 increases.  BUT, even in the smallest set of (D 0,M A ), d min /D 0 <<0.4. ⇒ The multiple islands formation can generally occur.

 Actually, in all cases, more than two magnetic islands appear. The generation of multiple magnetic islands is a general feature of the vortex-induced-reconnection. (weak KHI) (strong KHI) Generality of the multiple islands formation

Roles of RX in the vortex Generally, reconnection can cause 1.the plasma mixing 2.the particle acceleration. We investigated how the vortex-induced reconnection causes the plasma mixing and particle acceleration processes.

Roles of RX in the vortex ~plasma mixing~ (T~60-)  Both ions and electrons across the velocity shear layer begin to mix from multiple X-lines. (T~60-90)  The mixing area broadens along reconnected field lines by the thermal speed.  (T=120) Finally, inside of the vortex (island) becomes filled with the well-mixed ions and electrons.  The broadening for electrons is somewhat faster than that for ions, since the thermal speed for electrons is faster than that for ions. Plasma mixing rate of particles initially existing at Y>0 and Y<0 ions ele.

Roles of RX in the vortex ~plasma mixing~  The mixing area broadens efficiently inside the multiple magnetic islands.  Since the islands with well-mixed plasmas are incorporated into the vortex body via re-RX, the plasma mixing rapidly progresses while the islands incorporation process continues. (a)Total number of the mixed cells. (b)Sketch of the plasma mixing process in single X-line and multiple X-lines cases. 0 1 Mixing rate ions electrons

Roles of RX in the vortex ~electron acceleration~  Around the RX-points, the negative reconnection electric field appears.  Around the re-RX points, the positive reconnection electric field appears.  Each reconnection electric field intensity is almost consistent with the reconnection rate at each reconnection point (not shown).

Roles of RX in the vortex ~electron acceleration~  At RX-points, electrons are accelerated in the +Z-direction (almost same as the parallel direction) by the negative reconnection electric field.  At re-RX points, electrons are accelerated in the -Z-direction (almost same as the anti-parallel direction) by the positive reconnection electric field. X y z

Roles of RX in the vortex ~electron acceleration~  Since the re-RX process mixes electrons accelerated in the +Z and –Z directions, inside of the vortex body is filled with the bi-directionally accelerated electrons. ⇒ Mixed plasmas and bi-directional electrons inevitably coexist inside the rolled-up vortex via a series of multiple islands formation and incorporation processes. Grid number normalized by the total grid number of (red) the ion mixing area,(blue) electron mixing area, (green) both ion and electron mixing area, and (purple ) the area where plasma mixing and bi-directional electrons coexist.

Summary  The plasma mixing caused by the vortex-induced-reconnection is enhanced by a series of multiple islands formation and incorporation processes.  Bi-directional accelerated electrons are produced inside the vortex by a series of multiple islands formation and incorporation processes.  Thus, mixed plasma and bi-directional electrons (which are the same features as the LLBL plasmas) inevitably coexist inside the rolled-up vortex. Kinetic roles of the vortex-induced-reconnection  Multiple magnetic islands are generally formed at the compressed thin current sheet by the vortex flow.  These islands are incorporated into the vortex body via the re-reconnection process. Basic properties of the vortex-induced-reconnection

Observations of the vortex-induced-reconnection  Rolled-up vortices have successfully observed by Cluster [Hasegawa et al., 2004].

Observations of the vortex-induced-reconnection  C1-C4 crossed a same current sheet between KH vortices around 20:35:00UT.  C3 observed the evidence of reconnection.  C4 observed a bipolar B N fluctuation just after the CS crossing!! ⇒ This B N fluctuation could be the direct evidence of the multiple islands formation process of the vortex- induced reconnection. Electron acceleration obsercved aroud the vortex-induced RX region [Hasegawa et al., 2009]

Observations of the island formation [Eriksson et al., 2009]  Moving magnetic islands (FTEs) were commonly observed at the hyperbolic point of the vortex flow. Map of stream lines map from TH-A observations. Map of stream lines and field lines map from TH-A observations. THEMIS crossed the post-noon magnetopause.

Roles of RX in the KH vortex ~mixing with bidirectional ele.~

What controls the thickness of the current sheet?  In ideal-MHD simulations, the current sheet can become thinner at the thickness of dx.  In particle simulations, before the current sheet thickness reaches dx, magnetic reconnection occurs. ⇒ The lower limit of the current sheet thickness is controlled by the vortex- induced-reconnection process.

What controls the thickness of the current sheet?  As the KHI grows, the current sheet becomes thinner and thus the RX (tearing instability) growth rate increases. ←The RX growth rate depends on the current sheet thickness.  When the RX growth rate exceeds the KHI growth rate (T~48), the linear growth of the KHI finish and at the same time the current sheet thinning begins to stop. ⇒ The KHI growth rate controls the minimum thickness of the current sheet.

Roles of RX in the KH vortex ~electron acceleration~ Accelerated time period Accelerated speed

Kinetic properties of the LLBL  In the LLBL, mixed ions are observed with bi-directional electrons.  Particle velocity distribution functions shows the existence of bi- directional electrons in the mixing region of the LLBL. [e.g., Fujimoto et al., 1998] ion Hot cold parallelanti-parallel electrons

Dawn-dusk asymmetry of the LLBL  The ion mixing regions are composed of one-component ions. (hot magnetospheric and cold magnetosheath components not distinguished)  Particle velocity distribution functions shows a clear dawn-dusk asymmetry in the mixing region of the LLBL.  The ion mixing regions tend to be composed of two-component ions. ⇒ There is the large energy gap. dawnsideduskside Hot cold

PIC simulations We have performed 2.5D relativistic electromagnetic particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations [Hoshino, 1987]. The basic equations we use are Using initial density N 0 and in-plane magnetic field B 0, normalizations are made as follows: the velocity, time, and length are normalized by the ion Alfven velocity inverse of the ion gyrofrequency, and the ion inertial length, respectively. where  is the Lorentz factor, c is the speed of light and the suffix j is the particle number. The charge density  and the current density J is calculated by the PIC method. ・・・ Equation of motion for an ion and electron ・・・ Maxwell’s equations

Earth’s Low-Latitude-Boundary-layer (LLBL)  The spacecraft ISEE-1 first detected the LLBL [Sckopke et al, 1981].  The plasma mixing occurs inside the LLBL. density temp.

Dawn-dusk asymmetry of the LLBL  The ion mixing regions are formed from one-component ions. [Hasegawa et al., 2003]  Under prolonged northward IMF, the ion mixing regions tend to be formed from two-component ions. dawnsideduskside