Face and Face Management Psychology of Language John R. Baldwin School of Communication--ISU.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Social classification, face and politeness
Advertisements

Positive and negative politeness
Politeness Theory and Discourse Lecture 7. Objectives After this lecture, students should be able to: 1.Explain the notions of politeness and face 2.Explain.
Research Methods for T&I Studies I Politeness Phenomena.
POLITENESS AND INTERACTION
Recovering the Lost Customer. Why try to recover a potentially lost customer? Studies show that recovered customers will give a company more business.
Effective Supervision Practices MMS Safe & Civil Schools Team February, 2008.
Discourse and Pragmatics Politeness and Face. Popular Meanings Face: mian zi, min ji, mentsu, chae myon Concept of honour Politeness: Being ‘nice’, following.
Conversations  Conversation are cooperative events:  Without cooperation, interaction would be chaotic. Would be no reason to communicate  Grice's.
1 MODULE 2 Meaning and discourse in English COOPERATION, POLITENESS AND FACE Lecture 14.
POLITENESS Linguistic action which makes communication possible between competitive parties because it neutralize the potencial for aggression in social.
AS English Language Unit 3 Spoken Interaction Conversation Analysis Conversation Theory.
+. + Assumptions of PT Negative Face needs Free, act without constraints, autonomous Face-Threatening acts (FTA’s) Apologies, compliments, requests, threats,
CT 410: Advanced Interpersonal Communication Sustaining Relationships.
Yule, Principles of Politeness Pertemuan 10 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.
Spoken Discourse. Speech Acts Locutionary vs. Illocutionary Acts Locutionary vs. Illocutionary Acts Direct vs. Indirect Speech Acts Direct vs. Indirect.
Unit 9 The use of English (II). Review What are the three aspects of a speech act, according to John Searle? Use an example to illustrate. What are the.
Online collaboration skills in business education: a politeness theory perspective Terry O’Sullivan 5 th June 2013.
POLITENESS SITI AGRI RIYANTI ARIEN HUSNA IRRA WAHIDIYATI TUTI HASTUTI.
Interpersonal Communication Politeness Theory Chris Lewis.
Politeness in language
Consolidating Grice, Brown & Levinson, and Goffman
Politeness Theory Brown & Levinson (1987) Cheryl Holden.
Politeness Starter – How might Politeness be connected to English Language and Literature? Learning Objective – to explore Brown and Levinson’s politeness.
Brown and Livenson’s Politeness Theory.
The Concept of ‘Face’ – Brown and Levinson
____________________________________________________________________ Linguistic Politeness: Editor as diplomat TECM 5195 Dr. Chris Lam.
Putting your Best Face Forward: Politeness Theory at Work Yvonne Anderson Spring PD April 30 th, 2009.
S OLIDARITY AND P OLITENESS Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd.
Politness and Face theory
Notes on Face & Politeness. Face and Facework Goffman Face: The positive social image we seek to maintain during interaction. Why is Goffman’s perspective.
PRAGMATICS AND SOCIOCUTURAL NORMS. Sociocultural norms, such as how to express politeness in a given context, guide pragmatic expression. For example,
Introduction to linguistics II
Semantics 3rd class Chapter 5.
Characteristics of Blue comm. Friendly Helpful Expresses emotions Optimistic Foster harmony Takes time to relate Empathetic Creative Indirect Reads between.
Communication and Transitioning: From Our Eyes By Jennifer Lindner And BJ Gallagher PhD, CCC-SLP By Jennifer Lindner And BJ Gallagher PhD, CCC-SLP.
PRAGMATICS HOW TO DO THINGS WITH WORDS. What is Pragmatics? Pragmatics is the study of invisible meaning. Identifying what is meant but not said. J. L.
Communicating Identity The Social Self. Overview of Chapter Chapter covers two very broad areas of research 1.Personal identity (who and what we think.
Politeness & Speaking Style Discourse & Dialogue CS 359 November 15, 2001.
Politeness & Speaking Style Discourse & Dialogue CMSC November 22, 2006.
Interpersonal Conversations.
Copyright © 2002 Thomson Learning, Inc. Chapter 9: Improving Communication Climates Presentation prepared by Dr. Michael Pearson, Gretchen Gill, and Tim.
ADRESS FORMS AND POLITENESS Second person- used when the subject of the verb in a sentence is the same as the individual to.
George Herbert Mead wrote that the self consists of The “I” and the “Me.
Self and Identity January 11, Definitions Self – the process of reflexivity that emanates from the interplay between the “I” and the “me” Self-concept.
FACE. Goffman’s Face Erving Goffman was intrigued by what lay behind everyday expressions such as ‘losing face’, ‘saving face’ and ‘being shamefaced’.
PRAGMATICS 3. CH 7: POLITENESS AND INTERACTION Arrange these in order of politeness: (least polite first) Set the table! Could you please set the table?
Principles of conversation
What we have covered so far.... Do you have the power?????  Jot down 5 things that you have learnt so far about Language and power
Politeness.
1 Improving Communication Climates Looking Out, Looking In 12 th Edition  Chapter Summary Communication Climate: The Key to Positive Relationships Defensiveness:
1 Using Subtitles from Movie DVDs for in English Language Teaching Kenji Kitao Doshisha University Kyoto, Japan S. Kathleen Kitao Doshisha Women ’ s College.
Chapter 8 Spoken Discourse. Linguistic Competence communicative competence: the knowledge we bring to using language as a communicative tool in conversation.
FACE & FACE WORK Social & Cognitive Approaches to
Principle of coversation
POLITENESS STRATEGIES: Taken from: BROWN AND LEVINSON (1987: ) POLITENESS: Some Universals in Language Usage.
MODULE 2 Meaning and discourse in English
Positive and negative politeness
Politeness Negative and Positive Face
PRAGMATICS 3.
Figurative Language Understanding: A Special Process?
POLITENESS AND INTERACTION
Politeness In Language
UNIT 3 - POLITENESS.
Sociological analysis of CC misunderstanding
Messages & Conversation
And Building Self-Esteem
And Building Self-Esteem
Principle of coversation
a.a Traduzione Lingua inglese 1 Olga Denti
Presentation transcript:

Face and Face Management Psychology of Language John R. Baldwin School of Communication--ISU

The Basic Concepts Face: Interaction =Performance –Lines –Props –Audience Shameless or heartless? Out of face, wrong face

The Basic Concepts Facework: –Preventative –Restorative Dimensions of Face (Brown & Levinson) –Positive –Negative

Face-Threatening Acts Embarrassment happens when an “actor” loses face (or poise) Some acts can threaten both types of face Sometimes we save one type while losing another Any party can seek to redress face loss or prevent face loss Sometimes, the best response is no response

Remedial Facework 1.Untoward Act or Predicament 2.Challenge or Reproach (Need not be spoken) 3.Offering Humor Apology Account (excuse or justification) Remediation Aggression (Aggressive facework—save own face at expense of other’s face) 4.Acceptance 5.Appreciation

Preventative strategies for doing FTAs 1. Without redressive action (bald on record) 2. Positive Politeness (redressive action) 3. Negative Politeness (redressive action) 4. Off record (hinting) 5. Don't do the FTA Very Efficient Very Polite

Weightiness of an FTA SEVERITY OF FTA = –Distance (Speaker/Hearer) + –Power (Speaker/Hearer) + –Ranking X (Imposition)

Preventative Facework: Disclaimers Hedging: I may be wrong, but.. Credentialing: I’m your husband. I have every right to read your mail. Sin license: This is a special occasion! Cognitive disclaimer: I know this sounds crazy, but… Appeal for suspended judgment: Hear me out before you get upset

Positive Politeness Strategies CLAIM COMMON GROUND Convey X is admirable/interesting –Notice, attend to X’s interests, needs, etc. –Exaggerate interest, approval, etc. Claim in-group membership with X –Use in-group markers (we, us) Claim common point of view, attitude, opinions, knowledge, empathy –Give agreement and avoid disagreement –Presuppose (enthymeme); raise, assert common ground –Joke

Positive Politeness Strategies CONVEY THAT SPEAKER & HEARER ARE COOPERATORS Indicate you are taking X’s interests or needs into account Claim Reflexivity –Offer, promise –Be optimistic –Include both S & H in activity –Give (or ask for) reasons Claim reciprocity FULFILL H’s WANT (for some X) Give gifts to X

Negative Politeness Strategies DON’T ASSUME X IS WILLING OR ABLE TO PERFORM THE ACTION – Question, hedge DON’T TRY TO COERCE X Give X option not to act –Be indirect –Don’t assume H is able/willing to do the action –Assume X is not likely to do the Action (Be pessimistic) Minimize threat –Minimize imposition –Give deference

Negative Politeness Strategies COMMUNICATE s’S WANT NOT TO IMPINGE ON H –Apologize –Dissociate S, H from particular infringement Impersonalize S&H: Avoid “I” and “you” State FTA as a general rule REDRESS H’S OTHER WANTS RELATED TO NEG FACE –Give deference –Go on record as incurring a debt, or as not indebting

Off-Record Strategies INVITE CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURES Violate Relevance Maxim –Hints –Association clues –Presuppose Violate Quantity Maxim –Understate –Overstate Violate Quality Maxim –Use contradiction –Be ironic –Use metaphors and rhetorical questions

Off-Record Strategies BE VAGUE OR AMBIGUOUS Violate Manner Maxim –Be ambiguous –Be vague –Be incomplete, use ellipsis