1 Secondary Markets in Radio Spectrum FCC Forum May 31, 2000 Washington, D.C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supply and Demand in Search of a Market: The Case of Secondary Spectrum Markets Scott Wallsten June 2, 2011 Spectrum Markets: Challenges.
Advertisements

Competitive v. Top-Down: The TV Band White Space Issue Thomas W. Hazlett Professor of Law & Economics George Mason University INNOVATION,
The Consumer Welfare Gains of Guatemala’s Liberal Reforms Thomas W. Hazlett, Giancarlo Ibarguen S. and Wayne A. Leighton Presentation to “Convergence or.
3/4/2003ISART1 Spectrum Buyouts A Proposal for the Transition to Open Spectrum IKEDA Nobuo Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry.
Transitioning to a Market Allocation of Spectrum Evan Kwerel Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis Federal Communications Commission Spectrum.
Market Mechanisms for Redeveloping Spectrum Evan Kwerel Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis Federal Communications Commission DIMACS Workshop.
Wireless Utilities 2003 Chicago Special Regulatory Perspective Presented by: Christine M. Gill Telecommunications Practice Group McDermott, Will & Emery.
Spectrum Markets are Robust, When You Remember to Feed Them Thomas W. Hazlett Professor of Law & Economics George Mason University Spectrum.
Broadcasting: outline Radio and Television history Broadcasting policy: 1) Spectrum –Roots of goverment intervention –Alternatives and trade-offs 2) Ownership.
Upcoming FCC Spectrum Auctions Bryan N. Tramont Wilkinson Barker Knauer, LLP
Basics of Spectrum Workshop on Spectrum Management India International Centre, New Delhi
UK Spectrum Management Strategy: tomorrow’s challenges today Chris Woolford Director, International Spectrum Policy Radcomms 2014.
RadComms 2014: Innovations in Spectrum Management Lynne Fancy Senior Director Spectrum Development and Operations Industry Canada September 2014.
The Bright Future of Wireless Communications
Doc.: IEEE /0537r0 Agenda April 2015 Rich Kennedy, MediaTek IEEE /15 Regulatory SC DRAFT Teleconference Plan and Agenda Date:
What Really Matters in Spectrum Allocation Design Thomas W. Hazlett International Telecommunications Society Berlin, Germany Section.
SECONDARY SPECTRUM TRADING. OPPORTUNITIES AND DIFFICULTIES IN EU Ana Gónzalez David Rojo Claudio Feijóo Sergio Ramos Grupo de Tecnologías de la Información.
New Federal Spectrum Access System - US 3.5GHz bands -
Spectrum Sharing and Trading Africa Asia Regulatory Conference 2012 Helasiri Ranatunga Telecommunications Regulatory Commission of Sri Lanka 1.
Policies for the Broadband Digital Migration Barbara A. Cherry Senior Counsel Office of Strategic Planning & Policy Analysis Federal Communications Commission.
National Science Foundation Symposium Ed Thomas Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission.
Slide 13/4/02 SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT: PROPERTY RIGHTS, MARKETS, AND THE COMMONS Gerald R. Faulhaber & David J. Farber Wharton School & School of Engineering.
© M2Z Networks Inc. All rights reserved. Advances in Wireless Technology and Impacts on Broadband Deployment National Broadband Policy Workshop August.
International Perspectives New Zealand’s Radiocommunications Act Review.
Current Issues Affecting Fixed Wireless: An Update on FWCC Activities National Spectrum Management Association Cheng-yi Liu |
What Really Matters in Spectrum Allocation Design Thomas W. Hazlett Liberal Institute Prague, Czech Republic September 8, 2004.
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt 700 MHz: Spectrum Issues Wg Cdr Arif Khan (Retd) Director – Regulatory Affairs, Ericsson India Ltd.
2 August 2001www.spectrumreview.radio.gov.uk1 Independent review of radio spectrum management: presentation to the Fixed Links Consultative Committee (Radio.
Radio Frequency Spectrum Management in Indonesia - 3G/IMT 2000, TV Digital and other Wireless Activities And Issues - 3G/IMT 2000, TV Digital and other.
Wireless Broadband Service in Rural America Rural TeleCon ‘06 October 24, 2006 Paul D’Ari Spectrum Competition and Policy Division Federal Communications.
1 The Information Commons and the Future of Innovation, Scholarship & Creativity Gigi B. Sohn President Public Knowledge
Draft of 6/27/03 Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Federal Communications Commission John Muleta.
A;sldkfj1 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Agenda Meeting January 13, 2005.
Doc.: IEEE /0981r0 Agenda August 2015 Rich Kennedy, MediaTek IEEE /15 Regulatory SC DRAFT Teleconference Plan and Agenda Date:
The Economic Costs of Spectrum Misallocation: Evidence from the United States Jerry Ellig Senior Research Fellow.
Promoting Competition, Innovation, and Public Safety with Wireless Broadband May 2007.
Wireless Technology - Rural Networks FCC Broadband Plan Workshop Washington, DC August 13, 2009 Brett Glass LARIAT.NET P.O. Box 1693 Laramie, WY
Changes in State and Federal Telecommunications Policies: How Do They Affect US All? SCAN NATOA 16 th Annual Spring Conference and Star Awards Long Beach,
Overview of Service Rules and Due Diligence Dwain Livingston Senior Engineer Mobility Division, WTB November 1, – 1990 MHz BROADBAND PCS Auction.
1 2 nd INDUSTRY CONSULATION ON PROPOSED UNIFIED LICENSING FRAMEWORK IN KENYA: KCCT 19 th March 2008 Frequency Issues Communications Commission of Kenya.
1 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Agenda Meeting January 20, 2006.
SPECTRUM ALLOCATION: 3G MOBILE, DIGITAL TV & WIRELESS 19 March 2001 Tony Shaw Chairman Australian Communications Authority.
1 Satisfying Spectrum Demand Through Secondary Markets Peter Cramton Chairman, Spectrum Exchange Professor of Economics, University of Maryland May 31,
A Proposal for an FCC Spectrum Exchange Evan Kwerel Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis Federal Communications Commission John Williams Spectrum.
Wireless Services TC 310 June 2,2007. Why Regulate License Legacy Substituting Wireline  Regulatory Parity Network Effects  Interconnection  Standards.
Doc.: 18-12/108r0 Submission October 26, 2012 Slide 1 FCC TV Band Incentive Auction: Impact on Unlicensed Operation Notice: This document has been prepared.
La Industria Móvil Celular en Latinoamérica y las Diferencias en Términos de la Reforma a las Reglas acerca del Uso del Espectro en los Diferentes Países.
0 Slide 0 National Spectrum Managers Association Industry Round Table – Fixed Wireless Service May 20, 2008 Mitchell Lazarus | |
Setting the Stage for UAV/UAS Applications in Agriculture Ted Batkin Batkin Agricultural Service Visalia, CA.
1 Objective 4— Develop policy tools to streamline the deployment of new and expanded services and technologies, while preserving national and homeland.
Doc.: IEEE /0001r00 Agenda January 2016 Jay Holcomb, Itron Inc. IEEE RR-TAG Teleconference Agenda Date: 11 January 2016 Authors:
Marty Stern, Partner K&L Gates LLP Broadcast Spectrum Reallocation: With Change Comes Real Opportunity.
Ruihao Zhu and Kang G. Shin
Doc.: IEEE /1507r0 Agenda December 2015 Rich Kennedy, MediaTek IEEE /15 Regulatory SC DRAFT Teleconference Plan and Agenda Date:
Dynamic Spectrum Access/Management Models Exclusive-Use Model Shared-Use Model.
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 2007 Annual Report.
Doc.: IEEE /0760r0 Agenda June 2014 Rich Kennedy, MediaTek IEEE Regulatory SC DRAFT Teleconference Plan and Agenda Date: Authors:
NSMA Working Group Conference Report Larrie Sutliff, Chair NSMA Spectrum Management /16/2012.
Transition to New Band Plan Proponent-driven – January 10, 2008 deadline Based on Major Economic Areas –MEA Slide on Next Page Proponent must move EBS.
Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 6: Spectrum Management Copyright © 2007.
CREATING NEW MARKET MECHANISMS What is a market? Is there any such thing as a market in radiofrequency spectrum? Allocation market vs secondary market?
Licensing and the Regulatory Process Ari Fitzgerald Deputy Chief FCC International Bureau Abuja, Nigeria September 21, 2000.
Promoting Spectrum Access for Wireless Microphone Operations.
Spectrum Frontiers – 5G Michael Ha, Deputy Chief
Radio Spectrum Policy in Europe
November 2012 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: FCC TV Band Incentive Auction: Impact on.
November 2012 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: FCC TV Band Incentive Auction: Impact on.
“Allocation and Assignment of Radio-Spectrum Resources by using Price Mechanism: Proposals for a New System” WORKSHOP on Advanced Wireless Technologies:
Lecture 10: FCC Organization, Power and Structure
Presentation transcript:

1 Secondary Markets in Radio Spectrum FCC Forum May 31, 2000 Washington, D.C.

2 The Wireless Craze, The Unlimited Bandwidth Myth, The Spectrum License Faux Pas, and the Punchline to Ronald Coase’s ‘big joke’ Thomas W. Hazlett University of California, Davis American Enterprise Institute

3 The Wireless Bandwidth Market Challenge, Redux In 1959 the FCC invited future Nobel economist Ronald Coase to testify about his proposal for market allocation of spectrum. First question --

4 “Is this all a big joke?”

5 “I know of no country on the face of the globe -- except for a few corrupt Latin American dictatorships – where the ‘sale’ of the spectrum could even be seriously proposed.” -- Referee’s Report on Coase (Rand Study with W. Meckling & J. Minasian, circa 1960)

6 The Road To Bandwidth Markets Public Interest Allocation Property Rights Bandwidth Markets

7 Policy should worry about Traversing the Regulatory Gauntlet (a hazard-strewn political Line of Death from Public Interest Allocation to Property Rights)

8 Policy should not worry about Spontaneous Combustion in the Marketplace Property Rights to spectrum will spark Bandwidth Markets w/o a rule making –Wireline bandwidth exchanges popping up everywhere –Fiber pipes create private property rights in spectrum

9 Deconstructing Property Rights flexible use (service definition) flexible technology (standards) flexible divisibility transferability (including liability) right to use unoccupied bands

10 Unleash the Cornucopia Full property rights for spectrum users Restrictions limited to interference contours Burden of proof shifts to those opposing entry –Liability rules –Streamlined standards, technical adjudication Generic antitrust, not by band classification

11 Plausible? Liberalization benefits consumers –Spectrum reforms since 1964 –PCS overlay rights –AM/FM sub-carrier frequency use –Long distance telephone microwave links –UHF Channels (1992 OPP paper) Miles to Go –TV Band (1952 technology in transition) –Blocked technologies such as UWB –“Crowded” spectrum vastly under-utilized

12 No. OrdenNo. Registro LA SUPERINTENDENCIA DE TELECOMUNICACIONES DE GUATEMALA Con base en el Artículo 57 del Decreto 94 ‑ 96 del Congreso de la República extiende Título de Usufructo de Frecuencia Banda o Rango de Frecuencias: Horario de Operación: Potencia máxima efectiva de radiación: Máxima intensidad de campo eléctrico o potencia máxima admisible en el contorno: Area Geográfica de influencia: Fecha de Emisión: Fecha de Vencimiento:

13 Policy Reforms to Encourage Markets

14 1. Spectrum Registry Easy to use spectrum allocation database Actual use (and users) defined Possible to decipher w/o counsel Public access

15 2.Voluntary Reallocation Overlay Rights –Shift spectrum reallocation to the market –Speed services to the public –Rules can help structure negotiation Underlay Rights –Low-power zones for emerging technologies –Entrants assume liability for interference –Cooperative or competitive market structure

16 3. Private provision of public goods –Competitive bidding for enterprise- or market-level communications systems –Price, terms & conditions (á la data processing contracts) –Band manager emerges with spectrum resources and obligation to serve (Nextel)

17 4. Privatize Rulemakings Set time table for Allocation Rival consortia submit NPRMs –Liability and Adjudication addressed FCC and other parties Comment “Best” Orders submitted by applicants Comments by non-FCC parties FCC selects Best of the Best Auction conducted for rights (if necessary)

18 Proposed Schedule for UWB Rulemaking in 2000 Draft NPRMsAug. 1 Comments (non-FCC)Sept. 1 Comments (FCC)Oct. 1 Final NPRMs submittedNov. 1 Comments (non-FCC)Dec. 1 FCC selection Dec. 24