© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 1 SESSION 13: CORPORATE LEVEL STRATEGY: Analysis and Choice in The Multi-Business Company Rationalizing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CORPORATE STRATEGY: DIVERSIFICATION AND THE MULTIBUSINESS COMPANY
Advertisements

Principles of Management Learning Session # 27 Dr. A. Rashid Kausar.
Multibusiness Strategy
Chapter 7 Strategic Management.
MG 506 (Fall 1999: Class 3) 9/29/99 Tuesday, September 28, 1999 n Term project n Cases/teams n Strategic Management n Web sites: –FaxSav, audible n Case:
Topic 6 Industry Environments
BCG Tool for Analyzing Opportunities & Ability to Compete
Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
Chapter 1 Copyright ©2012 by Cengage Learning Inc. All rights reserved 1 1 Lamb, Hair, McDaniel CHAPTER 2 Strategic Planning for Competitive Advantage.
Strategic Planning ORGANIZATIONAL CAPABILITIES AND GOALS
©2002 South-Western Chapter 2 Version 6e1 chapter Strategic Planning for Competitive Advantage 2 2 Prepared by Deborah Baker Texas Christian University.
Strategic Management.
1 2. Strategic Planning & The Marketing Process. 2 What Is Planning Establish objectives Determine how to accomplish them regardless of what happens in.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 1 CHAPTER 8 Strategic Analysis and Choice in the Multibusiness Company:
When a Low-Cost Provider Strategy Works Best
Principles of Marketing
Company and marketing strategy: partning to build customer relationshp
Market Oriented Strategic Planning How do companies compete successfully in today’s market place? By creating and delivering superior value to target customers.
DEVELOPING STRATEGIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE Session 8 Diversification Strategy Session 8 Diversification Strategy 1.
BASIC STRATEGY CONTENT AND THE MULTINATIONAL COMPANY u Strategy content includes the strategic options available to companies u Multinational companies.
The Marketing Management Process
Chapter 1 Copyright ©2012 by Cengage Learning Inc. All rights reserved 1 1 Lamb, Hair, McDaniel CHAPTER 2 Strategic Planning for Competitive Advantage.
Objectives Understand how strategic planning is carried out at the corporate, division, and business unit levels. Learn the major steps in the marketing.
Entrepreneurship for MBA Students
Essentials of Health Care Marketing 2nd Ed. Eric Berkowitz
Strategy Formulation and Implementation
MGT-519 STRATEGIC MARKETING AAMER SIDDIQI. LECTURE 8.
Strategic Planning: Developing and Implementing a Marketing Plan.
FORMULATION OF STRATEGY: ANALYSING THE PRODUCT PORTFOLIO
战略规划 北京银行. Definitions SBU is the abbreviation for Strategic Business Unit What we have studied so far are SBUs, because each has a unique SBU Strategy.
BASIC STRATEGY CONTENT AND THE MULTINATIONAL COMPANY Strategy content includes the strategic options available to companies –multinational companies.
© 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
BASIC STRATEGY CONTENT AND THE MULTINATIONAL COMPANY Strategy content includes the strategic options available to companies –multinational companies.
Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning Chapter 08 Peshawar City Institute Of Modern Sciences.
Corporate Strategy -Kishore Kumar August Characteristics of Strategic Decisions Concerned with the scope of an organization’s activities Concerned.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 1 CHAPTER 8 Strategic Analysis and Choice in the Multibusiness Company:
Evaluating Strategies of Diversified Companies
Chapter 9 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 7 Strategic Management.
Strategy Formulation:
Chapter 8 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT © Prentice Hall,
© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 1 SESSION 12: CORPORATE LEVEL STRATEGY: Analysis and Choice in The Multi-Business Company Rationalizing.
Edition Vitale and Giglierano Chapter 5 Concepts and Context of Business Strategy Prepared by John T. Drea, Western Illinois University.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Business Portfolio Analysis By Nakato Ruth. Portfolio Analysis A common technique used to analyze an organization in relation to its environment. It mainly.
MT460 Mgmt Policy & Strategy
Lecture # 8 & 9 Chapter 7 – Strategic Management.
Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
Managing Strategy 1 Chapter 9. Strategic Management 2 The set of managerial decisions and actions that determines the long-run performance of an organization.
Rationalizing Diversification and Building Shareholder Value
Strategic Management (MGT501)
CORPORATE STRATEGY: DIVERSIFICATION AND THE MULTIBUSINESS COMPANY
Chapter 8 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT © Prentice Hall,
Strategic Planning and the Marketing Management Process
Strategic Intent and Mission.
Rationalizing Diversification and Building Shareholder Value
What Is Strategic Management?
Strategic Management I
Rationalizing Diversification and Building Shareholder Value
CHAPTER 8 Strategic Analysis and Choice in the Multibusiness Company: Rationalizing Diversification and Building Shareholder Value.
Define strategic management and explain why it’s important
Strategic Management Chapter 8
Rationalizing Diversification and Building Shareholder Value
Chapter 8 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT © Prentice Hall,
SESSION 7: Strategic Analysis and Choice in The Multi-Business Company
Rationalizing Diversification and Building Shareholder Value
Rationalizing Diversification and Building Shareholder Value
Rationalizing Diversification and Building Shareholder Value
Rationalizing Diversification and Building Shareholder Value
Presentation transcript:

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 1 SESSION 13: CORPORATE LEVEL STRATEGY: Analysis and Choice in The Multi-Business Company Rationalizing Diversification and Building Shareholder Value

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 2 The Concept of Corporate-Level Strategy Primary Question - Where to Compete? Are there other business opportunities? Entering or exiting Industries

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 3 CL Strategy – Whether to Diversify? Synergies Growth Opportunities Agency Issues – “Empire Building”

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 4 Multibusiness Corporations Corporations comprised of multiple businesses are often referred to as having a portfolio of businesses

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 5 By Definition a change in Corporate Level Strategy should be reflected in a change in Mission Statement

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 6

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 7

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 8

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 9

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 10

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 11

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 12

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 13

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 14

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 15 SONY PICTURES STUDIOS

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 16

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 17

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 18

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 19 The Portfolio Approach to Corporate Level Strategy Research Allocation Decisions How does Corporate Affiliation Provide Value?

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 20 GE and McKinsey The Concept of The SBU Corporate Review Capability Matrices to Facilitate/Illuminate the Resource Allocation Decision

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 21 To Be Designated an SBU, Businesses had to: Have a unique mission independent of other SBUs Have a clearly definable set of competitors Compete in external markets Be able to carry out integrative planning relatively independent of other SBUs Be able to manage resources in key areas Be large enough to justify senior management attention

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 22 Balancing Financial Resources: Portfolio Techniques Industry Attractiveness- Business Strength Matrix BCG Growth- Share Matrix Life Cycle- Competitive Strength Matrix

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 23 BCG Growth-Share Matrix High Low Cash Use (Growth Rate) Star Problem Child Cash Cow Dog Cash Generation (Market Share) High Low Market Share: Sales relative to those of other competitors in market (dividing point is usually selected to have only 2-3 largest competitors in any market fall into high market share region) Growth Rate: Industry growth rate in constant dollars (dividing point is typically GNP’s growth rate) Description of Dimensions

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 24 Factors Considered in Constructing an Industry Attractiveness-Business Strength Matrix Nature of Competitive Rivalry Number of competitors Size of competitors Strength of competitors’ corporate parents Price wars Competition on multiple dimensions Bargaining Power of Suppliers/Customers Relative size of typical players Numbers of each Importance of purchases from or dales to Ability to vertically integrate Threat of Substitutes/ New Entrants Technological maturity/stability Diversity of the market Barriers to entry Flexibility of distribution system Industry Attractiveness Factors

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 25 Fig. 9-3: Factors Considered in Constructing an Industry Attractiveness-Business Strength Matrix (continued) Economic Factors Sales volatility Cyclicality of demand Market growth Capital intensity Financial Norms Average profitability Typical leverage Credit practices Sociopolitical Considerations Government regulation Community support Ethical standards Industry Attractiveness Factors

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 26 Fig. 9-3: Factors Considered in Constructing an Industry Attractiveness-Business Strength Matrix (continued) Cost Position Economies of scale Manufacturing costs Overhead Scrap/waste/rework Experience effects Labor rates Proprietary processes Level of Differentiation Promotion effectiveness Product quality Company image Patented products Brand awareness Response Time Manufacturing flexibility Time needed to introduce new products Delivery times Organizational flexibility Business Strength Factors

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 27 Fig. 9-3: Factors Considered in Constructing an Industry Attractiveness-Business Strength Matrix (concluded) Financial Strength Solvency Liquidity Break-even point Cash flows Profitability Growth in revenues Human Assets Turnover Skill level Relative wage/salary Morale Managerial commitment Unionization Public Approval Goodwill Reputation Image Business Strength Factors

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 28 Fig. 9-4: Industry Attractiveness-Business Strength Matrix Invest Selective Growth Grow or Let Go Selective Growth Grow or Let Go Harvest Grow or Let Go Harvest Divest Low High Medium Business Strength MediumHighLow Industry Attractiveness Industry Attractiveness: Subjective assessment based on broadest possible range of external opportunities and threats beyond control of management Business Strength: Subject assessment of how strong a competitive advantage is created by a broad range of a firm’s internal strengths and weaknesses Description of Dimensions

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 29 Advantages of the Industry Attractiveness-Business Strength Matrix over the BCG Matrix Terminology is less offensive and more understandable Multiple measures associated with each dimension tap many factors relevant to business strength and market attractiveness Allows for broader assessment during both strategy formulation and implementation for a multibusiness company

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 30 Fig. 9-5: Market Life Cycle-Competitive Strength Matrix Stage of Market Life Cycle: See page 182 Competitive Strength: Overall subjective rating, based on wide range of factors regarding likelihood of gaining and maintaining a competitive advantage Description of Dimensions Low High Moderate Competitive Strength GrowthIntroductionMaturity Stage of Market Life Cycle Decline Push: Invest Aggressively Caution: Invest Selectively Danger: Harvest

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 31 Contributions of Portfolio Approaches Convey large amounts of information about diverse businesses and corporate plans in a simplified format Illuminate similarities and differences among businesses, conveying the logic behind corporate strategies for each business Simplify priorities for sharing corporate resources across diverse businesses Provide a simple prescription of what should be accomplished - a balanced portfolio of businesses

© 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 32 Limitations of Portfolio Approaches Does not address how value is created across business units Accurate measurement for matrix classification not as easy as matrices implied Underlying assumption about relationship between market share and profits varies across different industries and market segments Limited strategic options viewed as basic strategic missions Portrays notion that firms need to be self-sufficient in capital Fails to compare competitive advantage a business receives from being owned by a particular company with costs of owning it