Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 18 Organizational Design, Responsibility Accounting, and Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Rewarding Business Performance Chapter 24.
Advertisements

Chapter 15: Performance Evaluation and Compensation
Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Investment Centers and Transfer Pricing Investment Centers and.
Investment Centers and Transfer Pricing
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Decision Making is pushed down. Delegation of Decision Making (Decentralization) Decentralization.
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Investment Centers and Transfer Pricing Investment Centers and.
©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton Chapter 16 Management Control In.
Management Control Systems
DECENTRALIZATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION © itaesem/iStockphoto CHAPTER 10.
23 Flexible Budgets and Performance Analysis Principles of Accounting
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 25-1 REWARDING BUSINESS PERFORMANCE Chapter 25.
RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING
CHAPTER 11 Performance Measurement, Compensation,
Performance Evaluation in the Decentralized Firm
Chapter 13 Business Unit Performance Measurement.
CHAPTER 23 Performance Measurement, Compensation,
Managerial Economics and Organizational Architecture, 5e Chapter 17: Divisional Performance Evaluation McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill.
24 Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations Accounting 26e
Performance Measurement & Compensation
Performance Measurement, Compensation, and Multinational Considerations Chapter 23.
Performance Evaluation and the Balanced Scorecard
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
16-1 Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. Financial Performance Evaluation and Transfer Pricing in the Decentralized Firm.
Business Unit Performance Measurement Chapter 14 Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Decentralization and Performance Evaluation
ROI, Residual Income, and Economic Value Added
ADVANCED MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
Managerial Accounting:
Performance Measurement Chapter 23. Financial and Nonfinancial Performance Measures Some organizations present financial and nonfinancial performance.
Financial performance measures and transfer pricing
1 Copyright © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of the Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western are trademarks used herein under.
©2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publically accessible website, in whole or in part.
Copyright © by Houghton Miffin Company. All rights reserved.1 Financial & Managerial Accounting 2002e Belverd E. Needles, Jr. Marian Powers Susan Crosson.
Chapter Fifteen Performance Evaluation © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education.
RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING. Responsibility Center Types  Underlying the accounting classifications of responsibility centers is the concept of controllability:
Responsibility Accounting and Transfer Pricing
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Financial & Managerial Accounting The Basis for Business Decisions FOURTEENTH EDITION Williams.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Slide Chapter 24 Performance Measurement, Compensation, and Multinational Considerations.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Performance Evaluation Chapter 10 1.
Chapter 24 Responsibility Accounting and Performance Evaluation
Accounting 4310 Chapter 14 Business Unit Performance.
Chapter 23. Explain why and how companies decentralize.
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Performance Measurement, Compensation, and Multinational Considerations.
Organizational Design, Responsibility Accounting and Evaluation of Divisional Performance Chapter 18.
10-1 Decentralization: Responsibility Accounting, Performance Evaluation, and Transfer Pricing 10.
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada Slide 14-1 Decentralized Organizations, Transfer Pricing, and Measures of Profitability 14.
1 PowerPointPresentation by PowerPoint Presentation by Gail B. Wright Professor Emeritus of Accounting Bryant University MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING 10 TH EDITION.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Introduction The dilemma for companies is to find tools that allow the evaluation of managers at all levels in the organization. How would the evaluation.
Investment Centers and Transfer Pricing CHAPTER 13 Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 19 Financial Statement Analysis.
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved 1 Performance Evaluation and the Balanced Scorecard Chapter 12.
Performance Evaluation Chapter 15 Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 PowerPointPresentation by PowerPoint Presentation by Gail B. Wright Professor Emeritus of Accounting Bryant University © Copyright 2007 Thomson South-Western,
Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations
CHAPTER FIVE Responsibility Accounting and Transfer Pricing.
Responsibility Accounting and Transfer Pricing Chapter Five Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chapter 13 Financial performance measures for investment centres, and reward systems Copyright  2009 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint Slides.
10-1 Decentralization: Responsibility Accounting, Performance Evaluation, and Transfer Pricing.
©2005 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 13/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton Management Control in Decentralized.
CORNERSTONES of Managerial Accounting, 5e. © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part,
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any manner.
Performance Management and Evaluation 8. Performance Measurement OBJECTIVE 1: Define a performance management and evaluation system, and describe how.
FINANCIAL INDICATORS PRESENTED BY GROUP 8 吴亦凡 朱忠明 朱英蕾 盛洁.
Chapter 13 Financial performance measures for investment centres and reward systems.
Performance Measurement and Transfer Pricing
Investment Centers and Transfer Pricing
Decentralization and Performance Evaluation
Financial performance measures and reward systems
PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND MULTINATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 18 Organizational Design, Responsibility Accounting, and Evaluation of Divisional Performance

18-2 Learning Objective 1

18-3 Decentralized Organizations Decentralization - assigning of specific responsibilities to subunits of organizations. Decentralization - assigning of specific responsibilities to subunits of organizations. Goal congruence when subunit managers in the organization hold a common set of objectives. Goal congruence - when subunit managers in the organization hold a common set of objectives. Individual goal congruence - when a member’s personal goals are consistent with those of the organization as a whole. Individual goal congruence - when a member’s personal goals are consistent with those of the organization as a whole.

18-4 Goal Congruence and Performance Measurement Behavioral congruence Behavioral congruence - when individuals behave in the best interest of the organization regardless of their own goals. It is best for all concerned if the evaluation system used to measure a manager’s achievements result in at least behavioral congruence (if not goal congruence). Example: Overall company profitability.

18-5 Decentralized Organizations and Responsibility Accounting Responsibility accounting - a system of internal reporting tailored to specific organizational structures. It allows the aggregation of cost, profit and/or returns at the subunit levels, so that managers responsible for achieving results at each level can have their performance evaluated more appropriately.

18-6 Centralization versus Decentralization Centralized Centralized Decisions are handed down from the top echelon of management and subordinates carry them out. Centralized Centralized Decisions are handed down from the top echelon of management and subordinates carry them out. Decentralized Decentralized Decisions are made at divisional and departmental levels. Decentralized Decentralized Decisions are made at divisional and departmental levels.

18-7 Learning Objective 2

18-8 Benefits of Decentralization  Managers have specialized skills that permit them to manage their departments most effectively.  Their resulting autonomy provides a training opportunity for increased responsibility.  Managers with such authority exhibit positive motivation.  Delegation of tasks lightens the time burden on upper-level managers.  It also encourages timely responses to problem solving.

18-9 Costs of Decentralization  Local managers may narrow their focus to their own subunit’s performance.  Local managers may make decisions that are not congruent with the preferences of top management.  Some tasks or services may be duplicated among the decentralized subunits.

18-10 Learning Objective 3

18-11 Responsibility Accounting 1. Cost centers - responsible for the cost of a well defined activity. 2. Discretionary cost centers – responsible for the cost of an activity that is not well defined. 3. Revenue center – responsible for revenue attributed to the subunit. 4. Profit center – responsible for profit of a subunit. 5. Investment center – responsible for profit and the invested capital of a subunit.

18-12 Learning Objective 4

18-13 Performance Reports Shows the budgeted and actual amounts of key financial results tailored to the objectives of specific responsibility centers.

18-14 Shows the budgeted and actual amounts of key financial results tailored to the objectives of specific responsibility centers. Performance Reports Management by exception means that managers follow up on only the most significant variances between budgeted and actual results.

18-15 Budgets, Variance Analysis and Responsibility Accounting The flexible budget provides the benchmark against which actual revenues, expenses and profits are compared.

18-16 Activity-Based Responsibility Accounting Activity-based costing systems associate costs with the activities that drive those costs. The database created by an ABC system, coupled with nonfinancial measures of operational performance for each activity, enables management to employ activity-based responsibility accounting. Activity-based costing systems associate costs with the activities that drive those costs. The database created by an ABC system, coupled with nonfinancial measures of operational performance for each activity, enables management to employ activity-based responsibility accounting.

18-17 How Responsibility Accounting Affects Behavior Exchange information or assign blame? The system should identify the individual in the organization who is in the best position to explain each particular event or financial result. Can you help me understand the unfavorable cost variance? Sure, I’ll be glad to give you my input about the variance.

18-18 Learning Objective 5

18-19 Performance Measurement in Investment Centers Return on Investment (ROI) is the ratio of profits to investment in the assets that generate those profits. ROI = Income Invested capital

18-20 Performance Measurement in Investment Centers ROI = Income Invested capital ROI = × Sales revenue Invested capital Income Sales revenue or

18-21 Return on Investment The management of Matrix, Inc. is evaluating two investment proposals. 1. Project A will generate $150,000 in operating profits and require an investment of $600, Project B will generate operating profits of $500,000 and will require an investment of $2,500,000. Let’s calculate the ROI for these two projects. The management of Matrix, Inc. is evaluating two investment proposals. 1. Project A will generate $150,000 in operating profits and require an investment of $600, Project B will generate operating profits of $500,000 and will require an investment of $2,500,000. Let’s calculate the ROI for these two projects.

18-22 Return on Investment $150,000 ÷ $600,000 = 25% ROI If we can invest in only one project, we would select Project A. It has a higher ROI. If we can invest in only one project, we would select Project A. It has a higher ROI.

18-23 Return on Investment Matrix, Inc. provides the projected income statement for its investment in Project A. × Sales revenue Invested capital = ROI Income Sales revenue $150,000 $300,000× $300,000 $600,000 = ROI 50%50% = 25% ×

18-24 Learning Objective 6

18-25 Improving a Division’s ROI Decrease costs while maintaining the same sales level. Increase sales revenue with no change in costs. Decrease invested capital with no change in income. Decrease invested capital with no change in income. Caveat: None of these are easy to achieve!

18-26 Residual Income as a Performance Measure Residual income is defined as... The imputed interest rate should be the rate of return on investments of similar risk that are being forgone. Investment center’s profits – Investment center’s invested capital Imputed interest rate ×

18-27 Residual Income as a Performance Measure Using our original investment proposals and a imputed interest rate of 15%, let’s calculate the residual income. This time Project B looks much better.

18-28 Learning Objective 7

18-29 Comparing ROI and Residual Income Advantage: It uses percentages, which allow easy comparison with required returns. Disadvantage: Value of invested capital is measured in dollars of different purchasing power. Advantage: It facilitates goal congruence with its required rate of return Disadvantage: It is biased in favor of larger companies because it shows dollar results. ROI Residual Income Solution: Use both in evaluating investments.

18-30 Economic Value Added (EVA) as a Performance Measure All capital - debt or equity - has a cost. Cost of debt is equal to the interest payments made on the debt. Cost of debt is equal to the interest payments made on the debt. Cost of equity is the return the shareholders could obtain in price appreciation and dividends if they invested in a portfolio of companies about as risky as yours. Cost of equity is the return the shareholders could obtain in price appreciation and dividends if they invested in a portfolio of companies about as risky as yours.

18-31 Economic Value Added (EVA) Investment center’s after- tax operating profit EVA= – Weighted- average cost of capital × Investment center’s total assets Investment center’s current liabilities – Investment center current liabilities are subtracted from its total assets.

18-32 Weighted-Average Cost of Capital Cost of capital is the weighted average combination of the cost of debt and equity (WACC). After-tax cost of debt Market value of debt × Cost of equity Market value of equity × + Market value of debt Market value of equity x Weighted- average cost of capital =

18-33 Learning Objective 8

18-34 Measuring Investment Capital Three issues must be considered before we can properly measure the investment capital. Three issues must be considered before we can properly measure the investment capital. 1. Which asset value should be included in invested capital? 2. Should the assets be shown at historical or current cost? 3. Should we measure the investment at the beginning or end of period amount? Three issues must be considered before we can properly measure the investment capital. Three issues must be considered before we can properly measure the investment capital. 1. Which asset value should be included in invested capital? 2. Should the assets be shown at historical or current cost? 3. Should we measure the investment at the beginning or end of period amount?

18-35 Gross or Net Book Value Matrix, Inc. is considering an investment that is projected to produce operating profits of $25,000 before depreciation for the next three years. At the beginning of the first year Matrix will invest $100,000 in an asset that has a ten-year life and no salvage value. Straight-line depreciation is used. At the beginning of the first year Matrix will invest $100,000 in an asset that has a ten-year life and no salvage value. Straight-line depreciation is used. Matrix calculates ROI based on end-of-year asset values. Matrix calculates ROI based on end-of-year asset values. Let’s calculate ROI using both the gross and net book values. Matrix, Inc. is considering an investment that is projected to produce operating profits of $25,000 before depreciation for the next three years. At the beginning of the first year Matrix will invest $100,000 in an asset that has a ten-year life and no salvage value. Straight-line depreciation is used. At the beginning of the first year Matrix will invest $100,000 in an asset that has a ten-year life and no salvage value. Straight-line depreciation is used. Matrix calculates ROI based on end-of-year asset values. Matrix calculates ROI based on end-of-year asset values. Let’s calculate ROI using both the gross and net book values.

18-36 Gross or Net Book Value ($100,000 – $0) ÷ 10 = $10,000 per year $100,000 – $10,000 = $90,000 book value

18-37 Gross or Net Book Value $15,000 ÷ $90,000 = 16.67% $15,000 ÷ $100,000 = 15% The ROI increases each year under the net book value method even though no operating changes take place. The ROI increases each year under the net book value method even though no operating changes take place.

18-38 Current Value versus Historical-Cost Accounting Our previous example assumed no inflation. Let’s work with the same information and assume that the current replacement cost of the asset and profits before depreciation increase by 6% per year.

18-39 Historical Cost versus Current Cost $25,000 × 1.06 = $26,500

18-40 Historical Cost versus Current Cost Using historical cost and net book value, our ROI would be:

18-41 Historical Cost versus Current Cost Using current cost values, net operating profit would be: And ROI would be:

18-42 Beginning, Ending or Average Balance Using the average investment base provides acceptable results and discourages inappropriate investment decisions. If I purchase the asset early in the year, it will boost income for the entire year and impact ROI.

18-43 Return on Investment Allowing for the many possible variations of its components, ROI is the most commonly used measure of business-unit performance.

18-44 Nonfinancial Performance Measures The use of nonfinancial measures of performance in incentive plans is increasing. These measures help managers... 1.Focus on the drivers of profit, and 2.Recognize the time lags between nonfinancial and financial performance. The use of nonfinancial measures of performance in incentive plans is increasing. These measures help managers... 1.Focus on the drivers of profit, and 2.Recognize the time lags between nonfinancial and financial performance.

18-45 Performance Measurement in Nonprofit Organizations The goals of nonprofit organizations frequently are less clear-cut than those of for-profit enterprises. It may be difficult to have people within nonprofit organizations submit to the same types of controls as are often found in the business environment.

18-46 End of Chapter 18