Minimum Audible Angle Measured in Young and Old CBA Mice Using Prepulse Inhibition of Startle Paul D. Allen, Jordan Bell, Navin Dargani, Catherine A. Moore,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements Christopher A. Shera, John J. Guinan, Jr., and Andrew J. Oxenham.
Advertisements

Sound Localization Superior Olivary Complex. Localization: Limits of Performance Absolute localization: localization of sound without a reference. Humans:
Binaural Hearing Or now hear this! Upcoming Talk: Isabelle Peretz Musical & Non-musical Brains Nov. 12 noon + Lunch Rm 2068B South Building.
Sound source segregation Development of the ability to separate concurrent sounds into auditory objects.
CS 551/651: Structure of Spoken Language Lecture 11: Overview of Sound Perception, Part II John-Paul Hosom Fall 2010.
Intensity representation 1 Representation of the intensity of sound (or is it something else about efficiency?)
Localizing Sounds. When we perceive a sound, we often simultaneously perceive the location of that sound. Even new born infants orient their eyes toward.
Source Localization in Complex Listening Situations: Selection of Binaural Cues Based on Interaural Coherence Christof Faller Mobile Terminals Division,
Neuroscience & Behavior Program Robert J. Polewan & John W. Moore* University of Massachusetts Amherst COMPOUND CONDITIONING UNDER TEMPORAL UNCERTAINTY.
A.Diederich– International University Bremen – Sensation and Perception – Fall Frequency Analysis in the Cochlea and Auditory Nerve cont'd The Perception.
The Precedence Effect in mice, demonstrated in the inhibitory effect of reversing the order of clicks within pairs from two speakers on the startle reflex.
Development of sound localization
Antagonists of neural nitric oxide synthase affect auditory behaviours in mice: A study of the acoustic startle reflex (ASR) and its inhibition by gaps.
Age-Related Decrements in the Integrative Action of the Auditory Nervous System* seen in the Acoustic Startle Reflex of the CBA Mouse James R. Ison, Paul.
PATTERNS OF NORMAL AND ABNORMAL AUDITORY BEHAVIOR IN POTASSIUM CHANNEL KNOCK OUT MICE. J.R. Ison* 1, P.D. Allen 1, M. Zettel 1, R.H. Joho 2 1. Brain &
Stochastic Properties of Neural Coincidence Detector cells Ram Krips and Miriam Furst.
NORMAL THRESHOLD AND SUPRATHRESHOLD ABR AND ASR RESPONSES TO ACOUSTIC ONSETS IN KCNA1 KNOCKOUT MICE, BUT A REDUCED RESPONSE TO OFFSETS J. R. Ison 1, P.
Spectral centroid 6 harmonics: f0 = 100Hz E.g. 1: Amplitudes: 6; 5.75; 4; 3.2; 2; 1 [(100*6)+(200*5.75)+(300*4)+(400*3.2)+(500*2 )+(600*1)] / = 265.6Hz.
Effect in CBA Mice of varying Signal Intensity and Age on the Inhibition of the Acoustic Startle Reflex produced by a Change in Sound Location along the.
Colony-Wide Analysis of Mouse Auditory Brainstem Responses (II): Maturational, Gender and Aging Effects in C57Bl/6J and CBA/CaJ Mice Paul Allen 1, John.
Possible Interaction between KCNA1 Genotype and Aging on Auditory Spatial Discrimination in the Mouse Paul D. Allen, Peter J. Rivoli, James R. Ison Department.
Cross-Spectral Channel Gap Detection in the Aging CBA Mouse Jason T. Moore, Paul D. Allen, James R. Ison Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University.
Sound source segregation (determination)
Exaggerated Startle Reflex to Low Frequency Tone Bursts in C57BL/6J Mice with Progressive Hearing Loss: A Longitudinal Aging Study Jim Ison, Peter Rivoli,
Hearing.
Measuring the brain’s response to temporally modulated sound stimuli Chloe Rose Institute of Digital Healthcare, WMG, University of Warwick, INTRODUCTION.
Creating sound valuewww.hearingcrc.org Kelley Graydon 1,2,, Gary Rance 1,2, Dani Tomlin 1,2 Richard Dowell 1,2 & Bram Van Dun 1,4. 1 The HEARing Cooperative.
Michael P. Kilgard Sensory Experience and Cortical Plasticity University of Texas at Dallas.
1 Auditory, tactile, and vestibular sensory systems n Perceptually relevant characteristics of sound n The receptor system: The ear n Basic sensory characteristics.
Applied Psychoacoustics Lecture: Binaural Hearing Jonas Braasch Jens Blauert.
PHYSIOLOGY: Standard extracellular techniques were used to record 44 on and on-sustained units from the contralateral IC of 1-4 month-old CBA mice. Stimulus.
SIGNAL DETECTION IN FIXED PATTERN CHROMATIC NOISE 1 A. J. Ahumada, Jr., 2 W. K. Krebs 1 NASA Ames Research Center; 2 Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey,
Gamma-Band Activation Predicts Both Associative Memory and Cortical Plasticity Drew B. Headley and Norman M. Weinberger Center for the Neurobiology of.
Chapter 5: Normal Hearing. Objectives (1) Define threshold and minimum auditory sensitivity The normal hearing range for humans Define minimum audible.
Chapter 7: Loudness and Pitch. Loudness (1) Auditory Sensitivity: Minimum audible pressure (MAP) and Minimum audible field (MAF) Equal loudness contours.
Sounds in a reverberant room can interfere with the direct sound source. The normal hearing (NH) auditory system has a mechanism by which the echoes, or.
Localization of Auditory Stimulus in the Presence of an Auditory Cue By Albert Ler.
Auditory Brainstem Response
EFFECTS OF STIMULUS WIDTH AND LENGTH ON THE DETECTION THRESHOLDS FOR II-nd ORDER GRATINGS D. Mitov, Ts. Totev, K. Racheva, I. Hristov Institute of Neurobiology,
CSD 2230 INTRODUCTION TO HUMAN COMMUNICATION DISORDERS Normal Sound Perception, Speech Perception, and Auditory Characteristics at the Boundaries of the.
Communication and Cortex The computational neuroethology of mouse vocalizations Robert Liu Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neurobiology University.
Loudness level (phon) An equal-loudness contour is a measure of sound pressure (dB SPL), over the frequency spectrum, for which a listener perceives a.
Otoacoustic Emissions
Listeners weighting of cues for lateral angle: The duplex theory of sound localization revisited E. A. MacPherson & J. C. Middlebrooks (2002) HST. 723.
Introduction to psycho-acoustics: Some basic auditory attributes For audio demonstrations, click on any loudspeaker icons you see....
Speech Perception.
A. R. Jayan, P. C. Pandey, EE Dept., IIT Bombay 1 Abstract Perception of speech under adverse listening conditions may be improved by processing it to.
PERCEPTUAL LEARNING AND CORTICAL SELF-ORGANIZATION Mike Kilgard University of Texas Dallas.
Development of Sound Localization 2 How do the neural mechanisms subserving sound localization develop?
>>ITD.m running… IC 800Hz 40 sp/sec 34 O azim Neuron April 16, 2009 Bo Zhu HST.723 Spring 2009 Theme 3 Paper Presentation April 1, 2009.
PSYC Auditory Science Spatial Hearing Chris Plack.
Fletcher’s band-widening experiment (1940)
The role of reverberation in release from masking due to spatial separation of sources for speech identification Gerald Kidd, Jr. et al. Acta Acustica.
SPATIAL HEARING Ability to locate the direction of a sound. Ability to locate the direction of a sound. Localization: In free field Localization: In free.
Fundamentals of Sensation and Perception
김 진 욱 Chap 14. O VERVIEW OF A UDITORY E VOKED P OTENTIALS (3/3)
Jonas Braasch Architectural Acoustics Group Communication Acoustics and Aural Architecture Research Laboratory (C A 3 R L) Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute,
Loudness level (phon) An equal-loudness contour is a measure of sound pressure (dB SPL), over the frequency spectrum, for which a listener perceives a.
Auditory Localization in Rooms: Acoustic Analysis and Behavior
PSYCHOACOUSTICS A branch of psychophysics
Loudness level (phon) An equal-loudness contour is a measure of sound pressure (dB SPL), over the frequency spectrum, for which a listener perceives a.
Ana Alves-Pinto, Joseph Sollini, Toby Wells, and Christian J. Sumner
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (April 2009)
CHAPTER 10 Auditory Sensitivity.
Contrast Gain Control in Auditory Cortex
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (April 2009)
Ben Scholl, Xiang Gao, Michael Wehr  Neuron 
Speech Perception (acoustic cues)
Localizing Sounds.
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
Presentation transcript:

Minimum Audible Angle Measured in Young and Old CBA Mice Using Prepulse Inhibition of Startle Paul D. Allen, Jordan Bell, Navin Dargani, Catherine A. Moore, Carolyn M. Tyler, James R. Ison Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY ARO Introduction Methods Discussion Here we demonstrate that swapping the source of continuous noise between two speakers causes prepulse inhibition of startle in CBA mice, and since inhibition scales with angular separation, the technique can provide behavioral measures of minimum audible angle (MAA). These data indicate that in the 3 month old CBA mouse MAA at 0 degree azimuth is between 7 and 15°, but this resolution requires 60 to 100ms of processing, with shorter ISIs yielding coarser resolution. These results agree with previous behavioral estimates of MAA in the mouse, and the importance of sufficient ISI for inhibition to develop maximum sensitivity is analogous to the minimum integration time required for optimal MAA in human psychoacoustics. The rapid onset of inhibition when angular separation is large, but not when it is small, indicates that monaural cues at each ear are sufficient to alert the auditory system to a change in the acoustic environment, while the longer ISI required for inhibition when angular separation and hence monaural difference cues are reduced, suggests that binaural processing of inputs to the two ears is needed to detect the change in sound source location. The 3rd experiment using octave bands of noise shows that low frequency carriers are ineffective in producing inhibition, suggesting that ILDs provide the cues for spatial discrimination. This result is in accord with the mouse having a well developed LSO and atrophied MSO. Alternatively, over this same frequency range the mouse pinna produces spectral notches, which might serve as a separate cue for change in spatial location, mediated by DCN processing. This could be tested using narrow band or pure tone stimuli. There is a systematic increase with age in the ISI needed to obtain a particular level of auditory spatial resolution, and the magnitude of the inhibition produced at a given ISI and angle decline with age, particularly from 12 to 24 months of age. This finding suggests an ageing effect which could worsen presbycusis by diminishing binaural unmasking - the aging localization system gradually ceases to provide sufficient spatial resolution in the time available for unmasking to be effective. Subjects: CBA/CaJ mice 3, 6, 12, 24 months old Mice held in acoustically transparent wire cage mounted to a platform and accelerometer Startle eliciting stimulus (ES) delivered overhead (120dB SPL, 15 ms broadband noise burst) Startle response recorded from accelerometer (RMS 100ms window, post-ES) Spectrally-matched high-frequency speakers (TDT ES1) located 45cm from the mouse head Angular separations: 180, 90, 45, 22.5, or 15° (7° in Experiments 2 and 3) Cage oriented with head facing mid-line of two speakers Continuous broadband noise (60 dB SPL, 1-50kHz) presented from one speaker (min 15s) Prepulse is noise-swap between speakers at set inter-stimulus interval (ISI) prior to ES ISI conditions: 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 100, 150, 200, 300 ms, two no-prepulse controls, and a no-startle, no-swap activity control Speaker angle is fixed in each session (counterbalanced design) with 11 presentations of each condition, block randomized Inhibition calculated relative to no-prepulse controls Auditory spatial acuity supports sound localization and is used to improve communication in noisy environments via unmasking of spatially separable sound sources The CBA mouse is a successful animal model of presbycusis, displaying changes in auditory temporal processing with age analogous to those observed in humans, which have been linked to deficits in speech perception – especially in noisy backgrounds In this study we wanted to find out if parallel changes in auditory spatial acuity occur with age in the CBA mouse, using a novel application of prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle Startle response amplitude is modulated by prior perturbation of the acoustic environment (inhibition) Does a change in spatial location of a continuous sound source cause prepulse inhibition? Can we estimate a minimum audible angle for the mouse in this way? Previous behavioural measures of spatial acuity in the mouse 7-15° in 2 month old house mouse (Ehret & Dreyer, 1984) 19° in the 2 month old C57 mouse (Heffner, Koay, & Heffner, 2001) How does detection of a change in spatial location depend on stimulus duration? How do these parameters change with age? What are the neural bases for age-related changes in spatial acuity in the mouse? Experiment 1: Broad Band Noise Speaker Swap Experiment 2: Age Effect on Speaker SwapExperiment 3: Frequency Effect on Speaker Swap Question 1: Is 180° speaker swap inhibitory? 180° speaker swap was compared with simple noise offset and onset (i.e. S1 or S2 alone) 3 month old mice Off (N=7), On (N=6), Swap (N=13) Inhibition starts rapidly after noise Offset: at 1ms it is marginally significant, but highly significant from 2 to 300 ms Onset shows marginally significant facilitation out to 5 ms, then highly significant inhibition from 10 to 200 ms 180° speaker swap is significant from 5 to 300 ms, with a hint of facilitation at 1ms 180° speaker swap has inhibitory effect intermediate to noise offset and onset (dashed grey curve shows simple average of on- and offset data) The sum of monaural cues? Intervals with non-linear averaging may reflect binaural processing Question 2: Given that 180° speaker swap is inhibitory, how does inhibition depend on the angular separation of the speakers? Bringing speakers together reduces inhibitory effect of swap and delays ISI functions Smaller angles have longer ISI to peak inhibition and maximal inhibition is reduced Longer ISI required for significant inhibition Window of optimal inhibition is reduced at smaller angles: ms at 15° At a given ISI the effect size increases with the angular separation 5ms only 180° provides significant inhibition At 10ms, 22.5 ° is marginally significant At 50ms, 15° is marginally significant Minimum Audible Angle depends on ISI: optimum duration suggests MAA <15° 3 age groups: 6 month old (N=12) 12 month old (N=12) 24 month old (N=18) Same design as Experiment 1, except minimum angle is 7° None of the groups show significant inhibition for the 7° swap Compared with 3 month old data, ISI functions shift progressively later with age Size of inhibitory effect is reduced with age even when it is reliably generated by large angular separations Duration of optimum inhibition is reduced as longer ISI is required in old mice for inhibition, but inhibition does not persist longer 6 month old mice (N=12) 70dB octave band carriers with 2ms on/offset shaping and 50dB broadband floor to mask transients Swap of lower octaves (2-4 and 4-8 kHz) does not provide inhibition 8-16 kHz does provide inhibition, but only at large angles has inhibition at this ISI that accounts for most of the response seen to swap of broadband noise, but the effect of frequency band on ISI is unclear Masker noise and shaping of stimuli might also reduce inhibition, and account for the difference between broadband and kHz Supported by NIA Grant #AG09524 and The Schmitt Program on Integrative Brain Research