NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eligibility and Standards James Garrison Arizona State Historic Preservation Officer.
Advertisements

Wilderness and Cultural Resources: Symbiotic Management Pei-Lin Yu Rocky Mountains Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit March 6, 2013.
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation 1 36 CFR Part 800 Protection of Historic Properties Section 106 Managing the Environmental & Project.
The Section 106 Review Process: Introduction and Overview
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA)
Local Government Environmental Training: Archaeology April 2, 2009.
Geothermal Projects and Indian Tribes: Dealing with Cultural Resources Issues Michael P. O’Connell Stoel Rives LLP O R.
Archaeological Resources Protection Act Steve Perry Chief of Refuge Law Enforcement Region 7
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
Introduction to Historical Resources and Section 106 Division of Historical Resources (DHR) NH Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation.
Heritage Resources Management and the Wildland Fire Suppression Undertaking.
The National Register of Historic Places. NOT THE: National Historic Registry National Historic Registry Historical List Historical List Historical Registry.
Section 106 The reasons, the actions, the participants.
IDENTIFYING & EVALUATING HISTORIC PROPERTIES NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES –CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION HISTORIC.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
Cultural Resources Management in the USFWS. Overview of Laws & Regulations 1906 – Present.
Real Property Training
Woodland-Larchmere Commercial Historic District Cleveland, Shaker Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio National Register Public Hearing May 21, 2015 Barbara.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Environmental Review Todd Levine Architectural historian, environmental reviewer, Connecticut Freedom Trail coordinator, Washington- Rochambeau Revolutionary.
Federal Preservation Activities: Part 1. What did With Heritage So Rich (1965) and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provide to administer.
A BEGINNERS GUIDE TO SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE: REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Section 106 Processes A Guide to the Ideals and Reals of CRM.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Cultural Resource Management An Introduction to Federal Heritage Preservation and the Law.
Florida Cultural Resources and How They Relate to Your Public Works Project Presented by: Brent Handley, MA, RPA Archaeology Division Director.
Environmental Planning CULTURAL RESOURCES CH 5 - HO # 13
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division Working Through The S106 Process FY 2015 CDBG Applicant Workshop December 4 th, 2014Meg.
Procedures and Processes Phase II: Evaluation CRM Phases I-III This presentation uses materials taken from Ricardo Elia’s Cultural Resources Archaeology.
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CULTURAL RESOURCES LAWS AND REGULATIONS CH 5 CH 5 HO # 13, 13a, 13b
Nadine Peterson Preservation Planner NH Division of Historical Resources Lynne E. Monroe Preservation Company Christopher W. Closs Christopher W. Closs.
CULTURAL RESOURCES PRESERVATION
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation.
Section 106: Historic Preservation Review and Compliance as it relates to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 “How Can State Agencies Assist.
3D Technology and the Section 106 Process Matt Diederich Archaeologist Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Oregon Heritage Programs Division.
National Historic Districts And Why Taylor Should Be Among Them.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL.
NEPA and Section 106: An Introduction WISDOT MEETING NOVEMBER 3-4, 2015.
The Preservation Process. Sequence of Preservation actions 1. Setting standards or criteria that define what is worth preserving. 2. Undertaking a survey.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Anth January 2012.
National Treasures: Brownfields and the National Historic Preservation Act Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
Deepwater Horizon (MC 252) Oil Spill: Section 106 Compliance
Landscape Preservation and Archaeology
Cultural Resources Management in the USFWS
101 New London Road Newark, Delaware
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project FERC Project No February 26, 2008.
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
Midterm Review Public Archaeology.
Navigating the SHPD Review Process
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
Fort Wainwright, Alaska Environmental Officer Course 2011
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
Presentation transcript:

NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs

Indian Law

National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, amended The Congress finds and declares that The spirit and direction of the Nation are founded upon and reflected in its historic heritage The spirit and direction of the Nation are founded upon and reflected in its historic heritage Our historical and cultural foundations should be preserved as a living part of our lives to give a sense of orientation to the American people Our historical and cultural foundations should be preserved as a living part of our lives to give a sense of orientation to the American people Historic properties significant to the nation’s heritage are being lost or substantially altered, often inadvertently, with increasing frequency Historic properties significant to the nation’s heritage are being lost or substantially altered, often inadvertently, with increasing frequency The preservation of this irreplaceable heritage is in the public interest, so that it will be maintained and enriched for future generations The preservation of this irreplaceable heritage is in the public interest, so that it will be maintained and enriched for future generations

Requires Federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties. Section 106 of the Act defines how Federal agencies shall meet their statutory responsibilities. NHPA

36 CFR 800 The Section 106 Consultation Process

STEPS 1) To identify historic properties potentially affected by the undertaking; 2) Assess the effects; 3) Seek ways to avoid, minimize, or mitigate any adverse effects.

SOME TERMS: Agency Official SHPO-State Historic Preservation Officer THPO-Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Consulting Parties APE-Area of Potential Effects Eligibility Historic Property National Register of Historic Places Traditional Cultural Property (TCP)

UNDERTAKING 36 CFR (y) Undertaking means a project, activity, or program funded in whole or in part under the direct or indirect jurisdiction of a Federal agency, including those carried out by or on behalf of a Federal agency; those carried out with Federal assistance; those requiring a Federal permit, license or approval; and those subject to state or local regulation administered pursuant to a delegation or approval by a Federal agency. Undertaking means a project, activity, or program funded in whole or in part under the direct or indirect jurisdiction of a Federal agency, including those carried out by or on behalf of a Federal agency; those carried out with Federal assistance; those requiring a Federal permit, license or approval; and those subject to state or local regulation administered pursuant to a delegation or approval by a Federal agency.

Initiate Section 106 Consultation Process Establish undertaking Identify appropriate SHPO/THPO Plan to involve the public Identify other consulting parties Has potential to affect historic property

Identify Historic Properties Determine scope of efforts Identify historic properties May include background research, consultation, oral history interviews, and field survey

National Register criteria for evaluation National Register criteria for evaluation 36 CFR 60.4 The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity or location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association and

(a)that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patters of our history; or (b)that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or (c) that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction…high artistic values…significant and distinguished entity…; or (d)that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

Assess Adverse Effect 800.5(a)(1) An adverse effect is found when conditions may directly or indirectly alter characteristics of historic property that qualify it for the National Register that diminishes integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, or association Historic Property Is Affected

Examples Physical destruction Physical destruction Alteration of property Alteration of property Relocation Relocation Change in use Change in use Visual/audible elements Visual/audible elements Neglect Neglect Transfer Transfer

PHYSICAL DESTRUCTION

ALTERATION OF PROPERTY

VISUAL/AUDIBLE ELEMENTS

Resolve Adverse Effect Continue consultation to resolve, lessen, minimize, or mitigate effect. Continue consultation to resolve, lessen, minimize, or mitigate effect.

Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)

ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES PROTECTION ACT (ARPA) NATIVE AMERICAN GRAVES PROTECTION AND REPATRIATION ACT (NAGPRA)

ARPA Prohibited Acts “No Person may excavate, remove, damage, alter or deface or attempt to…” “No Person may excavate, remove, damage, alter or deface or attempt to…” “…sell, purchase, exchange, transport, receive, or offer to…” “…sell, purchase, exchange, transport, receive, or offer to…” “remove archeological resources in violation of State or local law and move them in interstate or foreign commerce” “remove archeological resources in violation of State or local law and move them in interstate or foreign commerce” “…hire, counsel, or procure another to violate the law.” “…hire, counsel, or procure another to violate the law.”

NO Stealing Artifacts You Will Be Prosecuted!

NAGPRA Elements a) “Whoever knowingly sells, purchases, uses for profit, or transports for sale or profit, the human remains of a Native American without the right of possession as provided by NAGPRA shall be fined $100,000 or 1 year in jail or both. On a second or subsequent violation, the fine will be $250,000 or 5 years in jail, or both.”