CHAPTER 15 DEALING WITH MULTIATTRIBUTED DECISIONS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Woodburn Interchange EA Evaluation Framework Presentation SWG Meeting #2 April 10, 2003.
Advertisements

Planning: Processes and Techniques
Elementary Methods Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT)
Operations Research Assistant Professor Dr. Sana’a Wafa Al-Sayegh 2 nd Semester ITGD4207 University of Palestine.
Combining Test Data MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski
Marketing 334 Consumer Behavior
NAMA ANGGOTA : DIANITA YANA RATRI ( ) SELVI PUTRI SIMDORA ( ) DEDY ARFIANTO ( ) MUJI IDA KURNIASARI ( )
COMPARING ALTERNATIVES
Irwin/McGraw-Hill Chapter 16 Alternative Evaluation and Selection.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc Course Arrangement !!! Nov. 22,Tuesday Last Class Nov. 23,WednesdayQuiz 5 Nov. 25, FridayTutorial 5.
1 Ravi Vatrapu Online Consumer Decision Making-2 Mishra, S., & Olshavsky, R. (2005). Rationality Unbounded: The Internet and Its Effect.
Chapter 10 JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING: HIGH CONSUMER EFFORT
Mutli-Attribute Decision Making Scott Matthews Courses: /
(c) 2001 Contemporary Engineering Economics 1 Chapter 17 Economic Analysis in the Public Sector Framework of Benefit- Cost Analysis Valuation of Benefits.
1 As Class Convenes u Find your team u Sign attendance form u Insert any work due today and u Return folder to the front desk.
Chapter 28 Design of Experiments (DOE). Objectives Define basic design of experiments (DOE) terminology. Apply DOE principles. Plan, organize, and evaluate.
Decision Making Reviewing and Selecting Solutions.
Module 4 Topics: Creating case study decision tree
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: / / Lecture /5/2005.
Part 5 Staffing Activities: Employment
1 Engineering Economic Decisions Lecture No.1 Professor C. S. Park Fundamentals of Engineering Economics Copyright © 2005.
The Conceptual Framework and Objectives of Financial Reporting
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 9-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
Principles of Engineering System Design Dr T Asokan
PARETO OPTIMALITY AND THE EFFICIENCY GOAL
Marketing Research Aaker, Kumar, Day and Leone Tenth Edition Instructor’s Presentation Slides 1.
Thinking. So what is ‘thinking’? In a general sense, thinking is the intentional use of cognitive capabilities for some purpose. –Recall some kind of.
ALI SALMAN0 LECTURE - 02 ASST PROF. ENGR ALI SALMAN ceme.nust.edu.pk DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT COLLEGE OF E & ME, NUST DEPARTMENT.
Topic 6 - A Designing the Compensation Program. 9. Centralization Vs. Decentralization of Pay Decisions 8. Open Vs. Secret Pay 7. Monetary Vs. Non-monetary.
Need Identification and Problem Definition
Conjoint Analysis. Assume that you want to buy a Mobile Phone Tri Band GSM 1.3 M Camera with flash 2 GB Memory MP3 Play back FM with recording Blue tooth.
Markets, Firms and Consumers Lecture 9- The Consumer.
How People make Decisions
1 Mutli-Attribute Decision Making Scott Matthews Courses: / /
Part 5 Staffing Activities: Employment
Consumer Decision Making I: The Process. What Would a Pet Owner Need to Know in Order to Make a Decision About Buying Pet Insurance? 2 Copyright 2010.
SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
An overview of multi-criteria analysis techniques The main role of the techniques is to deal with the difficulties that human decision-makers have been.
Alternative Evaluation and Selection Process
Chapter 7 Consumer Decision Making. Sample Consumption Decisions Buy or not buy? Buy car or go on a cruise? Buy sedan or coupe? Buy Toyota or Volvo? Buy.
Combining Test Data MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski
Human Resources Compensation. Chapter 14 Compensation Base wages and Salaries – Hourly/weekly/bi-weekly/monthly pay that employees receive in exchange.
Macroeconomics CHAPTER 1 First Principles PowerPoint® Slides by Can Erbil © 2004 Worth Publishers, all rights reserved.
Statistical Process Control
Copyright ©2015 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Sixteenth Edition By William.
Fuel Cell Systems Engineering, F06 Fuel Cell Systems Engineering Lecture 7 Quantitative Decision Methods.
S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology 1 Decision Analysis Raimo P. Hämäläinen Systems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University.
1 Integrative negotiations Multiple issues Differing strengths of preference Differing interests Future relationship Multiple alternatives.
ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS. OBJECTIVES IDENTIFY THE STEPS OF THE ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS. DETERMINE CRITERIA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW TECHNOLOGY.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Step 6: Selection Of The Recommended Plan Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
DADSS Multiattribute Utility Theory. Administrative Details Homework Assignment 6 is due Monday. (slightly shorter) Homework Assignment 7 posted tonight.
Public transport quality elements – What really matters for users? By Dimitrios Papaioannou and Luis Miguel Martinez Presentation for the 20 th ECOMM in.
Engineering Economic Analysis CHAPTER 1 1. What is Engineering Economy? Engineering economy involves the financial and economic evaluation of projects.
Factors to consider System component costs Methods
CHAPTER 6, INDEXES, SCALES, AND TYPOLOGIES
DSS & Warehousing Systems
Decision Matrices Business Economics.
MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski
Shapley Value Regression
AIRLINE MANAGEMENT AERO 4100 / 5100
Chapter One: 1.1 INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT AND CULTURE
TABLE 14-1 Job Offer Selection Problem
Engineering design is the process of devising a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. It is a decision-making process in which the basic.
Evaluating and Choosing Preferred Projects
IME634: Management Decision Analysis
Chapter 14: Decision Making Considering Multiattributes
Economics – Chapter 2, Section 2 Evaluating Economic Performance
Overview of Economic Content
Chapter 12 Section 2 Objective: To understand the committee system and the types of committees in both houses of Congress.
Presentation transcript:

CHAPTER 15 DEALING WITH MULTIATTRIBUTED DECISIONS

MULTIATTRIBUTED DESCIONS Decision making includes both monetary and nonmonetary considerations (attributes).Decision making includes both monetary and nonmonetary considerations (attributes). Value (as conceived by Aristotle inValue (as conceived by Aristotle in 350 B.C.) includes: (1) economic 350 B.C.) includes: (1) economic (2) moral (3) aesthetic (4) social (5) political (2) moral (3) aesthetic (4) social (5) political (6) religious (7) judicial. (6) religious (7) judicial.

EXAMPLES OF MULTIATTRIBUTED DECISIONS Selection of 1 st permanent professional job by an engineering graduateSelection of 1 st permanent professional job by an engineering graduate (insert Table 15-1) (insert Table 15-1)

EXAMPLES OF MULTIATTRIBUTED DECISIONS Selection of a CAD workstationSelection of a CAD workstation (insert Table 15-2) (insert Table 15-2)

CHOICE OF ATTRIBUTES Each attribute distinguishes at least two alternativesEach attribute distinguishes at least two alternatives Each attribute captures a unique dimension or facet of the decision problem (i.e., attributes are independent and nonredundantEach attribute captures a unique dimension or facet of the decision problem (i.e., attributes are independent and nonredundant Attributes, in a collective sense, are assumed to be sufficient for the purpose of selecting the best alternativeAttributes, in a collective sense, are assumed to be sufficient for the purpose of selecting the best alternative Differences in values assigned to each attribute are presumed to be meaningful in distinguishing among feasible alternativesDifferences in values assigned to each attribute are presumed to be meaningful in distinguishing among feasible alternatives

DIMENSIONALITY OF THE PROBLEM CompensatoryCompensatory models – collapses all information into a single dimension – changes in the values of a particular attribute can be offset, or traded off against, opposing changes in another attribute NoncompensatoryNoncompensatory models – retain the individuality of the attributes as the best alternative is being determined – full dimensional analysis – trade-offs among attributes are not permitted

NONCOMPENSATORY MODELS DominanceDominance SatisficingSatisficing DisjunctiveDisjunctive Resolution LexicographyLexicography

NONCOMPENSATORY MODELS DominanceDominance – screening method for eliminating inferior alternatives SatisficingSatisficing – method of feasible ranges – establishes minimum or maximum acceptable values (the standard) for each attribute DisjunctiveDisjunctive Resolution – similar to satisficing, except this method evaluates each alternative on the “best” value achieved for any attribute LexicographyLexicography – especially suitable for decisions in which a single attribute is judged more important than all other attributes

NONCOMPENSATORY MODELS - Example SelectionSelection of a dentist (insert Table 15-3)

NONCOMPENSATORY MODELS – Dentist Example DominanceDominance (insert Table 15-4)

NONCOMPENSATORY MODELS – Dentist Example SatisficingSatisficing (insert Table 15-5)

NONCOMPENSATORY MODELS – Dentist Example OrdinalOrdinal Ranking of Attributes (insert Table 15-6)

NONCOMPENSATORY MODELS – Dentist Example LexicographyLexicography (insert Table 15-7)

COMPENSATORY MODELS BasicBasic principle behind all compensatory models, which involve a single dimension, is that values for all attributes must be converted to a common measurement scale such as dollars or utiles. Autile is a dimensionless unit of worth.

COMPENSATORY MODELS – Dentist Example NondimensionalNondimensional Scaling (insert Table 15-8)

COMPENSATORY MODELS – Dentist Example NondimensionalNondimensional Data (insert Table 15-9)

COMPENSATORY MODELS – Dentist Example HurwiczHurwicz Procedure (insert Table 15-10)

COMPENSATORY MODELS – Dentist Example HurwiczHurwicz Procedure (insert Table 15-11)

COMPENSATORY MODELS – Dentist Example AdditiveAdditive Weighting Technique (insert Table 15-1)

COMPENSATORY MODELS – Worth of Material AdditiveAdditive Weighting Technique (insert Table 15-13)

COMPENSATORY MODELS – Worth of Material AdditiveAdditive Weighting Technique (insert Tables and 15-15)

SUMMARY Insert section 15.8