Reducing Dental Mercury Releases in New Hampshire Paul Lockwood (603) 271-2956 2005 National Environmental Partnership Summit.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the Draft Regional Master Plan Presented to the Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board October 26, 2011.
Advertisements

Health Records Management Practitioner
Reducing Mercury Pollution in the Environment Presentation by : Marc M. Sussman President and CEO Dental Recycling North America, Inc. To the Western.
June 19, 2014 CONTROL OF TRASH ENTERING WATERWAYS IN CALIFORNIA DRAFT WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD POLICY.
November 1, 2012 HB 592 REVIEW Revisiting Ohio’s Comprehensive Solid Waste Law Ohio EPA-SWMD Workgroup.
1 Licensing in the Energy Sector Georgian National Energy And Water Supply Regulation Commission Nugzar Beridze June 27 – July 3, 2008.
CO ‑ STAR: Colorado Strategy for Arsenic Reduction A Five Phase Compliance Assistance Program 1. Evaluate 2. Sample 3.Engineer4. Finance 5. Implement.
Oregon Dentist Partnership Rick Volpel Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (503)
The international pipeline contractor for landmark project JCV/vs rev 0 1 IPLOCA 2008 Environment Award.
Legal & Administrative Oversight of NGOs Establishing and Monitoring Performance Standards.
Wenxin Zhang Department of Civic Design University of Liverpool
Promoting Voluntary Efforts to Reduce Dental Mercury Releases to Wastewater Mark McMillan Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment October.
1 Animal Disease Traceability (ADT) April Full Traceability (Pre-harvest) Birth Premises Slaughter Full Traceability All Production and Points.
Collaboration Nation: Piloting EPA’s Small Local Governments Compliance Assistance Policy Ken Harmon, Attorney Office of Compliance U.S. Environmental.
Massachusetts Dental Mercury Amalgam Recycling Program CARROTS AND STICKS.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Massachusetts’ Power Plant Mercury Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection WESTAR Fall Business Meeting - September.
1 Public Outreach October 2008 By Adelina Murtezaj – Public Relation Officer For Inaugural Partnership Activity between ICC and ERO.
Case studies demonstrating amalgam phase-down approach: Initial findings (Draft) Presented at UNEP/WHO East Africa dental amalgam phase-down project Inception.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
One Game, Three Players and Everyone Wins Automotive Salvage Yards Sara J. Johnson, M.S N.H. Department of Environmental.
Clean Water Act 319(g) Petition Kathy G. Beckett Midwest Ozone Group January 22-23, 2009.
September 16, SWANA 2005 COLORADO CHARLES JOHNSON SOLID WASTE UNIT LEADER.
Region 2 Healthcare Compliance Initiative 1 Region 2's Healthcare Compliance Initiative: Environmental Results From An Integrated Strategy Leveraging Limited.
Joint Ventures: Business & Government Reduce Mercury through Innovative Programs: Dentists (amalgam recycling) and Vehicle Manufacturers (switches)
Mercury Reductions in the Dental Sector in Sweden Eva Sandberg Senior Adviser International Secretariat Swedish Chemicals Agency.
The Reality of Measuring Small Business Environmental Compliance Assistance Kenya Stump.
Mercury-Containing Product Reduction Programs in the Northeast Terri Goldberg NEWMOA.
PA Department of Environmental Protection Continuous Source Monitoring Manual (Manual, Revision 8)
Source Control Planning for Municipal Wastewater System Permit Compliance Environmental Trade Fair & Conference Austin, TX. May 6, 2015 David James Santiago.
WASTE MOTOR VEHICLE TIRE HAULER REGULATIONS Doug Ikenberry Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment July 25, 2007.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM Land Division Update Chip Crockett Chief, Industrial Hazardous Waste Branch Air & Waste Management Association Southern Section Pine.
Mercury Pollution Prevention in Healthcare Initiative Erie County Department of Environment & Planning Western New York Healthcare Association Buffalo.
Presented to Georgia Airports Association Conference October 21, 2009 EPA Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures – Update Also – What’s Coming with.
1 Using Data for Program Improvement New Hampshire Presenter: Carolyn H. Stiles Part C Coordinator/Program Coordinator Family Centered Early Supports and.
Circuit Rider Training Program (CRTP) Circuit Rider Professional Association Annual General Meeting and Conference August 30, 2012.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
CHAD FISHER HAZARDOUS WASTE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR WA STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AUGUST 30, 2013 Managing Pharmaceutical Waste in Washington State.
Inspection Directions: An EMS Approach to Inspecting for Section 608 and 609 Compliance.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Montgomery County Division of Solid Waste Services Business Recycling in Montgomery County COG Recycling CommitteeDecember 1, 2005.
Massachusetts’ 4-Pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Air Innovations Conference - August.
Using the FRP to Enhance Georgia’s Leadership Program May 9, 2006 Stephanie Busch P 2 AD.
SPCC & CCP Issues Jim Roewer APPA E&O Conference April 12, 2006.
Waste Auditing: A Practical Overview and Guide. What is a Waste Audit ?
Public Choices for a Healthy Harbor US EPA Collaborative Science & Technology Network for Innovation Rosslyn, VA - October 18 th, 2005 Marta A. Panero.
Tripartite Meeting Tokyo, September 2007 Ship Recycling An Overview of Regulatory and Industry Developments Presented by INTERTANKO and ICS on behalf of.
AB 32 Implementation Nuts and Bolts IEP Annual Meeting September 22, 2008 Kevin Kennedy Office of Climate Change California Air Resources Board.
Module 6: Working with Secondary Data Common Measures Training Chelmsford, MA September 28, 2006.
SOLID WASTE REGIONALIZATION MONTANA’S JOURNEY Waste & Underground Tanks Management Bureau Solid Waste Section.
Jamie Doucett MassDEP. What Problems Are We Solving? Current regulations are inadequate to address technologies other than recycling and composting Are.
ISAT 422: Environmental Management Pollution Prevention n Reduction or elimination of the creation of pollution.
Amalgam Rules Development & Implementation in New Hampshire Paul Lockwood (603) Northeast Environmental Summit.
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities The Authorization Process.
Smooth Sailing Ahead Partnering With Sustainability and Waste Compliance & Mitigation Fernando Berton, CIWMB.
Work Related to Senate Bill 2202 (effective January 1, 2001)
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE STATEWIDE PORTABLE EQUIPMENT REGISTRATION PROGRAM California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board June 22, 2006.
ESSB 6656 Overview and Scope of the Select Committee on Quality Improvement in State Hospitals April 29, 2016 Kevin Black, Senate Committee Services Andy.
Policy Committee Report Virginia Recycling Association Annual Members Meeting Charlottesville, Virginia November 8, VRA Policy Committee Report1.
Final Rule Accredited Third-Party Certification 1.
BACWA – Leading the way to protect our Bay Mercury Watershed Permit Special Provisions BACWA Annual Members Meeting January 29, 2009 Michele Pla Melody.
Pollution Prevention & Management DentalBMPs. Overview Amalgam in POTW New EPA Guidelines City of Tulsa Dental BMPs.
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
SPR&I Regional Training
Pinal County AQ & Environmental Compliance Assistance
Amalgam Rules Development & Implementation in New Hampshire
DENTAL AMALGAM RULE 40 CFR Part 441
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Presentation transcript:

Reducing Dental Mercury Releases in New Hampshire Paul Lockwood (603) National Environmental Partnership Summit May 8 – 11, 2006 (How to blend compliance assistance with regulatory enforcement)

Background: NH Mercury reduction efforts Rules development process Assistance and Rules implementation Measurement results Amalgam Rules Development & Implementation in New Hampshire

NH Mercury Reduction Strategy (Reports & Documents)

NH Mercury Reduction Strategy Recommended Actions Regarding Dental Amalgam Conduct outreach to the general public and dentist’s offices…to encourage the voluntary use of alternatives to mercury-containing amalgam and encourage the proper collection and disposal of waste amalgam. Draft legislation…with an effective date of July 1, 2003 to prohibit the use of mercury- containing amalgam. R-27 R-28

2002 Legislation HB 1251 – “An Act relative to the use of mercury amalgam fillings by dentists.” Introduced June, 2002 as a ban on the use of mercury-amalgam in New Hampshire NH Mercury Reduction Strategy

2002 Legislation Problems and Issues: Environmental or Public Health issue? Insurance issues Credibility of support data NH Dental Society support HB 1251 – As a ban on mercury amalgam: NH Mercury Reduction Strategy

2002 Legislation DES to draft rules relative to amalgam disposal (RSA 485-A:4 XVIII) DHHS to create pamphlet for dentists to provide to patients HB 1251 – Final version required: NH Mercury Reduction Strategy

Amalgam Management Rules Development in New Hampshire Rules Development Workgroup first met summer, 2002 Key issue = Enforcement Is the best approach a discharge limit? or a performance standard? (over 1,250 dentists and over 600 facilities)

Performance Standard = Amalgam Separator Issues: Level of performance required? “Home built” technologies? Particulate and soluble Hg? Waivers and exemptions? Amalgam Management Rules Development in New Hampshire

Performance Standard = Amalgam Separator Key issue still = Enforcement: 600 practices = 600 installations to inspect and monitor. Amalgam Management Rules Development in New Hampshire

Amalgam Management Rules Development in New Hampshire The Environmental Results Program (ERP) format offers best solution to managing a large regulated sector like dentists… …especially if ERP has rules backing it up.

installation of ISO certified amalgam separator or practitioner is exempt or requesting waiver Env-Ws 905 STANDARDS FOR MANAGEMENT OF MERCURY-CONTAINING AMALGAM Requires written self-certification from “owner of the practice”: Amalgam Rules Implementation in New Hampshire

Exemption for: Orthodonists, periodontists, oral or maxillofacial surgeons, oral pathologists, oral or maxillofacial radiologists who don’t generate amalgam wastes Retired & out-of-state practitioners (NH licensed but not practicing in NH) Amalgam Rules Implementation in New Hampshire

Waiver for: “de minimis” discharge of up to 0.5 gram Hg/year (= 1 gram amalgam = 2 fillings) equivalent alternative technology “zero discharge” (holding tank) Amalgam Rules Implementation in New Hampshire

Concurrent to Rules Development (2003 – 2005): Surveys & outreach with NH Dental Society Information provided at annual conferences Articles in journals, newspapers, etc. Site visits to dental facilities Best Management Practices manual Amalgam Rules Implementation in New Hampshire

Initial Notification July 8, ,260 Licensed practitioners notified 10% response in first two weeks even though none required until October 1. Amalgam Rules Implementation in New Hampshire

Early issues & problems: Mobile units & schools Semi-retired or not in state “Amalgam-free” practitioners Endodontists Amalgam Rules Implementation in New Hampshire

Amalgam Rules Implementation in New Hampshire

Next steps: Project turned over to enforcement staff January, 2006 Recalcitrants are being contacted. Requests for de-minimis waivers will be reviewed. Random sampling to determine accuracy of self-certification. Amalgam Rules Implementation in New Hampshire

Measurement: Outputs (beans) –367 surveys completed 860 BMP Guides distributed 5 presentations provided 7 site visits performed etc., etc. Outcomes (behavioral changes) 2002 – Separators in use = 12 dentists = 1% 2005 – Separators in use = 500 dentists = 40% Baseline survey is crucial to establish changes! Amalgam Rules Implementation in New Hampshire

Environmental Indicators (“hard” numbers) Measurement: Dental Mercury Generation Rates: NH % of National Releases 6.34 tons (Environ Report) x.004 (NH population) = 52 lbs/year/900 practicing dentists = 0.06 lbs/dentist/year Per Chair Generation Rate: 240 mg/chair/day x 4 days/wk x 48 weeks/454 grams/lb = 91 lbs/dentist/year/900 practicing dentists = 0.10 lbs/dentist/year 500 dentists x 0.06/lbs/yr x 95% separator efficiency = 28.5 lbs Hg recycled Amalgam Rules Implementation in New Hampshire

Conclusions: The Environmental Results Program (ERP) model is effective for addressing the dental sector. The ERP format can also be used to help develop regulations making their implementation easier. ERP is also useful for today’s “results-driven” projects and programs. Amalgam Rules Implementation in New Hampshire

Reducing Dental Mercury Releases in New Hampshire What’s the real P2 solution? Not this…

Reducing Dental Mercury Releases in New Hampshire What’s the real P2 solution? …but this!!!