1. Introduction 2 Peripheral arterial disease – Affects 20% adults in Europe and North America – In the UK 500-1000/million PAD, 1-2% require amputation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unstable angina and NSTEMI
Advertisements

Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia
Hip fracture NICE quality standard March 2012 ABOUT THIS PRESENTATION:
The Journey for Amputee Rehabilitation Josephine Wong Day Rehabilitation Centre Ambulatory & Primary Health Care Directorate Central Northern Adelaide.
Preoperative Assessment in Private Practical Pointers for Private Practitioners Dr Adam Molnar MBBS FANZCA Victorian Anaesthetic Group.
Monday 17 September (Materials presented to the Mayoral Team on 28 August 2012)
Improving the quality of medical and surgical care NCEPOD Dr Marisa Mason.
الجامعة السورية الخاصة كلية الطب البشري قسم الجراحة Perioperative management of the high-risk surgical patient Dr. M.A.Kubtan, MD - FRCS.
Fylde Coast Integrated Diabetes Care
British Association of Day Surgery The Future of Day Surgery: The Ambulatory Pathway Ian Smith, MD, FRCA Senior Lecturer in Anaesthesia.
Peter Ward Senior Physiotherapist Acute Medicine Driving Healthcare Change Through HSCP Research February 28 th, 2014 Carole Murphy Senior Occupational.
Ideas from UK modernisation: The Improvement Partnership for Hospitals Penny Pereira Ideas from UK modernisation.
Improving Patient Flow: Making the most of Day Case Surgery Dr Samantha Walker, Dr Tom Pike, Miss A. Kausar East Lancashire Hospital Trust
1. 2 Method Hannah Shotton 3 Background  Many changes in the last 20 years  NCEPOD reports 1989/1999  Kennedy Report  NSF for children  Clinical.
Department of Human Services Toolkit Pre-operative assessment and elective management A toolkit of the Patient Flow Collaborative Click here to continue.
Specialist Physical & Mental Health Private Rehabilitation Services.
The Big Puzzle Evolving the Continuum of Care. Agenda Goal Pre Acute Care Intra Hospital Care Post Hospital Care Grading the Value of Post Acute Providers.
Stroke Units Southern Neurology. Definition of a stroke unit A stroke unit can be defined as a unit with dedicated stroke beds and a multidisciplinary.
The National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit Key findings of the Third Annual Report Slides produced by the MBR Project Team. © The National.
Breast Cancer Surgery Challenging Preconceptions Hamish Brown Consultant Breast and General Surgeon Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust
Safety Basic Science December 22 nd, Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) I am encouraged by my colleagues to report any patient safety concerns.
An Anaesthetist’s perspective on Same Day Surgery
1 Covenants of the Medical Home Neighborhood  How Primary Care Physicians and Specialists can “Choose Wisely”
Preoperative assessment
Improving the quality of medical and surgical care 1 Subarachnoid Haemorrhage.
1 Chapter 5 Unit 4 Presentation ICD-9-CM Hospital Inpatient, Outpatient, and Physician Office Coding Shatondra Surulere, MBA, RHIA, CCS.
Management of Adults with Diabetes undergoing Surgery and Elective Procedures UHL Guideline – April 2013 The aim of the guideline is to improve standards.
Acute Quality Standards Dan Beckett Acute Physician CMO Advisor for Acute & General Medicine.
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm RCN Imaging nurses Forum Roadshow Cardiff, 2011 Dr Andrew Wood Cardiff & Vale University Health Board.
NCEPOD Report – an age old problem Nov 2010 Reflections and how we can do better Finbarr Martin Geriatrician, Guys and St Thomas’ Hospitals and President,
Data Collection and Quality Management Aim: To explain the DRG funding system and its relationship to quality management.
1989 Microsoft released ‘Office’ suite Berlin Wall comes down George Bush snr. becomes President USSR pulls out of Afghanistan First NCEPOD Report.
Improving the quality of medical and surgical care NCEPOD SEPSIS STUDY.
Method Two month data collection period (Feb-Mar 2004) NHS and independent hospitals in England, Wales, N Ireland, Guernsey, Isle of Man and Defence Secondary.
The Role of Thromboprophylaxis in Elective Spinal Surgery The Role of Thromboprophylaxis in Elective Spinal Surgery VA Elwell, N Koo Ng, D Horner & D Peterson.
Acute Oncology Dr Nicola Storey.
JOURNAL PRESENTATION By: Nur Izzatul Ashikin Harun Moderator: Dr Abdul Karim Othman.
Achieving safety and quality in MCCN chemotherapy services.
The “CEPOD” Theatre. CENOD Confidential Enquiry into NON Operative Death.
Auditing an evolving Pre-operative Assessment Service : Completing the cycle Paul Knight, Consultant Anaesthetist Joanna Gordon, ST3 Anaesthetics.
ED Capacity Management Admissions Flow through ED Tim Parke ED Consultant through ED.
Holistic Assessment Rapid Investigation
Perioperative Nursing Care
Carol J. Peden BSC, MB ChB, MD, FRCA, FFICM, MPH Royal United Hospital, Bath.
“ Knowing the Risk:” implications for Critical Care Dr Jane Eddleston.
Reflections on NCEPOD: Knowing the Risk Norman S Williams President December 2011.
The National Emergency Laparotomy Audit Dave Murray National Clinical Lead
British Association of Day Surgery How can day surgery be a high quality option for the elderly patient? Dr Anna Lipp President British.
Dr Alex Goodwin Consultant Anaesthetist, NCEPOD Clinical Co-ordinator and author of the NCEPOD sepsis report NCEPOD report for sepsis study
BTS/ICS Guidelines for the ventilatory management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in adults British Thoracic Society Intensive Care Society.
Dr Thomas Lloyd F1 Dr Aman Hargehandewal Wrexham Maelor Hospital
Critical Co-dependencies Maternity Services Stephanie Mansell SCN Clinical Lead – Maternity.
Yorkshire and the Humber Emergency Surgery Survey Jon Ausobsky RCS Director for Professional Affairs Yorkshire and the Humber & Alison Young Regional Coordinator.
JUST GIVE IT: a 2 phase study to audit the Immediate Management of Patients with Proven or Suspected Neutropenic Sepsis by Ally Gruber Acute Oncology Clinical.
Yorkshire and the Humber Emergency Surgery Survey Jon Ausobsky RCS Director for Professional Affairs Yorkshire and the Humber & Alison Young Regional Coordinator.
Dr Neil Smith Dr Simon McPherson Mr Derek O’Reilly #AP.
Orthopaedics at The Bon Secours, Cork
H Aladin1, A Tameem2, M Rushton3, E Roe3, A Jennings4
DIABETES affects: CONCLUSIONS
Frailty Programme Fran Rose-Smith June 2018.
NCEPOD report for sepsis study
Progressing and discharging patients from the intensive care
Method Two month data collection period (Feb-Mar 2004)
Principal recommendations
Principal recommendations
How Structured Mortality Reviews Can Improve Quality of Care
Critical Care Capacity & Immediate Life Preserving Treatment
Principal recommendations
PowerPoint 16:9 Screen Ratio Template *
Principal recommendations
Presentation transcript:

1

Introduction 2

Peripheral arterial disease – Affects 20% adults in Europe and North America – In the UK /million PAD, 1-2% require amputation – LLA 8-15% in people with diabetes with up to 70% dying <5 years of surgery Hospital inpatient data - 5,498 FCE (2009/10), & 530 deaths in England alone Previous reports indicate mortality is high reflecting age and comorbidites 3

Introduction Wide geographic variation in the number of amputations carried out Peri-operative cardiac complications are the leading cause of morbidity & mortality following surgery Previous guidelines – VSGBI – Diabetes UK – BACPAR 4

Aim To explore remediable factors in the process of care of patients undergoing major lower limb amputation 5

Objectives Pre-operative care – Access to multidisciplinary teams and a multiprofessional pathway of care – Pain management – Clinical care of the patient – Optimisation of comorbidities, including diabetic control Peri-operative care – The scheduling of surgery, including priority and cancellations – Seniority of clinicians (surgery and anaesthesia) – Operation undertaken – Antibiotic prophylaxis, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis – Diabetes control – Anaesthetic care 6

Objectives Post operative care – Access to critical care – Diabetes control – Pain management – Wound care – Rehabilitation Organisational factors – Hub & spoke arrangements – Management of diabetic foot sepsis including multidisciplinary care – Access to surgery – Availability of rehabilitation and prosthetic services – Submission of data to the NVD (NVR) 7

Objectives Hospital participation – Organisational data – Clinical data Study population – 6 month data collection period – OPCS codes – amputation of leg or operations on amputation stump – ICD10 codes – diseases of the circulatory system or diabetes Case identification – Local reporters identified all cases – 7 cases per hospital/3 per clinician 8

Method Questionnaires – Organisational – Clinical – Advisor assessment form – Therapy assessment form Case notes – Medical notes from admission to discharge – MDT notes – Imaging reports – Consent forms – Operation notes (including anaesthetic records) – Nursing notes – Rehabilitation (including physiotherapy) notes – Drug charts 9

Data returns 10

Patient overview 11

Reason for admission 12

Admission category 13

Organisation of care 14

Pre-operative care 15

Pathway for admission 16

Admitting ward 17

First consultant review 18

First consultant review 19

Co-morbidities 20

Co-morbidities In 123/138 patients an adequate attempt to control co-morbidities was made 21

Pre-operative medical review 22

Peri-operative care 23

Consultant vascular surgeon review 24

Consultant vascular surgeon review 25

Vascular surgeon review 1:4 emergency admissions not seen within 72h 26

Indication for amputation 27

Angiography and duplex ultrasound 28

Inadequate assessment of limb 29

Time from assessment to operation 30

Delay between assessment and surgery 31

Limb salvage prior to amputation Advisors: appropriate in a further 22 (7.7%) patients 32

MDT 58/140 (41%) had no MDT for amputees (Organisational data) 33

MDT discussion 40% discussed: Centralisation should = dedicated MDT 34

Pre-operative support services 349 diabetics Potential impact on post-op recovery, rehab & discharge 35

Overall assessment of pre-operative care 36

Overall assessment of pre-operative care 37

Consent 38

Consent 39

Consent: Poor or unacceptable information 40

41

42

Pre-operative investigations Advisors considered work-up adequate in 92.6% 43

Prophylactic antibiotics Organisational data: 131/137 (96%) had a protocol for prophylaxis 44

MRSA screening 85% screened: 96% units screen routinely (Organisational data) 45

Urgency of surgery and type of theatre n = 333 n = % emergency theatre QIF >75% elective 46

Time to operation 47

Time to operation 48

Impact of the delay 49

Duration of the delay Significant delay in 118/617 (19%) patients 50

Reasons for delay in surgery *Transfer, W/E Critical care bed 64 beyond surgeon’s control 52 organisational or because using CEPOD theatre 51

Pre-operative anaesthetic review 52

Pre-operative anaesthetic review Surgery: consultant present for 85% cases 53

Anaesthetic care 54

Methods of anaesthesia 55

The operation 56

Type of amputation performed 57

Seniority of surgeon operating and in theatre 58

Grade of surgeon 48/533 patients booked & cancelled at least once 59

Appropriate procedure undertaken 60

Reason for inappropriate surgery 61

Intra- and post operative monitoring 42 immediate post-op complications 10 = bleeding 10 = cardiac 6 = hypotension 62

Post operative surgical care 63

Post operative destination and outcome 64

Escalation of care 2 delayed, 5 not transferred 65

Escalation of care 66

Escalation of care 67

Stump complications 164/437 (37%) had a complication 68

Stump complications 69

Stump complications 70

Post operative medical care 71

Post operative complications 72

Post operative complications Frequent occurrence: 249/529 (47.1%) Advisor reviewed cases 290/628 (46.2%) Clinical questionnaire Medical twice as common as stump related complications 73

Post operative physician review 319/529 (59.2%) patients reviewed by at least one non-surgical specialist (excludes microbiology) 74

Post operative physician review No relationship between: Complications and physician review Kidney failure and renal medicine review Myocardial infarction/arrhythmia and cardiology review 75

76

77

Physician involvement Pre operative39.7% Post operative59.2% Whole pathway66.1% Recommendation: Model of medical care that includes regular review by physician and surgeon throughout the in-patient stay. 78

Rehabilitation and discharge 79

Co-ordination of care Complex patients Mobility changes admission to discharge Planning and care co-ordination important 80

Early planning of rehabilitation 81

Early planning of rehabilitation 82

Pre-operative discharge planning 83

Named individual available 84

Rehabilitation 91/409 (22.2%) cases additional review appropriate Most common omissions: Psychology38 Amputee rehabilitation33 Foot care team21 85

Post-operative physiotherapy 86

Physiotherapy 78/126 (62.4%) not suitable for early walking aids 36 cases where use delayed inappropriately 87

Falls risk assessment 88

Falls Adverse consequences (Advisors): Eleven stump complications – 3 required further surgery One fracture 89

Prosthetic services 124/169 hospitals formal arrangements for referral to prosthetics When prosthetics not available on site average distance 21 miles (<1– 100) Referral generally by combination of medical staff and physiotherapists 90

Prosthetics 91

92

93

Overall quality of rehabilitation 94

Discharge planning 95

Discharge planning 96

Care beyond the acute hospital 97

Discharge from hospital 57.3% 12.4% 5% 25.3% 98

Delayed discharge 99

Delayed discharge Overall 75 cases of delay for non-medical reasons 100

101

102

Diabetes care 103

Diabetes care 349/628 patients diabetes (55.6%) Age 68 (no diabetes, 71) “Complex” diabetes – 75/349 (21.5%) type 1 diabetes – Population 10% type 1 diabetes – 183/313 (58.5%) on insulin – Population 40% diabetic patients on insulin 104

Pre-operative review 73/132 (55.3%) hospitals performing amputations, policy of routine review by diabetes specialist nurse (DNS) 160/274 (58.4%) pre-op review by DNS 123/217 (56.7%) peer reviewed cases advice given by diabetes team on blood sugar control 105

Insulin use and DNS review Advisors’ view All patients would benefit from DNS review pre-op Review by diabetologist would potentially improve care and optimise co-morbidity Only 31 cases (9%) had surgery on day of admission 106

Insulin infusions - hypoglycaemia 173/278 (62.2%) patients received insulin infusion 107

Insulin infusions - management 108

Glycaemic control Poor or unacceptable at some point in pathway in at least 26.7% of cases 109

Diabetes treatments 110

Diabetes prescribing 111

Diabetes prescribing 112

Outcomes and diabetes Complications: (Clinical Questionnaire) No differences: Individual complications Infections Cardiovascular 30 day mortality: Diabetes11.6% No diabetes 13.3% 113

114

115

Diabetes care 116

Outcomes 117

Outcomes at 30 days 407/ % 138/ % 77/ % 2009 VSGBI AGM: mortality 17% HES, 9% NVD 2010 VSGBI QIF: mortality <5% by

Outcome by mode of admission > 119

Morbidity & mortality meetings 120

VSGBI QIF Pre-operative aspects of care ImplementedThe decision with the patient to perform amputation should be timed and recorded in the notes Controllable risk factors should be optimised Antithrombotic prophylaxis should be prescribed and continued at least until discharge from hospital 121

VSGBI QIF Pre-operative aspects of care ImplementedThe decision with the patient to perform amputation should be timed and recorded in the notes Controllable risk factors should be optimised Antithrombotic prophylaxis should be prescribed and continued at least until discharge from hospital Not implementedPain should be controlled, and the pain team involved if needed Patients should be assessed and managed by specialist MDT A named individual (identified pre-op) should be responsible for each patient (co-ordinate care, rehab and discharge planning) All patients should have formal risk assessment by, or in consultation with a consultant anaesthetist Discharge planning and rehabilitation should be considered pre- operatively, and review by the rehabilitation team encouraged 122

VSGBI QIF Peri-operative aspects of care ImplementedAnaesthesia should be given by a senior anaesthetist (post FRCA); a trainee should have consultant supervision available Amputation should only be undertaken in a facility with ready access to blood products and access to level III critical care All patients to have antibiotic prophylaxis, type of antibiotic according to local policy 123

VSGBI QIF Peri-operative aspects of care ImplementedAnaesthesia should be given by a senior anaesthetist (post FRCA); a trainee should have consultant supervision available Amputation should only be undertaken in a facility with ready access to blood products and access to level III critical care All patients to have antibiotic prophylaxis, type of antibiotic according to local policy Not implementedOperation should be undertaken on a planned operating list in normal working hours (target 75% of all major amputations) Patients not on a planned list should have surgery within 48h of decision to operate and no patient should be deferred more than once (unless new medical contraindications) Aim to undertake below knee amputation (BKA) wherever appropriate and have below knee: above knee ratio > 1 124

VSGBI QIF Post-operative aspects of care ImplementedAmputation should be undertaken in a unit with 24/7 network or local vascular cover, with access to multi-professional support (cardiac, renal, respiratory, diabetes) 125

VSGBI QIF Post-operative aspects of care ImplementedAmputation should be undertaken in a unit with 24/7 network or local vascular cover, with access to multi-professional support (cardiac, renal, respiratory, diabetes) Not implementedThere should be a formal pain management protocol, and access to an acute pain team There should be prompt access to a local amputee rehab team including early mobilisation and physiotherapy There should be continued discharge planning home, or to an appropriate facility There should be formal referral to a specialist rehabilitation team (prosthetics) Optimal medical management and health education should be completed before discharge 126

Overall assessment of care 127

Principal recommendations Best practice clinical care pathway to support QIF A ‘best practice’ clinical care pathway, supporting the aims of the Vascular Society’s Quality Improvement Framework for Major Amputation Surgery, and covering all aspects of the management of patients requiring amputation should be developed. This should include protocols for transfer, the development of a dedicated multidisciplinary team (MDT) for care planning of amputees and access to other medical specialists and health professionals both pre- and post operatively to reflect the standards of the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the British Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Amputee Rehabilitation and the British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. It should promote greater use of dedicated vascular lists for surgery and the use of multidisciplinary records. 128

Principal recommendations Diabetics should be reviewed by specialist diabetes team both pre- and post-operatively All patients with diabetes undergoing lower limb amputation should be reviewed both pre- and post operatively by the specialist diabetes team to optimise control of diabetes and management of co-morbidities. The pre-operative review should not delay the operation in patients requiring emergency surgery. 129

Principal recommendations Vascular review within 24 hours if admitted under another specialty When patients are admitted to hospital as an emergency with limb- threatening ischaemia, including acute diabetic foot problems, they should be assessed by a relevant consultant within 12 hours of the decision to admit or a maximum of 14 hours from the time of arrival at the hospital, in line with current guidance. If this is not a consultant vascular surgeon then one should be asked to review the patient within 24 hours of admission. 130

Principal recommendations Commence planning for rehabilitation and discharge as early as possible For patients undergoing major limb amputation, planning for rehabilitation and subsequent discharge should commence as soon as the requirement for amputation is identified. All patients should have access to a suitably qualified amputation/discharge co-ordinator. 131

Principal recommendations Surgery on planned operating lists within 48 hours As recommended in the Quality Improvement Framework for Major Amputation Surgery (VSGBI), amputations should be done on a planned operating list during normal working hours and within 48 hours of the decision to operate. Any case waiting longer than this should be the subject of local case review to identify reasons for delay and improve subsequent organisation of care. 132

133