Fosaprepitant and aprepitant

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Innovation ● Investigation ● Application
Advertisements

Management Of Nausea and Vomiting in Palliative Care
Innovation ● Investigation ● Application
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee
MASCC/ESMO ANTIEMETIC GUIDELINE 2013 Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Organizing and Overall Meeting Chairs: Richard J. Gralla, MD.
Prof. Hanan Hagar Pharmacology Department College of Medicine
Research Study Designs
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved. Guideline Update.
Prophylaxis antibiotics in colorectal surgery By: Hanaa Tashkandi.
Slide 1 Summary of Clinical Information: Role of EMEND ® in Managing Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Summary of Clinical Information: Role of.
Held in conjunction with the Association for Value-Based Cancer Care’s (AVBCC’s) First Annual Stakeholder Integration Conference.
Presentor: Ainani Aima Ismail Supervisor: Dr Lee Pui Kuan
1 FDA Advisory Committee March 6, 2003 Dennis M. Erb, PhD Regulatory Affairs Merck Research Laboratories EMEND ® (aprepitant)
Aprepitant: A new Drug for Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
Evidence, Challenges and Solutions: Preventing and Managing Chemotherapy- Induced Nausea and Vomiting Scott Edwards, Pharm D Clinical Oncology Pharmacist.
The EPEC-O Curriculum is produced by the EPEC TM Project with major funding provided by NCI, with supplemental funding provided by the Lance Armstrong.
Department of Pharmacology
1 Efficacy and Safety of 3 Different IV Doses of Palonosetron for the Prevention of PONV in the Outpatient (Study 1) and Inpatient (Study 2) Settings Study.
The short term effects of an AKT inhibitor (AZD5363) on biomarkers of the AKT pathway and anti-tumour activity in a breast cancer paired biopsy study (STAKT.
Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting March 6, 2003 Drug Interactions of Aprepitant Venkat Jarugula, Ph.D. Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics.
Dr. Mohammad Aljawadi PharmD, Msc, PhD Jamilah Alsaidan Msc PHCL 477 Clinical Pharmacy Department College of Pharmacy King Saud University March 2015.
Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting
Jamilah Alsaidan, Msc.  The three consecutive phases of emesis are: Emesis NauseaRetchingVomiting.
Does Infusion of Colloid Influence the Occurrence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Elective Surgery in Women? (Anesth Analg 2009;108:1788 –93)
Throughout the 1990s, more and more diagnosed cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy( 化療 ) which make patients experience CINV (Chemotherapy-induced.
Journal Club October 23, 2007 Leigh Marcus, MD Inspired by the TV series: 24.
Ginger for Chemotherapy-related Nausea in Cancer Patients Julie L. Ryan, PhD, MPH 1 C. Heckler, PhD 1, S.R. Dakhil, MD 2, J. Kirshner, MD 3, P.J. Flynn,
Presented By: Julie Hoffman, ADN, RN, OCN Sylvia Wentzky, ADN, RN Bon Secours St. Francis Health System Greenville, South Carolina.
Drugs Acting on the Gastrointestinal Tract. 1.Emetics and Antiemetics.
Introduction The treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer involves rechallenge with platinum based chemotherapy. One regimen commonly in use at the Christie.
Medical Management of Ulcerative Colitis Conrad Beckett Bradford Royal Infirmary M62 Course March 2006.
Efficacy results from the ToGA trial: a phase III study of trastuzumab added to standard chemotherapy in first-line human epidermal growth factor receptor.
Kytril: a once-daily 5HT 3 receptor antagonist for control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) Frederick Schnell Central Georgia Hematology.
Shiva Sharma, Breast/Endocrine S.H.O.  Most common presentation requiring surgery  Great variability with regards to:  Timing  Choice  Route of administration.
POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING Risk Factors and Prevention Plan.
Prim. mag. Marija Cesar Komar dr.med. 1st Congress of the Slovenian Association for Pain Therapy and Symposium on Clinical Neurophysiology of Pain Bled,
Seminar in Palliative Care September 26 – October 02, 2010 Salzburg, Austria in Collaboration with.
AprepitantAprepitant Division of Gastrointestinal and Coagulation Drug Products Division of Gastrointestinal and Coagulation Drug Products Center for Drug.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved. Antiemetics: American.
Mual Muntah Afifah Machlaurin>. Siapkan kertas Sebutkan titik yang bertanggung jawab terhadap respon mualmuntah ! 2. Sebutkan 4 mekanisme stimulasi.
CINVForum Web-symposium dedicated to chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting in lung cancer patients Survey on CINV – Results Base: 168 registered physicians.
Drugs Used to Treat Nausea and Vomiting Chapter 34 Mosby items and derived items © 2010, 2007, 2004 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc.
ANTIEMETICS …. CINV…. The Oncologist’s Nightmare Prof. Dr. Khaled Abulkhair, PhD Medical Oncology SCE, Royal College, UK Ass. Professor of Clinical Oncology.
MASCC/ESMO Antiemetic Guideline 2016
Intrathecal Morphine Usage in Hepatobiliary Surgery Dr David Cosgrave Dr Era Soukhin Dr Anand Puttapa Dr Niamh Conlon.
TM The EPEC-O Project Education in Palliative and End-of-life Care - Oncology The EPEC TM -O Curriculum is produced by the EPEC TM Project with major funding.
Management Of Nausea And Vomiting In Palliative Care
University of Auckland Nursing 785 Assignment 3. Marc McLaughlin
I N T HE N AME O F G OD Combination of Haloperidol, Dexamethasone, and Ondansetron, Reduces Nausea and Pain Intensity and Morphine Consumption after Laparoscopic.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline for Antiemetics in Oncology: Update 2006 Mark G. Kris, Paul J. Hesketh, Mark R. Somerfield, Petra Feyer,
CHEMOTHERAPY INDUCED NAUSEA AND VOMITING
MASCC/ESMO Antiemetic Guideline 2016 SUMMARY
Antiemetics Tutoring By Alaina Darby.
Eucrisa™ - Crisaborole
EVOLUZIONE DEL RAPPORTO COSTO/EFFICACIA DELLA
NAUSEA AND VOMITING Chemotherapy- induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
Shakir AlSharari, PhD Pharmacology Department College of Medicine
Senior Medical Director, Cardiovascular
Antiemetic agents Domina Petric, MD.
Updated CINV Guidelines New Evidence for Change and Practical Issues
The Changing Therapeutic Landscape of CINV
Olanzapine for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving Highly or Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy: A Randomized,
Section III: Neurohormonal strategies in heart failure
Updates on the Management of CINV From the 2014 June Congresses
Other Gastrointestinal Drugs
Updates on the Prevention and Management of CINV
Single-dose aprepitant vs ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in patients.
Prof. Hanan Hagar Pharmacology Department College of Medicine
Antiemetic Drugs.
Presentation transcript:

Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Dr Adam Hurlow 16/11/11

Fosaprepitant and aprepitant Selective neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists Aprepitant PO/fosaprepitant IV prodrug Fosaprepitant 115mg equivalent to aprepitant 115mg Licensed for treatment of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

Substance P/NK1R Substance P –tachykinin Acts on NK1 receptor Found in the area postrema (CTZ), nucleus tractus solitarri (NTS), vomiting centre Exogenous Substance P in NTS triggers vomiting  Substance P/NK1R within the final common pathway to regulate vomiting

Pathophysiology of Chemotherapy-Induced Emesis Two sites in the brainstem—the vomiting center and the chemoreceptor trigger zone—are important to emesis control. The vomiting center consists of an intertwined neural network in the nucleus tractus solitarius that controls patterns of motor activity. The chemoreceptor trigger zone, located in the area postrema, is the entry point for emetogenic stimuli. Enterochromaffin cells in the gastrointestinal tract respond to chemotherapy by releasing serotonin. Serotonin binds to 5-HT3 receptors, which are located not only in the gastrointestinal tract, but also on vagal afferent neurons and in the nucleus tractus solitarius and the area postrema. The activated 5-HT3 receptors signal the chemoreceptor trigger zone via pathways that may include the afferent fibers of the vagus nerve. Serotonin also may bind with 5-HT3 receptors in the brainstem. Other neurotransmitters, including dopamine and substance P, also influence the chemoreceptor trigger zone. Afferent impulses from the chemoreceptor trigger zone stimulate the vomiting center, which initiates emesis.1 1. Grunberg SM, Hesketh PJ. Control of chemotherapy-induced emesis. N Engl J Med. 1993;329: 1790-1796.

CINV Acute (post-treatment) Delayed Anticipatory Breakthrough Occurs within first 24 hours after administration of cancer chemotherapy Delayed CINV that begins after first 24 hours May last for 120 hours Anticipatory Learned or conditioned response from poorly controlled nausea and vomiting associated with previous chemotherapy Breakthrough CINV that occurs despite prophylaxis and requires rescue Refractory Occurs during subsequent treatment cycles when prophylaxis and/or rescue has failed in previous cycles

CINV 50% of patients receiving high-dose cisplatin experienced vomiting and 58% experienced nausea despite standard therapy Anthracycline and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for breast cancer evoked vomiting in 41% of patients and nausea in 67% following ondansetron and dexamethasone

Perception vs. Reality: Emetogenic Chemotherapy Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy In an international prospective observational study of 298 patients from 14 oncology practices performed in 2001-2002, 97% of patients received a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, with 78% receiving a corticosteroid prior to receipt of moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (78% received moderately emetogenic regimens). Physicians and nurses overestimated the efficacy of antiemetic treatment for the majority of patients. The greatest discrepancy between predicted and actual nausea and emesis occurred for the delayed period, with physicians and nurses underestimating the incidence of nausea/vomiting by nearly 30%. Of interest, even with treatment with antiemetics, 35% of patients experienced acute nausea and over 50% experienced delayed nausea.1 1. Grunberg SM, Hansen M, Deuson RR, Mavros P et al. Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis after modern antiemetics. Cancer. 2004;100:2261-2268. Grunberg S. Cancer. 2004;100:2261-2268.

Fosaprepitant and aprepitant in CINV Recommended in following guidelines fro highly/moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: American society of clinical oncology, 2006 European Society of medical oncology, 2008 Multinational association of supportive care in cancer,2008 National comprehensive cancer network,2008

Emetogenic Potential of Single Antineoplastic Agents HIGH Risk in nearly all patients (> 90%) MODERATE Risk in 30% to 90% of patients LOW Risk in 10% to 30% of patients MINIMAL Fewer than 10% at risk Emetogenic Potential of Single Antineoplastic Agents Shown are agents of moderate to high emetic risk. Low emetic risk (Level 2; 10-30% frequency of emesis) and minimal emetic risk (Level 1; <10% frequency of emesis) agents are also detailed in NCCN guidelines v.1.2004 but not shown here. Frequency of emesis shown are proportions of patients who experience emesis in the absence of effective antiemetic prophylaxis. 1NCCN guidelines v.1.2004. Available at http://www.nccn.org.

Evidence base Cochrane protocol but no review Recent literature reviews Chrisp P Core Evidence 2007;2(1) & Langford P and Chrisp P Core Evidence 2010:5 77-90 2007 - 1 meta-analysis, 13 RCT, 1 case reports 2010 – 1 meta analysis, 4 RCT, 2 case reports Both concluded – clear evidence adding aprepitant to dexamethasone plus a serotonin antagonist improves control of emesis and nausea and reduces need for rescue medication in patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy Clear evidence patients more satisfied with their antiemetic therapy when aprepitant added; less impact of symptoms on daily activities

Evidence: Aprepitant & standard therapy (ST) vs. ST and placebo   Acute complete response % Delayed complete response % Navari 1999 77 vs. 57 (p =0.004) 52 vs. 16 (p <0.001) Campos 2001 75 vs. 51 (p<0.01) 41 vs. 22 (p<0.05) Hesketh 2003 89.2 vs. 78.1 (<0.001) 75.4 vs. 55.8 (<0.001) Poli-bigelli 2003 82.8 vs. 68.4 (<0.001) 67.7 vs. 46.8 (<0.001) Gralla 2005 71 vs. 49 (<0.005) 67 vs. 32 (<0.005) Warr 2005 86 vs. 73 (<0.001) 72 vs 51(<0.001) Schmoll 2006 87.7 vs 79.3 (<0.005) 74.1 vs 63.1 (<0.004) Herrington 2008 66.7 -70.4 vs 56.2 63-59.3 vs 31.2 Yeo 2009 72.1 vs 72.6 75.6 vs 67.4

Aprepitant beyond chemo Preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: post hoc analysis of pooled data from two randomized active-controlled trials of aprepitant. Current Medical Research and Opinion2007, Vol. 23, No. 10 , Pages 2559-2565 Diemumsch P et al - 1599 patients for major surgery under general anaesthesia - RCT, double blind - aprepitant 40mg or125mg vs ondansetron 4mg IV pre-op - no significant nausea (56.4% vs. 48.1%) - no nausea (39.6% vs. 33.1%) - no vomiting (86.7% vs. 72.4%) - no nausea and no vomiting (38.3% vs. 31.4%) - no nausea, no vomiting, and no use of rescue (37.9% vs. 31.2%) p < 0.035 for the odds ratio for each comparison

Regimens Fosaprepitant (Ivemend)  intravenous infusion, over 20–30 minutes, 150 mg 30 minutes before chemotherapy on day 1 of cycle only Aprepitant (Emend) 125 mg 1 h pre chemotherapy, then 80 mg od for the next 2 days

Complications Aprepitant is eliminated primarily by metabolism; aprepitant is not renally excreted. Well tolerated in patients with mild to moderate hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh 5-9). Unknown >9 No dose adjustment for renal insufficient/HD Side effects diarrhoea (23-60%), headache 3%, infusion site pain 7.6-10.4%

Interactions CYP3A4 substrate - increased by ketocoanzole - decreased by carbemazapine inhibition of CYP3A4  and induction CYP2C9 - increases dex/methylpred levels - OCP failure - increases midazolam - decreases warfarin