TRUSTS / EORTC 62091/SARC021: A PHASE IIB/III STUDY OF TRABECTEDIN VS DOXORUBICIN AS FIRST LINE THERAPY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED/METASTATIC SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

516 (32723) Phase III trial comparing AC (x4)taxane (x4) with taxane (x8) as adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer: Results of N-SAS-BC02.
Goede V et al. Proc ASCO 2013;Abstract 7004.
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
A pooled analysis of the final results of the two randomized phase II studies comparing Gemcitabine (G) vs Gemcitabine + Docetaxel (G+D) in patients (pts)
IMPACT OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN UTERINE SARCOMA (UTS): REVIEW OF 12 CLINICAL TRIALS FROM EORTC INVOLVING ADVANCED UTS COMPARED TO OTHER SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA (STS)
LMS-02 A phase II single-arm multicenter study of Trabectedin in combination with Doxorubicin as first-line treatment of metastatic and/or locally advanced.
A blanket protocol to study oral regorafenib in patients with refractory liposarcoma, osteogenic sarcoma, and Ewing/Ewing-like sarcoma Coordinating Investigator:
Herceptin® (trastuzumab) in combination with chemotherapy: pivotal metastatic breast cancer survival data 1.
Introduction  Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS) are a group of highly chemotherapy resistant tumors  Doxorubicin is the only APPROVED 1 st line chemotherapy.
Surgical resection of metastatic GIST on imatinib delays recurrence and death: results of a cross- match comparison in the EORTC Intergroup study.
Targeting Tumors Using Endogenous Albumin
A MULTICENTRIC PHASE I STUDY OF SUNITINIB WITH CONCOMITANT RADIATION THERAPY IN INOPERABLE SARCOMAS (GIST EXCLUDED) M.P. SUNYACH, D. PEROL, N. PENEL, P.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Eastern cooperative oncology group E1496: ECOG and CALGB Cyclophosphamide/Fludarabine (CF) with or without Maintenance Rituximab (MR) in Advanced Indolent.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
SARC020 – EORTC TRUSTS – A phase IIb/III multicenter study comparing the efficacy of TRabectedin administered as a 3-hour or 24-hour infusion to.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
Randomized phase III trial of trabectedin versus doxorubicin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in translocation-related sarcomas (TRS) Sant P. Chawla,
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
A Phase II Trial of Perifosine in Patients with Chemo-Insensitive Sarcomas Study Update – November 2008 Dejka Araujo, MD MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston,
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
Predicting toxicity for patients with advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) treated with imatinib mesylate : an EORTC/ISG/AGITG randomized trial.
11 One vs Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor A Randomized Trial Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al.
NHL13: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study of Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment versus Observation Alone in Patients with Aggressive B ‐ Cell Lymphoma.
IMPROVED OVERALL SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED SOFT-TISSUE OR BONE SARCOMAS WHO ACHIEVED A CLINICAL-BENEFIT RESPONSE WHEN TREATED WITH AP23573, A.
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
Outcome of chemotherapy in synovial sarcoma (sys) patients (pts): review of 15 clinical trials from EORTCc involving advanced sys compared to other Soft.
EARLY PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS AN ANALYSIS FROM A PHASE III RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL (EORTC 62961/ESHO) OF NEOADJUVANT.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
MAX: International multi-centre randomised phase II/III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev) and mitomycin C (MMC) as first-line treatment for.
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
The Combination of Bevacizumab (Bev) with capecitabine/irinotecan (CapIri/Bev) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx/Bev) is highly active in advanced colorectal.
MEASURING CLINICAL EFFICACY IN PHASE II TRIALS Response: Karnofsky, WHO, RECIST Event rate: progression free/survival Time to event: progression/survival.
Correlation of Hand-Foot Skin Reaction (HFS) with Treatment Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer (PC) Patients (pts) Treated with Gemcitabine/Capecitabine plus.
. Background Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Platinum Refractory or Resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Galician Lung Cancer.
EORTC Tumor response to pre-operative chemotherapy (CT) with FOLFOX-4 for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (LM) Interim results of the EORTC.
Time to Secondary Resistance (TSR) After Interruption of Imatinib: Updated Results of the Prospective French Sarcoma Group Randomized Phase III Trial on.
C.P. Belani 1, D.M. Waterhouse 2, H.H. Ghazal 3, S. Ramalingam 4, J.M. Waples 5, R.E. Bordoni 6, G.A. Reznikoff 7, C.P. Curran 8, R. H. Greenberg 9 1 Penn.
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 AP23573 Induced Long-term Stability in 2 Patients with Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor (#561) Scott Schuetze, Warren.
Cabozantinib (XL184) in metastatic castration- resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Results from a phase II randomized discontinuation.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
EORTC OSN/CTOS11 Safety of Caelyx combined with ifosfamide in previously untreated adult patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Final.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Previously Untreated and.
Journal Club Dr. Eyad Al-Saeed Radiation Oncology 12 January, 2008.
Mok TS, Wu SL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: Gefitinib Superior.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel- Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab- Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab-Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
Everolimus for Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors N Engl J Med 2011;364: R4. 박선희 / Prof. 동석호.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 SINGLE AGENT DOXORUBICIN VS DOSE INTENSIVE COMBINATION THERAPY WITH EPIRUBICIN / IFOSFAMIDE IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ADULT.
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone inpatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status.
Results from the International, Randomized Phase 3 Study of Ibrutinib versus Chlorambucil in Patients 65 Years and Older with Treatment-Naïve CLL/SLL (RESONATE-2TM)1.
Randomized Phase III Study Of Gemcitabine
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
PHASE I/II STUDY OF PEGYLATED LIPOSOMAL DOXORUCIN (PLD) AND GEMCITABINE (GEM) IN RECURRENT PLATIN RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER (OC). A Study of the VWOG.
NCI/CTEP 7435: Eribulin Active, Tolerable in Urothelial Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
ACT II: The Second UK Phase III Anal Cancer Trial
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Presentation transcript:

TRUSTS / EORTC 62091/SARC021: A PHASE IIB/III STUDY OF TRABECTEDIN VS DOXORUBICIN AS FIRST LINE THERAPY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED/METASTATIC SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS analysis of phase IIb part B. Bui-Nguyen, J. Butrynski, N. Penel, J-Y Blay, N. Isambert, M. Milhem, J.M. Kerst, A.K.L. Reyners, S. Litière, S. Marreaud, A.P. Dei Tos, WTA van der Graaf November 2, CTOS 2013

Histologically proven advanced and/or metastatic malignant soft tissue sarcoma intermediate/high grade, except:  Well-differentiated liposarcoma, Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, Chondrosarcoma, Osteosarcoma (excluding extraskeletal osteosarcoma), Ewing tumors / primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET), Gastro-intestinal stromal tumors (GIST), Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans Main Selection criteria (1) Measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1 Confirmed disease progression based on investigator’s judgment No known history of CNS metastases or leptomeningeal tumor spread No prior anthracycline treatment No prior anticancer therapy for advanced or metastatic malignant soft tissue sarcoma 2

No anti-cancer therapy (i.e systemic therapy, RT, surgery) and no other investigational agent within 28 days prior to treatment start and while on protocol treatment > 18 years old WHO PS 0 or 1 Normal bone marrow, hepatic, renal and cardiac function No active or uncontrolled infections or serious illnesses or medical conditions, including a history of chronic alcohol abuse, hepatitis, HIV and/or cirrhosis. Contraception Written informed consent Main Selection criteria (2) 3

2 Steps Study Design 4 Phase IIb 120 pts Phase III 250 pts R R Trabectedin 1.5 mg/m 2 24h Doxorubicin 75 mg/m 2 Doxo 75 mg/m T 3h or 24h Select the best PFS & safety Trabectedin 1.3 mg/m 2 3h PFS? Stratification factors: -age (<60 vs ≥ 60 yrs) -presence of liver metastases (yes vs no) Secondary endpoints -OS, QoL, RR -toxicity R R

Median PFS in control arm 6 months (max) Alpha = (1-sided), power = 90% Target HR = 0.65 (i.e. 35% reduction in risk, corresponding to PFS of ± 9 months) Interim analysis to be performed when both  a total of 53 PFS events in doxo and Trab 3h arm  a total of 53 PFS events in doxo and Trab 24h arm Statistical considerations 5

1.If more than 5% of drug related deaths are observed, or if more than 15% of patients have to withdraw for toxicity, the safety profile of the trabectedin arms will be considered as unacceptable. 2.The study is not futile (i.e. HR > 1) for PFS 3.The selected trabectedin arm should not be inferior (by more than 10% in terms of hazard ratio) to the other investigational arm. 4.If the mean relative dose intensity in patients receiving at least 6 cycles of therapy is 10% lower in the 3 hour schedule (compared to the 24 hour schedule), the 3 hour treatment schedule will be considered as unacceptable. Protocol decision after phase 2b 6

7 Follow-up Median follow-up of 7.9 months (IQR 5.9 – 11.1) doxorubicin: 7.8 months (IQR ) trabectedin 3h infusion: 8.0 months (IQR 6.4 – 11.3) trabectedin 24 hr infusion: 7.9 months (IQR 5.7 – 11.3) Accrual from June 2011 to August 2012

8 Trab_3hrs (N=47) Trab_24hrs (N=43) Doxo (N=43) Total (N=133) N (%) Eligible No 3 (6.4) 3 (7.0) 1 (2.3) 7 (5.3) Yes 44 (93.6) 40 (93.0) 42 (97.7) 126 (94.7) Eligibility Patient id Hospital numberTreatmentReason 3234Trab_3hrsGrade 3 GGT 10234Trab_3hrsGrade 3 GGT 49287Trab_24hrsGrade 3 GGT DoxoGrade 3 GGT 54229Trab_3hrsGrade 3 GGT 72301Trab_24hrsineligible tumor type (well differentiated adipocytic sarcoma) 85227Trab_24hrsGrade 3 GGT

Baseline characteristics 9 Trab_3hrs (N=47) Trab_24hrs (N=43) Doxo (N=43) Total (N=133) N (%) Age at randomization < 60yrs 23 (48.9) 21 (48.8) 20 (46.5) 64 (48.1) ≥ 60yrs 24 (51.1) 22 (51.2) 23 (53.5) 69 (51.9) Median60 Range Presence of liver metastasis at randomization No38 (80.9)35 (81.4)37 (86.0)110 (84.7) Yes9 (19.1)8 (18.6)6 (14.0)23 (17.3) Sex Male 18 (38.3) 20 (46.5) 18 (41.9) 56 (42.1) Female 29 (61.7) 23 (53.5) 25 (58.1) 77 (57.9) WHO performance status 0 25 (53.2) 21 (48.8) 26 (60.5) 72 (54.1) 1 22 (46.8) 22 (51.2) 17 (39.5) 61 (45.9) Tumor typeADI 6 (12.8) 10 (23.3) 13 (30.2) 29 (21.8) (local path)LMS 18 (38.3) 8 (18.6) 14 (32.6) 40 (30.1) SYN 2 (4.3) 3 (7.0) 8 (6.0) OTH21 (44.6)22 (51.1)13 (30.2)56 (42.1)

Treatment Relative dose intensity (%) Trab_3hrs (N=15) Trab_24hrs (N=15) Doxo (N=23) Median Range Mean (SD)75.8 (17.5)73.0 (15.6)91.3 (7.4) Relative dose intensity (at least 6 cycles) 10 Trab_3hrs (N=46) Trab_24hrs (N=41) Doxo (N=40) Number of cycles Median346 Range Still on treatment? No 40 (87.0) 36 (87.8) 39 (97.5) Yes 6 (13.0) 5 (12.2) 1 (2.5)

1.If more than 5% of drug related deaths are observed, or if more than 15% of patients have to withdraw for toxicity, the safety profile of the trabectedin arms will be considered as unacceptable. 2.If the mean relative dose intensity in patients receiving at least 6 cycles of therapy is 10% lower in the 3 hour schedule (compared to the 24 hour schedule), the 3 hour treatment schedule will be considered as unacceptable. 3.The selected trabectedin arm should not be inferior (by more than 10% in terms of hazard ratio) to the other investigational arm. 4.The study is not futile (i.e. HR > 1) for PFS Protocol decision rules for IDMC 11

Trab_3hrs (N=46) Trab_24hrs (N=41) Doxo (N=40) Total (N=127) N (%) Still on protocol treatment 6 (13.0) 5 (12.2) 1 (2.5)12 (9.4) Off protocol treatment due to Disease progression (+ death due to PD) 26 (56.5) 23 (56.1) 12 (30.0) 61 (48.0) Symptomatic deterioration 3 (6.5) 1 (2.4) 2 (5.0) 6 (4.7) Stop for Toxicity (+ toxic death) 7 (15.2) 8 (19.5) 1 (2.5)16 (12.6) Death not due to malignant disease or toxicity 2 (4.3) 1 (2.4) 1 (2.5) 4 (3.1) Investigator decision (best interest) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.4) 1 (2.5) 2 (1.6) Patient decision (not related to toxicity) 1 (2.2) 2 (4.9) 1 (2.5) 4 (3.1) Other 1 (2.2) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.5) 2 (1.6) Reasons for stopping treatment 12

Treatment discontinuation under trabectedin*: 15 1 treatment related death: sepsis (T3h) 8 hematological toxicities  Leuco/neutropenia:3 (sepsis:1)  Thrombopenia:5 6 liver biological toxicities  Only cause of discontinuation in 3 patients 1 General status impairment 1 decrease of VEF>10% 1 creatinin increase, 1CPK increase Treatment discontinuation under doxorubicin:1  troponin increase *causes of discontinuation could be multiple *discontinuation if no return to grade 1 or less 14 days after theoretical date to resume treatment Causes of treatment discontinuations 13

1.If more than 5% of drug related deaths are observed, or if more than 15% of patients have to withdraw for toxicity, the safety profile of the trabectedin arms will be considered as unacceptable. 1.The study is not futile (i.e. HR > 1) for PFS 2.If the mean relative dose intensity in patients receiving at least 6 cycles of therapy is 10% lower in the 3 hour schedule (compared to the 24 hour schedule), the 3 hour treatment schedule will be considered as unacceptable. 3.The selected trabectedin arm should not be inferior (by more than 10% in terms of hazard ratio) to the other investigational arm. Protocol decision rules for IDMC 14

Progression free survival 15 Treatment Patients (N) Observed Events (O) Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 1-sided P-Value Median (95% CI) (Months) Doxo (3.12, 7.23) Trab_24hrs (0.67, 1.90) (1.91, 7.82) Trab_3hrs (0.91, 2.48) (1.45, 5.52) Treatment Patients (N) Observed Events (O) Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Trab_24hrs Trab_3hrs (0.81, 2.10)

Progression free survival 16 Doxorubicin Trabectedin 24hrs Trabectedin 3hrs

Trab_3hrs (N=47) Trab_24hrs (N=43) Doxo (N=43) N (%) Complete response 1 (2.1) 0 (0.0) Partial response 6 (12.8) 2 (4.7) 11 (25.6) Stable disease 19 (40.4) 25 (58.1) 16 (37.2) Progressive disease 15 (31.9) 15 (34.9) 9 (20.9) Early death 5 (10.6) 0 (0.0) 2 (4.7) Not assessable/not evaluable 1 (2.1) 1 (2.3) 5 (11.6) Best overall response 17 Trend test (considering early death and not-assessable/not-evaluable as PD): -Trab 3hrs vs doxo: 2-sided p-value Trab 24hrs vs doxo: 2-sided p-value 0.159

18 Doxorubicin Trabectedin 24 hrs Trabectedin 3 hrs

Overall survival 19 Treatment Patients (N) Observed Events (O) Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 1-sided P-Value Median (95% CI) (Months) Doxo Not reached Trab_24hrs (0.39, 2.25)0.441Not reached Trab_3hrs (0.58, 2.90) (8.2, 17.3) Trab_3hrs (N=47) Trab_24hrs (N=43) Doxo (N=43) N (%) Cause of death: Progression of disease (PD) 12 (25.5) 9 (20.9) 8 (18.6) Toxicity 1 (2.1) 0 (0.0) Other (not due to toxicity or PD) 2 (4.3) 1 (2.3) Unknown 1 (2.1) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.3)

20 Doxorubicin Trabectedin 24 hrs Trabectedin 3 hrs

1.Only 1 toxic death occurred, but more than 15% of patients stopped allocated treatment due to toxicity in the trabectedin arms. 2.Both trabectedin infusion arms compare to doxorubicin with an HR larger than the cut-off for futility, thus the trial meets futility criteria 3.The mean relative dose intensity was not different in the 3hr schedule than in the 24hr schedule. 4.With a HR = 1.30 the 3hr schedule is less active than the 24hr schedule. According to the decision rules, the study is stopped Conclusions 21

Thanks to The patients All the EORTC and SARC investigators EORTC and SARC staff pharmaMar Acknowledgements 22

23

IDSiteTreatment More details on toxicity 5228Trab_3hrsneutropenia, catheter infection treatment delayed and not possibility to restart treatment as per protocol 8228Trab_3hrsseptic choc (toxic death) Trab_3hrsAfter 3rd attempt Platelet count did not recover to required value. 97 K/MM Trab_3hrsTreatment delayed of more than 3 weeks due to Platelet count decreased 47906Trab_3hrsincrease of liver enzymes, decrease of platelets Trab_3hrsHepatopathy Trab_3hrstoxicity: thrombopenia, ALAT elevation, GGT elevation 19228Trab_24hrsgeneral status impairment, creatinine increased 28228Trab_24hrsliver toxicity Trab_24hrs3 weeks after last dose, pt still has Gr 2 decreased lymphocyte 690 (norm is ). CPK on 23/08/2012 is still elevated Grade 795 (norm ) 60228Trab_24hrshepatic toxicity 72301Trab_24hrsEjection fraction decrease below LLN (10% drop compared to baseline) 92228Trab_24hrsliver toxicity 96234Trab_24hrsplatelet count decreased Trab_24hrspancytopenia 76371DoxoTroponin increased due to cardiotoxicity for anthracycline 24

25

26

27

28

Safety 29