Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1216r1 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Consideration on Coexistence between LTE-U and 802.11 WLAN Date: 2014-09-13 September.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE /0019r0 March 2015 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 March 2015 Opening Report Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 January 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Coexistence Scenario and Use Cases Date: Authors: Notice: This.
Doc.: IEEE /1544r0 Submission Nov Liaison Report Nov 2014 Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)Slide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1157r3 SubmissionYunzhou Li, Tsinghua Univ.Slide 1 Feasibility of Coordinated Transmission for HEW Date: Authors: September.
Discussion of LAA LBT Categories
Doc.: IEEE /0007r0 SubmissionAlireza Babaei, CableLabsSlide 1 Comments on LAA EVM Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2014
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 # R1-15xxxx Fukuoka, Japan 25th – 29th May 2015
Submission doc.: IEEE /0058r1 September 2014 Alireza Babaei, CableLabsSlide 1 Fair Spectrum Sharing in Unlicensed Spectrum Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/1432r1 Submission Nov Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Proposed ax Specification Framework - Background Date: Authors:
Impact of LTE in Unlicensed Spectrum on Wi-Fi
Submission doc.: IEEE /0821r2 July 2014 Alireza Babaei, CableLabsSlide 1 Coexistence Requirements of WLAN and LTE in Unlicensed Spectrum.
Doc.: IEEE /554r0 TG3c Presentation January 16, 2007 Yongsun Kim – ETRISlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission July 2014 Hyunduk Kang et al, ETRISlide 1 Status of ISM Bands Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE 11-13/0000r0 Submission July 2013 Dapeng Liu (CMCC)Slide 1 Interference Control Use Case for HEW Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0209r3 Submission Aug Sangbum Kim, Samsung Electronics Slide 1 Managing SCW Regular Pattern IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Doc.: IEEE b Submission Sept Hyungsoo Lee, Cheolhyo Lee, Jaeyoung Kim, ETRISlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0 September 2014 Gwangzeen Ko, ETRISlide 1 Considerations for Partial Band Interference between WLAN Systems Date:
September 2013doc.: IEEE DiscussionJinyoung Chun, LG Electronics Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE ad Submission September 2009 J. Karaoguz, Broadcom, Chair WirelessHD Coex SGSlide 1 WirelessHD Specification and Coexistence.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: MISU Title: Proposal on new MIH service for Proximity Service Communications Date Submitted:
Doc.: IEEE /1238r0 Submission September 2011 Rolf de Vegt, QualcommSlide 1 Channelization and Bandwidth Modes for ah Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE Submission May 2014 Byung-Jae Kwak et al., ETRISlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /0061r1 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Probe Response frame transmission interval Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0079r0 Submission September 2015 Andrew Myles (Cisco)Slide 1 Discussion of issues related to EN revision 16 September 2015.
Doc.: IEEE b Submission Sept Hyungsoo Lee, Cheolhyo Lee, Jaeyoung Kim, ETRISlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE e Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposal.
Doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission Feedback on 3GPP CRs: LAA Multi-Channel Access and Energy Detect (ED) Coexistence Slide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0263r1 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRI Spec Framework Proposal: Selection of the AP for Scanning Date: Slide 1 March 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0896r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Probe Request Filtering Criteria Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /759r0 Submission November 2002 Bruce Kraemer, Intersil TK Tan, PhilipsSlide 1 Proposal to Amend a to address Japanese bands.
Doc.: IEEE c Submission January 2008 ETRISlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /0085r0 Submission November 2014 Hyunduk Kang, ETRISlide 1 November 2014 IG CUB Closing Report Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE e Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Subframe.
Doc.: IEEE m Submission ETRI July 2012 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /0618r0 Submission Listen interval for sensor devices May 2012 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jinsoo Choi, LG Electronics.
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1064r0 September 2015 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Long Range, Low Power Design Criteria Date: Authors:
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 March 2016
Single Tx switched UL DRAFT 3GPP RAN #77 September , 2017
November 2014 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Mobile Wireless Backhaul for Fast Moving.
Comments on LAA EVM Date: Authors: January 2015 Month Year
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 March 2016
Impact of LTE in Unlicensed Spectrum on Wi-Fi
September 2015 Opening Report
3GPP RAN1 #90 meeting summary on LAA Enhancements
Summary of WG activities
Proposed response to 3GPP ED request
ACK Protection Schemes for the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink
LB97 CID Coex Date: Authors: May 2007 May 2007
Adaptive Quiet Period Control in TDD WRAN System
WF on LTE-NR Coexistence
June 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: ax and HRP_LRP Coexistence Date.
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: z Comments on ax Coexistence Assurance.
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
3GPP Liaison Report Date: Authors: May 2012 May 2012
Consideration on Coexistence between LTE-U and WLAN
3GPP RAN1 and RAN4 status on NR-Unlicensed and LAA
Comments on LAA EVM Date: Authors: January 2015 Month Year
March 2015 SG CUB Opening Report
Feasibility of Coordinated Transmission for HEW
IEEE GPP 6 GHz Coexistence Workshop Preparation
ACK Protection Schemes for the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink
3GPP RAN1 status on NR-Unlicensed
Comments on LAA EVM Date: Authors: January 2015 Month Year
January 2015 Opening Report
January 2015 Opening Report
Feasibility of Coordinated Transmission for HEW
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /1216r1 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Consideration on Coexistence between LTE-U and WLAN Date: September 2014 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jeeyon ChoiETRI161 Gajeong-dong, Yuseong-Gu, Daejoen, Korea Jae Seung LeeETRI161 Gajeong-dong, Yuseong-Gu, Daejoen, Korea Jaewoo Park ETRI161 Gajeong-dong, Yuseong-Gu, Daejoen, Korea Yu Ro Lee ETRI161 Gajeong-dong, Yuseong-Gu, Daejoen, Korea Il Gyu Kim ETRI161 Gajeong-dong, Yuseong-Gu, Daejoen, Korea

doc.: IEEE /1216r1 SubmissionSlide 2 Background LTE-U will trigger coexistence issues in unlicensed band –3GPP TSG RAN plenary approved the study item on “Licensed- Assisted Access using LTE” which will be started in October [2]. – devices will be affected by LTE-U in the near future. –We should consider fair coexistence mechanism between LTE-U and in unlicensed band. 14/821r2 introduced coexistence requirements between LTE-U and –14/821r2 proposed “Duty cycle approach” [1]. –This may be one of a possible solution for the coexistence issues. –We may consider other possible solutions. Jae Seung Lee, ETRI September 2014

doc.: IEEE /1216r1 SubmissionSlide 3 Considerations for Coexistence (1/2) It is LTE-U that should devise the Coex mechanism rather than –LTE-U should not impact Wi-Fi services. – devices are already deployed in unlicensed band widely, so the new LTE-U should respect devices. – uses “Listen-Before Talk” and it provides good coexistence from side, so it is reasonable to have LTE-U devise Coex mechanism from LTE side in its spec. The Coex mechanism should require only minimal changes to the existing spec –Desirable to exploit or slightly change existing LTE spec. Current features should be reused as much as possible. –Desirable to use mechanism which does not require changes to WLAN. Jae Seung Lee, ETRI September 2014

doc.: IEEE /1216r1 SubmissionSlide 4 Considerations for Coexistence (2/2) The Coex mechanism should ensure enough transmission time to devices –For FDD LTE mode, the maximum quiet period is only 215 μsec which is not enough for WLAN devices for transmission [1]. –Need to consider Coex mechanism which ensures longer transmission time than this maximum quiet period to devices. –We should prevent LTE UE from being “out of range” if the duty cycle period is too long. Jae Seung Lee, ETRI September 2014

doc.: IEEE /1216r1 SubmissionSlide 5 Example of the COEX mechanism We may exploit Fake MBSFN subframe of LTE for coexistence between LTE-U and WLAN Fake MBSFN (Multicast/Broadcast Single Frequency Network) subframe –introduced in Release 10 for Relay operation –Relay does not transmit any signal to UE when it is supposed to receive data from eNB. –The Relay configures fake MBSFN subframess when UE (including Release 8 UE) are not supposed to expect any DL transmission. Jae Seung Lee, ETRI September 2014

doc.: IEEE /1216r1 SubmissionSlide 6 Fake MBSFN Subframe –Only control channel (including reference signals) is transmitted. –UE determines that the received subframe is a MBSFN subframe from the control channel in the frame. –The UE does not receive the remaining part of the subframe since it does not use MBMS (Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service).  UE does not become “out of range” although it does not receive reference signals. Jae Seung Lee, ETRI September 2014

doc.: IEEE /1216r1 SubmissionSlide 7 Using Fake MBSFN for Wi-Fi access Wi-Fi access gap can be signaled by using fake MBSFN subframes –W-Fi device can transmit during the gap signaled by the subframe. –This approach does not require any changes to devices. –LTE may consider to improve the existing Fake MBSFN in its spec to ensure LTE devices to provide enough transmission time to devices. Need input from IEEE to 3GPP if such improvement is necessary to LTE spec. Jae Seung Lee, ETRI September 2014

doc.: IEEE /1216r1 SubmissionSlide 8 Conclusion This contribution reviewed considerations for Coex between LTE-U and –It is LTE-U that should devise the Coex mechanism rather than –The Coex mechanism should require only minimal changes to the existing spec - Current features should be reused as much as possible. –The Coex mechanism should ensure enough transmission time to devices –Using Fake MBSFN subframes in LTE is provided as an example of Coex mechanism from LTE side Need input from IEEE to 3GPP to consider coexistence between WLAN and LTE-U Jae Seung Lee, ETRI September 2014

doc.: IEEE /1216r1 Submission References [ 1] IEEE /0821r2 Coexistence Requirements of WLAN and LTE in UnlicensedSpectrum [2] IEEE /1282r0 Liaison statement from 3GPP on LAA (License Assisted Access) [3] IEEE /0068r2 Coexistence Lessons Learned Contribution Jae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 9 September 2014