1 The Critical Role of Sip&H.323 Internetworking in Next- Generation Telephony Dr. Samir Chatterjee Associate Professor School of Information Science 909-607-4651;

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP, Presence and Instant Messaging
Advertisements

Presence, Security and Privacy. VON The Current Environment Many Faces of Security Authentication Verify someone is who they.
dynamicsoft Inc. Proprietary VON Developers Conference 1/19/00 C O N N E C T I N G T H E W O R L D W I T H A P P L I C A T I O N S.
IM May 24, 2000 Introduction to SIP Jonathan Rosenberg Chief Scientist.
Internet Telecom Expo September 20, 2000 SIP vs. H.323 SIP vs. H.323 Will the Real IP Telephony Please Stand Up? Jonathan Rosenberg.
Fall VoN 2000 SIP for IP Communications Jonathan Rosenberg Chief Scientist.
Caltech Proprietary Videoconferencing Security in VRVS 3.0 and Future Videoconferencing Security in VRVS 3.0 and Future Kun Wei California Institute of.
Adapted Multimedia Internet KEYing (AMIKEY): An extension of Multimedia Internet KEYing (MIKEY) Methods for Generic LLN Environments draft-alexander-roll-mikey-lln-key-mgmt-01.txt.
Encrypting Wireless Data with VPN Techniques
1 IP Telephony (VoIP) CSI4118 Fall Introduction (1) A recent application of Internet technology – Voice over IP (VoIP): Transmission of voice.
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Aarti Gupta. Agenda Why do we need SIP ? The protocol Instant Messaging using SIP Internet Telephony with SIP Additional.
A Presentation on H.323 Deepak Bote. , IM, blog…
July 20, 2000H.323/SIP1 Interworking Between SIP/SDP and H.323 Agenda Compare SIP/H.323 Problems in interworking Possible solutions Conclusion Q/A Kundan.
Basics of Protocols SIP / H
Voice over IP Fundamentals
Security in VoIP Networks Juan C Pelaez Florida Atlantic University Security in VoIP Networks Juan C Pelaez Florida Atlantic University.
Chapter 5 standards for multimedia communications
SIP and IMS Enabled Residential Gateway Sergio Romero Telefónica I+D Jan Önnegren Ericsson AB Alex De Smedt Thomson Telecom.
An Overview of SIP Security Dr. Samir Chatterjee Network Convergence Lab Claremont Graduate University
SIP Security Issues: The SIP Authentication Procedure and its Processing Load Stefano Salsano, DIE — Universit à di Roma “ Tor Vergata ” Luca Veltri, and.
SIP Chapter 5. SIP History 1980s – first packet multimedia experiments 1992 – first IETF audio-cast 1996 – first SIP related IETF drafts Session Invitation.
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) By: Zhixin Chen.
SIP Security Matt Hsu.
12/05/2000CS590F, Purdue University1 Sip Implementation Protocol Presented By: Sanjay Agrawal Sambhrama Mundkur.
SIP vs H323 Over Wireless networks Presented by Srikar Reddy Yeruva Instructor Chin Chin Chang.
Internet Telephony Helen J. Wang Network Reading Group, Jan 27, 99 Acknowledgement: Jimmy, Bhaskar.
SIP 逄愛君 SIP&SDP2 Industrial Technology Research Institute Computer & Communication Research Laboratories Elgin Pang Outline.
Voice and Data Integration over IP An analytical overview of voice-over-IP Prabhu Sivarja Wichita State University, Wichita, KS Spring 2003.
SIP Greg Nelson Duc Pham. SIP Introduction Application-layer (signaling) control protocol for initiating a session among users Application-layer (signaling)
SIP Session Initiation Protocol Short Introduction Artur Hecker, ENST.
Streaming Media Protocols Jani Hautakorpi Henry Pohan.
SIP Explained Gary Audin Delphi, Inc. Sponsored by
SIP? NAT? NOT! Traversing the Firewall for SIP Call Completion Steven Johnson President, Ingate Systems Inc.
Service Oriented VoIP (SOVoIP): True Convergence of Data and Voice Networks Presented By Mohammed Jubaer Arif Supervisors Dr Shanika Karunasekera and Dr.
3. VoIP Concepts.
VoIP security : Not an Afterthought. OVERVIEW What is VoIP? Difference between PSTN and VoIP. Why VoIP? VoIP Security threats Security concerns Design.
Session Initiation Protocol Team Members: Manjiri Ayyar Pallavi Murudkar Sriusha Kottalanka Vamsi Ambati Girish Satya LeeAnn Tam.
ITNW 1380 COOPERATIVE EDUCATION – NETWORKING Spring 2010 Seminar # 4 VOIP Network Solutions.
 Introduction  VoIP  P2P Systems  Skype  SIP  Skype - SIP Similarities and Differences  Conclusion.
Applied Communications Technology Voice Over IP (VOIP) nas1, April 2012 How does VOIP work? Why are we interested? What components does it have? What standards.
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). What is SIP? An application-layer protocol A control (signaling) protocol.
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) 王承宇 張永霖.
Larry Amiot Northwestern University Internet2 Commons Site Coordinator Training September 27, 2004 Austin, Texas Introduction to.
XML Web Services Architecture Siddharth Ruchandani CS 6362 – SW Architecture & Design Summer /11/05.
A Conference Gateway Supporting Interoperability Between SIP and H.323 Jiann-Min Ho (Presenter) Jia-Cheng Hu Information Networking Institute Peter Steenkiste.
Introduction to SIP Larry Amiot Northwestern University Internet2 Commons Site Coordinator Training March 22, 2004 Indianapolis,
Voice over IP by Rahul varikuti course instructor: Vicky Hsu.
VoN September ‘98 1 9/17/98 VoN Standards Update Jonathan Rosenberg Bell Laboratories September 17, 1998.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL SHREETAM MOHANTY [1] VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL SHREETAM MOHANTY ROLL # EC
Authentication of Signaling in VoIP Applications Authors: Srinivasan et al. (MIT Campus of Anna University, India) Source: IJNS review paper Reporter:
Omar A. Abouabdalla Network Research Group (USM) SIP – Functionality and Structure of the Protocol SIP – Functionality and Structure of the Protocol By.
Security, NATs and Firewalls Ingate Systems. Basics of SIP Security.
Voice over IP B 林與絜.
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Chapter 5 speaker : Wenping Zhang data :
CSE5803 Advanced Internet Protocols and Applications (14) Introduction Developed in recent years, for low cost phone calls (long distance in particular).
1 Internet Telephony: Architecture and Protocols an IETF Perspective Authors:Henning Schulzrinne, Jonathan Rosenberg. Presenter: Sambhrama Mundkur.
The Session Initiation Protocol - SIP
3/10/2016 Subject Name: Computer Networks - II Subject Code: 10CS64 Prepared By: Madhuleena Das Department: Computer Science & Engineering Date :
Analysis of SIP security Ashwini Sanap ( ) Deepti Agashe ( )
IP Security (IPSec) Matt Hermanson. What is IPSec? It is an extension to the Internet Protocol (IP) suite that creates an encrypted and secure conversation.
SOSIMPLE: A Serverless, Standards- based, P2P SIP Communication System David A. Bryan and Bruce B. Lowekamp College of William and Mary Cullen Jennings.
Postech DP&NM Lab Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Date: Seongcheol Hong DP&NM Lab., Dept. of CSE, POSTECH Date: Seongcheol.
E.S. Cherdyntsev MULTIMEDIA NETWORKS. Enhancing the TCP/IP Protocol Stack to Support Functional Requirements of Distributed Multimedia Applications Chapter.
سمینار تخصصی What is PSTN ? (public switched telephone network) تیرماه 1395.
VoIP ALLPPT.com _ Free PowerPoint Templates, Diagrams and Charts.
Basics of Protocols SIP / H
IP Telephony (VoIP).
VoIP Signaling Protocols Framework
Presentation transcript:

1 The Critical Role of Sip&H.323 Internetworking in Next- Generation Telephony Dr. Samir Chatterjee Associate Professor School of Information Science ;

2 Outline Definition of SIP and H.323 Comparison of SIP and H.323 Complexity Extensibility Scalability Services Security Mechanisms used in SIP and H.323 Market Analysis Conclusions

3 Definition – H.323 ITU H.323 series of recommendations (“Packet Based Multimedia Communications Systems”) defines protocols and procedures for multimedia communications on the Internet. It is an umbrella standard that provides a well-defined system architecture and implementation guidelines. It includes H.245 for control H for connection establishment H.332 for large conferences H.450(.1,.2,.3) for supplementary services H.235 for security H.246 for interoperability with circuit-switched services.

4 Definition – SIP The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), developed by MMUSIC working group of the IETF, is a signaling protocol for establishing real-time calls and conferences over IP networks. It resembles HTTP and SMTP. It uses SDP for media description. It is not as strictly defined as a complete system like H.323. Therefore, it is flexible and can be adapted to a number of implementations. It allows for the use of established protocols from other applications, such as HTTP and HTML.

5 Definition - Functional Entities Terminal Terminal Gatekeeper Terminal MCU Gateway PSTN H.323 Zone Enterprise network UA (softphone) UA (IP phone) Proxy/ Registrar Redirect server SIP telephony gateway H.323/SIP gateway SIP Realm SIP network H.323 network

6 Comparison - Complexity H.323 Rather complex protocol Defines hundreds of elements Uses binary representation for its messages → therefore it requires special code generators to parse Uses several protocol components →therefore, many services require interaction between many of them → this also complicates firewall traversal SIP Simpler protocol Defines only 37 headers Encodes its messages as text, similar to HTTP → this allows simple parsing and generation Uses a single request that contains all necessary information Source: schulzrinne and Rosenberg

7 Comparison - Extensibility H.323 Provides extensibility generally by use of nonstandardParam fields → this allows for different vendors to develop their own extensions Extensions are limited only to those places where a non- standard parameter has been added It has no mechanisms for allowing terminals to exchange information about which extensions each supports. SIP Built in a rich set of extensibility and compatibility functions Numerical error codes are hierarchically organized → this allows for additional features to be added by defining semantics for the error codes in a class, while achieving compatibility Uses textual encoding which is self describing → this enables developers to determine usage from the name Source: schulzrinne and Rosenberg

8 Comparison - Scalability H.323 Large Number of Domains It provides no easy way to perform loop detection in complex multi-domain searches. Server Processing The complexity of signaling makes it less scalable. Conference Sizes Three distinct mechanisms exits to support different conference sizes. Source: schulzrinne and Rosenberg SIP Large Number of Domains It uses a loop detection algorithm which can be performed in a stateless manner. Server Processing Simple signaling mechanism makes it more scalable. Conference Sizes It scales all different conference sizes.

9 Comparison - Services H.323 and SIP offer roughly equivalent call control services. H.323 provides a much richer set of functionality for capabilities exchange services. SIP provides rich support for personal mobility services. H.323 supports various conference control services. Sip does not provide conference control, rather it relies on other protocols for this service. Source: schulzrinne and Rosenberg

10 Security Mechanisms H.323/H.235 Two mechanisms that provide Authentication or/and Integrity are: Annex D - Baseline Security Profile Hop-by-hop processing Password based security Shared Secret-Key Digest (Hashing) Algorithm Annex E - Signature Security Profile Signature Profile – Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) Certificate Based Security Scalable - applicable for “Global” IP Telephony Hop-by-Hop and End-to-End security Digest Algorithms (Source: Radvision PPT) SIP End-to-end mechanisms Basic authentication Digest authentication S/MIME Hop-by-hop mechanisms Transport Layer Security (TLS) IP Security (IPSec) The SIPS URI schema (source: Ben Campbell presentation)

11 SIP Authentication SIP Client SIP Server REQUEST CHALLENGE Generate the Nonce value Nonce, realm Compute response = F(nonce, Username, password, realm) REQUEST Nonce, realm, Username, response Authenticate: compute F(nonce, username, password, realm) And compare with response F= MD5

12 Market Analysis Chart 1 summarizes the technology supported by the 77 products. (source: Wind River White Paper) Chart 2 summarizes the technology supported by VoIP Service Providers. (source: Wind River White Paper)

13 Interoperability Source: Ho et al.

14 Conclusion If SIP is better, why is H.323 important? Huge installed base and backward compatibility is important. However, newer products may not need H.323. In videoconferencing world, H.323 is still a dominant player. Most VoIP products support H.323 and SIP together. But this has the potential to increase the cost, size and power requirements of the products. An all-SIP network is simple and cleaner to run/manage but we will see H.323/SIP for a long time. Security mechanisms (authentication, privacy, authorization, integrity, non-repudiation) may well decide their fate.

15 References drafts and RFCs (3261, 2543) for SIP ITU-T and H.323 specifications. SIP Vs. H.323:A Business Analysis, white paper from WindRiver. SIP versus H.323, iptel.org/info/trends/sip.html H.323 versus SIP: A Comparison, packetizer analysis at A Comparison of SIP and H.323 for Internet Telephony Henning Schulzrinne and Jonathan Rosenberg Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV), (Cambridge, England), July For our work on SIP/H.323 security, see