Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 1 Getting Ready for SIP: Developing the Action Sequences FALL 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
King Kekaulike Complex Math Academy Mission: It is the mission of KKCMA to prepare all students for success in math as measured by performance on school,
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
CIP Part IV: Culture Strategies to Address School Safety/Classroom Management/Discipline/RTI Framework/Building Supportive Learning Environments.
Using Data to Improve Schools One child at a time……….. The Educator’s Role Pamela M. Kastner National Board Certified Teacher.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
SEM Planning Model.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
Principal Professional Development Summer 2006 Getting Ready for SIP: Identifying “Root Causes” Office of School Intervention & SupportOffice of Accountability,
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module: Plan
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
To use this PowerPoint you will need the following documents found in this module: OIP Stage 3 for the BLT The BLT 5-Step Process Visual The BLT 5-Step.
ELearning Planning Overview. Goals of eLearning Planning Guide Reduce planning time and effort Increase eLearning effectiveness through targeted improvement.
School Leadership Teams Collaborating for Effectiveness Begin to answer Questions #1-2 on the Handout: School Leadership Teams for Continuous Improvement.
Conducting a Comprehensive Needs Assessment Keeping the Process Effective and User-Friendly 1.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Principal Professional Development Summer 2005 Getting Ready for School Improvement Planning Office of School Intervention & SupportOffice of Accountability,
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
School Improvement Plans School Improvement  The Vision  Progress  Plan Components  Problem-Solving What is our vision for school improvement.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
Cohort 5 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring,
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Evidence and Standard Two. The Big Picture The Big Picture Standard Two is about: Curriculum Curriculum Planned, overseen curriculum – with clear outcomes.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Target Goals and Action Plans NDE School Improvement Workshops Fall 2011.
A CCOUNTABILITY & E VALUATION. Overview of this Session Defining Accountability & Evaluation MTSSS & Program Evaluation Issues Example of Evaluation in.
Regional Director’s Meeting ePlanning Session. Aims of this session Ultranet update The eLearning planning matrix Where your school is Where your school.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
1 Reflecting on the School Improvement Plan Office of School Intervention and Support Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Deb Stover, Principal, EH Phillips Elementary, Central Dauphin School District Margee Ziegenfuss, Former Supervisor of Curriculum, East Pennsboro Area.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Office of Service Quality
©2012 Texas Education Agency and the University of Texas System GRANT WALK-THROUGH 1.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
What is Forward? Forward K-5 Instructional System Consultative Services Progress Monitoring Integrated Curriculum and Assessment Professional Development.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
CIAS Program Level Assessment Office of Educational Effectiveness Assessment September 6, 2016.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
TAIS Overview for Districts
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
Grounding Share your “elevator speech” from your Comprehensive Needs Assessment summary “flamingo style”
Jean Scott & Logan Searcy July 22, MEGA
Continuous Improvement Planning with the eCIP Tool
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
February 21-22, 2018.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 1 Getting Ready for SIP: Developing the Action Sequences FALL 2006

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 2 Participants will understand the components of the Action Sequence in the Getting Results! Framework. Participating School Leadership Teams will: Become familiar with the required steps of the Action Sequence Become familiar with the required steps of the Action Sequence Reflect on a sample Action Sequence Reflect on a sample Action Sequence Become familiar with the SIP Action Sequence Checklist Become familiar with the SIP Action Sequence Checklist GOALS

3 Achievement School Profile SAT Team Walk Through Student Performance Goals Strategies & Interventions Monitoring Of Evidence Evaluating Task Reporting Professional Development Getting Results Process Flow DATA SOURCES Data Summary Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Repeat Steps 1 through 5 for each component of the SIP. TARGETSACTION SEQUENCESDOCUMENTATION

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 4 SIP Action Sequence Step 1 - Data Summary Step 2 - Design Step 3 - Delivery Step 4 - Development of People Step 5 - Documentation (monitoring)

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 5 Revisiting “Root Causes” A Root Cause is the deepest underlying cause or causes of positive or negative symptoms within any process, which if removed, would result in elimination, or substantial reduction, of the symptom.

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 6 SUPPORTING REALM parents governance personnel ENABLING REALM materials schedules professional development organizational structures CORE REALM instruction curriculum assessments school leadership monitoring staff accountability for performance others identified by the school funding student readiness to learn others identified by the school Dimension s of School Improvement

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 7 Thinking Through the Action Sequence What’s different about how we think about the SIP Action Sequence?  Coherent alignment of all five steps to data and root causes.  All five steps need to be addressed collectively, rather than in isolation.

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 8 Thinking Through the Action Sequence  Coherent alignment of all five steps to data and root causes.  Data Summary  Design  Delivery  Development of People  Documentation (monitoring)

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 9 Thinking Through the Action Sequence  All five steps need to be addressed collectively, rather than in isolation.

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 10 Thinking Through the Action Sequence  Highest-Priority Weaknesses in Student Achievement Across Student Populations

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 11 SIP Action Sequence Checklist

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 12 Step 1 - Data Sample Action Sequence

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 13 SIP Action Sequence Checklist Step 1: Data Where are we? 1. Have you analyzed your data? Trends/Patterns/Reflections on prior year’s data Student groups Multiple sources (PSSA,TerraNova, Benchmarks, DIBELS, WRAP, PSSA Checkpoints, DRA reading levels, End of Unit tests, etc.) 2. Have you identified “Root Causes”?

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 14 Step 1: Data Using the sample Action Sequence, discuss the following with a colleague : How are questions 1 and 2 satisfied in Step 1: Data? How do the identified root causes match the trends identified in the data summary?

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 15 Sample Action Sequence Step 2 - Design

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 16 SIP Action Sequence Checklist Step 2: Design Where do we want to go next? 1. Are your strategies research based and/or promising? Cited in the Core Curriculum Determined by Regional initiatives Determined by other Initiatives, e.g. America’s Choice, Emerging Scholars 2. Are your strategies aligned with the data? “Root Causes”? 3. Do your strategies enhance instruction and build capacity of staff?

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 17 Step 2: Design Discuss the following with a colleague: How are questions 1, 2 and 3 satisfied in Step 2: Design of the sample? How do the identified strategies address the root causes from Step 1?

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 18 Sample Action Sequence Step 3 - Delivery

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 19 SIP Action Sequence Checklist Step 3: Delivery How are we going to get there? 1. What needs to be done? Clearly connects to data and design 2. By when? Specific timeline/ logical sequence 3. By whom? Involves all stakeholders 4. With what? All resources have been identified (financial, human, space, time, etc.) 5. Evidence of effectiveness Evidence is measurable and related to improved student achievement, student engagement, and effective use of instructional time.

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 20 Step 3: Delivery Discuss the following with a colleague: How is this page different from action plans that you have written in the past?

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 21 Sample Action Sequence Step 4 - Development of People

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 22 SIP Action Sequence Checklist Step 4: Development What additional skills do we need? 1. Does the professional development align with the Design strategies and the Delivery tasks? 2. Does the professional development focus on 2-4 top priorities (needs of students)? 3. Does the professional development address identified needs of stakeholders? 4. Is the professional development sustained throughout the year?

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 23 Step 4: Development of People Discuss the following with a colleague: How does the PD connect with the Design and Delivery Steps? Is the PD aligned with the needs evident in our data?

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 24 Sample Action Sequence Step 5 - Documentation

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 25 SIP Action Sequence Checklist Step 5: Documentation How do we track our progress? 1. Does your monitoring system measure the effective implementation of Steps 2, 3, and 4 of the Action Sequence? 2. Is there written documentation of your monitoring process? 3. Does your documentation process evaluate student academic progress for all students and student groups throughout the year? 4. Are there intervals at which the evidence will be summarized and presented?

Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 26 Q & A