Intelligent Systems TC Background on the “Roadmap for Intelligent Systems in Aerospace” Presented at the Intelligent Systems Roadmap Workshop Chris Tschan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Global Leadership Forum for Construction Engineering and Management Programs 11th – 12 th May 2013 The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
Advertisements

1 Process Overview Three Missions…One Future The Process To-Date National Symposium on the Future of Canada’s Academic Health Sciences Centres January.
Institute Engagement in AIAA Event Model January 2013.
Welcome to the Aerospace Educator Workshop Saturday, March 8,
Intelligent Systems Roadmap Workshop 2015 Second IS Roadmap workshop to be held in August 2015 at NASA Ames, Mountain View, CA  Dates: August 6-7, 2015.
Previous Org Structure In the past, had to work all areas, not just technical program subcommittee.
Gerald Steinbauer Institute for Software Technology 1 RoboCup - A Platform for Teaching and Research in Robotics and AI Gerald Steinbauer Institute for.
BGH M&E Working Group Updates Siân Curtis. Brief History: PRH M&E WG  2004 evaluation of OPRH M&E recommended establishing a CA M&E WG  OPRH M&E WG.
C 2015 Business Plan Competition May 13, Agenda Welcome and Introductions Overview of CBHC and Social Enterprise Initiative Business Plan Competition.
Update on the NASA/NOAA/DOE Collaboration on the Utilization of ROA/UAV/UAS for Global Climate Change and Weather Research Will Bolton Sandia National.
Tennessee Valley Chapter SPACE AND MISSILE DEFENSE WORKING GROUP 14 November 2013 Meeting.
Aerospace Nuclear Science & Technology Technical Group Presentation to the ANS Board of Directors Leo Bobek, ANST Chair Atlanta, GAJune 17, 2009.
Conference Planning Subcommittee Accomplishments over the past year SciTech 2014  4 IS Sessions with 18 papers  Improvement from 3 sessions in 2013 &
Education Subcommittee (EdS) Mark W. Hilburger 9/23/10.
Moving Towards MDM & SOA February 27 th, 2009 presents… The Premiere Organization for Data Professionals Worldwide Few understand the data outside of their.
Mobile Payment Forum of India (MPFI) Dr.V.N.Sastry, Executive Secretary, MPFI & A ssociate Professor, IDRBT Institute for Development and Research in Banking.
Building a Strong Regional Team Module Three. Reflecting on the Previous Session What was most useful from the previous session? What progress have you.
THE GEO GLOBAL CAPACITY BUILDING SYMPOSIUM Seville (Spain) September 10 & 11, 2007.
Your library association’s name and logo. Geography, population, situation of libraries in your country Country profile.
AIAA Corporate Membership Advisory Committee Space & Astronautics CMAC Report June 7, 2013.
Please make a nametag, get hand-outs, and check the sign-in sheet. Aloha! Welcome to the Workshop John McLaughlin NOAA Office of Education July 2008.
Institutional Web Management: The Joined-Up Web Brian Kelly UK Web Focus UKOLNURL: University of Bath
Distance Learning and Education Center for Advanced Research in Technology for Education Lewis Johnson, Ph.D., Director Erin Shaw, presenter Research Scientist,
AIAA New Event Model January Why the New Event Model? Our profession is evolving and AIAA must change with it  More emphasis in the industry.
2006 Kick-Off Meeting Welcome to the Classes of 2008 and 2009! August 30, 2006 Business & Technology Club.
20th AIAA Advanced Measurement and Ground Testing Technology Conference Lessons Learned in AIAA Working Group Development E. Allen Arrington Dynacs/NASA.
Conference Planning Subcommittee Accomplishments over the past year SciTech 2015  13 IS Sessions (56 Papers, 2 Invited Panels)  4 IS Sessions with 18.
Aaron M. Dollar 1 and Daniela Rus 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1 Health Sciences and Technology and the Media Lab 2 Computer Science and Artificial.
Science On a Sphere TM Workshop January 22-24th, 2007 Maryland Science Center Baltimore, MD Welcome to the Workshop Please make a nametag, get an agenda.
FUZZy TimE-critical Spatio-Temporal (FUZZ-TEST): Project #3 Brandon Cook – 3 rd Year Aerospace Engineering ACCEND Student Dr. Kelly Cohen – Faculty Mentor.
Award Subcommittee Current Subcommittee Members  Mark Balas  Soon-Jo Chung  Sanjay Garg  Mitch Ingham  Stephan Kolitz  Amanda Lampton Need new co-chair!!
HPC Centres and Strategies for Advancing Computational Science in Academic Institutions Organisers: Dan Katz – University of Chicago Gabrielle Allen –
New Event Model Update TC Chair Training 6 January 2013 Basil Hassan, Vice President, Technical Activities.
Procedures Subcommittee Current Subcommittee Members  M. Ingham (Chair)  S. Adhikari (Co-Chair)  M. Abramson  D. Casbeer  L. Hartman  M. Johnson.
Space and Missiles Group 2014 Status Report Technical Activities Committee Meeting – 8 January 2015 Peter A. Montgomery, Technical Director - Space and.
Awards Subcommittee Report Brett A. Bednarcyk NASA Glenn Research Center 1 Fall Structures TC Meeting November 11, 2012 Savannah, GA.
A multidisciplinary graduate program in the Dietrich School dedicated to Applied Artificial Intelligence (AI) Program Goals Provide an outstanding interdisciplinary.
North East Regional Network Event 28 th March 2013 ‘The Changing Role of the Technician’
Look Forward to Complex Aerospace Systems Exchange (CASE) 2016 Craig Willis Systems Engineering Technical Committee September 2015.
SESPC Meeting ICES 2015 July 14, 2015 Bellevue, Washington.
Notes: Tweet: #aiaaSpace August 2014 San Diego, CA Track (#): (track title) Session (number): (session title) Session Chair: (name) ( ) Rapporteur.
Some Public Policy Committee (PPC) Discussion Notes Public Policy Committee Meeting 5 January 2010 Phil Hattis.
Intelligent Systems TC Welcome 2014 AIAA Intelligent Systems Workshop.
Complex Aerospace Systems Exchange (CASE) Event. 2 New Conference/Event Offering Complex Aerospace Systems Exchange.  Pasadena Convention Center, Pasadena,
AIAA Diversity Working Group Susan A. Frost, Ph.D. Chair AIAA Diversity Working Group Research Scientist Intelligent Systems Division NASA Ames Research.
WREN Spring Workshop Program Evaluation Methodologies, Policies, and Management of R&D Organizations: Where are We Now and Where do We Want to be? June.
C 2016 Business Plan Competition May 12, Agenda Welcome and Introductions Overview of CBHC and Social Enterprise Initiative Business Plan Competition.
AIAA Aerospace Sciences Group TC Presentation GNC, AFM, and Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conferences Portland, OR 8-11 August 2011.
MM/DD/YYYY Intelligent Systems Technical Committee January 2015 to December 2015 Annual Report.
Intelligent Systems Technical Committee
Intelligent Systems Technical Committee
Intelligent Systems Technical Committee
Tom Irvine Managing Director, Content Development January 11, 2017
Intelligent Systems Workshop (Aug. 2-3, 2017) / E. Atkins
Consultation: Your Say ….
AIAA Technical Committee on Management
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
Intelligent Systems Technical Committee
Intelligent Systems Technical Committee
AEROSPACE CONTROL and GUIDANCE Initiatives Meeting Content
AEROSPACE CONTROL and GUIDANCE Initiatives Meeting Content
Region 3 Vice Chairperson Region 3 Membership Chair
CTS PACE Professional Activities Committees for Engineers 02/11/2014 Fawzi Behmann
Town Hall Meeting SIR Branch 8 Choosing Our Future
Aerospace Systems Integration Engineering Panel
VAEEC Programmatic Update
New Teacher Induction Program WicoMICO county public schools
AEROSPACE CONTROL and GUIDANCE Initiatives Meeting Content
CTS PACE - Professional Activities Committees for Engineers
AEROSPACE CONTROL and GUIDANCE Initiatives Meeting Content
Presentation transcript:

Intelligent Systems TC Background on the “Roadmap for Intelligent Systems in Aerospace” Presented at the Intelligent Systems Roadmap Workshop Chris Tschan Elad Kivelevitch Adnan Yucel August 8, 2014

Intelligent Systems TC The Good – Improving Library of Intellectual and Guidance Docs 2

Intelligent Systems TC The Bad & the Ugly – Mass Media Spin on Automation/Autonomy 3

Intelligent Systems TC Who’s Heard of the DARPA Robotics Challenge? After two days of competition, DARPA selected eight teams to receive up to $1 million in funding to continue their work. The scores, out of a total of 32 points, were: 1.27 points: SCHAFT (SCHAFT, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) 2.20 points: IHMC Robotics (Florida Institute for Human & Machine Cognition, Pensacola, Fla.) 3.18 points: Tartan Rescue (Carnegie Mellon University, National Robotics Engineering Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.) 4.16 points: Team MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Boston, Mass.) 5.14 points: RoboSimian (NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Los Angeles, Calif.) 6.11 points: Team TRACLabs (TRACLabs, Inc., Webster, Tex.) 7.11 points: WPI Robotics Engineering C-Squad (Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Mass.) 8.9 points: Team Trooper (Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories, Cherry Hill, N.J.) 4

Intelligent Systems TC What Happened to the DARPA Robotics Challenge Winner? bought-by-google-darpa-robotics-challenge-winner Who Is SCHAFT, the Robot Company Bought by Google and Winner of the DRC? By Erico Guizzo and Evan Ackerman Posted 6 Feb 2014 | 17:22 GMT The DARPA Robotics Challenge held its inaugural competition last December, and by most accounts (including ours), it was a success. … Overall, it was a big win for DARPA and for robotics as a whole, but without question, the biggest winner of all was SCHAFT, the Japanese company that utterly dominated the competition and that had been acquired by Google just months earlier. SCHAFT put on a nearly flawless performance, ending at the top spot with the most points and, we guess, leaving Andy Rubin (the Google executive leading its robotics program) with a big smile on his face. It also left many observers curious to learn more about the company, its origins, and its robot. So who is SCHAFT?DARPA Robotics Challengeincluding ourshad been acquired by Google just months earlierthe Google executive leading its robotics program According to a story in Popular Science, Google is supposedly planning to withdraw SCHAFT from the DRC Finals. The reasons were unclear, but apparently Google wants to avoid financial ties to DARPA and the U.S. militarystory in Popular Science 5

Intelligent Systems TC Is the DARPA Robotics Challenge Related to Intelligent Systems? 1.Why shouldn’t there be a corresponding DARPA Intelligent Systems Challenge? 2.Once you move into the realm of an event like a DARPA challenge, interest and support open up 3.Perhaps we want a diverse technology base for intelligent systems, with not all the winners being bought by Google 4.Where do ideas like having a DARPA Intelligent Systems Challenge come from? 6

Intelligent Systems TC Background on the Roadmap Roadmap Committee established about a year ago At 2013 Roadmap Committee Membership Ella Atkins Christine Belcastro David Casbeer Kelly Cohen Elad Kivelevitch Nhan Nguyen Corey Schumacher Chris Tschan Paul Zetocha Adnan Yucel 7

Intelligent Systems TC Motivation for a Roadmap Need to move the ball down the field The time is right for a breakthrough in intelligent systems Focuses ISTC on a central product that represents where we believe Intelligent Systems should/could be going Helps ISTC members understand and collaborate Gets AIAA leadership’s attention Help larger AIAA membership understand what intelligent systems contribute Get attention outside of AIAA Focus resources for intelligent system development 8

Intelligent Systems TC Roadmap Committee Activities Discuss technology, formulate ideas Collaborate via technical backplane Organize thoughts Write vignettes Draft the roadmap Updates TC members at ISTC meetings Hold Intelligent Systems Roadmap Workshop About 4 months ago, shifted attention primarily to this workshop 9

Intelligent Systems TC Vision Areas to Covered in the Intelligent Systems Roadmap 1.Safety 2.Reduction of aerospace system platform costs 3.Reduction of aerospace system operating costs 4.Air traffic control and airspace management 5.Unmanned aerial vehicles uses in civilian applications 6.Space exploration, exploitation and colonization 7.Training 8.Academic research 9.Education 10

Intelligent Systems TC Breakout Sessions Autonomy Adaptive and Non-Deterministic Systems Applications - Air Traffic Management and UAS Integration 11

Intelligent Systems TC Topics to Address in the Breakout Sessions What are the Technical Challenges? What are the Research Gaps? How should we overcome roadblocks? What actions should be taken? 12

Intelligent Systems TC Summary We welcome your participation We need your intellectual DNA We need you to be focused…to help us succeed This workshop may become a recurring event Please enjoy the workshop and provide feedback on what we can do to improve it 13

Intelligent Systems TC Agenda - Intelligent Systems Roadmap Workshop Day Registration Opening Remark - Workshop Chair Plenary - Ms. Kris Kearns Intelligent Systems Roadmap Presentation Roadmap Background Introduction for Breakout Sessions Autonomy Adaptive and Non-Deterministic Systems Applications - Air Traffic Management and UAS Integration Coffee Break Breakout meetings - Vision for Intelligent Systems Lunch Plenary - Dr. Kevin Wise Breakout Sessions - Technical Challenges for Implementation Coffee Break Breakout meetings - Technical Approaches to Address Challenges/Roadblocks Closing Remark & Logistics for the next day Evening ISTC meeting 14

Intelligent Systems TC Agenda - Intelligent Systems Roadmap Workshop Day 2 · Plenary - Dr. Kalmanje Krishnakumar · Coffee Break · Discussion of Intelligent Systems Roadmap - "Where will Intelligent Systems be in 5, 10, 20 years?" · Workshop Summary and Closing Remark - Workshop Chair · Afternoon tour of Air Force MuseumAir Force Museum 15