Seismic Retrofit of the Historic North Torrey Pines Bridge Jim Gingery, PE, GE Principal Engineer, Kleinfelder, San Diego PhD Student, University of California.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oasys SIREN.
Advertisements

Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., PE West Virginia University Tech and Gary Norris Ph.D., PE University of.
JP Singh and Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., P.E. Gary Norris, Ph.D., P.E. March 2004 COMPUTER PROGRAM S-SHAFT FOR LATERALLY LOADED.
Updates on Ground Motion and Geotechnical Data Requirements in the 2013 CBC Jorge F. Meneses, PhD, PE, GE, D.GE, F.ASCE Carlsbad, California consulting.
Development of an In-Situ Test for Direct Evaluation of the Liquefaction Resistance of Soils K. H. Stokoe, II, E. M. Rathje and B.R. Cox University of.
Assessing Seismic (Cascadia Subduction Zone) Risk at Oregon Dams
Ground Motions Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Steve Kramer
Caltrans Guidelines on Foundation Loading Due to Liquefaction Induced Lateral Spreading Tom Shantz, Caltrans 2010 PEER Annual Meeting.
ADSC/CALTRANS CIDH Pile Workshop Spring Overview of Structural Design and Detailing of Large Diameter Drilled Shafts (Caltrans Practice) Amir M.
Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift Marios Panagiotou Assistant Professor, University of.
Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with
Tim Rushton, Phoebe Martin and Amy Fitzgerald. History  Faulting of an uplifted plateau, between the ‘North American Plate’ and the ‘Cocos Plate’. 
Seismic design for the wind turbine tower (WP1.5 background document presentation) Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki.
Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., PE West Virginia University Tech and Gary Norris Ph.D., PE University of.
Record Processing Considerations for Analysis of Buildings Moh Huang California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program California Geological Survey Department.
Local Site Effects Seismic Site Response Analysis CEE 531/ESS 465.
Modeling Seismic Response for Highway Bridges in the St. Louis Area for Magnitude 6.0 to 6.8 Earthquakes J. David Rogers and Deniz Karadeniz Department.
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Earliest approach taken to seismic hazard analysis Originated in nuclear power industry applications Still used for.
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Measurement of Soil Propertiess Richard P. Ray, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering University of South.
PEER Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles May 22, 2002 Geotechnical Uncertainties for PBEE.
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
Selection of Time Series for Seismic Analyses
Roberto PAOLUCCI Department of Structural Engineering
Seismic LRFD for Pile Foundation Design
The Alaskan Way Viaduct Steve Kramer University of Washington Seattle, Washington.
The Nuclear Renaissance & Research Opportunities in the Nuclear Field Dr. Annie Kammerer PEER NEES Quake Summit 2010 San Francisco, California October.
Literature Review on Compatible Soil Structure Yielding by Weian Liu
Foundation Flexibility and Damping from Forced Vibration Testing of Field Structure Lisa M. Star Michael J. Givens George Mylonakis Jonathan P. Stewart.
Liquefaction Analysis For a Single Piled Foundation By Dr. Lu Chihwei Moh and Associates, Inc. Date: 11/3/2003.
C ONTACT STRESS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING. Introduction 1 Skyscrapers Bridges Dams How are these constructions supported? Why are all these large constructions.
Incremental Dynamic Analyses on Bridges on various Shallow Foundations Lijun Deng PI’s: Bruce Kutter, Sashi Kunnath University of California, Davis NEES.
Cheng Chen Ph.D., Assistant Professor School of Engineering San Francisco State University Probabilistic Reliability Analysis of Real-Time Hybrid Simulation.
MAE CENTER RESEARCH SUCCESS WITH DOTs Past and Future Neil M. Hawkins - Professor Emeritus University of Illinois MAE Center Annual Meeting With.
Updating the Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Highway Bridges Status update for the Mid-America Ground Motion Workshop February 2003.
Feasibility Level Evaluation of Seismic Stability for Remedy Selection Senda Ozkan, Tetra Tech Inc. Gary Braun, Tetra Tech Inc.
LIQUEFACTION FAILURE OF FOUNDATION - STRUCTURE COLLAPSE.
Napa Earthquake - Results Strong shaking in epicentral area, low-level shaking throughout Bay area Recorded strong motion: 340 ground response stations.
1 NEESR Project Meeting 22/02/2008 Modeling of Bridge Piers with Shear-Flexural Interaction and Bridge System Response Prof. Jian Zhang Shi-Yu Xu Prof.
NEEDS FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)
IMPACT OF FOUNDATION MODELING ON THE ACCURACY OF RESPONSE HISTORY ANALYSIS OF A TALL BUILDING Part II - Implementation F. Naeim, S. Tileylioglu, A. Alimoradi.
Foundations and Earthwork Stott Bushnell, Cathryn Cecil, Tyler Cecil, and Craig Fowler – BFCC Engineering Residential foundations are very stiff, often.
RESPONSE OF BRIDGES DUE TO LIQUEFACTION INDUCED LATERAL SPREADING Erickson Nguon University of Auckland, New Zealand August 14, 2013.
1 MICROFOR Micropile Interstate Cooperative Research on Foundations and slOpe Reinforcement Micropile Interstate Cooperative Research on Foundations and.
PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES By Ed Wilson Draft dated 8/15/14 September SEAONC Lectures #2.
Site Specific Response Analyses and Design Spectra for Soft Soil Sites Steven F. Bartlett, Ph.D., P.E. I-15 NATIONAL TEST BED TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER SYMPOSIUM.
RECORD EVALUATION OF A BRIDGE UNDER THE NAPA EARTHQUAKE RECORD EVALUATION OF A BRIDGE UNDER THE NAPA EARTHQUAKE Omar Alcazar Pastrana [Dr. Carlos E. Ventura]
Tri-State Seismic Hazard Mapping -Kentucky Plan
Bridge Hydraulics and Geotechnical. BRIDGE HYDRAULICS AND GEOTECHNICAL TECHNICAL STANDARDS BRANCH INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION Slide 2 The Hydrological.
Davide Forcellini, Univ. of San Marino Prof. Ahmed Elgamal, Dr. Jinchi Lu, UC San Diego Prof. Kevin Mackie, Univ. of Central Florida SEISMIC ASSESSMENT.
Vulnerable Structural Elements
Recent CSMIP/Caltrans Downhole Array Data and their Application in Site Specific Analysis H. Haddadi 1, V. Graizer 1, A. Shakal 1, P. Hipley 2 1 – California.
ACI Committee 341-C State-of-the-Art Summary Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Techniques for Concrete Bridges.
Center of Excellence in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics at IIT Roorkee A.Personnel 1.Relevant Faculty of Civil, Earthquake, Mechanical.
Earthquake Site Characterization in Metropolitan Vancouver Frederick Jackson Supervisor – Dr. Sheri Molnar.
Development of Seismic Design Approach for Freestanding Freight Railroad Embankment Comprised of Lightweight Cellular Concrete Cell-Crete Corp. Steven.
Printout 4 slides per page, give for questions by
Liquefaction and Landslide Hazards in the City of Seattle
Musashi Institute of Technology
Construction Examples in Japan High Capacity Micropile
BRIDGES MOST IMPORTANT GEOTECHNICAL EFFECT- LIQUEFACTION
Design Spectra.
Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington
الفصل 1: الحركة الدورانية Rotational Motion
Dr. Praveen K. Malhotra, P.E.
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis
End-Users Needs in Seismic Hazard Analysis
Notes on the Intensity Measure Breakout Session - PEER Annual Meeting - Jan. 17, 2002   ·   Testbeds will not provide definitive answers as to the best.
SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MICROPILE SYSTEMS
Post Seismic Bridge Inspection
Presentation transcript:

Seismic Retrofit of the Historic North Torrey Pines Bridge Jim Gingery, PE, GE Principal Engineer, Kleinfelder, San Diego PhD Student, University of California San Diego

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 2 Presentation Outline The Bridge Site Conditions Earthquake Ground Motion Development Soil-Structure Interaction Evaluations Retrofit Strategy

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 3 The Bridge

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 4 The Bridge

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 5 South Abutment North AbutmentOld River Channel Pre-Construction Circa 1930

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 6 Early Days of the Bridge - Late 1930’s

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 7 Difficult Field Conditions!

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 8 Site Conditions

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 9 Earthquake Ground Motions and Soil-Structure Interaction

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 10 Earthquake Ground Motion Development 1. PSHA and DSHA at bedrock 2. Seed time history selection 3. Rotation of seeds to principal axes 4. Spectral matching to FN and FP bedrock targets 5. Baseline correction 6. Site response analysis (5 soil profiles)

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 11 Directivity Effects on Ground Motions

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 12 Directivity of Seed Time Histories

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 13 Spectral Matching Process Acceleration Displacement Velocity Seed time histories Target (design) Seeds matched to target RSPMatch

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 14

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 16 Earthquake Ground Motions (2 directions) X (3 EQ’s) X (5 profiles) = 30 site response analyses and time histories!

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 17 Soil-Structure Interaction KK KZKZ KXKX F Z = K Z *  Z

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 18 Soil-Structure Interaction KK KZKZ KXKX 6X6 Foundation Stiffness Matrix

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 19 6X6 Stiffness Matrix for Piled Footings Individual pile Pile cap Pile group Cross Coupling Linearization & displacement compatibility

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 20 Liquefaction Hazard at the Site Typical (N 1 ) 60 of liquefiable layers 12+/- Layers typically <=5 ft thick north of Bent 4 Layers typically 5 to 12 ft thick s. of Bent 4

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 21 Liquefaction Hazard at the Site

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 22 Seismic Slope Stability

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 23 Seismic Slope Stability

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 24 Retrofit Strategy

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 25 Project Partners City of Del Mar (owner) Simon Wong Enrg. (prime, structural) David Evans & Assc. (nonlinear FE modeling) Caltrans (review) Earth Mechanics, Inc. (peer review) Frieder Seible (peer review)

KLEINFELDER CONFIDENTIAL North Torrey Pines Bridge Seismic Retrofit 26 THANK YOU!