Annual Meeting Montréal September 26, 2009

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simon Foo, Edward Morofsky & Brian Kyle
Advertisements

A. T. Tankut Middle East Technical University, Turkey
Codes and Standards Future Work
Introduction to Lateral Force Resisting Systems
Actions and Retrofit of Post Earthquake-Damaged Bridges
Passive Vibration Control
Performance of buildings in the February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake Associate Prof Rajesh Dhakal University of Canterbury Christchurch, NZ Sixth International.
B.A. Izzuddin, L. Macorini and G. Rinaldin
Quick-Release Field Experiments on Seismically Isolated Bridges Stuart S. Chen, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor, University at Buffalo (SUNY), Fulbright.
Mechanics Based Modeling of the Dynamic Response of Wood Frame Building By Ricardo Foschi, Frank Lam,Helmut Prion, Carlos Ventura Henry He and Felix Yao.
BUILDING IN ANTAKYA. Information about the Building  Building consists of basement +ground+8 typical floors. (no RC walls at basement)  Built in 1973.
Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Xuehui AN.
空間構造性能 Structural Performance 27. Aug / 2005Seismic Resistance of RC-framed Masonry Wall System1 RCM-2005 Seismic Resistance of RC-framed Masonry Wall.
Project #4 Energy Dissipation Capacity of a Wood-frame Shear Wall CEE Numerical Analysis.
Example Effects of NEES Research on Structural Design Practice Bill Holmes Rutherford + Chekene San Francisco March 3, NEES Governance Board Workshop.
Structural Principles and Landscapes Over Structure GSD 6242 Ecologies, Techniques, Technologies IV Spring 2015Niall Kirkwood FASLA Alistair McIntosh FASLA.
Christchurch Town Hall November 27th, Introduction What happened –Settlement –Lateral Spread –Measurements Analysis –Current capacity Repair and.
Yahya C. Kurama University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana, U.S.A
July 21-23, 2006 NEES Annual Meeting 1 NEESR-SG Seismic Performance Assessment and Retrofit of Non-Ductile RC Frames with Infill Walls P. Benson Shing,
Research and Application of Seismic Retrofit Technologies in Canada Mark M. Lumbay MSST-06.
ATHENS 12 th of April, M. Eng. Velyan Petkov The European Center for Risk Prevention, Sofia, Bulgaria Bulgarian seismic design codes and civil construction.
The University of Adelaide Earthquake Engineering in Australia – International Collaboration and Future Directions Mike Griffith President, Australian.
Contents : Introduction. Rapid Visual Screening.
Department for ENGINEERING STRUCTURES Professor Vlado MICOV, Ph.D Head of Department.
Bridge Vulnerabilities Oct What puts bridges at risk? Ability to withstand seismic forces and displacements.
by: Jon Heintz, S.E. & Robert Pekelnicky
University of Minho School of Engineering Territory, Environment and Construction Centre (C-TAC) Uma Escola a Reinventar o Futuro – Semana da Escola de.
UTAH COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS SEISMIC HAZARDS SURVEY AZIMUTH ENGINEERING AMY FREDRICKSON CODY HATCH ASHLEY BLOOD.
CONSTRUCTION AND DETAILING 1
Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Coupling Beams for RC Walls
Prof. Sarosh H Lodi NED University of Engineering and Technology What Works and Does not Work in the Science and Social Science of Earthquake Vulnerability,
REPAIR AND STRENGTHENING OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS AND BEAMS ICRI – International Concrete Repair Institute Transportation Structures 2010 Fall Convention.
EWHA WOMANS UNIVERSITY ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURE LABORATORY Investigation of Rehabilitation Effects on Fire Damaged High Strength Concrete Beams Eun Mi Ryu.
Teacher: Mark Casto Lab Assignment: Progressive Collapse of RC Structures Principal Investigator: Mehrdad Sasani.
How detailed should a model be? Pierre Hoogenboom Delft University of Technology.
Villanova University Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering CEE 8414 – Structural Dynamics Northridge Earthquake 1 Northridge Earthquake - Concrete.
FEASIBILITY STUDY OF HYBRID WOOD STEEL STRUCTURES
Welcome!! Structural and Earthquake Engineering Group Department of Civil Engineering University of British Columbia.
Structural Drawing Chapter Technical Drawing 13 th Edition Giesecke, Mitchell, Spencer, Hill Dygdon, Novak, Lockhart © 2009 Pearson Education, Upper.
Fire Testing of an Earthquake Damaged R.C. Frame Presented by: U.K. Sharma/Pradeep Bhargava Under UKIERI Project being Jointly Investigated by: Indian.
Greg Deierlein, Paul Cordova, Eric Borchers, Xiang Ma, Sarah
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Melbourne Finite Element Modelling Applications (Notes prepared by A. Hira – modified.
ATHENS WORKSHOP / EC 8 – 3 : 2005 and nGCSI : 2012 APRIL 12, 2013 Recent Greek Provisions for RC Structures with URM Infills M. Chronopoulos and P. Chronopoulos,
NEES Facilities Used: University of Nevada, Reno University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana INTRODUCTION Bridge columns are subjected to combinations of.
Frames and Walls Lateral Stability
Team UCDSESM Yihai Bao, YeongAe Heo, Zhiyu Zong University of California, Davis April 4 th, 2008 Prediction for Progressive Collapse Resistance of a 2D.
Construction of Buildings to Prepare for Earthquakes What structures are needed to prevent serious damage ?
Topic Today’s Objective
Villanova University Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering CEE 3704 Statistical and Numerical Analysis 1 Group Project #2 Energy Dissipation Capacity.
Inland Waterways Navigation Conference PIs: Robert Ebeling and
BEAMS: Beams are structural members that can carry transverse loads which produce bending moments & shear force. Girders: Main load carrying members into.
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
Repair and Strengthening of Concrete Bridges and other Structures
Design of Bracing Connections in Concentrically Braced Frames
Base Isolation. Conventional Construction Practice assumes Fixed Base Structures The Dynamic Characteristics of Fixed Base Structures are determined by.
INTRODUCTION Due to Industrial revolution metro cities are getting very thickly populated and availability of land goes on decreasing. Due to which multistory.
Confined Masonry Construction
TOPIC 3: DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION
CIVI 6061-Strengthening of bridges using FRP
Performance of Concrete Railway Ties Prestressed with Basalt FRP
AQQABA SECONDRY SCHOOL Structural Design.
Mohammad Maher Jaradat Raghad Abdel-Salam Owaidat
GUIDED BY, MS. D. DARLING HELEN LYDIA M.TECH., PRESENTED BY,
STRUCTURES in FIRE SiF’2014 paper no 44
ATHENS WORKSHOP / EC 8 – 3 : 2005 and nGCSI : 2012 APRIL 12, 2013
ASSESSEMENT AND REHABILITATION OF STRUCTURES
ASSESSEMENT AND REHABILITATION OF STRUCTURES
A Brief Idea on Seismic Retrofitting Techniques
Structural Drawing Chapter 19.
Evaluation of RC building strengthened with column jacketing method with consideration of soft-story Hendrik Wijaya Department of Civil and Construction.
Presentation transcript:

Annual Meeting Montréal September 26, 2009 Project 3.3 Seismic Upgrade Using Innovative Materials Project Leader: Murat Saatcioglu Annual Meeting Montréal September 26, 2009

Researchers Perry Adebar (UBC) Ken Elwood (UBC) David Lau (Carleton) Pierre Léger (Ecole Poly) Bruno Massicotte (Ecole Poly) Denis Mitchell (McGill) Dan Palermo (UofO) Patrick Paultre (USherbrooke) Jean Proulx (USherbrooke) Murat Saatcioglu (UofO) Robert Tremblay (Ecole Poly)

Summary of Progress Literature Review Access to the Japanese database on FRP, concrete, and steel jacketing of columns (Elwood) Review of experimental research on Ultra-High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concrete (UPFRC) as seismic retrofit material (Massicotte) Use of concrete-filled hallow structural steel (HSS) sections as compression struts (Palermo and Saatcioglu) A state-of-the art report on the use of FRP as innovative seismic retrofit material (Saatcioglu)

Summary of Progress Analytical Research Correlation of analytical model predictions with experimental results of concrete shear walls retrofitted with FRP (Lau) Non-linear dynamic analyses of irregular bridges to assess the effects of upgrading of critical bridge elements using innovative materials (Mitchell) Analysis of ordinary and super elastic shape memory alloy (SMA) reinforced concrete shear walls (Palermo) 3D nonlinear FE analysis of FRP wrapped columns (Paultre, Proulx) Development of a seismic retrofit design methodology for CSA S806 (Saatcioglu) Development of a bond-slip model and effective bond length design information for surface bonded FRP (Saatcioglu)

Summary of Progress Experimental Research A test program to develop seismic retrofit methodology for surface bonded FRP on RC shear walls (Lau, Sherwood, Palermo, Saatcioglu) A test program for RC columns jacketed with Ultra-High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concrete (Massicotte) Pseudo-dynamic and reversed cyclic tests of RC bridge and building columns to develop a performance-based FRP seismic retrofit methodology (Paultre, Proulx) A test program to develop seismic retrofit methodology involving “Super Elastic Shape Memory Alloys” (Palermo) Experimental program to develop surface-bonded FRP retrofit techniques for infill and load bearing masonry walls (Saatcioglu)

Summary of Progress Experimental Research (Cont’d) Tests of non-ductile RC frames with concrete filled HSS compression only braces (Palermo, Saatcioglu) Tests of non-ductile RC frames with or without masonry infill walls, retrofitted with diagonal prestressing (Saatcioglu) Shake table tests of 8-storey RC shear wall models to develop FRP repair and retrofit methodologies (Tremblay, Léger)

Milestones Project 3.3 in Year 1 in original proposal was only ½ year duration Objectives were achieved and exceeded in some categories, especially if the research involved were the continuations of previous efforts Need for closer collaboration on key topics for Year 2

Outcomes Application of FRP as an innovative seismic retrofit material Literature review and a state-of-the art report (in collaboration with PWGSC)

Future Plans Frame-Wall Interactive Systems: A large-scale test on a concrete “building” (shear wall – multiple floor slabs – gravity column) will be carried out under reversed cyclic loading (August 2010). The specimen will subsequently be repaired with innovative materials and retested (fall of 2010). The test program will be completed by December 2010. A scaled model of an 8-storey building, consisting of frame-wall assembly, will be tested using the Ecole Polytechnique shake table, repaired with FRP and retested (December 2009). Numerical analyses of test specimen will be conducted. The analytical research will be expanded to include various modeling issues involving damping and higher mode effects (Winter 2010).

Future Plans RC and Masonry Load Bearing Walls: Experimental research on surface mounted FRP retrofit methodology for RC shear walls will continue. The test setup and the fabrication and testing of wall specimens will be completed by June 2010. The use of super elastic SMA as an innovative material will be investigated experimentally. Two-½ scale RC shear walls will be constructed (one with ordinary reinforcement and the other with SMA reinforcement) by November 2009 and tested by December 2010. A detailed hysteretic model will be developed for super elastic SMA for inclusion in nonlinear finite element analysis of RC components (Jan 2010 - Aug 2010) Two concrete block walls with surface bonded FRP sheets will be designed, built and tested (Jan 2010 – Sept 2010)

Future Plans Building and Bridge Columns: The literature survey on UPFRC jacketed columns will be completed. A test program will be designed for rectangular columns with inadequate strength and detailing. Column testing will be completed by September 2010. Compilation of current test data on fibre-wrapping and addition of fibre-reinforced concrete will be completed by June 2010. Analytical studies on the influence of resulting ductility improvements on the performance of bridges will be conducted by September 2010. The performance-based FRP rehabilitation procedure developed for bridge piers will be refined by September 2010. The procedure will be applied in the field in collaboration with Transports Québec.

Future Plans Non-ductile RC Frames: Three 2/3 scale non-ductile frames will be built and tested under reversed cyclic loading to develop design and detailing procedures for concrete filled HSS bracing systems (Oct 2009 – Sep 2010) Two 2/3 scale non-ductile frames with and without block masonry infill walls will be built, diagonally prestressed and tested under reversed cyclic loading (Oct 2009 – Sep 2010) Two frame specimens with concrete block infill walls will be designed and built for subsequent retrofitting with surface-bonded FRP (June 2010 – September 2010). Two ½ scale non-ductile R/C frames that were damaged and repaired previously will be diagonally braced with HSS elements and tested (Oct 2010 – Dec 2010).

Surface-Bonded FRP on Walls (U of O and Carleton) URM Infill Wall RC Shear Wall

Shake Table Tests of Frame-Wall Systems (Poly)

Non-ductile Frames with URM Infills (U of O) As Built Diagonally Prestressed