Energy Analytical Models: A Holistic Energy Assessment Technique Doug Dixon Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 20 June 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy Conservation Energy Management.
Advertisements

New Paradigms for Measuring Savings
Army Utilities Privatization (UP) Defense Communities National Summit
Building Energy Efficiency By Doug Horn. Agenda Introduction Why Focus on Buildings? ecoEnergy Retrofit Homes Program Energy Efficiency Measures Renewable.
as of 17 Aug. 09 TEXAS -26 Fort Sam Houston 1 Fort Bliss – 3 Fort Hood –8 Surge Up to a year -
1 U.S. ARMY CORPS of ENGINEERS BALTIMORE DISTRICT MILITARY PROGRAM TRI-SERVICES INDUSTRY OUTREACH FORUM 5 December 2006.
Army Implementation of Performance-Based Contracting 29 Jun 05 Mr. Jim Daniel Chief, Cleanup Division, USAEC.
Pentagon Washington, D.C. UMCS contract for modernization of the Pentagon Scope includes: Design, engineering and commissioning of the Building Operations.
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy & Environment) Fifth Annual Energy Workshop NCPPP & ADC Amanda Simpson Executive Director, Army.
A Workshop for Federal Energy Managers presented for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Federal Energy Management Program by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Overview of Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program San Antonio Office of Environmental Policy December 16, 2009.
MENG 547 LECTURE 3 By Dr. O Phillips Agboola. C OMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ENERGY AUDIT Why do we audit Commercial/Industrial buildings Important.
ENERGY EFFICIENCY FOR END-USERS.  CSU Chancellors office coordinates the efforts to accomplish the goals established by Assembly Bill 32 for green house.
Action-Oriented Benchmarking Paul A. Mathew, Ph.D. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley California Using CEUS Data to Identify and Prioritize.
Prioritized Distribution 1)1100 enrollees/ full time PCM (if UR = 4.0) 2)PA/NPs- ambulatory focus 3)Physicians- cover in-patient 4)Leaders- field grade.
Energy Audit- a small introduction A presentation by Pune Power Development Pvt. Ltd.
Steve Craker K-12 Team Lead Geoff Overland IT and Data Center Focus on Energy Increase IT Budgets with Energy Efficiency.
BRAC ’05 / Army Transformation & Regional Economic Growth Presentation For Southwest Dream Team VisitNovember 20, 2009 MG (Ret) Bill Barron Executive Director,
Housing Market Crisis: Support to Soldiers and Families Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management Strategic Communications.
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army Installations and Environment Our Installations Supporting the War: Relevant and Ready “Sustain the Mission.
5/10/ of 10 Update Army WAWF Implementation Mr. Juan Camacho DFAS Army WAWF Project Manager May 10, 2006.
UNCLASSIFIED “It’s All About the Soldier” Net Zero – Energy Initiative Prepared by: Todd A. Dirmeyer Energy Manager 7 August 2012 Thanks to: DASA- I,E&E.
1 Dr. Jean Shorett Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Environment, Safety, & Occupational Health Army Environmental Management System.
Army's Residential Communities Initiative (RCI) Program A NEPA Success Story Mr. Mike Betteker, Tetra Tech Dr. Neil Robison, Mobile District April 8, 2004.
UPDATE ON ARMY MILITARY MUNITION RESPONSE PROGRAM (MMRP) Mary Ellen Maly / SFIM-AEC-CDP / / DSN / 1.
SOUTHEAST REGION, INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND SERO John Wuichet: IMCOM-SE,
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Comprehensive Energy and Water Evaluations (CEWE) of Large Campus Facilities Best practices and strategies for.
Army Contracting Command-Redstone
CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MOBILIZATION and DEPLOYMENT. 2 AGENDA PART I – MOBILIZATION PLANNING PART II – DEPLOYMENT.
The Changing Acquisition Environment
Reviewing the Audit Results. Defining a Quality Base Year is Key to Maximizing Project Value n Base year is the mutually agreed upon pre-retrofit annual.
Monterey Model: Strategies for an Efficient Public-Public Partnership Case Studies toward Success George Helms General Services Superintendent.
LTC Joe Knott/DAIM-ED/(703) Army Compatible Use Buffer (ACUB) Program 1 of October 2006 Army Compatible Use Buffer.
Effective Energy Management. 1.Develop baseline 2.Identify and quantify savings opportunities 3.Measure and benchmark to sustain efforts.
1 ~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~ USACE 3 October 2005 United States Army Corps of Engineers Association of the United States Army: Annual Meeting.
UNCLASSIFIED SEP07 Soldier and Family Assistance Center Briefing Colleen Tuddenham SFAC Program Manager Installation Management Command December.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona District or Distributed Integrated EnergyDistrict Heating and Cooling Robert McMillin Siemens Industry, Inc.
Chapter 2: A New Reality: Impact of the Global War on Terrorism Operation: Military Kids Ready, Set, Go! Training.
Big Mo, Big Bro, Let’s Go – The Growing Trend Towards Sustainability Presented by: Kevin Palmer The Center for Sustainable Solutions Presented.
1 of 10COL Jeffrey Phillips / DAIM-EDS / (703) (DSN 329) / “Sustain the Mission – Secure the Future”
UNCLASSIFIED 1 of 13 Messenger/IMCOM-SE ( DSN Garrison Commander Conference RNOV2007 The Quest for.
1 ~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~ Army and Corps Transformation Mr. Donald Basham Chief, Engineering & Construction Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps.
Army Landfill Gas to Electricity Feasibility Study Mary Matthews Hains, PE AMEC Environment and Infrastructure.
Sustainable Laboratory Design: Challenges and Solutions
Week 6 The Energy Walk Through. Possible elements of a walk through Understand on-site information collection and listing of essential data for collection.
Week 7 Utility Data Analysis. Essential Elements Identify sources for obtaining utility data: paper form, electronically or from the internet Review utility.
UNCLASSIFIED Deputy Army Spectrum Manager Army Spectrum Management Office (ASMO)
Civilian Personnel Advisory Center
UNCLASSIFIED Stu Timerman Army Spectrum Manager 8 December 2009 Army Spectrum Management Office (ASMO) Overview.
Water Audits and Best Management Practice Life Cycle Cost Analyses for Army Medical and Health Care Facilities Presented By: Lisa Raysby Hardcastle, P.E.
Army Participation in the OSHA Voluntary Protection Program Colonel John Ciesla Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Environment, Safety.
1 How good are building simulation models? Comparing simulated and actual building energy consumption at the circuit level Brock Glasgo, PhD Student Engineering.
1 SFAC CONFERENCE JULY 2008 NAOMI E. LYNCH HQ IMCOM ACAP CHIEF Our mission is to provide the Army the installation capabilities and services to support.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Capital Investment Strategy (CIS) to Achieve Total Netzero Energy, Waste, and Water Porscha Porter USACE Engineering.
U.S. Army Human Resources Command
Fort Stanwix National Monument Energy Audit Contract
Seminar On Energy Audit Submitted To: Submitted By:
AAFES/Wal-Mart - Major Locations, USA
Projected Solicitations By FY (issued)
BRAC Update Colonel Jim Balocki
Colleen Dinner.
Family and Morale, Welfare and Recreation Command
FY17 SSO AORs and Duty Locations
SFAC CONFERENCE JULY 2008 NAOMI E. LYNCH HQ IMCOM ACAP CHIEF
CAM REGIONAL MAP DSN 793 COM’L EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 2013
BRAC 2005 Strategy Dr. Craig College Installations and Environment
BRAC 2005 Strategy Dr. Craig College Installations and Environment
SFAC Locations 1 Ft. Drum Ft. Lewis West Point WRAMC Ft. Riley Ft. Dix
“Developing and Building Flagship Installations” MG Larry J
IMCOM Sustainment Directorate
Presentation transcript:

Energy Analytical Models: A Holistic Energy Assessment Technique Doug Dixon Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 20 June 2007

Agenda n Army SE Region Energy Performance n Energy Modeling/Assessment Results at SE Region Installations n What is the Facility Energy Decision System (FEDS)? n Other applications of FEDS

SE Region Glide Path Performance (through FY 2006)

SERO Installation Energy Assessments SERO conducted comprehensive installation energy assessments using the Facility Energy Decision System (FEDS) software. Specific goals of these assessment were: Establish baseline for installation energy consumption and costs. Identify and prioritize cost-effective energy projects for funding via third party financing (ESPC, UESC, BPA), and/or government funding (ECIP, OMA). Estimate impact on energy demand and consumption from new building construction, demolition, renovation, utility modernization, O&M, and energy-specific retrofits. Provide input for Installation Long-Range Energy Management Plan.

FEDS General Approach  Collect information on building inventory, energy-related infrastructure, energy consumption and prices  Sort building inventory into groups with common characteristics and audit representative buildings (typically buildings)  Characterize central energy plant and thermal distribution system performance  Utilize Facility Energy Decision System (FEDS) building energy model to calculate energy consumption of building groups  Calibrate the model to actual energy use using actual weather data  Utilize the model to predict energy use impact of infrastructure changes, and identify life-cycle cost effective retrofits using typical weather data (TMY).

SE Region FEDS Results *Annual Savings and Payback not available for McPherson and Gillem

FEDS Opportunities FEDS run for both appropriated funding and alternatively-financed projects. Retrofit Type Energy Savings (Million Btu/yr) Annual Savings ($/yr) Installed Cost ($) Net Present Value ($) SIR Simple Payback (yr) Envelope Total 237,3162,497,27515,113,05731,263, Cooling 20,846238,6411,359,7441,365, Heating Total (27,345)856,9493,778,0668,603, Hot Water Total 5,674207,464433,2892,030, Lighting Total 30,9861,114,8015,575,72313,858, Motors Total 4025,92161,9965, Grand Total 267,8794,921,05126,321,87557,126, Alternative Financing Total 164,1024,195,85614,901,85728,251, Summary of Potential Energy and Cost Savings for Redstone Arsenal Using Appropriated Source of Capital 16% 10%

White Sands Missile Testing Center Fort Sill Fort Bliss Fort Hood Fort Polk Pine Bluff Ars McAlester AAP Red River AD Lone Star AAP Camp Stanley Storage Actv Louisiana AAP Fort Sam Houston Corpus Christi AD Presidio of Monterey Fort Irwin Yuma Proving Ground Fort Hauchuca Riverbank AAP Sierra Army Depot Hawthorne AD Fort Hunter Liggett (USAR) FEDS Assessments Completed at Army Installations Natick R & D Ctr Devens RFTA (USAR) Fort McPherson Fort Gordon Fort Stewart/Hunter AAF Fort Jackson Fort Buchanan Fort Benning Fort Rucker Fort Gillem Mississippi AAP Fort Bragg MOT Sunny Point NERO SWRO Fort Shafter Schofield Barracks Fort Wainwright Fort Richardson Ft. Greely PARO Tokyo/Yokohama Akizuki/Kure Zama/Sagamihara Okinawa Kwajalein Detroit Ars USAG Selfridge Lima Army Tank Plt Fort McCoy (USAR) Fort Leonard Wood Fort Riley Fort Leavenworth Iowa AAP Kansas AAP Lake City AAP Dugway Proving Ground Pueblo Depot Fort Carson Tooele AD Deseret Chem Depot Fort Lewis Yakima Training Center Umatilla Chem Depot Rock Island Arsenal USAG Miami Moffett Field RFTA (USAR) Fort Drum Fort Monmouth Picatinny Arsenal Watervliet Ars Ft. Hamilton Fort Dix (USAR) West Point Fort Belvoir Aberdeen Proving Ground Fort Story Fort Lee Fort Eustis Fort Monroe Ft. AP Hill Radford AAP Letterkenny AD Carlisle Barracks Fort McNair Ft. Meade Fort Myer Walter Reed Ft Detrick Tobyhanna Army Depot Adelphi Lab Ctr Scranton AAP SERO NWRO Parks RTFA FEDS Completed Redstone Arsenal Anniston AD Holston AAP Fort Campbell Fort Knox Milan AAP Blue Grass AD

Facility Energy Decision System An Overview of

n Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is one of DOE’s multi-program research and development laboratories located in Richland, Washington combined GOCO/ COCO operation operated for DOE by Battelle Memorial Institute ~4500 staff members

FEDS - What is it? n FEDS is a fuel-neutral, technology independent, comprehensive method for quickly and objectively identifying building energy efficiency improvements that offer maximum savings

Why was FEDS Developed? n Large military bases needed a tool to help them determine where their energy was going and what energy opportunities existed Bases had: –hundreds and often thousands of buildings, and usually only one meter –little detailed engineering information on individual buildings –limited understanding of utility information n Key elements missing in existing software programs

FEDS Design Goals n FEDS was designed with two major purposes in mind: estimating current energy consumption for all energy systems under consideration determining the minimum life-cycle-cost retrofits to systems within a facility and on an installation (considering all interactive effects) and includes estimating: –pre- and post-retrofit consumption –first cost of the retrofits –recurring O&M costs for the retrofits –value of the change in annual energy consumption and annual O&M requirements –net present value of the retrofits

Peak tracking Life-cycle cost optimization Technology & fuel independence Financial options FEDS is

A FEDS Case Installation Information Building Set RecordsEnd Use Inputs Technology Records

FEDS Building Types Civilian: Assembly Education Food sale Food service Health care Lodging Mercantile service Office Public Order Warehouse/storage Other building Single family detached Single family attached Mult. Units 2-4 Mult. Units 5 or more Mobile Home Military: Administration Barracks Chapel Clinic Club Commissary Dining hall Electronics Exchange Hangar Hospital Hotel Lab Laundry Morale,welfare & recreation Other Production/process Recreation Schools/training Security Shops Storage Warehouse Single family detached Single family attached Duplex Mult.unit 3+ Single family mobile Special: Commissary - Sales Commissary - Warehouse

Guidance for Developing Building Sets n Always: Type Size (sf) Age (yr) Fuel Availability n As Applicable: Operation/occupancy Envelope Lighting Heating Cooling Ventilation Service hot water Miscellaneous equipment Motors

FEDS Required Inputs n Installation and Financial Information Location and Analysis Year Energy Price Data Cost of Money (if not DOE/EIA) n Building Information Type, Age, Size, and Quantity Operating Hours Equipment (Lights, Heat, Cool, Hot Water)

FEDS Results n Energy consumption: total, by fuel type, by end use, by building set, by central plant n Suggested retrofits: specific technologies to install and replace, capital cost, energy and cost savings, net present value n Peak demand: amount and time, for installation and by building set n Emissions: by pollutant type, by building set

Report Options n A summary report of the energy, demand, dollar, and air pollution emissions impacts for the installation, central plants, and building sets (*.txs) n A detailed retrofit report (*.txd) n A detailed spreadsheet of retrofit data (*.csv) n An Energy Conservation Investment Program report (*.ecp) – for single retrofits only (no bundling)

Other FEDS Uses n Evaluate alternative sustainable building designs n Analyze fuel switching n Value “deals” n Assess impacts of change n Apportion reimbursable customers n Central plant and thermal loop analysis (optimize amount of decentralization)

Building Design Evaluation Use FEDS to assess the impact of building designs during the design review stage. FEDS can indicate the impact the new building(s) will have on your facility (energy and dollars), and it can indicate energy efficient retrofit technologies before the design goes to construction.

Facility Energy Decision System