Protecting Infrastructure: The Role of Standards John Hooper Director of Earthquake Engineering Magnusson Klemencic Associates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Experience in Turkey for Building Vulnerability and Estimating Damage Losses P. Gülkan and A. Yakut Middle East Technical University.
Advertisements

During the semester Introductions Basics of earthquakes History and Recording Damaging Earthquakes and Understanding seismic exposure Undertaking loss.
Performance of buildings in the February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake Associate Prof Rajesh Dhakal University of Canterbury Christchurch, NZ Sixth International.
Seismic Code Highlights Determining what level of Seismic Restraints are Required Arkansas Fire Prevention Code 2002 Based on the IBC 2000.
Earthquake Mitigation I: Techniques for Reducing Earthquake Hazard “Earthquake Hazards and Risk Mitigation in Western Washington and Oregon” Keoni Wong,
Project #4 Energy Dissipation Capacity of a Wood-frame Shear Wall CEE Numerical Analysis.
OSHA Subpart Q Concrete and Masonry Construction.
1 Holmes IRCC Workshop October 18, 2006 Motivation and Development of PBEE for Existing and New Buildings William T. Holmes Structural Engineer Rutherford.
SOUTH ASIA LAUNCH OF GLOBAL CAMPAIGN MAKING CITIES RESILIENT MY CITY IS GETTING READY New Delhi June 8-9, 2010.
Seismic Design Guidelines for Tall Buildings Ronald O. Hamburger Senior Principal Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc. Quake Summit 2010 October 8, 2010.
New “Risk-Targeted” Seismic Maps Introduced into USA Building Codes
1 SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT Dr. Carlos E. Ventura Kate Thibert & Hugón Juárez García February 26 th, 2007.
During the semester Introductions Basics of earthquakes History and Recording Damaging Earthquakes and Understanding seismic exposure Undertaking loss.
© Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc. 1 Development of Performance-based Seismic Design Standards & Criteria Ronald O. Hamburger, SE, SECB Senior.
The use of risk in design: ATC 58 performance assessment procedure Craig D. Comartin.
What Will a Large Earthquake be Like? Tom Heaton Caltech.
PEER Tall Buildings Initiative—Task 2 Workshop April 18, Background of Seismic Codes and Performance Expectations.
California Earthquakes. Sylmar Earthquake About: When: 6:00 A.M. February 9, 1971 Where: San Fernando Valley What: Ruptured segment of the San Fernando.
1 Yahya C. Kurama, Professor Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences University of Notre Dame Introduction to Engineering Program University.
1 Yahya Gino Kurama, Associate Professor Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences University of Notre Dame Introduction to Engineering Program University.
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS A KEY ELEMENT OF BECOMING DISASTER RESILIENT Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina,
Rapid Assessment A quick evaluation of a disaster/emergency impacted area.
Villanova University Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering CEE 8414 – Structural Dynamics Northridge Earthquake 1 Northridge Earthquake - Concrete.
California Department of Transportation District 4 Oakland Seismic Retrofit Project Presentation to the California Transportation Commission July 26, 2007.
Section 2 Review 1. Seismic waves carry the energy of an EQ away from the focus. Some of those waves reach the surface and become surface waves. 2… P-waves-compress.
Performance-based Seismic Design in 2014 Canadian Bridge Code
Structural Engineering Issues for a Large Cascadia Event.
Seismic Analysis Concepts - Prof SH Lodi
Earthquake Hazards and Safety 1- What kinds of damage can earthquakes cause? The severe shaking produced by seismic waves can damage or destroy buildings.
Section 3: Earthquakes and Society
Section 3: Earthquakes and Society
Do Now – In Notebooks  What are some effects of earthquakes?  Why is intensity not always the same as magnitude for an earthquake?
The 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering
Real World Applications of USGS EQ Science: Stacy Bartoletti Degenkolb Engineers Structural Engineers Association of Washington Cascadia Region Earthquake.
How to Use This Presentation To View the presentation as a slideshow with effects select “View” on the menu bar and click on “Slide Show”, or simply press.
BUILDING RESILIENT COMMUNITIES Dr. Barbara Carby The Cayman Islands LEADERS 2006, Jamaica.
Building Codes. Building codes: collapse prevention.
Before you jump into this slide show, you should view the Presentation on EarthquakeSeismology See notes for link.
Earthquake Damage Unit. Where would you be the safest in an earthquake? Open level field away from buildings Movement of the ground rarely causes deaths.
Chapter 10 Section 3 Earthquake Hazards Objectives: -Summarize earthquake hazards and the damage they can cause -Explain how safe building practices and.
LESSONS FROM PAST NOTABLE EARTHQUAKES PART VIII Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
University of Palestine
NATURAL FREQUENCY AND BUILDING RESPONSE structural engineers are keeping us safe.
1 Building Collapse Fragilities Considering Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences Using Publicly Available NEEShub Data Yue Li and Ruiqaing Song Michigan Technological.
LESSONS FROM PAST NOTABLE EARTHQUAKES. Part IV Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Construction of Buildings to Prepare for Earthquakes What structures are needed to prevent serious damage ?
Section 12-3 Review page 308 #s 1-6
Villanova University Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering CEE 3704 Statistical and Numerical Analysis 1 Group Project #2 Energy Dissipation Capacity.
The Role of Building Codes in Delivering Seismic Performance John Hooper Director of Earthquake Engineering Magnusson Klemencic Associates.
Handout 3 (2-3) green “Recording Earthquakes”
Fundamental Review of State Government Seismological Laboratory John Anderson, Director.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS PART II A– PAKISTAN’S EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS. TAIWAN PART I: EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
EARTHQUAKES Week 2.
The Christchurch CBD is gone, Now what? Kevin Warwood Business Manager Parking.
Özgür BOZDAĞ Mutlu SEÇER Dokuz Eylül University Katip Çelebi University Izmir, Turkey SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE FOR CONVERTING.
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:.
Review of Indian Seismic Codes
Basics Of Seismic Vibration Control
Miriam Dean Report – Nov 2015
RECENT EARTHQUAKES. NEW ZEALAND
Seismic Waves Large strain energy released during an earthquake
by Dr. Syed Mohamed Ibrahim M.Tech., Ph.D.,
Construction Examples in Japan High Capacity Micropile
More lectures at Disasters Supercourse - 
A Brief Idea on Seismic Retrofitting Techniques
NOVEMBER 2018 DARBANDIKAN EARTHQUAKE OBSERVATIONS
1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake Mitigation and Reconstruction
By the name of Him.
Handout 3 (2-3) Recording Earthquakes
Presentation transcript:

Protecting Infrastructure: The Role of Standards John Hooper Director of Earthquake Engineering Magnusson Klemencic Associates

Haiti—January 12, 2010  Over 220,000 casualties  Over 300,000 homes damage/destroyed  Over 1.5 M people affected  No Codes or Standards M W 7.0

M W 8.8 Chile—February 27, 2010 Under 500 casualties Estimated damage: $30B US Building Codes and Standards similar to US

Performance of Chilean Buildings Post 1985 Buildings that collapsed: 4 (approximately) Buildings to be demolished: 50 (estimated) Number of buildings 9+ stories: 1,939 Failures of 9+ stories: 2.8%

Crushed Concrete Walls at Transition Zones

Poorly Detailed Concrete Walls

Christchurch—February 22, 2011  181 deaths  Estimate damage: $16B  Aftershock intensity exceeded the initial earthquake  Modern building codes and standards M W 6.3

2011 Christchurch Earthquake

Transect of approximately 300 buildings was accurate for nearly 4000.

Grand Chancellor -Reinforced concrete -19 stories -mid-1980s -Core wall (up to 7 th story) -Perimeter frame (above 7 th story) Courtesy of Dr. Ken Elwood and EERI

Grand Chancellor South FaceEast Face Courtesy of Dr. Ken Elwood & EERI

Observations—URM Buildings Upgrade performed better than unstrengthened 33% “Code” Upgrade: Not good in MCE 50% - 67% “Code Upgrade: Variable Full “Code” Upgrade: Performed well in general

Building Codes and Standards: New Buildings

Building Codes and Standards: Existing Buildings

Building Seismic Performance Matrix

Frequent Earthquakes (25-50 years) Design Earthquake ( years) Maximum Considered Earthquake ( years) Ground Motion Levels

Building Seismic Performance Matrix Building Performance Levels Operational Immediate Occupancy Life Safe Collapse Prevention Frequent Earthquakes (25-50 years) Design Earthquake ( years) Maximum Considered Earthquake ( years) Ground Motion Levels

Building Seismic Performance Matrix Building Performance Levels Operational Immediate Occupancy Life Safe Collapse Prevention Frequent Earthquakes (25-50 years) Design Earthquake ( years) Maximum Considered Earthquake ( years) Ground Motion Levels New Buildings/Basic Retrofit Objective

Building Seismic Performance Matrix Building Performance Levels Operational Immediate Occupancy Life Safe Collapse Prevention Frequent Earthquakes (25-50 years) Design Earthquake ( years) Maximum Considered Earthquake ( years) Ground Motion Levels New Essential Facilities/Enhanced Retrofit Objective New Buildings/Basic Retrofit Objective

Life Safety Performance

Other Infrastructure Codes & Standards Bridges Life safe performance, on par with buildings Lifelines (water, sewer, gas, power, etc.) No consistent, national standards Performance will be inconsistent

Summary Building Codes and Standards (and their enforcement) make a difference Continued Code/Standard updates are essential Analysis Physical Research Earthquake Reconnaissance Need to establish consistent standards for Lifelines Is Life Safety Performance adequate?