Forced Outages in Genesys Examining the overall and individual outages for thermal generating resources.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Variance reduction techniques. 2 Introduction Simulation models should be coded such that they are efficient. Efficiency in terms of programming ensures.
Advertisements

Power Supply Adequacy Assessment Model/Methodology Review Steering Subcommittee Meeting January 29, 2010.
Genesys Model Enhancements October 4, 2011 NW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting Gwendolyn S Shearer.
Investigating the Use of a Variable-Pitch Wind Turbine to Optimize Power Output Under Varying Wind Conditions. Galen Maly Yorktown High School.
©GoldSim Technology Group LLC., 2012 Optimization in GoldSim Jason Lillywhite and Ryan Roper June 2012 Webinar.
5/18/2015CPE 731, 4-Principles 1 Define and quantify dependability (1/3) How decide when a system is operating properly? Infrastructure providers now offer.
GoldSim 2006 User Conference Slide 1 Vancouver, B.C. The Submodel Element.
Inventory Systems in Practice Or “How I got out of doing the last two questions on the final exam”
Lecture 9 Output Analysis for a Single Model. 2  Output analysis is the examination of data generated by a simulation.  Its purpose is to predict the.
CHAPTER 11: Sampling Distributions
Reliability-with-Repair.PPT Reliability with Repair Last revised 12/06/2006.
System Testing There are several steps in testing the system: –Function testing –Performance testing –Acceptance testing –Installation testing.
In this chapter we introduce the idea of what it means for something to be truly random. We also investigate techniques for simulating randomness.
Two Approaches to Calculating Correlated Reserve Indications Across Multiple Lines of Business Gerald Kirschner Classic Solutions Casualty Loss Reserve.
Coordinating Failed Goods Collecting Policies and Repair Capacity Policies in the Maintenance of Commoditized Capital Goods Henny P.G. van Ooijen J. Will.
Colombian Firm Energy Market: Discussion and Simulation Peter Cramton (joint with Steven Stoft and Jeffrey West) 9 August 2006.
Hinchinbrook Island Researcher: Gordon Dalton PhD student Supervisor: Dr David Lockington.
Developing an Adequacy Metric Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting October 16, 2009.
Ville Mattila and Kai Virtanen Systems Analysis Laboratory,
Adequacy Assessment for the 2017 Pacific Northwest Power Supply Steering Committee Meeting October 26, 2012 Portland, Oregon 1.
Ch. 1.  High-profile failures ◦ Therac 25 ◦ Denver Intl Airport ◦ Also, Patriot Missle.
Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project October 16, 2009 Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting.
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
ERCOT Planning October 2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System - Methodology.
Bell Work FRACTIONDECIMALPERCENTWORDS. You have probably heard a weather forecaster say that the chance of rain tomorrow is 40%. Have you thought about.
Powered by the Loads and Resource Information System (LaRIS) Pacific Northwest Loads and Resources Operational Peaking Adjustment Council Briefing.
May 31, Resource Adequacy Capacity Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee May 31, 2006 Background Image: Bennett, Christian Science.
Issues in Estimation Data Generating Process:
Stat 1510: Sampling Distributions
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
Downtime Reduction Ideas for a Symposium Presentation and Training
CONFIDENCE STATEMENT MARGIN OF ERROR CONFIDENCE INTERVAL 1.
Fitness Cases Are input-output pairs describing the output a program should produce given the particular input value. The fitness of an individual is usually.
Computer Simulation. The Essence of Computer Simulation A stochastic system is a system that evolves over time according to one or more probability distributions.
Interim and Long-term Approaches for Assessing Wind’s Contribution to Capacity Adequacy PNW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting July 21, 2008.
John Carwardine, Ewan Paterson, Marc Ross 14/15 July 2009 Availability Task Force: Subgroup #2.
Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2015 Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting October 1, 2010.
Maintenance Management [14]
Atcllc.com Using CEMS Data to Estimate Coal-Fired Plant FORs and Scheduled Maintenance Chris Hagman
Mean Time To Repair
NW Loss of Load Probability James Gall Power Supply Analyst
A new Nomogram Development POM- based tool - Application results in the Idaho Power System. Orlando Ciniglio, IPC Marianna Vaiman, V&R Energy WECC TSS.
Developing Synthetic Temperature-Correlated Wind Generation Data Steering Committee Meeting January 29, 2010.
WEPS Climate Data (Cligen and Windgen). Climate Data ▸ Climate Generation by Stochastic Process A stochastic process is one involving a randomly determined.
Stat 100 Mar. 27. Work to Do Read Ch. 3 and Ch. 4.
Lecture 19 Approximating Integrals. Integral = “Area”
Introduction Imagine the process for testing a new design for a propulsion system on the International Space Station. The project engineers wouldn’t perform.
Random numbers. Using Random Number Table 1.Randomly select in the table a 1-digit number. Describe the position of that number (e.g. 5 th row, 13 th.
Defining LOLP Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting November 14, 2008.
Chapter 9 Sampling Distributions 9.1 Sampling Distributions.
WHAT IS A SAMPLING DISTRIBUTION? Textbook Section 7.1.
 Software reliability is the probability that software will work properly in a specified environment and for a given amount of time. Using the following.
Modeling the Hydroelectric System in GENESYS Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting July 25, 2007.
Availability Availability - A(t)
Generating Electricity 7
Relationships between MTTF & MTTR
Operations Management
Sample vs Population comparing mean and standard deviations
Chapter 5 Sampling Distributions
Operations Management
Data Analysis and Statistical Software I ( ) Quarter: Autumn 02/03
GENESYS Current Functionality
8.2 The Geometric Distribution
INTERCONNECTED SYSTEM GENERATING CAPACITY RELIABILITY EVALUATION
Which Test Should I Use?.
CHAPTER 11: Sampling Distributions
Chapter 5 Sampling Distributions
Operations Management
Game Description Player 1: Decides on integer x > 0
Presentation transcript:

Forced Outages in Genesys Examining the overall and individual outages for thermal generating resources

FOR in Genesys The user provides the forced outage rate and the mean repair time for individual thermal generating resources The individual resources can be set for zero outages, non-stochastic outages (reduction applied to every hour) or stochastic outages Zero outages and non-stochastic outages can be helpful for other study purposes

FOR in Genesys output FOMW = number of MW that are not available due to forced outages PerFO = percent of the thermal stack that is not available due to forced outages -- adjusted if availability of a resource goes to zero due to monthly distribution factors (e.g. maintenance outages during certain months) Reliability record output includes FOMW and PerFO for curtailment hours, and the user can choose to output FOMW and PerFO for all hours simulated

Stochastic FOR The user-defined FOR and mean repair time (MTTR) are used to calculate the hours until failure (MTTF) Each resource has an initial outage “state” -- operating or experiencing an outage, based on random draw Number of hours until subsequent states depends on additional random draws combined with either the user-defined MTTR or MTTF

Stochastic FOR For any resource, some games might not have any outages, while in other games there may be many outages, and for varied amounts of time Investigating whether actual FOR of a resource over many games is comparable to the user-entered FOR

Stochastic FOR Studying Columbia Generating Station –Using a maximum output of 1160 MW –User-entered FOR = 5%, MTTR = 200 hrs –1000 game run, one run included a refueling outage, another run omitted the refueling outage –Average FOR in terms of MW = 5.95% Average output 1091 MW, (1-(1091/1160)) = –Average FOR in terms of hours = 5.97% (w/o refuel), 6.15% (w/refuel, adjusting total hours simulated) downtime hrs / total hrs = downtime hrs / total hrs =

Repair hours vs. random number draw Number of repair hours is a function of a random draw. With a user-defined MTTR of 200 hours, over 100 draws the mean repair hours comes out to 194. Over 1000 draws it comes out to 199, and over draws the mean of the repair hours is – more draws brings you closer to the user-defined MTTR

FOR over 1000 games

Stochastic FOR With larger FOR (e.g. experimented with 50% FOR, but did not change MTTR), the user-entered FOR and the actual FOR over 1000 games is very close With smaller user-entered FOR (1% - 5%), actual FOR coming out to be 2% - 6% Could run more games to converge