THE RISE OF THE CRASH-PROOF CAR John Capp & Bakhtiar Litkouhi IEEE Spectrum May 2014 IS 376 September 4, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHAPTER 11 EXPRESSWAYS.
Advertisements

Driver Behavior Models NSF DriveSense Workshop Norfolk, VA Oct Mario Gerla UCLA, Computer Science Dept.
Negotiating Intersections
© Ricardo plc 2012 Eric Chan, Ricardo UK Ltd 21 st October 2012 SARTRE Demonstration System The research leading to these results.
SCHOOL BUS TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
Chapter 7 Negotiating Intersections
Managing Time and Space Vehicle Positioning. USE ANY OF THESE VISUAL TECHNIQUES 1.IPDE 2.The Smith System 3.Zone Control.
Chapter 10: Negotiating Intersections
Connected Vehicles AASHTO Annual Meeting | October 17, 2013 | Denver, CO Mike Cammisa Director, Safety Association of Global Automakers.
ITS Joint Program Office 62 nd Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 24, 2013 Walton Fehr.
FGDC Coordinaton Group Connected Vehicles & Digital Infrastructure Carl K. Andersen U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 21.
G4 Apps The Impact of Connected Vehicles on Traffic Operations ISMA Traffic Expo October 1, 2014.
Managing Time, Space, and Visibility
Chapter 9 Driving in Urban Traffic
Guidelines for Traffic Control at Surface Mines
InVANET(Intelligent Vehicular Ad Hoc Network
Hazard and Incident Warning « Majority of events occurring on the road represent a danger for road users » By transmitting road events and road status.
1. Overview Background Introduction to IntelliDrive SM Preliminary Research/Proof of Concept Potential Applications –Safety –Mobility –Commercial The.
AUTOMOBILES Dimitris Milakis, Transport Institute, Delft University of Technology Envisioning Automated Vehicles within the Built Environment: 2020, 2035,
Ch. 6 - Passing NY State DMV 1. The law requires that we drive on the right side of the road.  When we are allowed to pass other vehicles, we usually.
Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems Initiative May 2005, ITS America Annual Meeting Mike Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office U.S. Department.
Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart Roads”
Traffic Enforcement And Management System Malam-Team is Israel's largest systems integration organization, One of the most exciting solutions offered by.
Geopositioning and Applications in Transportation GMAT9205 Students: Ellis Leung ( ) Terry Nham ( )
IntelliDrive Policy and Institutional Issues Research Valerie Briggs Team Lead, Knowledge Transfer and Policy, ITS Joint Program Office, RITA May 4, 2010.
National VII Architecture – Data Perspective Michael Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office US Department of Transportation TRB 2008 Annual Meeting Session.
Security Tracking and Advising for Taxi Customers Group Member Tanapol Euaungkanakul Chayanin Mukviboonchai Thanachit Viriyayanyongsuk.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
New English Integrated Course Book Four Unit Two Smart Cars.
Safety support in the automotive industry Jacob Bangsgaard Director of External Affairs and Communications 1st Annual International Conference on ICTs.
The future of road safety Michael Meyer Robert Bosch GmbH.
2. Survey of VANETs A Tutorial Survey on Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks
AHS – The Vision. The Automated Highway System (AHS) and The Intelligent Vehicle Initiative (IVI)
F Networked Embedded Applications and Technologies Lab Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering National Cheng Kung University, TAIWAN.
Eric Eiswerth Safety Research Project Manager FORD AUTOMOTIVE SAFETY OFFICE 2011 AASHTO Annual Meeting The Vehicle of the Future: Greener, Safer, Smarter.
Doc.: IEEE ae Submission Jan Kenney – Toyota/VSC3Slide 1 Case Study for reduced priority management frames – Vehicular Safety.
Drive Right Chapter 7 Negotiating Intersections Unit 4
Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (VII) FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 20, 2008 George Gilhooley.
SMART CAR Natural User Interface Technology CAR CUSTOMIZATION BY USER RECOGNITION.
MODULE 5 Objectives: Students will learn to recognize moderate risk environments, establish vehicle speed, manage intersections, hills, and passing maneuvers.
Limited Access Highways Driver Risk Prevention Curriculum State of New Hampshire Departments of Education and Safety Division of Program Support State.
September 25, 2013 Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety Research, Development and Test Overview of V2I Safety Applications.
IntelliDriveSM Update
ABSTRACT Currently, drivers must utilize a third-party, such as a radio or broadband device, to learn about local traffic conditions. However, this information.
Potential Consequences of an Executive Order vs. Sample Law to Ban Texting Greg Fitch, Ph.D. Senior Research Associate Virginia Tech Transportation Institute.
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division.
A Vehicle Manufacturer’s Perspective on VII Christopher Wilson ITS Oregon- Feb 1, 2005 Christopher Wilson.
1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration An Overview of NHTSAs Vehicle Safety Research Priorities Nathaniel Beuse Associate Administrator, Vehicle.
© 2006 PSEN Unit - #4 Let’s Go Driving Identification Evaluation Control Monitor.
 Introduction  What is Driverless Car ?  History  Component  Action  Technology  Advantages  Disadvantages  Conclusion  Reference.
1 The Role and Design of V2X Communications for Automated Driving Gaurav Bansal Toyota InfoTechnology Center, USA Mountain View, CA
DSRC and SPaT, SSM, SRM & MAP
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
Module 5 Terena Wibecka Lauren Megan Block 1X. Processing Information 1.A driver needs visibility, space, and time to safely operate a vehicle. 2.A vehicle.
Telematics derived from the Greek words “Tele” and “matos”, Tele means (far away) and matos means (derivative of Greek word machinari), Combinedly telematics.
Sample Workbook for Crash Avoidance Technologies Focus Groups.
The City of Calgary’s Intelligent Transportation Systems and Yeatland (Yeats) Wong, P. Eng. The City of Calgary Transportation Department.
1 Autonomous Vehicles. 2 One of our top priorities is preparing our members for the impact of automation in vehicles.
Emerging Risks & Technologies
Vehicle to Vehicle Communication
On-board Technologies
ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS
PRESENTED BY:BHABESH RANJAN MAHAKUD
PRESENTED BY: SHAHIN HUSSAN
VANET.
Autonomous CAR.
Accelerating the Introduction of
July 2007 doc.: IEEE p Jan Case Study for reduced priority management frames – Vehicular Safety Communication Date:
On-board Technologies
Presentation transcript:

THE RISE OF THE CRASH-PROOF CAR John Capp & Bakhtiar Litkouhi IEEE Spectrum May 2014 IS 376 September 4, 2014

THE RISE OF THE CRASH-PROOF CAR IS 376 SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 PAGE 2 WATCHFUL CARS SATELLITE SYSTEMS PROVIDE NAVIGATION DATA WIRELESS COMMUNICATION BETWEEN VEHICLES HELPS PREVENT COLLISIONS SENSORS PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY SURROUNDING THE CAR THE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE (ROAD SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, ETC.) TRANSMIT CURRENT LOCAL CONDITIONS PEDESTRIANS AND CYCLISTS WITH WEARABLE DEVICES (E.G., MOBILE PHONES) MAKE THEIR PRESENCE KNOWN TO THE VEHICLE

THE RISE OF THE CRASH-PROOF CAR IS 376 SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 PAGE 3 SATELLITE NAVIGATION GLOBAL POSITION SYSTEMS USE TRILATERATION TO PINPOINT THE LOCATION OF A RECEIVER. MULTIPLE SATELLITES ORBIT THE EARTH, TRANSMITTING THEIR CURRENT POSITIONS. THE RECEIVING STATION COMPUTES ITS DISTANCE FROM THREE OF THOSE SATELLITES AND CALCULATES THE TWO POINTS OF INTERSECTION OF THE APPROPRIATE SPHERES SURROUNDING THEM. ONE OF THOSE TWO POINTS IS ON THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH, AND THAT POINT IS THE GPS LOCATION OF THE RECEIVER. TO COMBAT ATMOSPHERIC CONDITIONS AND STRUCTURAL INTERFERENCE, THE SATELLITES PERIODICALLY TRANSMIT TO EARTH STATIONS WITH FIXED LOCATIONS, ADJUSTING THEIR CALCULATIONS ACCORDINGLY.

THE RISE OF THE CRASH-PROOF CAR IS 376 SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 PAGE 4 360° SENSING ULTRASONIC SENSORS USE ACOUSTIC WAVES TO PROVIDE PROXIMITY DETECTION FOR LOW-SPEED EVENTS; IT IS BLIND IF THE CAR IS MOVING FASTER THAN A PERSON CAN WALK. RADAR (RADIO DETECTION AND RANGING) IS MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE, BUT WORKS IN ANY KIND OF WEATHER AND HAS SHORT-, MEDIUM-, AND LONG-RANGE CAPABILITIES TO SUPPORT ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL, BLIND-SPOT DETECTION, ETC.

THE RISE OF THE CRASH-PROOF CAR IS 376 SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 PAGE 5 V2V COMMUNICATION VEHICLE-TO-VEHICLE COMMUNICATIONS IS A PROPOSED WIRELESS NETWORK IN WHICH AUTOMOBILES SEND MESSAGES TO ONE ANOTHER ABOUT WHAT THEY’RE DOING (E.G., SPEED, LOCATION, DIRECTION OF TRAVEL, BRAKING, LOSS OF STABILITY). WITH A COMMUNICATION RANGE OF 1000 FEET AND THE ABILITY TO RETRANSMIT RECEIVED SIGNALS, V2V COULD POTENTIALLY MAKE CERTAIN THAT DRIVERS ALWAYS HAVE INFORMATION CONCERNING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A MILE AHEAD. IN AUGUST 2014, THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ANNOUNCED PLANS TO CREATE A NEW FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD REQUIRING V2V COMMUNICATION CAPABILITY FOR LIGHT VEHICLES (PROBABLY BY 2016).

THE RISE OF THE CRASH-PROOF CAR IS 376 SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 PAGE 6 V2I COMMUNICATION RED LIGHT VIOLATION WARNING ROADSIDE EQUIPMENT (RSE) BROADCASTS SIGNAL PHASE AND TIMING (SPAT) MESSAGE, GEOMETRIC INTERSECTION DESCRIPTION, AND GPS CORRECTION IN-VEHICLE DEVICE DETERMINES IF VEHICLE IS IN DANGER OF VIOLATING A RED LIGHT CURVE SPEED WARNING ROADSIDE EQUIPMENT BROADCASTS GEOMETRIC AND WEATHER INFORMATION TO IN- VEHICLE DEVICE IN-VEHICLE DEVICE DETERMINES APPROPRIATE SPEED FOR THAT PARTICULAR VEHICLE, WITH WARNINGS TAILORED TO SPECIFIC VEHICLE CAPABILITIES STOP SIGN GAP ASSIST ROADSIDE SENSORS DETECT ONCOMING TRAFFIC ROADSIDE EQUIPMENT BROADCASTS TRAFFIC STATUS IN-VEHICLE DEVICE DETERMINES IF THERE IS ANY DANGER FOR VEHICLE ON MINOR ROAD RAILROAD CROSSING VIOLATION WARNING ROADSIDE EQUIPMENT CONNECTED WITH EXISTING TRAIN DETECTION EQUIPMENT IN-VEHICLE DEVICE DETERMINES PROBABILITY OF VEHICLE CONFLICT WITH APPROACHING TRAIN AND ISSUES ALERT TO DRIVER THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IS DEVELOPING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A VEHICLE-TO-INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEM.

THE RISE OF THE CRASH-PROOF CAR IS 376 SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 PAGE 7 MORE V2I COMMUNICATION SPOT WEATHER IMPACT WARNING ROADSIDE EQUIPMENT CONNECTED TO REMOTE WEATHER INFORMATION SYSTEM (RWIS) WEATHER EVENTS AND LOCATIONS BROADCAST TO VEHICLE IN REAL-TIME IN-VEHICLE DEVICE ISSUES ALERT TO DRIVER OVERSIZE VEHICLE WARNING ROADSIDE EQUIPMENT BROADCASTS BRIDGE/TUNNEL DIMENSIONS AND DETECTED VEHICLE DIMENSIONS TO OVERSIZE VEHICLE IN-VEHICLE DEVICE ISSUES ALERT TO DRIVER TO TAKE ALTERNATE ROUTE OR A WARNING TO STOP REDUCED SPEED/WORK ZONE WARNING ROADSIDE SENSORS CONNECTED TO TRAFFIC MESSAGE CHANNEL (TMC) AND/OR LOCAL NETWORK IN WORK ZONE ROADSIDE EQUIPMENT BROADCASTS SPEED LIMIT INFORMATION AND WORK ZONE INFORMATION IN-VEHICLE DEVICE ISSUES ALERT TO DRIVER TO REDUCE SPEED, CHANGE LANES, AND/OR PREPARE TO STOP

ROBOT, YOU CAN DRIVE MY CAR Philip E. Ross IEEE Spectrum June 2014

A professional drives the platoon’s lead vehicle, which communicates with the following cars by radio. A professional drives the platoon’s lead vehicle, which communicates with the following cars by radio. A professional drives the platoon’s lead vehicle, which communicates with the following cars by radio. A professional drives the platoon’s lead vehicle, which communicates with the following cars by radio. Drivers in the following vehicles relax. When the platoon approaches their various destinations, each driver pulls to the side and drives on independently. Drivers in the following vehicles relax. When the platoon approaches their various destinations, each driver pulls to the side and drives on independently. Drivers in the following vehicles relax. When the platoon approaches their various destinations, each driver pulls to the side and drives on independently. Drivers in the following vehicles relax. When the platoon approaches their various destinations, each driver pulls to the side and drives on independently. A driver finds a platoon that’s going the right way by selecting a destination and following the navigation system’s directions. The driver joins the platoon at the rear and the system takes control. A driver finds a platoon that’s going the right way by selecting a destination and following the navigation system’s directions. The driver joins the platoon at the rear and the system takes control. A driver finds a platoon that’s going the right way by selecting a destination and following the navigation system’s directions. The driver joins the platoon at the rear and the system takes control. A driver finds a platoon that’s going the right way by selecting a destination and following the navigation system’s directions. The driver joins the platoon at the rear and the system takes control. When one car leaves the platoon, the following cars automatically close the gap and continue until their drivers decide to peel off and go their own way. When one car leaves the platoon, the following cars automatically close the gap and continue until their drivers decide to peel off and go their own way. When one car leaves the platoon, the following cars automatically close the gap and continue until their drivers decide to peel off and go their own way. When one car leaves the platoon, the following cars automatically close the gap and continue until their drivers decide to peel off and go their own way.

VOLVO: MAGNETIC ROADS ROBOT, YOU CAN DRIVE MY CAR IS 376 September 4, 2014 Page 11 In February 2014, Volvo unveiled its research on the concept of embedding magnets in roadways as a means of supporting driverless cars. Their conclusion was that, at a cost of $109 per car and $40K per mile on a two-line road, it represents the most economically feasible approach currently in existence.

SAFETY ISSUE: INATTENTION ROBOT, YOU CAN DRIVE MY CAR IS 376 September 4, 2014 Page 12 A recent study by the Highway Loss Data Institute indicates that many vehicles with lane departure warning systems actually experienced an increase in collisions. To some critics, this provides supporting evidence that dependence on such systems may cause drivers to reduce their vigilance during driving.

SAFETY ISSUE: HACKING Advanced driver assistance systems, such as emergency braking and intersection surveillance, could potentially be invaded by external hackers. ROBOT, YOU CAN DRIVE MY CAR IS 376 September 4, 2014 Page 13 Current proposed measures to combat such hacking are primarily variations of the safety and security procedures used in the aviation industry.

SAFETY ISSUE: IRRESPONSIBILITY Will reliance on advanced safety features result in irresponsible behavior behind the wheel? ROBOT, YOU CAN DRIVE MY CAR IS 376 September 4, 2014 Page 14

PREDICTED TIMELINE ROBOT, YOU CAN DRIVE MY CAR IS 376 September 4, 2014 Page Modern Cruise Control 1966 Mechanical Antilock Brakes 1987 Electronic Stability Control 1995 Adaptive Cruise Control 2001 Lane- Departure Warning 2003 Pre-Crash Mitigation System 2007 DARPA Urban Challenge 2010 Google Car 2012 Nevada Autonomous Car Licenses 2014 NHTSA Autonomous Rulemaking 2018? First V2V & V2I Vehicles 2020? Driverless Traffic Jam Assistance 2025? Driver- Supported Autonomous 2030? Fully Autonomous Cars 2032? Half of All New Cars Autonomous