ENGAGE Wraparound Fidelity Monitoring: The WFI-EZ Jane Timmons-Mitchell, Ph.D. January xx, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Valuable Asset School districts put a valuable asset of the nation’s schools at risk when they ignore the health of their employees. WHY? BECAUSE… Actions.
Advertisements

Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Maryland Choices “One Team – One Mission”. Regional CME Maryland Choices is …  The Northwest Regional Care Management Entity.
From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.
The San Francisco Parent Training Institute Triple P Program December 7, 2011 Stephanie Romney, PhD Danijela Zlatevski, PhD
The Continuous Quality Improvement Process Empowering staff to develop local level solutions.
Information Sharing 1. Overview Inquiries into sexual violence incidents are extremely sensitive. Collecting and sharing information on GBV can be dangerous,
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Calhoun County School System Jacksonville, Alabama April 27-30, 2014.
Transition co-ordinator New role for transition planning.
Catulpa Community Support Services.  Use of an electronic data entry program to record demographic data and case notes to reflect service delivery 
Welcome to the YPQA Scores Reporter On Line Tutorial! This technology, available to network and program site leaders using the YPQA as part of quality.
What Outcomes Are Important for CACs?: Survey Results and Implications Ted Cross, Ph.D. Lisa Jones, Ph.D. Crimes Against Children Research Center University.
Waitlist Process Review Board Meeting April 8, 2014.
Neil Naftzger Principal Researcher Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation February 2015 Copyright © 20XX American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved.
Terrell W. Zollinger, DrPH Evaluation Consultant Healthy Women, Healthy Hoosiers Conference October 7, 2011.
Wraparound – A Team Based Approach. What is Wraparound? Evidence-based model for youth involved in multiple systems Facilitation of child and family teams.
Drug Medi-Cal Waiver Evaluation Planning Darren Urada, Ph.D. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs January 5, 2015 The author’s views and recommendations.
Tania Hanford MS LPC PROMISE Counselor Fox Valley Area.
Supporting Foster Care Students. Improving Outcomes for Foster care Students Nationally, less than half of youth in foster care complete a regular high.
© Judi’s House 2012 Supporting Grieving Youth in Schools Micki Burns, Ph.D. Director of Programs Brook Griese, Ph.D.
Illinois Medical Home Project Presented by Kathy Sanabria, MBA, PMP Project Director.
TCRS Concord Project Employer Training. Agenda 2 Topic Objectives Why Are You Here? Project Overview What’s New Your Resources Questions Demonstration.
Communities Coordinating for Healthy Development General Introduction.
Ontario’s Special Needs Strategy Spring The Vision “An Ontario where children and youth with special needs get the timely and effective services.
Adams County Educational Stability Grant Project Update March 2014.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
Our three year strategy >Our vision >Children and young people in families and communities where they can be safe, strong and thrive. >Our mission >Embed.
Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency March 3, 2014.
Guidelines for Divisional Coaching Development Coordinators (DCDCs) Biathlon Canada, 2008.
Service/Support Array, Provider Network, Natural Helpers and Financing Track 1- Early Developmental Stages Michelle Zabel University of Maryland Carrie.
Suicide Prevention Education a collaboration of the Mississippi Department of Education/Office of Healthy Schools Mississippi Department of Mental Health.
Participants Adoption Study 109 (83%) of 133 WSU Cooperative Extension county chairs, faculty, and program staff responded to survey Dissemination & Implementation.
Understanding and Administering the School- Wide Evaluation Tool (SET)
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Dr. John N. Austin, Director and Ms. Renee S. Jones, Associate Director Delaware State University Office.
ACO Mapping Group Recommendations 1. Are the subclass members being identified? 2. Are the subclass members being assessed? 3. Are the subclass members.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
SENSE Fall 2007 Pilot Orientation Conference Calls.
The Life of a Policy Council Member
NiaTx Project  Big Aim:  Reduce (re-) hospitalizations due to gaps in service delivery when consumers’ needs are immediate, multiple, and/or exceed.
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
MA Wraparound Fidelity Assessment System: Promoting Positive Outcomes through Fidelity Monitoring With special thanks to Eric Bruns, April Sather, and.
Financial Reporting (Overview & EFIS Users). 2 General Reporting Requirements  Reporting requirements are outlined in the 2011/12 Child Care Business.
Guidance for Completing Interim Report I Evaluation Webinar Series 3 Dec 2013.
1 CMHS Block Grant Peer Reviews Ann Arneill-Py, PhD, Executive Officer CA Mental Health Planning Council California Mental Health Planning Council April.
Child/Youth Care Management 2015 training. WELCOME!
Important Considerations When Building an OA FSP Diane Dworkin, L.C.S.W. San Mateo County Mental Health Steven Pickard, PSC Telecare OA, FSP Kathy Craig,
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Understanding and Sharing BERS-2 Information and Scoring with Parents, Caregivers and Youth May 1, 2012.
June 10, PM Discharge Planning Goal Local Contact Agency (LCA) SECTION Q PARTICIPATION IN ASSESSMENT AND GOAL SETTING.
Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports Family & Community Team Member Network Meeting Thank you for coming! Please make yourself comfortable.
 The development of the perinatal assessment tool was a vital precursor leading to the addition of data collection of the perinatal population. Data collected.
Youth Coordinated Entry System The Pilot in Hollywood.
1 YOUTHBUILD EVALUATION Building evidence about the effect of YouthBuild on the young people it serves August 17, 2011 Washington, D.C.
Overview of Expectations of CCSNL Sharon Lambton, R.N., M.S.N Nurse Consultant Children’s Medical Services.
FIELD VISIT PROCESS TPAs develop Monthly Work plan – all sites covered at least once per month. Field Staff (TPAs) – attend field visit with Project Field.
Affiliated with Children’s Medical Services Affiliated with Children’s Medical Services Introduction to the Medical Home Part 4 How Can Assessment Tools.
Semi Annual PBIS Data Collection System January 2 – 25, 2012 Technical Assistance for School based Teams and Coaches Series.
Collaborative Community Based Strategies for Addressing Fall Prevention October 2012 April R. Vince LSW, MSSA Cuyahoga County Board of Health.
UCI Library Website Chris Lee Archana Vaidyanathan Duncan Tsai Karen Quan.
Name of presentation Improving health in Greenwich: Linking integrated health & social care with primary care.
National 4-H Common Measures Suzanne Le Menestrel, Ph.D. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA Jill Walahoski, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
Housing & Employment Navigator Workforce Innovation Fund Study.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Local Standards of Care LAND, FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS JANUARY 11, 2016 PRESENTED BY SHARON AGUILAR, PROGRAM MANGER.
Case Management Updates.  During the of week April 11, 2011, the ETO system experienced technical difficulties.  As of April 13, 2011, the errors have.
“Right Door” Approach All doors in a school should lead to assistance ideally within the school walls Identify and provide resources for youth at a vulnerable.
Data Collection Interview
Introducing the service….
Lincoln County Social Services Organizational Effectiveness
Presentation transcript:

ENGAGE Wraparound Fidelity Monitoring: The WFI-EZ Jane Timmons-Mitchell, Ph.D. January xx, 2015

What is the WFI-EZ? The WFI-EZ, or Wraparound Fidelity Index, Short Form, was developed by the Wraparound Evaluation and Research team at the University of Washington. The WFI-EZ is a measure of adherence to the primary activities of the Wraparound process. The WFI-EZ is a brief survey given once to – Caregivers – Youth – Facilitators – Copies of the surveys have been sent in separate pdf links

Who gives the WFI-EZ? The WFI-EZ forms should be given to youth and caregivers by a neutral person, preferably not employed by the agency. The WFI-EZ forms should not be give to youth and caregivers by their facilitator, case manger, or therapist. It is recommended that the WFI-EZ be completed in privacy unless the respondent needs help reading items.

When do I give the WFI-EZ? Each youth/caregiver/facilitator group should complete the WFI-EZ once. The WFI-EZ should be completed after the family has been enrolled in Wraparound for 3 months or more. Pick a month (e.g., April), and administer to families enrolled more than 3 and less than 12 months.

Who completes the WFI-EZ? The WFI-EZ should be administered to caregivers. It may be administered to more than one caregiver; if so, the role needs to be clearly identified. The WFI-EZ should be administered to youth 11 years of age and older. The WFI-EZ should be completed by facilitators or care coordinators.

How many families need to be given the WFI-EZ? Sampling Plan Sample = all Sample = 15 Sample = 35% of total youth served (active families); i.e., 35 of 100 or 70 of 200. WFI-EZ Number Served Sample Up to 15 active families 16 – 50 active families 51 and greater (These are minimum standards!) From University of Washington, Wraparound Evaluation and Research Team

Consent It is important to follow the IRB approved consent procedure. The approved IRB protocol requires: – A script introducing fidelity monitoring must be read to participants (Caregivers and Youth) – A consent form must be read and given to participants (Facilitators, Caregivers and Youth); active consent is not required

Which families should complete The WFI-EZ? Select cases: (if more than 15) OhioMHAS provides the Outcome System 6 digit code list for all cases and sends to us. We will use a random number generator to select which families to include for programs with more than 15 families. Programs with 15 families or fewer will sample all families. Packets: We will send packets with OhioMHAS 6 digit code numbers on forms and on the packet. There will be one form for caregiver, one form for facilitator/case manager/care coordinator, and one form for youth. (If youth is younger than 11 years, disregard youth form.) Return completed WFI-EZs in packets. We will enter data on the WrapTrack system. Data will be downloaded and summarized for reports as needed.

Is there an additional cost for administering the WFI-EZ? No. The forms are made available to sites and do not cost anything. The cost of entering and analyzing data is being assumed by Case. The cost of the license with the University of Washington is being assumed by Case.

Feedback from the Field— Laura Domitrovich, MSSA, LSW Children’s Program Coordinator Trumbull County Mental Health and Recovery Board It has been very positive to incorporate Wraparound fidelity monitoring. It has been very reassuring and rewarding on many levels to see that we are maintaining fidelity to the model, continually delivering a high quality Wraparound Process for our youth and families It helps to highlight the areas that we are doing well, and pinpoint the areas that we need to fine tune. The information is very valuable to the staff and agencies that provide the Wraparound facilitation, as well as community partners and funders of the process.

Questions? If you have questions, please feel free to contact: – Jane Timmons-Mitchell, Ph.D. – – (216) – (216) (cell)