Www.westconsultants.com 1 Sediment Management for Dam Removal: An HEC-6 Approach.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modelling tools - MIKE11 Part1-Introduction
Advertisements

L-1621/Klipsch98 1 Importing HEC-2 Data Into HEC- RAS What you need to know…
WinTR-20 Course February Muskingum-Cunge Flood Routing Procedure in NRCS Hydrologic Models Prepared by William Merkel USDA-NRCS National Water Quality.
Basics of Reservoir Operations Computer Aided Negotiations Fall 2008 Megan Wiley Rivera.
Lower Yellowstone River Diversion Dam Project – Phase II - Physical Modeling of the Rock Ramp BRT, COE, MTAO Update Meeting November 4, 2010.
15 March 2012 WATERSHED Science & Engineering WEST Consultants.
Use of a hydrodynamic model to
Stream Geomorphology Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012.
STREAM SEDIMENT SAMPLING
1/40 Surface Water Hydrology at White River Lake, Texas Presented by Shane Walker May 3, 2005 CE 392K.2 – Hydrology.
Design of Open Channels and Culverts
Sediment Movement after Dam Removal
Hydrotechnical Considerations
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
FLOODS, STREAMS AND MEANDERS. GAUGING STATION On all major streams Measures Stream Height Height vs. Discharge (volume) Flood Stage and height above Flood.
Hoover Dam – Colorado River. Reasons for Dams Flood Control 39,000 dams worldwide higher than 15 m (ICOLD, 1988)
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
CHARACTER OF RIVER CHANNELS
WATER TEMPERATURE MODEL FOR BRANCHED RIVER SYSTEMS.
HEC-RAS.
Modeling River Ice and River Ice Jams with HEC-RAS
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation 1-Dimensional Modeling CWPPRA Technical Committee and.
Water Resources and International Conflict: Game Theory Kristina Schneider CE 384D Kristina Schneider CE 384D.
CH 7 - Open Channel Flow Brays Bayou Concrete Channel Uniform & Steady
Feb 2003HEC-RAS Version 3.11 Slides adapted from HEC Unsteady Flow Course Unsteady Flow Course.
Middle Fork Project Flow and Temperature Modeling (Status Report) November 4, 2008.
Stream Processes and Habitat Ryan Johnson. Overview Watershed Processes – Factors and their effects on the watershed as a whole Stream Processes – Factors.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Modeling sand transport and sandbar evolution along the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam.
1 Overview of Unsteady Flow Modeling With HEC-RAS Gary W. Brunner, P.E.
Stormwater Overview Board of County Commissioners Planning Conference March 1, 2007.
Dynamic Channel Routing Preissmann Scheme. Dynamic Channel Routing Preissmann Scheme unconditionally stable for  >=0.5 second-order accurate if 
Mathematical Background
MIKE 11 IntroductionNovember 2002Part 1 Introduction to MIKE 11 Part 1 General Hydrodynamics within MIKE 11 –Basic Equations –Flow Types Numerical Scheme.
1 Vladimir Smakhtin, Luna Bharati, Nilantha Gamage August, 2007 PLANNING WATER TRANSFERS IN KRISHA RIVER BASIN: TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL.
Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel
Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel
Hyporheic Zone- area where stream water and ground water intermix.
Yellowtail Dam Modeling Results Brian Marotz Hydropower Mitigation Coordinator.
Prevention and Cure. Contents Introduction to Reservoirs Preventing Siltation Cure Cost Benefit Analysis Conclusion.
HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Overview
Basic Hydraulics: Open Channel Flow – I
STRATEGIES FOR FRESHWATER. CONTEXT FOR STRATEGIES.
FLO-2D Model Development Rio Grande Canalization Project Reach Presentation to: New Mexico – Texas Water Commission and Paso del Norte Watershed Council.
Modeling of the Potential for Vertically Downward Saltwater Migration from a Dredge Pond Peter F. Andersen 1, Lisa M. Grogin 1, and Ronald L. Bartel 2.
Morphological Modeling of the Alameda Creek Flood Control Channel Rohin Saleh, Alameda County Flood Control District Søren Tjerry, Ph.D., DHI Portland,
Christie Beeman and Jeff Haltiner Philip Williams & Associates Hydrograph Modification: An Introduction and.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation Integration of Results 6 Month Progress ERDC West Bay.
WEAP Demand Management
7. Bedforms in coarse-grained channels Step-pool units Cluster bedforms Riffle-pool sequences.
Hydrology and application of the RIBASIM model SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning.
Hydrology and application of the RIBASIM model SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning.
Regional to Engineering Scale HUC8 HUC12 Catchment Engineering Hydrology Engineering Hydraulics Personal – a flooded home.
Anthony Alvarado, PE, CFM National Hydraulic Engineering Conference
Presented by Jon Traum, P.E.
Bridges Reach analysis Fundamental tool for design
EXAMPLE Water flows uniformly in a 2m wide rectangular channel at a depth of 45cm. The channel slope is and n= Find the flow rate in cumecs.
Hydrological changes resulting from dam construction
Week 1.
Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel
Hydraulic and Sediment Handling Performance Assessment of Rani Jamara Kulariya Irrigation Project (RJKIP) by Conjunctive Use of 1D and 3D Simulation Models.
Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel
Morphodynamic and Sediment Tracers in One-Dimension
A SURFACE WATER MODEL OF THE MIAMI RIVER
Modelling tools - MIKE11 Part1-Introduction
UH-Downtown White Oak Buffalo.
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
Hydrotechnical Design Guidelines for Stream Crossings
Instituto Superior Técnico instituto superior técnico
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Scour Analysis on the west fork of the Duchesne River
Presentation transcript:

1 Sediment Management for Dam Removal: An HEC-6 Approach

2 Overview ●What is HEC-6? ●Why use HEC-6 for Dam Removal Studies? ●Applicability of HEC-6 for Dam Removal Studies ●Unique Issues to Dam Removal and Sediment Management using HEC-6 ●Conclusions

3 HEC-6. What is it? ●One-Dimensional Moveable Boundary Open Channel Flow Numerical Model. ●Time-Series of Steady Flow Profiles. ●Can Simulate Changes in River Profiles due to Scour and/or Deposition over Moderate Time Periods (years +). ●Simulates Bed Sediment Sorting and Armoring.

4 Why use HEC-6??? ●Time-series Sediment Concentrations ■ Fisheries ► What is the survival threshold/duration for native species? ■ Irrigation Intakes ► Damage to pumping systems. ■ Municipal Water Supply ► Water quality

5 Why use HEC-6??? ●Volumes ■ Quantities of sediment removed from the reservoir. ■ Sources of Sediment Scoured ► Are there contaminated sites within the reservoir? ► What areas need to be targeted for scour/non-scour

6 Why use HEC-6??? ●Downstream Depositional Zones ■ Bridge Constrictions ■ Overbank Areas ■ Pump/Canal Intakes ●Final Bed Profiles Final Bed Profile Initial Bed Profile

7 Why use HEC-6??? ●Good Tool to Evaluate a Variety of Dam Removal Alternatives. Staging 1 Staging 2 Staging 3 Geometry 1 Geometry 2 Geometry 3 Best Alternative

8 Applicability of HEC-6 to Dam Removal ●Dynamic Equilibrium (Calibration) ●Represented by 1-D Assumption ■ Final Thalweg already present or can be logically assumed.

9 Applicability of HEC-6 to Dam Removal ●Full Drawdown is Relatively Gradual ■ Months or Years…not Days ●Bypass ChannelsMultiple Reaches

10 Unique Issues for Dam Removal ●Internal Boundary at Dam ■ Gradual Drawdown can be simulated by designating the Dam cross section as an internal boundary ■ Water surface elevations are specified for each time step.

11 Unique Issues for Dam Removal ●Staging ■ HEC-6 can simulate the removal of part or all of the dam by using the DREDGE card. ■ The DREDGE card allows for a portion of the cross section to be removed during the simulation. ■ The DREDGE template must be a trapezoidal shape.

12 Unique Issues for Dam Removal ●Staging (cont.) ■ Only one DREDGE card per cross section. If the dam is removed in stages, use the DREDGE card to simulate the final staged removal. ■ Previous stages must be lumped in to the initial cross section shape. ■ May overestimate localized scour.

13 Unique Issues for Dam Removal ●Cross Section Spacing ■ Close. Less than 200 ft for moderate drawdown periods. Useful to cut cross sections from GIS ■ Refined Cross Section Spacing can: ► Improve numerical stability. Be mindful of time step! – Explicit Solution Scheme ► Eliminate “Sawtooth” profile pattern

14 Unique Issues for Dam Removal ●Time Steps ■ 1 day or less throughout the simulation. ■ 1/10 or 1/20 day for active drawdown periods. ■ May have to reduce to 1/100 day at times throughout the simulation to achieve numerical stability.

15 Unique Issues for Dam Removal ●Bypass Channels ■ Some dam removal scenarios involve bypassing reservoir sediments with a constructed channel. ■ HEC-6 cannot handle looped networks. ■ Must use a common upstream reach for the reservoir and the bypass channel. Copy the sediment and geometry properties from the upstream reach above the reservoir at the time step in which flow is bypassed. Then transfer those properties to the “pseudo” reach above the bypass channel.

16 Unique Issues for Dam Removal

17 Conclusions ●HEC-6 is a Useful Tool for Evaluating Alternative Dam Removal Scenarios ■ Should be used for a comparison of alternatives, not for coming up with hard numbers. ■ Can be used to evaluate different staging and inflow hydrograph timings. ■ Can be used to evaluate staging durations (i.e. How fast should the dam be removed?)

18 Conclusions Sediment Concentrations

19 Conclusions Cumulative Sediment Through Dam

20 Conclusions Cumulative Sediment Deposition Downstream

21 Conclusions ■ Can evaluate grade control structures and their effectiveness. ■ Can pinpoint potential deposition zones in downstream reaches. ► Bridges ► Natural grade breaks ► Areas of low velocity

22 Conclusions Local Sedimentation at Downstream Bridge

23 Questions???