Topical Discussion: Joint Task Force on Undergraduate Physics Programs (J-TUPP) Undergraduate Curriculum Task Force.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Advertisements

Training Needs Analysis. Ambition in Action TAFE NSW: Doing business in the 21 st Century The TAFE NSW Workforce Development Guarantee.
Using training packages to meet client needs Facilitator: Gerard Kell.
Educating for a Sustainable Future – Environmental Engineering Body of Knowledge The EE BOK Working Group Debbie Reinhart, PhD, PE, BCEE University of.
CCCS = California Common Core Standards.  Common Core standards corresponds with the original NCLB timeline of 2014  Students need real world skills.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
General Education Outcomes (GEOs) JOE TERRERI Professor of Mathematics General Education Outcomes Coordinator.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
Update from the UNC General Education Council [presented to the UNC Board of Governors’ Educational Planning, Programs, and Policies Committee on February.
1 General Education Senate discussion scheduled for April 11 and 25 1.Proposal to base General Education on outcomes that can be assessed 2.Proposal for.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.
History/Government/Social Studies Update December 15, 2011 Don Gifford History/Government/Social Studies.
A Multi-method Approach: Assessment of Basic Communication Cheryl E Drout, Ph.D. SUNY-Fredonia.
LSP Nov 2 Agenda Announcements Reading Follow-up TERI –Update and overview –Partnerships –Task Groups.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Course Portfolio: Making Pedagogy Visible Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) Queensborough Community College, CUNY Spring 2008.
Impact of Including Authentic Inquiry Experiences in Methods Courses for Pre-Service Elementary and Secondary Teachers Timothy F. Slater, Lisa Elfring,
Minia Univresity Council for Education Affairs Meeting - July Higher Education Enhancement Project Fund (HEEPF) Improving Transportation Engineering.
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
New York State K-12 Social Studies Update Dr. John B. King, Jr. New York State Commissioner of Education President of the University of the State of New.
Seeing the Destination So We Can Direct Others to It
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Chancellor’s Cabinet September 28, 2004.
A Distance Learning Approach to Enhancing Technology Use in Rural Schools Jim Barber Wallace Hannum University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
History of the Two-Year College Physics Faculty in the AAPT Warren Hein Executive Officer American Association of Physics Teachers.
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
Academic Assessment Task Force Report August 15, 2013 Lori Escallier, Co-Chair Keith Sheppard, Co-Chair Chuck Taber, Co-Chair.
Renewal of the Advanced Physics Laboratory Course Brian Davies Western Illinois University.
Universal Design for Learning in the College Classroom Abstract This Faculty Learning Community (FLC) integrated components of Universal Design for Learning.
Oregon State Board of Education January 19, 2012.
Presentation to the Michigan Assessment Consortium January 20, 2012.
Educator Effectiveness Academy STEM Follow-Up Webinar December 2011.
Michigan’s Public Review of the Next Generation Science Standards for Today’s Students and Tomorrow’s Workforce.
The Changing Face of Education: How Common Core Impacts Our Curriculum Beth Smith President, ASCCC Oct. 31, 2013.
SPIN-UP: How to Increase the Number of Physics and Astronomy Majors in Your Department Robert C. Hilborn Amherst College Support from American Association.
Student learning outcomes Training Subcommittee University Assessment Committee University of Toledo
The Next Generation Science Standards From Awareness to Transition
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Professional Resources for Developing Global Competence Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools Developing Global Competence Symposium June 24, 2014 Presentation.
SPIN-UP Regional Workshops: Building Undergraduate Physics Programs for the 21 st Century Robert C. Hilborn University of Texas at Dallas Support from.
Workshop on Teaching Introductory Statistics Session 1: Planning A Conceptual Course Using Common Threads And Big Ideas, Part I: GAISE Recommendations.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
Full-Service Community Schools TASK FORCE Staff Lead: Jane Nicholson.
NEASCNEASC Standards Committees Kick-off Today’s Topic: Overview of the NEASC Game Plan and instructions for today’s work.
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
Model for Sustaining Departmental Student Outcomes Assessment Russ E. Mullen, Mary H. Wiedenhoeft, Thomas A. Polito, Sherry L. Pogranichniy, and Michelle.
The AAPT Undergraduate Curriculum Task Force Ernie Behringer AAPT Representative Eastern Michigan University SUPC Next Steps Session: 6:15 PM Saturday,
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Resources and Reflections: Using Data in Undergraduate Geosciences Cathy Manduca SERC Carleton College DLESE Annual Meeting 2003.
Science Department Draft of Goals, Objectives and Concerns 2010.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Next Generation Science Standards “Taking the Steps to Implement NGSS” March 29, 2013 TEEAM Conference.
Unpacking NGSS Laura Kresl Julie Roney. Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) September 4, 2013 C Subject: State Schools Chief.
SPIN-UP Strategic Programs for Innovations in Undergraduate Physics Robert C. Hilborn The University of Texas at Dallas Support from American Association.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
From Dialogue to Action Michelle L. Younker New Mexico Mathematics Summit October 2, 2015.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
JOINT TASK FORCE ON UNDERGRADUATE PHYSICS PROGRAMS APS and AAPT Laurie McNeil and Paula Heron, co-chairs.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
NC Digital Learning Competencies School Administrators and Classroom Teachers ****** Partnering for Education Impact April 19, 2016.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Presentation transcript:

Topical Discussion: Joint Task Force on Undergraduate Physics Programs (J-TUPP) Undergraduate Curriculum Task Force

Agenda J-TUPP  Beth A. Cunningham, AAPT  Robert Hilborn, AAPT  Theodore Hodapp, APS Undergraduate Curriculum Task Force  Andrew Gavrin, IUPUI  Joseph Kozminski, Lewis University Input from the Audience

J-TUPP and UCTF Background Concern by departments about the future of physics programs Pressure from accrediting bodies and senior administrators to know best practices for teaching physics Need to change curriculum to meet needs of today’s students  Not all go to graduate school  Curriculum the same for 60 years

J-TUPP and UCTF Background UCTF work started in 2012 APS and AAPT saw value in partnering to address the needs of physics departments AAPT approved J-TUPP at SM13 APS approved J-TUPP in Fall 2013

J-TUPP Charge To prepare a report that will engage and inform physicists in answering the question: “What skills and knowledge should the next generation of undergraduate physics degree holders possess to be well prepared for a diverse set of careers?”

J-TUPP Report Provide guidance for revising the undergraduate curriculum to improve the education of a diverse student population. Recommendations on:  content  pedagogy  professional skills  student engagement Describe documentable student outcomes.

J-TUPP Members Paula Heron, co-chair, University of Washington Laurie McNeil, co-chair, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Douglas Arion, Carthage College J.D. Garcia, University of Arizona S. James Gates, University of Maryland Elizabeth McCormack, Bryn Mawr College Duncan Moore, University of Rochester Helen Quinn, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Quinton Williams, Howard University Lawrence Woolf, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems

Society Liaisons Beth Cunningham, AAPT Renee Michelle Goertzen, APS Bob Hilborn, AAPT Theodore Hodapp, APS Liaison to AAPT Undergraduate Curriculum Task Force : Ernie Behringer

Timeline First face-to-face meeting was mid- November Input from physics community in 2015  AAPT WM15 and SM15  APS March and April Meetings Final report anticipated in late 2016

AAPT Undergraduate Curriculum Task Force Summary of tasks performed so far (Andy) Undergraduate lab recommendations (Joe)

UCTF Charge The AAPT Undergraduate Curriculum Task Force (UCTF) is charged with developing specific, multiple recommendations for coherent and relevant undergraduate curricula (including course work, undergraduate research, mentoring, etc..) for different types of physics majors in collaboration with the APS and AIP, and with developing recommendations for the implementation and assessment of such curricula. "Enhancing the understanding and appreciation of physics through teaching"

UCTF Anti-Charge NOT to develop a “one-size-fits nobody” curriculum NOT to develop standardized tests NOT to become an accrediting body "Enhancing the understanding and appreciation of physics through teaching"

UCTF Activities Produce, collect and distribute resources to  Guide curriculum change  Connect with J-TUPP Major reports so far:  Lab Goals (Joe Kozminski, up next)  Computation *  Undergraduate Research (past)  Spin-Up (original, new) "Enhancing the understanding and appreciation of physics through teaching"

Computer and Computational Physics Skills and Practices Draft v3 Evidence in support of including computation and computer skills Learning outcome recommendations  Technical computer and computational skills  Computational physics thinking practices "Enhancing the understanding and appreciation of physics through teaching"

Recommendations for the Undergraduate Laboratory Curriculum

Goal of the Subcommittee Develop a set of curriculum recommendations (objectives, experiences, learning outcomes) for the introductory and advanced (i.e. beyond first year) labs that foster the development of many key 21 st century skills and competencies.

These Recommendations DO NOT: Prescribe a curriculum Prescribe particular labs the students should do Provide a list of required equipment Develop or prescribe particular assessments for your lab courses Develop a separate set of guidelines for online labs

Lab Curriculum Focus Areas

Constructing Knowledge – collect, analyze, and interpret real data from personal observations of the physical world to develop a physical worldview.

Lab Curriculum Focus Areas Modeling – develop abstract representations of real systems studied in the laboratory, understand their limitations and uncertainties, and make predictions using models.

Lab Curriculum Focus Areas Designing Experiments – develop, engineer, and troubleshoot experiments to test models and hypotheses within specific constraints such as cost, time, safety, and available equipment.

Lab Curriculum Focus Areas Developing Technical and Practical Laboratory Skills – become proficient using common test equipment in a range of standard laboratory measurements while being cognizant of device limitations.

Lab Curriculum Focus Areas Analyzing and Visualizing Data – analyze and display data using statistical methods and critically interpret the validity and limitations of these data and their uncertainties.

Lab Curriculum Focus Areas Communicating Physics – present results and ideas with reasoned arguments supported by experimental evidence and utilizing appropriate and authentic written and verbal forms.

Status of the Lab Curriculum Recommendations Document Endorsed by the AAPT Committee on Laboratories on July 29, 2014 Endorsed by the AAPT Executive Board on November 10, 2014 Available on AAPT website:

Future of the Lab Curriculum Recommendations Document We hope that this document will: Inform the UCTF and J-TUPP Be used by departments to evaluate and update their lab curriculum Be used by external reviewers for departmental reviews Be used by the PER community for developing laboratory assessments Have an online presence with user input of implementation examples

What we want from you What weighs heavily on department minds regarding preparation of undergraduate physics majors? What can J-TUPP do to help out departments with these concerns?

Presentations By J-TUPP Members Douglas Arion  Session ED03  Monday, January 5 th, 4:30 – 5:00 pm  Updating Physics Curricula: Professional Development and Entrepreneurship Education Lawrence Woolf  Session GB01  Tuesday, January 6 th, 8:30 – 9:00 am  Mentoring Graduate Students for Their Likely Non-Academic Careers

Questions? J-TUPP website: rgrad/jtupp.cfm