ISTW2006 11-13 October Chengdu CDX-U The Lithium Tokamak – Results from CDX-U and Progress towards LTX R. Kaita, H. Kugel, T. Gray, D. Mansfield, J. Spaleta,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ion Heating and Velocity Fluctuation Measurements in MST Sanjay Gangadhara, Darren Craig, David Ennis, Gennady Fiskel and the MST team University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Advertisements

PPRC PPRC IR-T1 Tokamak Experimental Programme, Plans and Recent Results IR-T1 Tokamak Experimental Programme, Plans and Recent Results Presented By P.
First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
APS-DPP October Denver, Colorado CDX-U Final results from the CDX-U lithium program R. Majeski, R. Kaita, H. Kugel, T. Gray, D. Mansfield, J. Spaleta,
PPPL Experiment Seminar Wednesday, February 21, 2001 Li capillary porous system on T-11M Gettering of Deuterium and He Deuterium retention in Li limiter.
SFG meeting 18 May 2005 CDX-U Recent Lithium Evaporative Coating and Electron Beam Heating Results in CDX-U Presented by Dick Majeski R. Kaita, T. Gray,
Lithium Surface Experiments on the Current Drive Experiment-Upgrade R. Kaita Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory National Spherical Torus Experiment Program.
ASIPP Lithium experiments on HT-7 and EAST tokamak G. Z. Zuo, J. S. Hu, Z.S, J. G. Li, EAST team Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10 : Running a discharge / diagnostics.
49th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2007, Orlando, Florida Ion Temperature Measurements and Impurity Radiation in.
PFC meeting 9-11 May 2005 PPPL CDX-U E-beam experiments on CDX-U Presented by Dick Majeski R. Kaita, T. Gray, H. Kugel, J. Spaleta, J. Timberlake, L. Zakharov.
A. HerrmannITPA - Toronto /19 Filaments in the SOL and their impact to the first wall EURATOM - IPP Association, Garching, Germany A. Herrmann,
9/20/04NSTX RESULTS REVIEW NSTX rtEFIT implementation progress results NSTX 2004 RESULTS REVIEW September 20&21, 2004 REAL-TIME EQUILIBRIUM RECONSTRUCTION.
10th ITPA TP Meeting - 24 April A. Scarabosio 1 Spontaneous stationary toroidal rotation in the TCV tokamak A. Scarabosio, A. Bortolon, B. P. Duval,
Edge Neutral Density (ENDD) Diagnostic Overview Patrick Ross Monday Physics Meeting Monday, March19, 2007.
ASIPP Development of a new liquid lithium limiter with a re-filling system in HT-7 G. Z. Zuo, J. S. Hu, Z.S, J. G. Li,HT-7 team July 19-20, 2011 Institute.
SUNIST SUNIST- Sino UNIted Spherical Tokamak Status of SUNIST spherical tokamak in 2006 HE Yexi, ZHANG Liang, *FENG Chunhua, FU Hongjun, GAO Zhe, TAN Yi,
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgements: M. G. Bell 2, R. Kaita 2, H. W. Kugel 2, R. Raman 3, A. L. Roquemore 2 1 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
1 Modeling of EAST Divertor S. Zhu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Plasma Dynamics Lab HIBP E ~ 0 V/m in Locked Discharges Average potential ~ 580 V  ~ V less than in standard rotating plasmas Drop in potential.
1 CHI Summary Transient CHI (XP606) –All systems operated reliably without any faults Edge Current drive (XP533)
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgement s: R. Maingi 2, D. A. Gates 3, J. Menard 3, R. Raman 4, R. E. Bell 3, C. E. Bush 2, R. Kaita 3, H. W. Kugel 3, B.
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
Demonstration of 200 kA CHI Startup Current Coupling to Transformer Drive on NSTX B.A. Nelson, R. Raman, T.R. Jarboe, University of Washington D. Mueller,
T.M. Biewer, Oct. 20 th, 2003NSTX Physics Meeting1 T. M. Biewer, R.E. Bell October 20 th, 2003 NSTX Physics Meeting Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.
H. W. Kugel 45 th APS DPP Meeting Oct 27-31, 2003, Albuquerque, NM 1 Lithium Experiments in the NSTX Boundary Physics Program H.W.Kugel, M.Bell, R.Kaita,
PF1A upgrade physics review Presented by D. A. Gates With input from J.E. Menard and C.E. Kessel 10/27/04.
EAST Data processing of divertor probes on EAST Jun Wang, Jiafeng Chang, Guosheng Xu, Wei Zhang, Tingfeng Ming, Siye Ding Institute of Plasma Physics,
Advances In High Harmonic Fast Wave Heating of NSTX H-mode Plasmas P. M. Ryan, J-W Ahn, G. Chen, D. L. Green, E. F. Jaeger, R. Maingi, J. B. Wilgen - Oak.
ASIPP Long pulse and high power LHCD plasmas on HT-7 Xu Qiang.
CHI Run Summary for March 10-12, 31 & April 9, 2008 Flux savings from inductive drive of a Transient CHI started plasma (XP817) R. Raman, B.A. Nelson,
Brent Stratton for the NCSX Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Oak Ridge National Laboratory NCSX Program Advisory Committee Meeting #8 Princeton.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
Study of NSTX Electron Density and Magnetic Field Fluctuation using the FIReTIP System K.C. Lee, C.W. Domier, M. Johnson, N.C. Luhmann, Jr. University.
ASIPP New progresses of lithium coating in EAST J.S. Hu 1, G.Z. Zuo 1, Z. Sun 1, J.G. Li 1, D. K. Mansfield 2, L.E. Zakharov 2 1 Institute of Plasma Physics,
1) Disruption heat loading 2) Progress on time-dependent modeling C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Bethesda, MD, 4/4/2011.
Edge characterization experiments in the National Spherical Torus Experiment V. A. Soukhanovskii and NSTX Research Team Session CO1 - NSTX ORAL session,
Session I-B – Overview Talks Lithium in Magnetic Confinement Experiments S. MirnovLi collection experiments on T-11M and T-10 in framework of Li closed.
Rajesh Maingi Oak Ridge National Laboratory M. Bell b, T. Biewer b, C.S. Chang g, R. Maqueda c, R. Bell b, C. Bush a, D. Gates b, S. Kaye b, H. Kugel b,
Work with TSC Yong Guo. Introduction Non-inductive current for NSTX TSC model for EAST Simulation for EAST experiment Voltage second consumption for different.
FEC 2006 Reduction of Neoclassical Transport and Observation of a Fast Electron Driven Instability with Quasisymmetry in HSX J.M. Canik 1, D.L. Brower.
RFX-mod programme workshop, January 2009 Scenario and operational issues for high current L. Zanotto, R. Cavazzana, S. Dal Bello, F. Milani.
GOLEM operation based on some results from CASTOR
Dependence of Pedestal Structure on Ip and Bt A. Diallo, R. Maingi, S. Zweben, B.P. LeBlanc, B. Stratton, J. Menard, S. Gerhardt, J. Canick, A. McClean,
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
Solenoid Free Plasma Start-up Mid-Run Summary (FY 2008) R. Raman and D. Mueller Univ. of Wash. / PPPL 16 April 2008, PPPL 1 Supported by Office of Science.
Edge Turbulence in High Density Ohmic Plasmas on NSTX K.M. Williams, S.J. Zweben, J. Boedo, R. Maingi, C.E. Bush NSTX XP Presentation Draft 5/25/06.
M. Ono NSTX FWP 2014 Budget Planning Meeting Apr. 15, 2012 Chapter 10. NSTX-U Facility Status and Proposed Upgrades Text, figures – mostly there except.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
V. A. Soukhanovskii Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory H. W. Kugel, R. Kaita, A. L. Roquemore Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Research Team.
With: R. Bell, D. Boyle, R. Kaita, T. Kozub, B. LeBlanc, M. Lucia, E. Merino, J. Schmitt, D. Stotler, G. Tchilingurian PPPL T. M. Biewer, T. K. Gray ORNL.
Planning for Toroidal Lithium Divertor Target for NSTX and Supporting Experiments on CDX-U/LTX R. Kaita Boundary Physics Science Focus Group Meeting July.
Development and Assessment of “X-point limiter” Plasmas M. Bell, R. Maingi, K-C. Lee Coping with both steady-state and transient (ELM) heat loads is a.
Simulation of Non-Solenoidal Current Rampup in NSTX C. E. Kessel and NSTX Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory APS-DPP Annual Meeting, Savannah, Georgia,
Scaling experiments of perturbative impurity transport in NSTX D. Stutman, M. Finkenthal Johns Hopkins University J. Menard, E. Synakowski, B. Leblanc,R.
Engineering Operations Outage Status: New shielding of HHFW/in-vessel components has been completed. Fit-ups of OH bus lead upgrades to reduce error fields.
5.4 Stored Energy Crashes  Diamagnetic loop shows the plasma energy crashes at low plasma density  ECE signals are in phase with the energy crashes 
Radiation divertor experiments in the HL-2A tokamak L.W. Yan, W.Y. Hong, M.X. Wang, J. Cheng, J. Qian, Y.D. Pan, Y. Zhou, W. Li, K.J. Zhao, Z. Cao, Q.W.
54th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics, October 29 – November 2, 2012, Providence, Rhode Island 3-D Plasma Equilibrium Reconstruction.
Supported by US DOE contracts DE-AC02-09CH11466 Dick Majeski Princeton Plasma Physics Lab with H. Ji, T. Kozub, A. Khodak, E. Merino, M. Zarnstorff Concepts.
NSTX APS-DPP: SD/SMKNov Abstract The transport properties of NSTX plasmas obtained during the 2008 experimental campaign have been studied and.
Long Pulse High Performance Plasma Scenario Development for NSTX C. Kessel and S. Kaye - providing TRANSP runs of specific discharges S.
56 th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics. October 27-31, New Orleans, LA Using the single reservoir model [3], shown on right, to:
EX/P2-15 ECRH Pre-ionization and Assisted Startup in HL-2A Tokamaks in HL-2A Tokamaks Xianming SONG*, Liaoyuan CHEN, Jinghua ZHANG Jun RAO, Jun ZHOU, Xiao.
Profiles of density fluctuations in frequency range of (20-110)kHz Core density fluctuations Parallel flow measured by CHERS Core Density Fluctuations.
For the NSTX Five-Year Research Program 2009 – 2013 M.G. Bell Facility and Diagnostic Plans.
Temperature Measurements of Limiter Surfaces at High Heat Flux in the HT-7 Tokamak H. Lin, X.Z. Gong, J. Huang, J.Liu, B. Shi, X.D. Zhang, B.N. Wan,
Catalin Teodorescu, William Young, Richard Ellis, Adil Hassam
Presentation transcript:

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U The Lithium Tokamak – Results from CDX-U and Progress towards LTX R. Kaita, H. Kugel, T. Gray, D. Mansfield, J. Spaleta, J. Timberlake, L. Zakharov, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA V. Soukhanovskii, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA R. Maingi, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA R. Doerner, University of California at San Diego, CA, USA Dick Majeski, PPPL and

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U Outline  CDX-U lithium and fueling systems for 2005 –Final results from the CDX-U lithium program  Recycling and particle confinement time –~30% recycling coefficient (record for magnetically confined plasmas) –Temperature, impurity effects  New magnetic diagnostics, equilibrium reconstructions  Plasma confinement results –Approximate order of magnitude increase in confinement times –Exceeds ITER98P(y,1) ELMy H-mode scaling by  »Record confinement enhancement for an ohmic tokamak  LTX description and status –Implications of the CDX-U results for LTX

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U Three lithium, two gas fueling systems available on CDX-U in 2005 R 0 =34 cm a = 22 cm  1.6 B T (0)  2.1 kG I P  80 kA  disch <25 msec T e (0)~100 eV n e (0)<6x10 19 m -3 CDX-U:  Lithium tray limiter –300 g of lithium in a toroidal tray –Half Li inventory liquid  New electron beam lithium coating system –Used lithium in tray as source  New resistively heated lithium evaporator –NSTX prototype  Gas injection systems –Wall mounted piezo valve –Supersonic gas injector R 0 = 34 cm, width = 10 cm 6 mm deep  Up to 1000Å of lithium coatings between discharges  600 cm 2 of liquid lithium forms lower limiter

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U High power density electron gun intended to “spot heat” lithium Charging of probe tip insulator disturbs beam Gaussian beam profile, width 3 mm  Converted commercial gun  4 kV, mA typ.  sec. run typical  Total power modest: <1.6 kW  Power density high: < 60 MW/m 2  Objective: 1000Å lithium wall coatings –TF + VF used to guide beam »Can be pulsed to 600G; typ. 200 G –Lithium tray fill (~3 mm deep)used as evaporation target. »Lithium area ~600 cm 2 >> beam spot Maximum evaporation rate: 600 mg/minute

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U  Electron beam heating induces flow  Flow very effectively inhibits localized heating  25 sec movies (visible, IR) 150 sec. into an e-beam run  Yellow denotes +55°C, red denotes +110°C  Field ramps from 200 G to 400G 10 sec into clip  If only conduction were active, area under beam would heat to 1400ºC in 0.1 sec. Beam spot. Note NO local heating 1000 Å wall coating in < 1 min, 30 sec before discharge Framing pauses, white flag at field ramp  Localized heat deposition (and/or beam current) induces lithium flows –Marangoni effect; temperature- dependent surface tension IR image Visible image Centerstack Lithium in tray

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U Recycling coefficient reduced to ~0.3 with full liquid lithium tray + evaporative coatings  ~3  reduction in D  for full- tray liquid lithium operation (2000 cm 2 )  T e (a)~28 eV with lithium –~20 eV without »~17% D  emission correction  Bare tray: deuterium prefill only –Liquid lithium operation required 8  increase in gas fueling  Lithium reduces recycling coefficient R from ~1 to ~0.3 –Overestimate (background light)  Lowest R ever obtained for a magnetically confined plasma  Thinner coatings from resistive evaporator produced ~5% recycling reduction  2005 global R~ –1/2 tray + evaporator  D  emission at the centerstack –Lithium coated (solid) –Primary plasma contact Bare SS tray - R~1 Full liquid lithium tray, coatings (no confinement data, ) Resistive evaporator, e-beam (2005)

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U Liquid lithium + coatings produce strong pumping  CDX-U lithium systems: –Electron beam heating, evaporation of the lithium tray limiter –Second resistive oven to coat centerstack »600 cm 2 liquid lithium limiter cm 2 solid lithium coatings  Exceeds wall pumping rate in a TFTR supershot by 2  –Active wall area is two orders of magnitude smaller High recycling Low recycling (Discharge duration 25 msec)

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U Impurity ion temperature increases by 3  with lithium  Carbon impurity level (signal magnitude) drops by over an order of magnitude  No profile information (no radial localization)  No Thomson scattering available No lithium 24 eV Hot lithium 71 eV

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U Lithium operation eliminated impurities  Oxygen emission was reduced to nearly the noise level  Water lines were eliminated from the RGA  Modeling (TSC, S. Jardin) indicated Z eff < 1.2 –But no direct measure of Z eff available Liquid lithium Bare SS tray Oxygen

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U New magnetic diagnostics permited reconstructions, measurement of  E in 2005  Magnetic probes, compensated diamagnetic loop added  Equilibrium and Stability Code (ESC) modified to include vessel eddy currents –Response function approach –Calibrated with “step function” coil pulses –Compensation for nonaxisymmetric eddy currents B-dot probes Flux loop Rogowski coil Flux loop Diamagnetic loop, compensation coil

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U Measured confinement times significantly exceed ELMy H-mode scalings  ITER98P(y,1) included START data (slightly larger “small” ST)  Confinement in CDX improved by 6  or more with lithium wall coatings, partial liquid lithium limiter  Exceeds scaling by 2-3   Largest increase in ohmic tokamak confinement ever observed Active Li evaporation No Li evaporation for 2 weeks  61kA <I p <78kA  2.1 kG  Identical loop voltage waveforms  0.5 < n e < 1  m -3  Gas puffing terminated several msec before peak in plasma current –“Pellet fueling” simulation  Pre-lithium confinement times: msec (kinetic) –New magnetics not available All discharges:

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U Confinement time is correlated with recycling  Density pumpout rate (dn/dt) is a measure of recycling suppression  Strong pumping (low recycling) results in high confinement High recycling Low recycling

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U Lithium discharges exhibit long confinement times, very low loop voltage  Reconstruction of centerstack limited plasma from ESC  Total coating of 13,000 Å (4 g) of lithium had been applied during preceding 2 hrs –1000 Å applied <1 min. before discharge   E for this discharge 6 msec  Surface voltage at current peak < 0.5V –300 J stored energy –L i ~ 0.7 –Very low ohmic power input: 45 kW –Low ohmic power a future concern »Lithium area 600 cm 2 for the discharges for which reconstructions (& surface loop voltage) are available »External loop voltage was lower with a full (2000 cm 2 ) tray (2003, 2004)  q 0 >1 in all analyzed lithium discharges –No sawteeth –No significant MHD Li tray

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U LTX status  CDX-U has been disassembled –Vacuum vessel undergoing modifications  Shell support structure being modified to withstand disruptive forces  Poloidal field coil set is being upgraded –Present set incapable of holding equilibria with I p >80 kA  Thomson scattering system will be rebuilt –Based on existing ruby system –Will incorporate full amplifier set from PBX-M (~15J output) –12 spatial channels  Interferometer will utilize 1 fixed, 2 movable channels to provide a 5 point profile in 2 shots  Upgrade magnetics (more flux loops)  Reinstall spectroscopy diagnostics from CDX-U –But: shift from D-  to Lyman-  to reduce stray light problem  Schedule is for first plasma in Spring 2007 –Only a limited diagnostic set will be available

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U Follow-on to CDX-U, LTX, will have 5 m 2 wall of liquid lithium film  Two e-beam lithium evaporators  Heaters will maintain shell temperature ~300ºC Shell fitted into vessel Stainless steel inner surface Inner & outer poloidal gaps Shell interior 1 cm copper with heater fixtures Toroidal gaps

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U  Projections from recent renewal submission (Spring 05) –L-mode scaling  TSC, ASTRA projected confinement time for LTX at 3.8 kG, 250 kA was <3.1 msec  Observed confinement time for CDX-U at ~70 kA, 2.1 kG is already 2  higher  Existing tokamak scalings are not good predictors for lithium tokamak performance Prelithium CDX-U LTX (orig proj) - 2 KG, 250 kA LTX (orig proj) - 4 kG, 300 kA CDX-U performance has already exceeded code predictions for LTX START data CDX-U lithium (measured, ~70 kA, 2 kG) (M. Walsh, APS-DPP98) 5 msec ISTW October Chengdu

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U LTX operation at I p > 100 kA requires new PF coils New coil set designed for I p ≤ 400 kA CDX-U New PF coils  Equilibrium modeling shows that CDX plasmas with I p ≥ kA scraped-off on outer limiter –Vertical field too low –One major factor limiting I p  New PF set, rearrangement of existing power supplies address this problem for LTX  Toroidal field will increase to 2.4 kG  Poloidal field coil set designed for a 400kA equilibrium –Higher current may be necessary to offset lowered loop voltage  Have power supplies for all external coils –New internal coil requires fast capacitor-driven IGBT supply

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U Shell support structure redesigned for significant disruptive forces  Shell is electrically isolated from vessel –Ceramic breaks required for in-vessel mounting  Disruptive forces modeled by Zakharov  Maximum force ~ 5 kN –Overturning moment on shell quadrant –Impulse rules out internal ceramic supports  Load will be transferred to mounting points exterior to the vessel –Compliant G10 insulating supports –In-vacuum supports fully welded

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U Diagnostics and auxilliary systems for LTX  Fueling with supersonic gas jets –HFS and LFS –Pellets on hold; ohmic input power in CDX is very low –Proposing low-energy neutral beam fueling ( kV)  Expanded, upgraded magnetic diagnostics  Upgraded Thomson scattering –Single pulse, 10-15J ruby –12 spatial points –Additional edge channels to be implemented  Multiple interferometer chords  Lyman-  detectors for recycling –Lithium reflectivity at nm is very low  All other spectroscopic diagnostics to be transferred from CDX-U

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U LTX schedule  CDX-U vessel has been disassembled, being modified  Rework of shell supports underway  Shell will be assembled into the vessel at the PPPL shop facility in September for fitting –Removed for final reassembly, with all internal diagnostics and coils –Installation of new PF set in late 2006  First pumpdown in early 2007  New OH supply available in early spring 2007  First plasma (no lithium) in late spring 2007  First lithium in summer 2007 –Very limited diagnostic set in 2007

ISTW October Chengdu CDX-U Summary  In 2005 CDX-U simultaneously employed 600 cm 2 liquid lithium limiter Å between-shots lithium wall coatings –Higher recycling than full-tray (2000 cm 2 ) operation –But: new diagnostics, analysis for equilibrium, confinement  Particle removal rates produced in CDX-U sufficient to pump a TFTR supershot  Recycling coefficients of ~30% are the lowest ever achieved in a magnetically confined plasma  6-10  enhancement in low recycling discharge confinement times over high recycling case –Largest increase in ohmic tokamak confinement ever observed –Empirical tokamak scalings appear irrelevant to lithium tokamaks  CDX-U now being disassembled, converted to LTX –25  increase in liquid lithium surface over best-case CDX-U