Inertial Navigation Systems and GPS Juan Jacobo Van der Dys April 20 th, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Feedback Control Dynamically or actively command, direct, or regulate themselves or other systems.
Advertisements

CDL Inertial technology tutorial
JASS 2006, St.Petersburg Christian Wimmer
Inertial Navigation Advantages
Benoit Pigneur and Kartik Ariyur School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University June 2013 Inexpensive Sensing For Full State Estimation of Spacecraft.
Navigation Fundamentals
Use it Free: Instantly Knowing Your Phone Attitude Pengfei Zhou*, Mo Li Nanyang Technological University Guobin (Jacky) Shen Microsoft Research.
Use it Free: Instantly Knowing Your Phone Attitude Pengfei Zhou*, Mo Li Nanyang Technological University Guobin (Jacky) Shen Microsoft Research.
INS : State of the art Yves PATUREL. 2 INS : noise on the sensors For inertial sensors, one typical way of measuring noise is the draw the Allan variance.
© Copyright 2011 MicroStrain Inc. High Performance Miniature Inertial Measurement Systems MicroStrain Inc Mike Robinson
Position and Attitude Determination using Digital Image Processing Sean VandenAvond Mentors: Brian Taylor, Dr. Demoz Gebre-Egziabher A UROP sponsored research.
AIR NAVIGATION Part 7 Magnetic Fields and The Compass.
September, School of Aeronautics & Astronautics Engineering Performance of Integrated Electro-Optical Navigation Systems Takayuki Hoshizaki
Attitude Determination and Control
Dr. Shanker Balasubramaniam
Parth Kumar ME5643: Mechatronics UAV ATTITUDE AND HEADING HOLD SYSTEM.
Attitude Determination - Using GPS. 20/ (MJ)Danish GPS Center2 Table of Contents Definition of Attitude Attitude and GPS Attitude Representations.
Matt McKeever Jonathan Baker UAV Design Team 11/16/2006
VHF Omnidirectional Range (VOR)
Fundamentals of Strapdown Inertial and GPS-Aided Navigation
August, School of Aeronautics & Astronautics Engineering Optical Navigation Systems Takayuki Hoshizaki Prof. Dominick Andrisani.
Lesson 16: Aircraft Instrument Systems
December, Simulation of Tightly Coupled INS/GPS Navigator Ade Mulyana, Takayuki Hoshizaki December, 2001 Purdue University.
Crossbow Products Presented by: Stephen Justice. Topics Brief view of gyros Brief view of gyros A look at MEMS A look at MEMS The two types of sensors.
Navigational Aids Know the theory and operation of modern air navigational aids.
An INS/GPS Navigation System with MEMS Inertial Sensors for Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Masaru Naruoka The University of Tokyo 1.Introduction.
Smartphone Overview iPhone 4 By Anthony Poland 6 Nov 2014.
Computer Vision Group Prof. Daniel Cremers Autonomous Navigation for Flying Robots Lecture 3.2: Sensors Jürgen Sturm Technische Universität München.
Attitude Determination and Control System
Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos (ITA-Brazil)
Complete Pose Determination for Low Altitude Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Using Stereo Vision Luke K. Wang, Shan-Chih Hsieh, Eden C.-W. Hsueh 1 Fei-Bin Hsaio.
Mathematical Engineering in Avionics Applications Dr. SK Chaudhuri Sc. ‘H’ Sc. ‘H’ Associate Director, RCI 9 th June 2007, IISc Bangalore.
TAMDAR Winds Some results from a study of the ATReC/AIRS-II Campaign Data Robert Neece, NASA Langley Research Center.
1 POS MV Vertical Positioning March Where we fit in! “Other sensors (notably modern heave-pitch-roll sensors) can contribute to achieving such.
Karman filter and attitude estimation Lin Zhong ELEC424, Fall 2010.
IMPROVE THE INNOVATION Today: High Performance Inertial Measurement Systems LI.COM.
INS: Inertial Navigation Systems An overview of 4 sensors.
Inertial Navigation System Overview – Mechanization Equation
HIAPER 3D Winds – current status - Dick Freisen -.
Method determinate angle of rotation of an IMU application for UAV Trinh Dinh Quan Southern TaiWan University.
ADCS Review – Attitude Determination Prof. Der-Ming Ma, Ph.D. Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Tamkang University.
AVAT11001: Course Outline Aircraft and Terminology
Current Works Corrected unit conversions in code Found an error in calculating offset (to zero sensors) – Fixed error, but still not accurately integrating.
EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems Wednesday, January 13 EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems Slide 1 of 18.
Dead Reckoning and Wind
Quadcopters A CEV Talk. Agenda Flight PreliminariesWhy Quadcopters The Quadcopter SystemStability: The NotionSensors and FusionControl AlgorithmsThe Way.
EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems Wednesday, January 8 EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems Slide 1 of 18.
Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Introduction E. Schrama.
EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems Aided INS Monday, April 07 EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems Slide 1 of 10.
A Low-Cost and Fail-Safe Inertial Navigation System for Airplanes Robotics 전자공학과 깡돌가
10/31/ Simultaneous Estimation of Aircraft and Target Position With a Control Point Professor Dominick Andrisani Purdue University, School of Aeronautics.
7/ 24/ Simultaneous Estimation of Aircraft and Target Position Professor Dominick Andrisani Purdue University, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Day 48, Tuesday, 3 November, 2015 Inertial Navigation Systems The magical, mysterious, always everywhere box The ball in the trunk Dead Reckoning: Direction.
Strapdown Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) Sensors and UAVs Avionic
© Crown copyright Met Office Wind and turbulence measurements on the BAe146 Phil Brown, OBR Conference, Dec 2012.
EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems Kalman Filtering – Part II Mon, April 4 EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems Slide 1 of 23.
Beard & McLain, “Small Unmanned Aircraft,” Princeton University Press, 2012, Chapter 2: Slide 1 Chapter 2 Coordinate Frames.
Cruise missile technology “GUIDANCE SYSTEMS” By, Vivek S
10/31/ Simulation of Tightly Coupled INS/GPS Navigator Ade Mulyana, Takayuki Hoshizaki October 31, 2001 Purdue University.
EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems
Sensor Error Characteristics By: Hector Rotstein.
EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems INS Error Mechanization Mon, March 21 EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems Slide 1 of 10.
Localization Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Daniel Villa Carnegie Mellon Matthew Deans QSS/NASA Ames.
EE 440 Modern Navigation Systems
Inertial Navigation System (INS)
Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems: Sensing
Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) Basics
Closing the Gaps in Inertial Motion Tracking
Inertial Measurement Units
Unit 2 Unmanned Aircraft
Presentation transcript:

Inertial Navigation Systems and GPS Juan Jacobo Van der Dys April 20 th, 2005

Outline Introduction Inertial Navigation Systems –Definition –Determining Position –Determining Attitude –Inertial Platforms –Strapdown Systems –Gyro and Accelerometer errors and their consequences. The money issue Pseudo-attitude from GPS The Kalman filter.

Introduction The five basic forms of navigation are: -Pilotage: Recognizing landmarks to know where you are. Older than human kind. -Dead reckoning: Knowing where you started from, some sort of heading and some estimate of speed. -Celestial Navigation: Knowing time and angle between vertical and celestial objects. -Radio Navigation: rely on radio-frequency sources with known locations. -Inertial Navigation: Knowing initial position, velocity, attitude and measuring accelerations and attitude rates to determine position and attitude. No external references.

Inertial Navigation Systems INS (or INU) = Navigation Computer + gyroscopes + acceleration IMU (or IRU) = Inertial Sensors. Once aligned to a set of reference axes (North, East, Down) the computer carries out continuous dead-reckoning calculations.

Determining Position Courtesy of C.F.Savant Jr et. al. acceleration ∫∫ position Newton’s Law

Determining Attitude Based on Euler Angles Kinematic differential equations Courtesy of Wie, Bong

Why do we care about attitude? Instrument Flight Rules (IFR): Flying below minimum weather requirements. Guidance: Auto-pilots, cruise missiles, precision approaches. Courtesy of Cessna Aircraft Company

Inertial Platforms An inertial platform uses gyros to maintain accelerometers in a fixed attitude. Courtesy of Dr. Walter Haussermann, Marshal Space Flight Center Pros: Simpler Gyros Higher Accuracy Self-alignment by gyrocompassing Sensor Calibration by platform rotations Cons: Complexity and cost. Gimbal Mechanics. Reliability.

Strapdown Systems The gyroscopes and accelerometers are rigidly mounted to the vehicle structure so that they move with the vehicle. Courtesy of Minneapolis-Honeywell Pros: Simpler structure, low cost, lighter weight. Ruggedness. Reliability. Cons: Alignment. Sensor calibration. Motion induced errors. Strapdown computer.

ERRORS (and consequences) From Anthony Lawrence “Modern Inertial Technology”

Errors Scale Factor Non-linearity Asymmetry Bias –Change over time/temperature –Tilt misalignment Random Drift/Walk Dead Band, Threshold, and Resolution Hysteresis Gyro acceleration sensitivity. From Anthony Lawrence “Modern Inertial Technology”

Precision/Accuracy is $$$ The better the sensor, the more expensive it is. –Most of the time this also means size and weight. From Avidyne CorporationFrom Raytheon Company

Accumulated error correction Airspeed/Baro-altitude, –Δv ~ ∫a bias Magnetic Field, is constant for short range flights. GPS: –Derive position (twice) to compute acceleration –Trajectory angle ~ velocity (heading - beta (side slip angle) + airspeed) + wind. –Flight path angle ~ pitch angle + alpha (angle of attack) –In coordinated flight constant heading means zero roll angle.

Pseudo Attitude from GPS Pseudo roll: Pseudo pitch: Pseudo yaw: Images from the Queensland University of Technology

The Kalman filter From Portland State Aerospace Society The state vector Θ pitch Φ roll Ψ yaw p q r Xaccel bias Yaccel bias Zaccel bias Xgyro bias Ygyro bias Zgyro bias α angle of attack β sideslip angle Airspeed

The Kalman filter Sensors: Accelerometers Gyros GPS Magnetometer Airdata Compute the results: –Read the sensors –Estimate signal covariance –Calculate gains –Compute state Tuning the Kalman filter may be very challenging. Initializing can be tricky.

Conclusion GPS is a great aid for INS GPS allows engineers use inexpensive sensors and have good accuracy. System susceptible to GPS jamming (not liked by FAA). Requires lots of computer power.

References Mohinder S. Grewal, "Global Positioning Systems, Inertial Navigation, and Integration" Wiley-Interscience; Book&Disk edition (December 15, 2000) Savant, C.F. et al. “Principles of Inertial Navigation” McGraw-Hill (1961) Wie, Bong “Space Vehicle Dynamics and Control” AIAA Education Series (1998) Lawrence, Anthony “Modern Inertial Technology” Springer- Verlag (1993) Shephard, William et al. “Inertial Navigation” D Van Nostrand Co. (1962)

Questions?