The Marshal Court How was the Federalist party able to stay relevant despite not winning any presidential elections since the John Adam’s administration?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Supreme Court Nullification Enter John Calhoun
Advertisements

The Marshall Court Mr. Johnson AP US History.
John Marshall and Judicial Nationalism Landmark Cases in Support of an Important Concept.
John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court
Marbury v. Madison (Appointed fed. Judge by Pres. Adams night before Adams left office) (Sec. of State for Jefferson) (1803) Background –“Midnight Judge”
Court Cases that Changed America
The Marshall Court. Marshall was born in the foothills of the Virginia's Blue Ridge Mountains in 1755, far from the wealthy tobacco and slave Tidewater.
In a series of Marshall Court decisions from , A) state charters were not recognized as legal contracts B) a strong federal government was promoted.
John Marshall, Chief Justice
SUPREME Court’s Decisions
SUPREME COURT CASES. THE CASE William Marbury, one of Adam’s “midnight appointments” was denied his job as a judge.
Federalism and the Supreme Court McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) 2- minute summary Summary This landmark case declared that the United States government had implied powers as well as those.
7-2 Nationalism at center stage
Judicial Review Power of the Courts. Judiciary Act of 1789 George Washington George Washington Created the Federal Court System and outlined the powers.
Marbury v. Madison (1803) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1824)
7.2 Nationalism at Center Stage Mr. Manelski CPUSH.
Judicial Branch Notes Denise Bell. Power of the Supreme Court Originally the court was paid little attention. During the first 10 years the court had.
JOHN MARSHALL’S GREATEST HITS Marbury v. Madison1803 Fletcher v. Peck1810 McCulloch v. Maryland1819 Gibbons v. Ogden1824.
John Marshall and the Marshall Court By Meghan Gabel and Kathleen Reilly.
The Marshall Court Chapter 8. John Marshall and Judicial Nationalism Marshall was the most important chief justice in U.S. history ( ) Significantly.
John Marshall, Chief Justice  Nominated to Supreme Court by John Adams in1801  Marshall agreed, and upheld Hamilton’s doctrine of “implied powers” 
Interpretation of the US Constitution US Supreme Court before 1830.
Thomas Jefferson. Election of 1800  Thomas Jefferson- Democratic- Republican  Supported by poor farmers  Favored Popular Democracy & States’ Rights.
Served as an officer with General Washington during the Revolution Attended College of William and Mary and became a practicing attorney. 2 nd cousin of.
Marshall Court I.Chief Justice John Marshall A. Dominates Supreme Court B. Strengthened federal govt. at the expense of state governments.
Supreme Court Cases Overview. Marbury v. Madison Marbury sued Sec of State Madison for his appointment to be a judge (midnight judges – Adams administration)
Confederation to Constitution 1776: 2 nd Continental Congress declares independence; PA creates democratic state constitution 1781 : Articles of Confederation.
Chief Justice John Marshall
NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT Mr. Sandford AP United States History.
Thomas Jefferson Election of 1800 In a presidential election you are really voting for electors who meet in what is known as the electoral college.
The Era of Good Feelings  Marked by spirit of nationalism, optimism, & goodwill  Republicans dominated politics  “Good feelings” actually a misnomer.
Supreme Court Cases The John Marshall Court strengthened the federal government by supporting.
The Era of Good Feelings. The End of the Federalists War of 1812 – 1814-Feds hold Hartford Convention – Propose Amendments to Constitution Attempt to.
The Marshall Courts. Purpose of the Judicial Branch  Interpret the Law –Set Legal Precedents –Determine if laws passed by Congress or Presidential Actions.
Supreme Court Cases. In your group, you will.. Read your court case individually Examine the case as a group Present your findings to the class.
Born in Virginia, 1755 Served as an officer with General Washington during the Revolution Attended College of William and Mary and became a practicing.
The Emergence of the Supreme Court The Marshall Court
Supreme Court of the United States  SCOTUS Branch of gov’t which interprets/applies the law Makes sure laws/gov’t action are constitutional  Judicial.
UNITED STATES HISTORY AND THE CONSTITUTION
Supreme Court USHC-1.7.
Building a Nation’s Identity
Supreme Court USHC-1.7.
NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT
VUS5e John Marshall How did Chief Justice John Marshall, a Virginian, contribute to the growth of the U.S. Supreme Court’s importance in relation to the.
The Federalist Judiciary
McCulloch v Maryland (1819)
John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court
Expanding the powers of the Judicial Branch
John Marshall's supreme court
The Marshall Court.
Judicial decisions Colin Bouchard.
No fighting political parties
The Marshall Court.
The Marshall Court 6.3.
Reviewing Marshall Court Decisions
The Marshall Court- A Stronger National Govt.
NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT
Do Now: What is the main job of the Judicial Branch?
Defining the Powers of the National Government
Do Now: What is the main job of the Judicial Branch?
Supreme Court Cases of the early Republic
5-4: Nationalism 1820s-1850s.
JOHN MARSHALL Born in Virginia, 1755
JOHN MARSHALL Born in Virginia, 1755
A Changing Nation.
Do Now (Background Essay)
Marshall Court AIM: Did the Supreme Court under John Marshall Give Too Much Power to the Federal Government at the Expense of the State Governments?
The Legacy of the Marshall Court
The Marshall Court.
Presentation transcript:

The Marshal Court How was the Federalist party able to stay relevant despite not winning any presidential elections since the John Adam’s administration?

In Your Teams I will give you specific details regarding the following Supreme Court Cases during the Marshal era… Marbury v. Madison 1803 Fletcher v. Peck 1810 Dartmouth v. Woodward 1819 McCulloch v. Maryland 1819 Gibbons v. Ogden 1824

Details… I will give you specific details of the case: Your job, as a team, is to categorize the cases in the correct category of the case… Here are the random details…

The ANSWERS!!! Fletcher v. Peck 1810 Supreme Court ruled a state law unconstitutional for the first time. Involved land grants from the Georgia state legislature to the Yazoo Land Company Later session of the state legislature tried invalidate earlier land grants Land grants were obtained through bribery and fraud DECISION: State could not repudiate grants because they were contracts and the Constitution forbade states to impair the obligation of contracts.

The ANSWERS !!! Dartmouth College v. Woodward 1819 Upheld sanctity of contracts New Hampshire legislature tried to revise the college charter, trying to make it a public university as opposed to a private university President of the University wanted this, trustees did not Original charter was granted during the colonial period Decision: Contract could not be changed without the consent of both parties, even if one of the parties is the state government

The ANSWERS!!! McCulloch v. Maryland 1819 Upheld the constitutionality of the 2nd Bank of the United States Several states tried to force branches of the United States in their state out of business The state placed a $15,000 tax on the Baltimore Branch Three questions to be answered; (1) Did Congress have the power to charter a bank (2) Was it constitutional for a state to tax a federal bank or agency of the federal government and (3) who had sovereign or supreme power, the federal government or the state governments Decision: Congress had implied powers under the constitution, “the power to tax involves the power to destroy” so states cannot tax the bank, and the federal government was created by the people, not by the states, so federal power is supreme

THE ANSWERS!!! Gibbons v. Ogden 1824 Concerned the jurisdiction over control of interstate commerce New York awarded a steamboat company a monopoly on passenger service across the Judson from New York to New Jersey States can only regulate commerce within their borders (intrastate) Allowed the country to further develop by reducing restraints created by states Decision: Only the federal government has control over interstate commerce