20 th Anniversary of Ultrasound “Twenty Years of Progress”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Selection and Judging of Beef
Advertisements

Things that Come in Arrays
Effect of Time of Birth Within the Spring Calving Season on Performance and Carcass Traits of Beef Calves Fed in the Iowa Tri-County Steer Carcass Futurity.
Selection For Carcass Marbling and Muscling-- Benefits and Pitfalls Jim Gosey University of Nebraska.
Professor N. Nelson Blue Mtn. Agriculture College.
Animal Breeding Systems
Multiplication Facts 9 through x 5= 50 Number One.
Organic Beef Production – Sire breed comparison Richard Fallon, Brendan Swan & Elaine Leavy Organic Production Research Conference 2nd December 2008.
Introduction to the Beef Industry. What is the importance of the beef industry? Missouri ranks 2 nd nationally in number of beef cattle – Texas 1 st (larger.
Meeting Consumer Demands through Genetic Selection: The NCBA Carcass Merit Project Dan W. Moser on behalf of the CMP Team.
Breeds of Beef Cattle. Terms Breed - group of animals related by decent from common ancestors, with similar characteristics Bull - a male Cow - a female.
BEEF COW CALF & SEEDSTOCK INDUSTRY By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Expected Progeny Differences Cattle Selection Using Genetic Data Nick Nelson Blue Mountain Community College.
Placings By Traits Muscle: Finish: Capacity: Structure: Balance: Official Placing: Cuts:
Carcass EPD: Where are we, and where are we going? Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum
BEEF GENETICS NEXT What color are Shorthorns? n A. White n B. Red n C. Roan n D. All the above A B C D NEXT.
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
By Payton Fehringer. Why Red Angus Genetics?  Superior maternal traits  Crossbreeding advantages  Promotional tools  Red Angus Association.
EPD 101 PredictingProfit… Red Angus – EPD 101. EPD 101 Members (Seedstock producers) succeed through enabling the success (profit) of their commercial.
Exploring the Beef Industry
Ultrasound Guidelines Council Overview Loren C. Jackson.
From Conception to Carcass 2006 National Angus Conference Mike Kasten.
Milt Thomas, Department of Animal and Range Sciences Identification of Molecular Markers to Improve Fertility of Beef Cattle (USDA-NRI )
Van Eenennaam 11/17/2010 Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
A.I. Management Manual Fifth Edition CHAPTER 15 HEIFER A.I.
Limousin Heifers Class 1 Rank these heifers as replacements for a purebred operation in which the primary product is terminal bulls for the commercial.
Expected Progeny Differences Cattle Selection Using Genetic Data Nick Nelson Blue Mountain Community College.
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How Do I Decide What Traits are Important? Carcass/Ultrasound EPDs Bob Weaber GRA-Cornell.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Characterizing Change in the Beef Industry Justin W. Waggoner, Ph.D. Beef Systems Specialist Kansas State University Garden City, KS.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How do I decide what traits are important ? Selection Indices Dorian Garrick Department.
Commercial Ranch Project and DNA testing John Pollak Cornell University.
Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education “Economic value of genomic information: Sire and commercial heifer selection" Van Eenennaam 10/19/2011.
Ottensmeier Angus A DECADE OF EXCELLENT ANGUS CATTLE.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
ACROSS BREED EPD TABLES FOR THE YEAR 2006 ADJUSTED TO THE BIRTH YEAR OF 2004 L. Dale Van Vleck and Larry V. Cundiff MARC-ARS-USDA Lincoln and Clay Center,
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
Exploring the Beef Industry SECHS Mr. Pullom Fall 2011.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
Genetics for Producing Profitable and Sustainable Grass-Fed Beef Dr. Scott M. Barao Executive Director The Jorgensen Family Foundation Hedgeapple Farm.
The Five P’s of Marketing Product Packaging Place Price Promotion “The Purple Cow”
Sunshine Farms P O Box 1777 Clanton, AL Using Ultrasound Data in a Seedstock Production Program.
Selection & Judging of Beef Cattle
Beef Cattle. BEFORE THE 1960’s… Approximately 20 different breeds were available in the United States. Today, there are over 70 breeds found in the United.
Ultrasound Guidelines Council: Certification Lisa A. Kriese-Anderson Auburn University.
National Beef Cattle Evaluation Consortium Brown Bagger Seminar Carcass EPDs Integrating Carcass and Ultrasound October 22, 2008 Sally L. Northcutt Genetic.
START It’s two o’clock It’s a quarter to ten It’s five to eight It’s twenty to one.
Using EPDs in Selection Edited by: Jessica Hawley & Brandon Freel Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle Susan Keene A portion of these slides work of: Matthew I. Miller Extension Agent Animal Science This presentation is from.
Sustainable Agriculture
Exploring the Beef Industry
Things that Come in Arrays
Selection and Judging of Beef Cattle
Using EPDs in Selection
From Conception to Carcass
Update on Multi-Breed Genetic Evaluation
PLACE VALUE Hundred thousands Ten thousands Thousands Hundreds
Using EPDs in Selection
CGs to EPDs 2006 BIF Symposium Sponsored by Ultrasound Guidelines Council Dr. Lisa A. Kriese-Anderson Auburn University.
Numbers
Definition of EBVs of Economically Relevant Traits in Sheep Production
Expected Progeny Differences
MINUTES five past ten past quarter past 11 1 twenty past
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
+/- Numbers Year 6 – Place value, rounding and mental methods
Presentation transcript:

20 th Anniversary of Ultrasound “Twenty Years of Progress”

Breed Changers! Sire Summary Leaders

The Early Years…1986 Brinks Brangus donated an Ultrasound machine to Kansas State University. First Rib eye area measures are taken. Kansas State University Project Dr. Jack Riley, Willard Olson, Michael Dikeman, Bob Chalis, Larry Corah, Mark Johnson, Don Waldner.

The Early Years…1986 Designed progeny tests and carcass data was gathered on Brinks sires out of commercial herds owned by Albert Wiggins, Clemson University and others.

The Early Years…1987 All yearling bulls and females are ultrasounded at Brinks Brangus.

The Early Years…1989 Serial harvests are conducted in conjunction with Kansas State University. Every four months, six head at a time. As a result of these serial harvests, it was determined that 12 months of age was the optimum age to measure ribeye area.

The Early Years…1990 NG Hotline of Brinks was identified as the top ribeye area yearling in the Brinks sale. Hotline was the eventual prepotent “muscle sire” in the breed and became a trait leader for ribeye area.

Lineman of Brinks 881A7 NG Hotline of Brinks Transformer of Brinks Brightside of Brinks 789G5

In the Spring 2006 Brangus Sire Summary, Transformer of Brinks, four sons and grandsons make up the top five REA trait leaders.

The Early Years…1993 Klaus Birkel purchases the Brinks cowherd in its entirety. Camp Cooley along with others fund IMF research at Iowa State University. Auburn University – (Dr. John Hough and Dr. Lisa Kreise) Conducted research to identify the effects of selection for increased ribeye area. Every yearling bull and heifer are ultrasounded for IMF at Camp Cooley Ranch.

Progress through selection…1997 The top 14 ribeye area sires in the breed carry the Brinks brand.

Progress through selection…1999 The Brangus breed includes IMF in the lists of traits analyzed in the sire summary. Brangus puts all collected carcass data on an ultrasound basis and combines the information in the sire summary. Eight of the top ten sires for IMF in the Brangus Sire Summary are products of the Camp Cooley Ranch Brinks Brangus herd.

Brangus Genetic Trends: Where have we been and how have we progressed?

Progress through selection…2006 Camp Cooley Ranch Genetic Trends Brangus REA11.44”13.78” IMF

Camp Cooley Ranch Genetic Trends Progress through selection…2006 Angus REA9.16”13.05” IMF

Camp Cooley Ranch Genetic Trends Progress through selection…2006 Charolais REA12.35”14.06” IMF

Progress through selection…2006 Eight of the top ten ribeye area sire trait leaders are from Camp Cooley Ranch (And fifteen of the top twenty.) Eight of the top ten IMF sire trait leaders are from Camp Cooley Ranch ( And twelve of the top fifteen.)

What has all of this meant for Camp Cooley Ranch? The proof is in the results.

Record Breaking Bull Sale –1000+ bulls averaged $3400+ –100 Brangus females averaged $5,000+ –Sold cattle from coast to coast –Average Brangus REA 13”+ on 500+bulls

What’s On The Horizon?

The Future…where are we headed? We have a commitment to our customers and the beef industry… progress through selection.

The Future…where are we headed? Lead Gun of Brinks 222K14 BWWWYWMilkSCREAIMF Lead Gun % Ranking

“If you don’t have the passion, you can not create the future!” We have the passion! Carlos Dowdal – Argentine Brangus Breeder.

(800) Join us! November Bulls