Wild and Scenic Rivers “ LESSONS LEARNED TO AVOID LITIGATION”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Washington Department
Advertisements

Project Introduction Consists of 9,040 acres of deeded land and 52,000+ acres of state and federal lands. Encompasses 16.6 miles of the South Fork and.
Notebook Ref 3.5. Tier 3: No Degradation in ONRWs Applies only to waters classified as Outstanding National Resource Waters (ONRW) This classification.
Colorados Instream Flow Program at 40 Colorado Water Workshop July 18, 2013 Gunnison, Colorado.
Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting. NEPA Update Deconstruction Plans Hydraulic Modeling Next Steps Agenda.
Resource Advisory Councils (RACs) Bureau of Land Management.
Alternative Transportation Case Study: The Maroon Bells of Colorado.
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
Environmental Project Commitments The Alberta Experience
National Environmental Policy Act of Establishes protection of the environment as a national priority Mandates that environmental impacts be considered.
Streamgaging Task Force Final Report Advisory Committee on Water Information Herndon, Virginia April 3, 2002.
ICMP Public Meeting February 18 th, 2011 February 18 th, 2011.
City of St Helena Upper York Creek Ecosystem Restoration Project April 28, 2015 St. Helena City Council Meeting.
Hydroelectric Relicensing in Vermont Brian Fitzgerald Vermont Agency of Natural Resources.
1 Floodplain Management SESSION 25 Rivers as a Legal Battleground Special Districts and Landowners Prepared by Elliott Mittler, Ph.D.
THE GEOMORPHIC RESPONSE OF RIVERS TO DAMS Speakers – John Berry and John Esler.
Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research Program Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research.
Decommissioning and Site Restoration of Non-Federal Hydroelectric Projects John A. Schnagl Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (202)
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Feasibility Studies National Heritage Areas. Initiating National Heritage Areas National Heritage Area designations have been initiated in four different.
Drought and the Central Valley Project August 2014.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS How (does) it all come(s) together.(?) Aaron Stockton 2011.
1 Cooperating Agency and Coordination Training Washington State Association of Counties Friday, November 22, 2013 Victoria Barr, Oregon/Washington State.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Oregon’s Statewide Land Use Planning Program A Framework for Community Decisions Richard Whitman – Director Oregon Department of Land Conservation and.
Blackstone Hydropower Status Report 3 rd Annual River Users Conference Blackstone Valley Tourism Council Tricia Jedele, Conservation Law Foundation Bruce.
State of Oregon New Hydroelectric Projects Mary Grainey October 2008 Oregon Water Resources Department.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Proposed Action Purpose and Need A proposal to authorize, recommend, or implement an action in response to the need identified in the Purpose and Need.
Lake Apopka Restoration Proposed projects for Legislative Appropriation.
Jason King, P.E. State Engineer WSWC/NARF Symposium on the Settlement of Indian Reserved Water Right Claims August 25-27, 2015 Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe’s.
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
Middle Fork Project Project Description April 25, 2006.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Resource Management Plan (RMP) Revision for the Las Vegas and Pahrump Field Offices Muddy Mountains.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Technical Meeting May 16, 2007, 1-4 pm Red Lion Redding, CA.
Transportation Programs. Habitat and Wildlife Habitat Connectivity Restoration Mitigation Wildlife Human Safety Crossings.
Transmission Siting Considerations, Best Practices, and Lessons Learned Gary Graham, Ph.D. Transmission Project Director.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Roseau River Flood Damage Reduction Project Roseau, Minnesota.
Slide 1April 8, 2015, Financial Assistance Council Meeting.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND FERC. HYDRO 101A ”Water Runs Down Hill”
BUILDING STRONG SM Northwestern Division Presented by Lori Rux Chief, Program Support Division June 11, 2009 BPA Direct Funding for Corps Hydropower Projects.
CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005.
Taunton River Wild & Scenic Study A Partnership Effort on Behalf of The Taunton River.
Effects Analysis and Comparison. Objectives Accurately determine which impacts need to be evaluated in the land use plan. Develop a matrix comparing the.
Establishing the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management On the Upper Mississippi River Dr. Ken Lubinski, USGS Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center.
Water Quality Certification for hydropower licensing in Wisconsin.
U.S. Section International Boundary and Water Commission Rio Grande and Tijuana River Flood Control Projects Programmatic EIS.
The Malheur Subbasin Key Subbasin Facts 40 + Irrigation Dams – Impoundments & Irrigation Projects Primary Land Uses – Agricultural Production and Processing.
Director’s Order 12 contains information concerning review of other agency proposals.
RESOURCE ADVISING IN SPECIAL MGMT. AREAS. TYPES OF SMA’S Designated Wilderness WSA - Wilderness Study Area National Monuments and similar areas Wild and.
NEPA and WildernessNEPA and Wilderness Michael C. Blumm & Lorena Wisehart ‘13 Wilderness Act at 50 (April 11, 2014) Lewis and Clark Law School.
GOOD NEIGHBOR AGREEMENTS (AUTHORITY) MARCH 31, 2016.
Assessing Complex Issues of Resource Protection & Allocation. Weighing Science, Management, Politics, & Public Opinion. A Case Study on Wild and Scenic.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting February 2, 2009 Handout #5.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
Legislative History. First enacted in 1934  Enacted due to concerns over the loss of commercial and sport fisheries from water resource developments.
CONSERVATION AND RESOURSE PROTECTION GRANT PROGRAM NEVADA DIVISION OF STATE LANDS Question 1.
GOOSE CREEK WATERSHED LEVEL I STUDY SCOPING MEETING
Partnership Wild and Scenic Rivers
The Gila River Restoration at Apache Grove
Environmental Flow Protection in TCEQ Permitting
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
Nebraska Water Infrastructure Funding and Financing Programs
Acquisition Details: Owners: James E Joyce Sr. Revocable Intervivos Trust and Gloria A Joyce Revocable Intervivos Trust Location: Section 27, Town of.
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
Presentation transcript:

Wild and Scenic Rivers “ LESSONS LEARNED TO AVOID LITIGATION”

Summary of Planning Wild & Scenic River Management Plan Wild & Scenic River Management Plan Upgrade of several roads Upgrade of several roads New parking lot at Riddle Brothers Ranch New parking lot at Riddle Brothers Ranch Divert water to maintain meadows Divert water to maintain meadows Corridor to include campgrounds and housing at Riddle Brothers Ranch Corridor to include campgrounds and housing at Riddle Brothers Ranch Plan appealed but not stayed Plan appealed but not stayed Recreational Access Surrounding the Steens Mountain Loop Road Plan Upgrade of several roads New parking lot at Riddle Brothers Ranch Litigated but upheld

The Donner und Blitzen Wild and Scenic River A River Manager’s Perspective

Omnibus Oregon Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1988 All 87.5 miles classified “wild” All 87.5 miles classified “wild” Includes: Includes: Riddle Brothers National Historic District Riddle Brothers National Historic District Numerous two-track roads Numerous two-track roads Steens Mountain National Back Country Byway Steens Mountain National Back Country Byway Two campgrounds Two campgrounds Irrigated meadows Irrigated meadows

Outstandingly Remarkable Values Scenery Scenery Geology Geology Recreation Recreation Fish and Wildlife Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Vegetation Cultural (Historic and Prehistoric) Cultural (Historic and Prehistoric)

Conflicting Values and Uses “Management Challenges” Roads Roads Special Status Fish Special Status Fish Water Quality Water Quality Riddle Brothers National Historic District Riddle Brothers National Historic District Grazing Grazing Wild Horses Wild Horses Public Safety Public Safety Resource Protection Resource Protection Wilderness Study Areas Wilderness Study Areas ACECs ACECs

Summary of Planning, cont Riddle Brothers Ranch Historic District Plan Riddle Brothers Ranch Historic District Plan Continue to graze meadows Continue to graze meadows Continue to divert to meadows Continue to divert to meadows Upgrade road to historic and administrative sites Upgrade road to historic and administrative sites New parking lot at Riddle Brothers Ranch New parking lot at Riddle Brothers Ranch Administrative appeal dismissed Administrative appeal dismissed South Steens Allotment Management Plan Continue to graze WSR corridor Administrative appeal, actions not stayed

BLM Litigated in U.S. District Court Previous plans do not provide protection and enhancement to ORVs Previous plans do not provide protection and enhancement to ORVs

BLM enjoined from grazing, upgrading roads, constructing parking lots, and diverting water until an EIS is completed

Lessons Learned Give serious consideration to an EIS when this many plans overlap Give serious consideration to an EIS when this many plans overlap Ask if other plans cumulatively protect and enhance free flow, water quality, and ORVs Ask if other plans cumulatively protect and enhance free flow, water quality, and ORVs The designation of a WSR should cause management to reconsider objectives of other plans The designation of a WSR should cause management to reconsider objectives of other plans If at all possible, field staff should be involved in establishment of WSR boundaries and classification If at all possible, field staff should be involved in establishment of WSR boundaries and classification

Protecting and Enhancing Wild and Scenic River Values Sections 7 and 10 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act Sections 7 and 10 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act

Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: Section 7 Requires river- administering agencies to evaluate the effects of proposed, federally assisted, water resource projects Applies to designated and congressionally authorized study rivers Does not apply to eligible or suitable rivers identified through agency planning process

Water Resource Projects Dams Dams Reservoirs Reservoirs Water Conduits Water Conduits Powerhouses Powerhouses Transmission Lines Transmission Lines Levees Levees 404 Permit Activities 404 Permit Activities Road Construction Road Construction Water Diversion Projects Habitat/Watershed Restorations Habitat/Watershed Enhancements Bridges/Road Construction Bank Stabilizations Channelization Boat Ramps Fishing Piers

Federal Assistance Loans Loans Grants Grants Licenses Licenses Permits Permits Funding Funding Technical assistance Technical assistance

Section 7 Evaluation Standards Project Within the Designated or Study River Corridor FERC licensed “On or directly affecting” Other federal assistance “Direct and adverse effects” on free flow, water quality, and ORVs Project Outside the Designated River Corridor “Invade or unreasonably diminish” scenic, recreational, fish and wildlife values Project Outside the Congressional Study River Corridor “Invade or diminish” scenic, recreational, fish or wildlife values

Section 7 Determination Independent of NEPA process Documented and appended to environmental analysis May recommend measures to eliminate adverse effects Requires close coordination with proponent/regulating agency Responsibility of river-administering agency

Section 7 Determination Elements (Within Corridor) Describe the project Describe the project Describe alterations to within channel conditions Describe alterations to within channel conditions Describe effects to riparian and floodplain Describe effects to riparian and floodplain Describe effects to upland Describe effects to upland Describe effects to existing hydrologic or biologic processes Describe effects to existing hydrologic or biologic processes

Section 7 Determination Elements, cont. Describe indirect effects Describe indirect effects Describe time scale of effects Describe time scale of effects Compare to objectives Compare to objectives Make determination on effects to free flowing condition and values Make determination on effects to free flowing condition and values

Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: Section 10 Requires administering agencies to protect and enhance values that supported inclusion in National WSR System (free flow, water quality, ORVs) Requires administering agencies to protect and enhance values that supported inclusion in National WSR System (free flow, water quality, ORVs) Allows use of any general agency statutory authorities available to protect resources Allows use of any general agency statutory authorities available to protect resources Authorizes cooperative agreements with states and local governments for river administration Authorizes cooperative agreements with states and local governments for river administration

Further Reference