HCP Implementation in Pima County, Arizona Julia Fonseca Pima County Office of Sustainability and Conservation Photo by Aaron Flesch.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pima County Natural Resources, Parks and Recreation Partnerships Presentation Rafael Payan, Director.
Advertisements

Land And Water Use Part 4. URBAN LAND DEVELOPMENT.
Agua Hedionda Watershed Management Plan Copyright © 2005 Kenneth & Gabrielle Adelman. All rights reserved.
1 The Challenge Preserving forest cover, parkland and open space can help to meet needs for water quality, air quality, recreation and wildlife habitat.
Preserving our open space heritage Protecting our economy Building our future Habitat Conservation Plans - Landscape Level Conservation in a Rapidly Developing.
County Land Ownership Owner:Acres:Percentage: Federal WA State Pri. Timber (tax at harvest) Reduced, or no tax
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure.
May 17 th,  Overview of endangered species regulations  Purpose of Habitat Conservation Plans  Review Balcones Canyonlands Conservation Plan.
Measure M2 Freeway Environmental Mitigation Program.
National, State and Local Funding Sources for Conservation Easements Montana Association of Land Trusts Montana Conservation Easement Conference for Financial,
RESILIENCE AND INTACTNESS A Manager’s Perspective.
Regional mitigation sites for three Arizona solar energy zones: The Nature Conservancy nominations Dale Turner Marcos Robles The Nature Conservancy in.
Biological Basis of the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan.
WLCI Update July 23, 2010 Conserving World-class Wildlife Resources Facilitating Responsible Development.
Ranching in SE AZ and the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan Compromise - Consensus - Balance.
Green Infrastructure Planning for working landscapes, natural resources and other open spaces.
Natasha Pearce, Jenny Bauman, Nicolas Ramos-Lara, Samantha Redmon.
Habitat Conservation Planning in Pima County…? U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Linette Ancha, Gabrielle Lehmicke, Kathryn Marlor, and Aaron Poe.
Putting Nature on the Map Through Landscape Level Mitigation Greenprints to RAMP: A Multiple Benefit Approach Liz O’Donoghue The Nature Conservancy California.
Is the cost worth the risk? Why are we blowing such a large amount of money on such a small amount of land? Saving a lot of land might do little for wildlife,
SDCP and the protection of biological diversity Center For Biological Diversity SDCP SDCP.
SOUTH COAST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN REVISION BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office California Desert District.
Bureau of Reclamation Overview Christopher Cutler Deputy Chief Boulder Canyon Operations Office.
Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan Development on Navy Installations in Southern California Coralie Cobb Natural Resources Specialist Southwest.
Working to improve availability of plant materials for partner organizations Shannon Hatch DEVELOPMENT OF NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS FOR RIPARIAN RESTORATION.
The Intertwine & The Intertwine Alliance Addressing Climate Change: A Regional Response Mike Houck, Director Urban Greenspaces Institute.
Palmetto-Peartree Preserve: Community Forestry in Eastern North Carolina Community-Owned Forests Conference Missoula, MT June 16-19, 2005 Mikki Sager,
Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative An Approach to Landscape Scale Conservation in Southwest Wyoming October 23, 2014.
Chapter 10 Land, Public and Private. The Tragedy of the Commons In 1968, ecologist Garrett Hardin described the “tragedy of the commons” Tragedy of the.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) DECEMBER 20, 2011.
Dr. Kenton Miller Chair, IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas The State of the World’s Parks and Protected Areas The State of the World’s Parks and.
Manual Direction Cave & Karst Resources Management James Goodbar Senior Cave /Karst Specialist Bureau of Land Management May 12-16, 2014 Cody, Wyoming.
May 27 th, 2003FRCV Conservation Plan Summary and Status Rock Creek Valley Conservation Plan & Priorities Prepared by Friends of Rock Creek Valley with.
Integrated Regional Water Management MAY 22, 2015 TRACIE BILLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES 1.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Invasives Species Science Branch Science and Management Priorities for.
By: Helena Brantz Period 2 APES-Rall.  Draft Years: 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988  National Scope: First signed by Nixon in As of November 2011, there.
Annexations as a Means to Preserve Open Space October 29, 2009.
Land Chapter 14. How we use land  Land usage- –Rangeland= used for grazing and wildlife –Forest land= used for harvesting wood, wildlife, fish, and other.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
Mission Statements of Some Federal Land Management Agencies U.S. Forest Service The mission of the U.S. Forest Service is to sustain the health, diversity.
T HE S TAYING C ONNECTED I NITIATIVE - An International Collaboration to Conserve, Restore and Enhance Landscape Connectivity Across Vermont and the Northern.
Case Study: Saving the San Pedro River Adam Czekanski 17 November 2005.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
The science of conservation planning Course objective: a free-ranging examination of some key scientific principles and research needs pertaining to conservation.
Metropolitan Planning Organization for Blair County (Altoona MSA) Regional Long Range Transportation Plan Draft Agency Coordination Meeting (ACM)
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Overview and Progress Marci Henson, Program Manager August 22, 2013.
Watershed Protection Land Trust Partnerships to Meet Your Goals.
Fish and Game Commission Meeting December 12, 2012 Randy Botta South Coast Region/Wildlife Program Bighorn Sheep in the Peninsular Mountains Photo by J.
California Department of Fish and Game Inland Desert - Region 6 San Jacinto Wildlife Area A Presentation to the California Fish and Game Commission March.
Habitat Conservation Planning In Collier County: Challenges and Opportunities Trust Resources South Florida Ecological Services Office - Vero Beach Spencer.
CONSERVATION AND RESOURSE PROTECTION GRANT PROGRAM NEVADA DIVISION OF STATE LANDS Question 1.
GREEN GROWTH TOOLBOX Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Black-crowned night heron.
Kennett Township land Stewardship Initiative
Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan California Department of Fish and Game Inland Deserts Region Bobcat photo by Gerald and Buff.
Griffith Park Fire Draft Recovery Plan May 30, 2007
Planning and Development
Executive Order – The Basics
Agriculture and Land Stewardship Planning
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Biodiversity, Conservation & Sustainability
Land Use Chapter 14 Part 4.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Presentation transcript:

HCP Implementation in Pima County, Arizona Julia Fonseca Pima County Office of Sustainability and Conservation Photo by Aaron Flesch

HCP overview 44 species (down from 55) 30 years / 36,000 acres 404 streamlining Avoidance, minimization and mitigation are already in place

Pima County, Arizona 9,189 Square Miles 85% land is Federal, State or tribal Population: 980,263 Tucson: 6 th poorest city of its size class in US Tucson

Rapid Growth & Development in Eastern Pima County, Arizona

The Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan elements respond to community values: Habitat and Corridors Cultural Resources Riparian Ranch Mountain Parks Pima County Pima County Regional Flood Control District Tohono O’odham Nation U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service City of Tucson Town of Marana Town of Oro Valley Metropolitan Domestic Water District U. S. Bureau of Land Management U. S. Forest Service Environmental Protection Agency Arizona Game and Fish Department National Park Service

Ranch lands define urban form

Habitat and Corridors Element : Habitat and Corridors Element : To ensure the long-term survival of the full spectrum of plants and animals that are indigenous to Pima County through maintaining or improving ecosystem structures and functions necessary for their survival. View from Diamond Bell Ranch 2010

Reserve Design Process

Implemented: From Development Guidelines to 2001 Land Use Plan

: Plan development 2006: Owl delisted 2010: HCP submitted 2012: FWS DEIS

Implemented: Riparian Mitigation Ordinance

Implemented: $165 million in Open Space Acquisitions 225,000 acres under management

Experiment: Ranch Management

Land Management Implemented County mitigation lands have multiple uses for people as well as wildlife.

View from Diamond Bell Ranch, Brian Powell 2010 Other types of mitigation land: Floodprone and In-Lieu Fee programs Developer set-asides Donations Future bond acquisitions Future land exchanges and RPPA acquisitions

Implemented: Cactus Mitigation Bank County-owned land For County projects Established 2002 Banks have a benefit to Pima County, but a landscape approach is better.

Failed Species Restoration Project

Experiment: Removal of Non-native Frogs in Ranch “Frogsheds”

Process Improvement: CIP Impacts

Other Advance Implementation Invasive species management Testing of monitoring protocols Database development Funding: property taxes

NEPA Experiment Public scoping 2000, 2003 County-hosted public process, 7 draft HCPs DEIS published comments 2012

Why advance implementation? Protect habitat before more fragmentation. Success helps sustains political will and citizen support. Implementation creates certainty. Failure shows what is not “practicable”. Opportunity for process improvement before a permit is issued.

omLOGFg omLOGFg Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan