Conducting a User Study Human-Computer Interaction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Our goal is to assess the evidence provided by the data in favor of some claim about the population. Section 6.2Tests of Significance.
Advertisements

Statistical Issues in Research Planning and Evaluation
BHS Methods in Behavioral Sciences I April 25, 2003 Chapter 6 (Ray) The Logic of Hypothesis Testing.
Making Inferences for Associations Between Categorical Variables: Chi Square Chapter 12 Reading Assignment pp ; 485.
PSY 307 – Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis CSCI 4800/6800 University of Georgia Spring 2007 Eileen Kraemer.
Evaluating Hypotheses Chapter 9. Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics n Descriptive l quantitative descriptions of characteristics.
What z-scores represent
Cal State Northridge  320 Ainsworth Sampling Distributions and Hypothesis Testing.
Inferential Stats for Two-Group Designs. Inferential Statistics Used to infer conclusions about the population based on data collected from sample Do.
Evaluating Hypotheses Chapter 9 Homework: 1-9. Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics n Descriptive l quantitative descriptions of characteristics ~
Lect 10b1 Histogram – (Frequency distribution) Used for continuous measures Statistical Analysis of Data ______________ statistics – summarize data.
Lecture 9: One Way ANOVA Between Subjects
Chapter Sampling Distributions and Hypothesis Testing.
Independent Sample T-test Often used with experimental designs N subjects are randomly assigned to two groups (Control * Treatment). After treatment, the.
PY 427 Statistics 1Fall 2006 Kin Ching Kong, Ph.D Lecture 6 Chicago School of Professional Psychology.
Inferential Statistics
Introduction to Testing a Hypothesis Testing a treatment Descriptive statistics cannot determine if differences are due to chance. A sampling error occurs.
Statistical Analysis. Purpose of Statistical Analysis Determines whether the results found in an experiment are meaningful. Answers the question: –Does.
AM Recitation 2/10/11.
Chapter 4 Hypothesis Testing, Power, and Control: A Review of the Basics.
Testing Hypotheses I Lesson 9. Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics n Descriptive l quantitative descriptions of characteristics n Inferential Statistics.
Jeopardy Hypothesis Testing T-test Basics T for Indep. Samples Z-scores Probability $100 $200$200 $300 $500 $400 $300 $400 $300 $400 $500 $400.
Linear Regression Inference
Statistical Analysis Statistical Analysis
Conducting a User Study Human-Computer Interaction.
Statistics Primer ORC Staff: Xin Xin (Cindy) Ryan Glaman Brett Kellerstedt 1.
Comparing Two Population Means
Sample size determination Nick Barrowman, PhD Senior Statistician Clinical Research Unit, CHEO Research Institute March 29, 2010.
Spring /6.831 User Interface Design and Implementation1 Lecture 15: Experiment Analysis.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 17 Inferential Statistics.
Topics: Statistics & Experimental Design The Human Visual System Color Science Light Sources: Radiometry/Photometry Geometric Optics Tone-transfer Function.
PowerPoint presentations prepared by Lloyd Jaisingh, Morehead State University Statistical Inference: Hypotheses testing for single and two populations.
Individual values of X Frequency How many individuals   Distribution of a population.
Learning Objectives In this chapter you will learn about the t-test and its distribution t-test for related samples t-test for independent samples hypothesis.
User Study Evaluation Human-Computer Interaction.
Conducting a User Study Human-Computer Interaction.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Exam Exam starts two weeks from today. Amusing Statistics Use what you know about normal distributions to evaluate this finding: The study, published.
Conducting a User Study Human-Computer Interaction.
1 Lecture 19: Hypothesis Tests Devore, Ch Topics I.Statistical Hypotheses (pl!) –Null and Alternative Hypotheses –Testing statistics and rejection.
Maximum Likelihood Estimator of Proportion Let {s 1,s 2,…,s n } be a set of independent outcomes from a Bernoulli experiment with unknown probability.
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Research Design Explained 6th edition ; ©2007 Mark Mitchell & Janina Jolley Chapter 10 The Simple Experiment.
Introduction to Inferential Statistics Statistical analyses are initially divided into: Descriptive Statistics or Inferential Statistics. Descriptive Statistics.
Essential Question:  How do scientists use statistical analyses to draw meaningful conclusions from experimental results?
Educational Research Chapter 13 Inferential Statistics Gay, Mills, and Airasian 10 th Edition.
Human-Computer Interaction. Overview What is a study? Empirically testing a hypothesis Evaluate interfaces Why run a study? Determine ‘truth’ Evaluate.
Experimental Design and Statistics. Scientific Method
Statistical Inference for the Mean Objectives: (Chapter 9, DeCoursey) -To understand the terms: Null Hypothesis, Rejection Region, and Type I and II errors.
F, t, and p Basic Statistics for Computer Scientists (aka knowing enough to be critical of user studies) April 4, 2002 Benjamin Lok.
But! Let’s first review…
Stats Lunch: Day 3 The Basis of Hypothesis Testing w/ Parametric Statistics.
Welcome to MM570 Psychological Statistics
Chapter 10 The t Test for Two Independent Samples
Statistical Analysis. Null hypothesis: observed differences are due to chance (no causal relationship) Ex. If light intensity increases, then the rate.
Introduction to Testing a Hypothesis Testing a treatment Descriptive statistics cannot determine if differences are due to chance. Sampling error means.
T tests comparing two means t tests comparing two means.
BHS Methods in Behavioral Sciences I May 9, 2003 Chapter 6 and 7 (Ray) Control: The Keystone of the Experimental Method.
Welcome to MM207 Unit 7 Seminar Dr. Bob Hypothesis Testing and Excel 1.
BIOL 582 Lecture Set 2 Inferential Statistics, Hypotheses, and Resampling.
Chapter 7 Inference Concerning Populations (Numeric Responses)
Hypothesis Testing and Statistical Significance
Statistical Inference for the Mean Objectives: (Chapter 8&9, DeCoursey) -To understand the terms variance and standard error of a sample mean, Null Hypothesis,
Educational Research Inferential Statistics Chapter th Chapter 12- 8th Gay and Airasian.
Conducting a User Study
Chapter 9: Hypothesis Tests Based on a Single Sample
Hypothesis Testing.
What are their purposes? What kinds?
1.3. Statistical hypothesis tests
BHS Methods in Behavioral Sciences I
Presentation transcript:

Conducting a User Study Human-Computer Interaction

Overview Why run a study? Why run a study? Determine ‘truth’ Determine ‘truth’ Evaluate if a statement is true Evaluate if a statement is true Ex. The heavier a person weighs, the higher their blood pressure Ex. The heavier a person weighs, the higher their blood pressure Many ways to do this: Many ways to do this: Look at data from a doctor’s office Look at data from a doctor’s office Descriptive design: What’s the pros and cons? Descriptive design: What’s the pros and cons? Get a group of people to get weighed and measure their BP Get a group of people to get weighed and measure their BP Analytic design: What’s the pros and cons? Analytic design: What’s the pros and cons? Ideally? Ideally? Ideal solution: have everyone in the world get weighed and BP Ideal solution: have everyone in the world get weighed and BP Participants are a sample of the population Participants are a sample of the population You should immediately question this! You should immediately question this! Restrict population Restrict population

Population Design Identify the statement to be evaluated Identify the statement to be evaluated Ex. A mouse is faster than a keyboard for numeric entry Ex. A mouse is faster than a keyboard for numeric entry Create a hypothesis Create a hypothesis Ex. Participants using a keyboard to enter a string of numbers will take less time than participants using a mouse. Ex. Participants using a keyboard to enter a string of numbers will take less time than participants using a mouse. Identify Independent and Dependent Variables Identify Independent and Dependent Variables Independent Variable – the variable that is being manipulated by the experimenter (interaction method) Independent Variable – the variable that is being manipulated by the experimenter (interaction method) Dependent Variable – the variable that is caused by the independent variable. (time) Dependent Variable – the variable that is caused by the independent variable. (time) Design Study Design Study Invite 100 people Invite 100 people Time them Time them Graph Graph See if there is a trend See if there is a trend

Two Group Design Identify the statement to be evaluated Identify the statement to be evaluated Ex. Shorter people are smarter than taller people Ex. Shorter people are smarter than taller people Create a hypothesis Create a hypothesis Ex. IQ of people shorter than 5’9” > IQ of people 5’9” or taller Ex. IQ of people shorter than 5’9” > IQ of people 5’9” or taller Design Study Design Study Two groups called conditions Two groups called conditions How many participants? How many participants? Do the groups need the same # of participants? Do the groups need the same # of participants? What’s your design? What’s your design? What is the independent and dependent variables? What is the independent and dependent variables? Confounding factors – factors that affect outcomes, but are not related to the study Confounding factors – factors that affect outcomes, but are not related to the study

Biases Hypothesis Guessing Hypothesis Guessing Participants guess what you are trying hypothesis Participants guess what you are trying hypothesis Experimenter Bias Experimenter Bias Subconscious bias of data and evaluation to find what you want to find Subconscious bias of data and evaluation to find what you want to find Systematic Bias Systematic Bias bias resulting from a flaw integral to the system bias resulting from a flaw integral to the system E.g. an incorrectly calibrated thermostat) E.g. an incorrectly calibrated thermostat) List of biases List of biases

What does this mean?

Design External validity – do your results mean anything? External validity – do your results mean anything? Results should be similar to other similar studies Results should be similar to other similar studies Use accepted questionnaires, methods Use accepted questionnaires, methods Power – how much meaning do your results have? Power – how much meaning do your results have? The more people the more you can say that the participants are a sample of the population The more people the more you can say that the participants are a sample of the population Pilot your study Pilot your study Generalization – how much do your results apply to the true state of things Generalization – how much do your results apply to the true state of things

Design People who use a mouse and keyboard will be faster to fill out a form than keyboard alone. People who use a mouse and keyboard will be faster to fill out a form than keyboard alone. Let’s create a study design Let’s create a study design Hypothesis Hypothesis Population Population Procedure Procedure Two types: Two types: Between Subjects Between Subjects Across Subjects Across Subjects

Procedure Formally have all participants sign up for a time slot (if individual testing is needed) Formally have all participants sign up for a time slot (if individual testing is needed) Informed Consent (let’s look at one) Informed Consent (let’s look at one) Execute study Execute study Questionnaires/Debriefing (let’s look at one) Questionnaires/Debriefing (let’s look at one)

Hypothesis Proving Hypothesis: Hypothesis: People who use a mouse and keyboard will be faster to fill out a form than keyboard alone. People who use a mouse and keyboard will be faster to fill out a form than keyboard alone. US Court system: Innocent until proven guilty US Court system: Innocent until proven guilty NULL Hypothesis: Assume people who use a mouse and keyboard will fill out a form than keyboard alone in the same amount of time NULL Hypothesis: Assume people who use a mouse and keyboard will fill out a form than keyboard alone in the same amount of time Your job to prove differently! Your job to prove differently! Alternate Hypothesis 1: People who use a mouse and keyboard will fill out a form than keyboard alone, either faster or slower. Alternate Hypothesis 1: People who use a mouse and keyboard will fill out a form than keyboard alone, either faster or slower. Alternate Hypothesis 2: People who use a mouse and keyboard will fill out a form than keyboard alone, faster. Alternate Hypothesis 2: People who use a mouse and keyboard will fill out a form than keyboard alone, faster.

Analysis Most of what we do involves: Most of what we do involves: Normal Distributed Results Normal Distributed Results Independent Testing Independent Testing Homogenous Population Homogenous Population

Raw Data Keyboard times Keyboard times E.g. 3.4, 4.4, 5.2, 4.8, 10.1, 1.1, 2.2 E.g. 3.4, 4.4, 5.2, 4.8, 10.1, 1.1, 2.2 Mean = 4.46 Mean = 4.46 Variance = 7.14 (Excel’s VARP) Variance = 7.14 (Excel’s VARP) Standard deviation = 2.67 (sqrt variance) Standard deviation = 2.67 (sqrt variance) What do the different statistical data tell us? What do the different statistical data tell us?

What does Raw Data Mean?

Roll of Chance How do we know how much is the ‘truth’ and how much is ‘chance’? How do we know how much is the ‘truth’ and how much is ‘chance’? How much confidence do we have in our answer? How much confidence do we have in our answer?

Hypothesis We assumed the means are “equal” We assumed the means are “equal” But are they? But are they? Or is the difference due to chance? Or is the difference due to chance? Small Pattern (seconds)Large Pattern (seconds) MeanS.D.MeanS.D.MinMax Condition Condition Condition Condition

T - test T – test – statistical test used to determine whether two observed means are statistically different T – test – statistical test used to determine whether two observed means are statistically different

T-test Distributions Distributions

T – test (rule of thumb) Good values of t > 1.96 (rule of thumb) Good values of t > 1.96 Look at what contributes to t Look at what contributes to t htm htm

F statistic, p values F statistic – assesses the extent to which the means of the experimental conditions differ more than would be expected by chance F statistic – assesses the extent to which the means of the experimental conditions differ more than would be expected by chance t is related to F statistic t is related to F statistic Look up a table, get the p value. Compare to α Look up a table, get the p value. Compare to α α value – probability of making a Type I error (rejecting null hypothesis when really true) α value – probability of making a Type I error (rejecting null hypothesis when really true) p value – statistical likelihood of an observed pattern of data, calculated on the basis of the sampling distribution of the statistic. (% chance it was due to chance) p value – statistical likelihood of an observed pattern of data, calculated on the basis of the sampling distribution of the statistic. (% chance it was due to chance)

T and alpha values

Small PatternLarge Pattern t – test with unequal variance p – value t – test with unequal variance p - value PVE – RSE vs. VFHE – RSE ** *** PVE – RSE vs. HE – RSE ** * VFHE – RSE vs. HE – RSE

Significance What does it mean to be significant? What does it mean to be significant? You have some confidence it was not due to chance. You have some confidence it was not due to chance. But difference between statistical significance and meaningful significance But difference between statistical significance and meaningful significance Always know: Always know: samples (n) samples (n) p value p value variance/standard deviation variance/standard deviation means means

IRB Let’s look at a completed one Let’s look at a completed one You MUST turn one in before you complete a study You MUST turn one in before you complete a study Must have OKed before running study Must have OKed before running study