Seismic design for the wind turbine tower (WP1.5 background document presentation) Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Seismic Design of Buried Structures

Advertisements

During the semester Introductions Basics of earthquakes History and Recording Damaging Earthquakes and Understanding seismic exposure Undertaking loss.

Design of Steel and Composite-Structures for Seismic Loading – Safety Requirements, Concepts and Methods – Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard Fehling, University.

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH) Institute of Steel Structures Prof. C.C Baniotopoulos Iakovos Lavasas Civil Engineer Padelis Zervas Dr. Civil.

Finite element seismic analysis of a guyed mast

ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LABORATORY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COMPILED GREGORY G. PENELIS ANDREAS J. KAPPOS 3D PUSHOVER.

Evaluation of shell thicknesses Prof. Ch. Baniotopoulos I. Lavassas, G. Nikolaidis, P.Zervas Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki,

An-Najah National University

Preloaded anchors (WP 1.4 background document presentation) Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki.

GTSTRUDL User’s Group Dynamic Analysis of Service Water Pump for Seismic Restraint June 24, 2011 Parimal Gandhi, PE Sr. Engineer 1 Annual Meeting

October 11, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Student Chapter at CU Boulder Why care about EQ Engineering?

Earthquake Basics Section 2. +What causes earthquakes? +How do earthquake forces enter buildings? +How does the building respond? +What building elements.

Response Spectrum Analysis Enhancements

By the name of the god Graduation project presentation.

Response Spectrum Analysis as per Indian IS: 1893 (Part 1)-2002

Stress distribution around door-opening Prof. Ch. Baniotopoulos I. Lavassas, G. Nikolaidis, P.Zervas Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki,

Seismic Design Guidelines for Tall Buildings Ronald O. Hamburger Senior Principal Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc. Quake Summit 2010 October 8, 2010.

Lecture 2 January 19, 2006.

IRENG07 1 Seismic Consideration Discussion for The Interaction Region Fred Asiri-SLAC.

Reproduction interdite © ALMA EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM Reproduction forbidden Design, Manufacture, Transport and Integration in Chile of ALMA Antennas Page.

Dynamics Free vibration: Eigen frequencies

ASCE 7-05 Seismic Provisions

December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.

Towers, chimneys and masts

Soil settlement and structure interaction with Pdisp and GSA Raft

Lecture 5 January 31,  Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 5/ Slide 2 In this Lecture Impulsive.

University of Palestine

CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS

Static Pushover Analysis

TOPICS COVERED Building Configuration Response of Concrete Buildings

85M102006D. Seismic Analysis for a Turbine Building with Spring Supported Turbine / Generator Deck Feifei Lu, PE Shaw Power Group, Charlotte, NC June.

Bentley RM Bridge Seismic Design and Analysis

Structural Analysis and Design of

University of Palestine

Building Fun You will have 30 minutes to build the strongest structures you can with only the materials you are provided with. Explain to the class the.

Along-wind dynamic response

An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Graduation Project Prepared by : 1- Areej Melhem 2- Jawad Ateyani 3-Rasha.

ATLAS thermosiphon project Piping design and seismic analysis framework Délio Ramos EN/MME,

IMPACT OF FOUNDATION MODELING ON THE ACCURACY OF RESPONSE HISTORY ANALYSIS OF A TALL BUILDING Part II - Implementation F. Naeim, S. Tileylioglu, A. Alimoradi.

Projectile - an object for which the only force acting upon it is gravity. The force of air resistance is negligibly small or nonexistent for a projectile.

6/25/20081 Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of a Composite Structure on a Backfill Hilltop WSRC-STI Rev 0 Lisa Anderson, Bechtel National,

Response of MDOF structures to ground motion 1. If damping is well-behaving, or can be approximated using equivalent viscous damping, we can decouple.

Static Equilibrium Physics 150/250 Center of Mass Types of Motion

Dynamic Analysis of Fan Foundation Mahendra Madhavan.

Raft and Soil-Structure Interaction Pdisp and GSA Raft

BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN

CTA, MST – seismic calculation Roland Platzer, ZM1 DESY Hamburg Munich, January 28 th, 2013.

Basics of Earthquakes Frequency

Seismic analysis of Bridges Part II

ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING

Welcome to Earthquake Engineering

Dead zone analysis of ECAL barrel modules under static and dynamic loads Marc Anduze, Thomas Pierre Emile – LLR CALICE Collaboration Meeting.

AQQABA SECONDRY SCHOOL Structural Design.

CFHT Pier Building Evaluation

Dead zone analysis of ECAL barrel modules under static and dynamic loads for ILD Thomas PIERRE-EMILE, Marc ANDUZE– LLR.

Seismic Moment Dr. Syed Mohamed Ibrahim M.Tech., Ph.D.,

Seismic Design Method for Pile Foundation

Sound Wall/Noise Barriers Provided by INNSTRUCT

Compound motion Three types of motion: Vertical motion

Earthquake resistant buildings

Compound motion Three types of motion: Vertical motion

Projectile Motion Projectile - an object for which the only force acting upon it is gravity. The force of air resistance is negligibly small or nonexistent.

Evaluation of Numerical Models in the Analysis of Pine Flat Dam

Projectile Motion.

Projectile Motion.

Evaluation of shell thicknesses Prof. Ch. Baniotopoulos I. Lavassas, G. Nikolaidis, P.Zervas Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki,

What FEA can be used in:. The whole tower analysis

Iakovos Lavasas Civil Engineer Padelis Zervas Dr. Civil Enginner

Stress distribution around door-opening. Prof. Ch. Baniotopoulos I

CALTRANS SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA Version 1.7 November 2012

Presentation transcript:

Seismic design for the wind turbine tower (WP1.5 background document presentation) Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki

Seismic design for the wind turbine tower Relevant Codes:  EC8-1 : Design of structures for earthquake resistance – General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings  EC8-6 : Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Towers, masts and chimneys  GL Wind 2003 IV – Part 1

Seismic design for the wind turbine tower Methods of analysis:  Spectral response analysis is used (EC8.6 §3.2.2 & EC8.1 §3.2.2)‏  Lateral force method of analysis is not applicable (more than one modes are participating)‏  Time history analysis can be used supplementary for the verification of spectrum analysis results  Non linear static (pushover) analysis may be applied for verification purposes only (EC8.1 § )‏

Seismic design for the wind turbine tower Earthquake motion representation  Represented by the “Elastic response spectrum”  Alternatively, the “Design spectrum” may be used (ductile behaviour of the structure)‏  Since wind is the dominant load case, “Elastic response spectrum” can be used  Translational spectra are taken into account  Rotational spectra are taken into account (EC8-6 §3.1) when: Structures taller than 80 m in regions where the peak ground acceleration exceeds the 25% of gravity acceleration Structures with height > 5 * max base dimension (pile foundations excluded) Combination of rotational component to the corresponding translational (SRSS method)  Foundation has to be modeled together with the tower for 2 nd order & soil-structure interaction effects (except erecting the towers on rock or very stiff soil).

Seismic design for the wind turbine tower Elastic spectrum

Seismic design for the wind turbine tower Elastic spectrum

Seismic design for the wind turbine tower Design spectrum

Seismic design for the wind turbine tower Combinations of seismic actions: The sum of the effective modal masses taken into account must amount to at least 90% of the total mass of the structure. Combination: SRSS method when combining independent vibration modes (Tmin <= 0.9*Tmax). Else more accurate combinations as CQC must be used. Combination of the horizontal & vertical components of the seismic excitation: