Pressure Vessel Safety Calculation Takeyasu Ito Los Alamos National Laboratory EDM Collaboration Meeting Durham, NC May 20-21, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Control calculations Heat Engines & Boilers.
Advertisements

So Far: Conservation of Mass and Energy Pressure Drop in Pipes Flow Measurement Instruments Flow Control (Valves) Types of Pumps and Pump Sizing This Week:
MICE hydrogen review Commissioning, testing and operations.
Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ ) Heat transfer in SIS 300 dipole MT/FAIR – Cryogenics Y. Xiang, M. Kauschke.
Chapter 2: Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient
Liquefied Natural Gas Fuel tank
February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Roberto Than R&D ERL Cryogenics Roberto Than February 17-18, 2010 CRYOGENICS.
Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System
Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Procurement Review Steve Virostek Mike Green Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting October.
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
MICE AFCSWG Safety Review Summary Mary Anne Cummings Dec. 17, 2003 MICE Video Conference.
MTA Cryostat & cooling loop design Christine Darve Fermilab/Beams Division/ Cryogenic Department/ Engineering and Design Group Preparation of the Mucool/MICE.
MICE Hydrogen System Implementation Tom Bradshaw Elwyn Baynham Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Jim Rochford.
Mucool cryo-design Christine Darve Fermilab/Beams Division/ Cryogenic Department 8/12/02.
Interface issues on Super-FRS magnets test at CERN
RF-Accelerating Structure: Cooling Circuit Modeling Riku Raatikainen
23 Jan 2007 LASA Cryogenics Global Group 1 ILC Cryomodule piping L. Tavian for the cryogenics global group.
R&D Status and Plan on The Cryostat N. Ohuchi, K. Tsuchiya, A. Terashima, H. Hisamatsu, M. Masuzawa, T. Okamura, H. Hayano 1.STF-Cryostat Design 2.Construction.
Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient
Calorimeter Analysis Tasks, July 2014 Revision B January 22, 2015.
Cryomodule Helium Vessel Pressure -- a Few Additional Comments Tom Peterson 18 November 2007.
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
Conceptual Design Review of the NPDGamma Experiment in Beam Line 13 Seppo Penttila NPDGamma project manager September 25, 2007 at SNS.
Nuclear Thermal Hydraulic System Experiment
Safety Requirements and Regulations 10/3/20121Safety Requirements & Regulations James Sears.
Lesson 13 CONVECTION HEAT TRANSFER Given the formula for heat transfer and the operating conditions of the system, CALCULATE the rate of heat transfer.
ERL: G-5/e-Gun Cryogenic & Pressure Safety Committee Review ERL G-5/e-gun Beam Line Vacuum Failure Analysis April 24, 2009.
Consideration of Baffle cooling scheme
February 13, 2012 Mu2e Production Solenoid Design V.V. Kashikhin Workshop on Radiation Effects in Superconducting Magnet Materials (RESMM'12)
2009/1/16-18 ILD09 Seoul 1 Notes for ILD Beam Pipe (Technical Aspect) Y. Suetsugu, KEK Parasitic loss Vacuum pressure profile Some comments for beam pipe.
Hall D Target System Review J. FochtmanSeptember 28,2011 Preliminary Design Work.
Heat Transfer Equations. Fouling Layers of dirt, particles, biological growth, etc. effect resistance to heat transfer We cannot predict fouling factors.
EDMEDM EDM Collaboration Meeting 3-06 Jan Boissevain, P-25 March 2, 2006 NCSU EDM Experiment Design Status.
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule Norihito Ohuchi, Norio Higashi KEK Xu QingJin IHEP 2008/3/3-61Sendai-GDE-Meeting.
56 MHz SRF Cavity Cryostat support system and Shielding C. Pai
56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai
Preparation for the 3He Injection Test
56 MHz SRF Cavity and Helium vessel Design
EDM Engineering Issues General Mechanical Considerations EDM Cryostat Plan D ANSYS EMAG Calculations ANSYS MECH Calculations 3 June ‘03 J. Boissevain.
9/17/07IRENG071 Cryogenic System for the ILC IR Magnets QD0 and QF1 K. C. Wu - BNL.
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
EDMEDM LANL Review of EDM Cost and Schedule Jan Boissevain, P-25 February 11, 2005, Los Alamos National Laboratory EDM Reference Design Tour of the Reference.
M. Yoda, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, D. L. Sadowski, B. H. Mills and M. D. Hageman G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Correlations for Divertor Thermal-Hydraulic.
1 Cryogenic Design and the 4 He Evaporative Purifier David G. Haase, et al., North Carolina State University.
External Flow: The Flat Plate in Parallel Flow Chapter 7 Section 7.1 through 7.3.
Pipe flow analysis.
Cryogenic Summary - K. C. Wu Testing D2L102 in MAGCOOLJune, 02 Difference between D2L102 and D2L101 Operating Summary Cooldown to 100 K and 6 K Test Condition.
Cryogenic scheme, pipes and valves dimensions U.Wagner CERN TE-CRG.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule (up-dated) Norihito Ohuchi KEK 2008/4/21-251FNAL-SCRF-Meeting.
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel and HGRP Tom Peterson 4 December 2014 Design Review.
G.H. PATEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SUBJECT – Fluid Flow Operations Name : URVISH J SONI KINAR THAKORE PRATIK VASOYA.
17-18 December 2013 LARP VTF Workshop BNL Proposal 1 A.Marone
8/29/07K. C. Wu - Brookhaven National Lab1 Major Components in ILC IR Hall Interchangeable Detectors.
Vacuum tank relief for Super-FRS long multiplet cryostat CrYogenic Department in Common System (CSCY) GSI, Darmstadt Yu Xiang.
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
UITF ODH Assessment UITF Safety Review May 10, 2016.
Comments from the SNS Cryostat Design Review February 2010 Tom Peterson, Fermilab 15 February 2010.
TS Cool Down Studies TSu Unit Coils (24-25) N. Dhanaraj and E. Voirin Tuesday, 10 March 2015 Reference: Docdb No:
Cryomodule Safety Approvals Jay Theilacker LCLS-II Production Cryomodule Final Design Review May 12-14, 2015.
Cryomodule Development Status Prashant Khare, Shailesh Gilankar Pradeep Kush, Rupul Ghosh Abhishek Jain, A. Laxminarayanan, Rajeev Chaube.
704 MHz cavity design based on 704MHZ_v7.stp C. Pai
Working group meeting 07/05/15. Agenda Overview of review and current action list Relief system – Summary of problem – Details of analysis, testing and.
Lesson 7: Thermal and Mechanical Element Math Models in Control Systems ET 438a Automatic Control Systems Technology 1lesson7et438a.pptx.
Cryogenic Safety- HSE seminar CERN,
Final Design Cryogenic and mechanical configurations
NPDG Liquid Hydrogen Target: Design and Safety Features
2 K Coldbox Safety and ESH
ESS elliptical cryomodule
Aleksander Kopczyński
Presentation transcript:

Pressure Vessel Safety Calculation Takeyasu Ito Los Alamos National Laboratory EDM Collaboration Meeting Durham, NC May 20-21, 2008

2 Introduction Cryostat needs to meet the safety requirements of the facility Recent examples – Liquid hydrogen target for the SAMPLE experiment at MIT-Bates – Liquid hydrogen target for the G0 experiment at JLAB – Superconducting magnet for the G0 Experiment at JLAB – Liquid hydrogen target for the NPDGamma Experiment at LANL and ORNL/SNS The nEDM apparatus needs to meet the safety requirements of ORNL/SNS. In addition, the portion of the nEDM apparatus to be first tested at LANL needs to meet the LANL safety requirements. This is a summary of what we did for the Dual Use Cryostat. – More details can be found in the Design Document posted on the Twiki site.

3 Some useful references W.M.Schmitt and C.F.Williamson, “Boiloff rates of cryogenic targets subject to catastrophic vacuum failure”, Batess Internal Report # (1990) NPDGamma liquid hydrogen target engineering document (2007) G.Cavallari, I.Gorine, D.Guesewell, R. Stierilin, “Safety tests with the LEP superconducting cavity”, CERN/ER/RF (1989) Physics division cryogenic safety manual, Argonne National Laboratory Physics Division Cryogenic Safety Committee (2001).

4 Dual Use Cryostat HV electrodes HV Heat Shields 3 He Atomic Beam Source 3 He Injection Test Apparatus HV Test Apparatus HV LHe Volume ParameterValue Outer vacuum vessel volume 2.58 m 2 Outer vacuum vessel surface area m 2 Outer vacuum vessel material 6061 aluminum Outer vacuum vessel MAWP 15 psid Liquid helium vessel volume m 3 Liquid helium vessel surface area 2.6 m 2 Liquid helium vessel material SS304 Liquid helium vessel MAWP 30 psid Selected parameters

5 Credible Accident Scenarios Loss of isolation vacuum to air or helium Failure of liquid helium containing vessels

6 Loss of isolation vacuum to air Outer Vacuum Vessel Liquid Helium Vessel Relief valve AIR AIR FREEZES QQQ Q Q He gas PP

7 Sizing the relief system: things to do Estimate the rate of heat transfer to liquid helium Determine the boiloff rate Calculate the pressure drop Calculate the strength of the vessel

8 Rate of heat transfer to liquid helium due to loss of vacuum LHe Frozen air Vessel wall Film boiling The rate of heat transfer depends on: Rate of air flow Heat resistance due to Vessel wall Helium gas film Frozen air layer

9 Rate of heat transfer to liquid helium: some measured values dq/dt (W/m 2 ) ConditionReference (1-6) x 10 4 No superinsulationH.M.Long and P.E.Loveday in Technology of Liquid Helium, (NBS Monograph 111, 1968) 1.4 x 10 4 No superinsulationANL Physics Division Cryogenic Safety Manual (2001) [ATLAS] 3.1 x 10 5 No superinsulation, superfluidS. M. Harrison, IEEE Trans. Appl. Superconduct. 12, 1343 (2002) [AMS] x in. thick superinsulationH.M.Long and P.E.Loveday in Technology of Liquid Helium, NBS Monograph 111 (1968) 7.5 x layers of superinsulationM. Wiseman, R. Bundy, J. P. Kelley, and W. Schneider, in Application of Cryogenic Technology (Plenum Press, 1989) [CEBAF] 4.4 x mm superinsulation “Cryocoat Ultralight”, superfluid S. M. Harrison, IEEE Trans. Appl. Superconduct. 12, 1343 (2002) [AMS]. We adopt: with superinsulation Note: thermal conductivity of gas filled superinsulation is 7x10 4  W/m/K, which gives a heat flux of 2000 W/m 2 when subject to a 300 K temperature difference.

10 Boiloff Rate Helium latent heat: Total heat flow into LHe vessel: Helium mass flow:

11 Pressure Buildup Darcy’s formula: Resistance coefficient – Straight pipe – For turbulent flow in a smooth pipe – “Minor corrections”: correction for entrance, exit, bend, etc. f = friction factor L = length of the pipe Re= Reynolds number

12 MAWP (Maximum Allowable Working Pressure) Definition given by ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section II Part D In general, MAWP is a pressure which raises the membrane stress in the metal to the lesser of the following two value: – the tensile strength/3.5 – the 0.2% yield strength/1.5.

13 Strength Calculation Using ANSYS (By John Ramsey)

14 Outer Vacuum Vessel Liquid Helium Vessel 26” 27” 20” 12” 3.0” OD pipe Rupture disk (3”, 12 psi) Emergency vent stack Primary vent stack Relief valve Parallel plate (3”, 6 psi)

15 Pressure Buildup in Dual Use Cryostat Darcy’s formula: Resistance coefficient Pressure drop ComponentK K Entrance0.590 degree bend0.4 Shaped Curve1.0Rupture disk2.0 Bellows0.2Exit1.0 Dividing T ” 40” long pipe0.2

16 Reality Check Dual Use CryostatCEBAF SRF Cavity LHe vessel volume (m 3 ) LHe vessel surface area (m 2 ) LHe vessel MAWP (psi)3060 Rapture disk burst pressure (psi)1245 Rapture disk size (in.)32 Vent line ID (in.)

17 Comment by Bob Bourque (head of the LANL Pressure vessel committee) Our valueBob Bourque’s recommendation Heat flux into liquid helium with superinsulation 2000 W/m W/m 2 Temperature of helium gas coming out of the vent 300 K50 K

18 Remarks Heat capacity of gas not taken into account – Taking the gas heat capacity into account might reduce the estimated boil off rate. – However, estimating how much heat goes into heating the gas is very difficult. There are many approximations and they are on the side of safety, costing in heat load. If a more accurate estimate is necessary, we might need to use CFD calculation, such as FLUENCE.