Revisiting causal neighborhood effects on individual ischemic heart disease risk: a quasi-experimental analysis among Swedish siblings Juan Merlo In collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How would you explain the smoking paradox. Smokers fair better after an infarction in hospital than non-smokers. This apparently disagrees with the view.
Advertisements

1 Arlene Ash QMC - Third Tuesday September 21, 2010 (as amended, Sept 23) Analyzing Observational Data: Focus on Propensity Scores.
Merlo J Juan Merlo Department of Community Medicine Lund University, Malmö SWEDEN.
The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.
Introduction to Cancer Epidemiology Epidemiology and Molecular Pathology of Cancer: Bootcamp course Tuesday, 3 January 2012.
Chance, bias and confounding
Evaluate potential limitations with current foodborne illness source attribution estimates obtained from outbreak reports. Neal Golden, Ph.D. January 31.
Ora Paltiel, MD, MSc Braun School of Public Health & Community Medicine Hebrew University of Jerusalem Hadassah Medical Organization Israel.
Study Design and Analysis in Epidemiology: Where does modeling fit? Meaningful Modeling of Epidemiologic Data, 2010 AIMS, Muizenberg, South Africa Steve.
Case Control Study Manish Chaudhary BPH, MPH
Cohort Study.
Early Life Events and Health and Labor Market Outcomes in Adulthood Rucker C. Johnson Robert F. Schoeni University of California, Berkeley University of.
1 Lecture 20: Non-experimental studies of interventions Describe the levels of evaluation (structure, process, outcome) and give examples of measures of.
Case control study Moderator : Chetna Maliye Presenter Reshma Sougaijam.
Population Health: Challenges for Science and Society David Mechanic, Ph.D. Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research Rutgers, the State.
Epidemiology The Basics Only… Adapted with permission from a class presentation developed by Dr. Charles Lynch – University of Iowa, Iowa City.
TWO-STAGE CASE-CONTROL STUDIES USING EXPOSURE ESTIMATES FROM A GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM Jonas Björk 1 & Ulf Strömberg 2 1 Competence Center for.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS AND MORTALITY FROM CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE AMONG PEOPLE WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES IN SCOTLAND ( ) Caroline Jackson, Jeremy Walker,
Evidence-Based Medicine 3 More Knowledge and Skills for Critical Reading Karen E. Schetzina, MD, MPH.
Biostatistics Case Studies Peter D. Christenson Biostatistician Session 5: Analysis Issues in Large Observational Studies.
CHP400: Community Health Program- lI Research Methodology STUDY DESIGNS Observational / Analytical Studies Case Control Studies Present: Disease Past:
Self-reported cognitive and emotional effects and lifestyle changes shortly after preventive cardiovascular consultations in general practice Dea Kehler.
There are two main purposes in statistics; (Chapter 1 & 2)  Organization & ummarization of the data [Descriptive Statistics] (Chapter 5)  Answering.
Gunnar Malmberg Anna Pettersson Department of Social and Economic Geography, Umeå University, Sweden Centre for Population Studies: Ageing and Living Conditions.
ECON ECON Health Economic Policy Lab Kem P. Krueger, Pharm.D., Ph.D. Anne Alexander, M.S., Ph.D. University of Wyoming.
 Is there a comparison? ◦ Are the groups really comparable?  Are the differences being reported real? ◦ Are they worth reporting? ◦ How much confidence.
Mother and Child Health: Research Methods G.J.Ebrahim Editor Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, Oxford University Press.
The Price of Violence Long term effects of assault on labor force participation and health Petra Ornstein, Uppsala university.
Criteria to assess quality of observational studies evaluating the incidence, prevalence, and risk factors of chronic diseases Minnesota EPC Clinical Epidemiology.
Beyond surveys: the research frontier moves to the use of administrative data to evaluate R&D grants Oliver Herrmann Ministry of Business, Innovation.
Lecture 5 Objective 14. Describe the elements of design of experimental studies: clinical trials and community intervention trials. Discuss the advantages.
Case-control study Chihaya Koriyama August 17 (Lecture 1)
Is the association causal, or are there alternative explanations? Epidemiology matters: a new introduction to methodological foundations Chapter 8.
Propensity Score Matching for Causal Inference: Possibilities, Limitations, and an Example sean f. reardon MAPSS colloquium March 6, 2007.
Study Designs for Clinical and Epidemiological Research Carla J. Alvarado, MS, CIC University of Wisconsin-Madison (608)
Types of study designs.
Case Control Study Dr. Ashry Gad Mohamed MB, ChB, MPH, Dr.P.H. Prof. Of Epidemiology.
Introduction Psychological factors have been implicated to be etiologies for idiopathic environmental illness (IEI) in many studies. No study has ever.
Design and Analysis of Clinical Study 10. Cohort Study Dr. Tuan V. Nguyen Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney, Australia.
Study designs. Kate O’Donnell General Practice & Primary Care.
Case-Control Studies Abdualziz BinSaeed. Case-Control Studies Type of analytic study Unit of observation and analysis: Individual (not group)
Choosing a reference group Dublin June comparing disease incidence in exposed and unexposed (reference) comparing exposure in cases and exposure.
Matching. Objectives Discuss methods of matching Discuss advantages and disadvantages of matching Discuss applications of matching Confounding residual.
Confounding Biost/Stat 579 David Yanez Department of Biostatistics University of Washington July 7, 2005.
Types of Studies. Aim of epidemiological studies To determine distribution of disease To examine determinants of a disease To judge whether a given exposure.
Public Finance and Public Policy Jonathan Gruber Third Edition Copyright © 2010 Worth Publishers 1 of 24 Copyright © 2010 Worth Publishers.
(ARM 2004) 1 INNOVATIVE STATISTICAL APPROACHES IN HSR: BAYESIAN, MULTIPLE INFORMANTS, & PROPENSITY SCORES Thomas R. Belin, UCLA.
Introduction to General Epidemiology (2) By: Dr. Khalid El Tohami.
Purpose of Epi Studies Discover factors associated with diseases, physical conditions and behaviors Identify the causal factors Show the efficacy of intervening.
WELCOME TO BIOSTATISTICS! WELCOME TO BIOSTATISTICS! Course content.
Case Control study. An investigation that compares a group of people with a disease to a group of people without the disease. Used to identify and assess.
Correlates of HIV testing among youth in three high prevalence Caribbean Countries Beverly E. Andrews, Doctoral Candidate University.
Measures of disease frequency Simon Thornley. Measures of Effect and Disease Frequency Aims – To define and describe the uses of common epidemiological.
Epidemiological Study Designs And Measures Of Risks (1)
a systematic review and meta-analysis
Association Between Serotonergic Antidepressant Use During Pregnancy and Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children Hilary K. Brown, PhD; Joel G. Ray, MD, MSc,
Associations of Maternal Antidepressant Use During the First Trimester of Pregnancy With Preterm Birth, Small for Gestational Age, Autism Spectrum Disorder,
Present: Disease Past: Exposure
Comparison of three Observational Analytical strategies
Viktor Oskarsson,1 Caroline Nordenvall,2 and Alicja Wolk1
Mode of first delivery and severe maternal complications in the subsequent pregnancy LOTTE B. COLMORN1 , LONE KREBS2 , KARI KLUNGSØYR3,4 , MAIJA JAKOBSSON5.
Basile Chaix,. † Pierre Chauvin,† Juan Merlo
Lecture 1: Fundamentals of epidemiologic study design and analysis
Annals of Internal Medicine • Vol. 167 No. 12 • 19 December 2017
ERRORS, CONFOUNDING, and INTERACTION
Mendelian Randomization (Using genes to tell us about the environment)
Research Techniques Made Simple: Interpreting Measures of Association in Clinical Research Michelle Roberts PhD,1,2 Sepideh Ashrafzadeh,1,2 Maryam Asgari.
Dr Luis E Cuevas – LSTM Julia Critchley
Effect Modifiers.
Presentation transcript:

Revisiting causal neighborhood effects on individual ischemic heart disease risk: a quasi-experimental analysis among Swedish siblings Juan Merlo In collaboration with: SV Subramanian, Henrik Ohlsson, Basile Chaix, Paul Lichtenstein, Ichiro Kawachi, Social Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Sweden (Juan Merlo, Henrik Ohlsson). Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA (Ichiro Kawachi, Subramanian SV). Unit for Primary Health Care Research, Region Skåne, Sweden (Juan Merlo, Henrik Ohlsson) Centrum for Economic Demography, Lund University, Sweden (Juan Merlo) Inserm, U707, Paris, France (Basile Chaix) Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris6, UMR-S 707, Paris, France (Basile Chaix) Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (Paul Lichtenstein)

Counterfactual approach to causation Exchangeable?

Exchangeable?

UNEXPOSEDEXPOSED N=1 TEMPORAL CONFOUNDING Exchangeable?

x 1 = x 2 UNEXPOSED EXPOSED TWINS Exchangeable ?

EXPOSED UNEXPOSED Identical twins Exchangeable? TEMPORAL CONFOUNDING

EXPOSED UNEXPOSED “AVERAGE” causal effects

SAMPLING StatisticaL inference X sample x Knowing the distribution  information on the population (confidence interval) +/- random error

RANDOMISATION (Instrumental variable) (RCT) X Urval x 2 Random samples +/- random error Urval x 1 X≈ x 1 ≈ x 2 x 1 = x 2 UNEXPOSED EXPOSED Intervention “AVERAGE” causal effects +/- random error Exchangeable?

EXPOSED UNEXPOSED OBSERVATION

X x 2 +/- random error x 1 X≠ x1≠ x2X≠ x1≠ x2 OBSERVATIONAL EPIDEMIOLOGY TRIES TO SIMULATE “COUNTERFACTUAL” SITUATIONS X≈ x 1 ≈ x 2 Multiple/risk score regression Stratification Restriction Propensity of exposition score matching UNEXPOSED EXPOSED EXPOSED UNEXPOSED Intervention Exchangeable?

ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE INDIVIDUAL FACTORS (common cause) Pathway / independent / confounding effect in the actual world ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE INDIVIDUAL FACTORS AREA EXPOSED/UNEXPOSED AREA EXPOSED/UNEXPOSED Exchangeable?

UNEXPOSED EXPOSED x 1 ≈ x 2 Exchangeable? SIBLINGS 50% genetic Shared early environment better controlling for unknown confounding

Revisiting causal neighborhood effects on individual ischemic heart disease risk: a quasi-experimental analysis among Swedish siblings

BACKGROUND Previous studies: neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage  individual risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD) The value of those observations for causal inference is uncertain

AIMS To apply a quasi-experimental family- based design to investigated whether a discrepant exposure to neighborhood socioeconomic circumstances among full brothers is associated with the IHD risk. AREA

–Swedish Multi-Generational Register –Register of Total Population –Longitudinal Integration Database for Health Insurance and Labor Market Studies The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Karolinska Institute (Dnr ). REGISTERS

Swedish population residing in the country by December 31th, 2004 –971,519 men aged 45 to 64 years –403,135 men aged 65 to 80 years INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA:INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: –Only men (higher incidence of IHD, more definite measures of socioeconomic position than women) –Only Swedish born individuals (identification of familial relations by the Multi-generation register) –Without previous hospitalization for IHD between January 1st 2001 and December 31st –Only residing in neighborhoods with more than 50 people –Who had continuously resided in the country between December 31th 1992 and December 31th 2004 –Only families with two or more full brothers. POPULATION-1

POPULATION-2

INDIVIDUAL LEVEL VARIABLES

NEIGBOURHOOD LEVEL VARIABLES -1

NEIGBOURHOOD LEVEL VARIABLES - 2

FAMILY LEVEL VARIABLES - 2

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

RESULTS - 1

RESULTS -2 Low familial mean neighborhood income This observation was in line with previous findings obtained by traditional multilevel analyses and investigating different socioeconomic characteristics of the neighborhood. – 45 to 64 year-old males Age-adjusted OR = 1.05, (95%CI: 1.04 – 1.06) + Individual variables OR = 1.04, (95%CI: 1.03 – 1.04) –65 to 80 year-old males Age-adjusted OR = 1.05, (95%CI: 1.03 – 1.07) + Individual variables OR = 1.04, (95%CI: 1.02 – 1.05) The low familial mean neighborhood income deliberately forced a confounded comparison of unrelated individuals from families that differ in unknown – and thereby difficult to control – shared genetic and environmental factors.

RESULTS-3 Intrafamilial-centered neighborhood income (i.e., comparing full brothers with a different contextual exposures), –45 to 64 year-old males Age-adjusted OR = 1.04 (1.03 – 1.05) + Individual variables OR = 1.02 (1.02 – 1.04). –65 to 80 year-old males Age-adjusted OR = 1.01 (0.99 – 1.03) + Individual variables OR = 1.00 (0.98 – 1.02).

DISCUSSION-1 We need to consider that in addition to discrepancies in the contextual exposure of interest, –Full brothers still have a 50% difference in genetic background. –They also differ in non-shared environmental circumstances acquired across their life course and these circumstances may be a common cause of both increased IHD risk, and the selection of a neighborhood of residence.

DISCUSSION-2 Selection bias, especially in the elderly –Siblings were younger –They had a lower IHD mortality that the overall population –Otherwise, the characteristics of the sibling subpopulation were very similar.

DISCUSSION-3 Results very similar using a family stratified conditional Cox regression. Cox regression, however, cannot estimate the association between low familial mean neighborhood income and individual IHD since there is not variation within families in mean neighborhood income.

We replicated the association between impaired socioeconomic characteristics in a neighborhood and increased individual IHD risk previously described(Chaix B, 2009)Chaix B, 2009 However, we observed this association only in adult men, not in the elderly, and residual confounding by genetic and non-shared environmental factors may still be present DISCUSSION-4

Anders Zorn (1860 – 1920) Joaquin Sorolla y Bastida ( ) Exchangeable?