California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (Cal-EnviroScreen) OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARD ASSESSMENT CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NEPA and Cumulative Impacts on Environmental Justice Communities A Presentation by W. Schulte, Esq. Eastern Environmental Law Center April 13, 2011.
Advertisements

CUMULATIVE IMPACTS from the EJAC to the IRONBOUND COMMUNITY of Newark, NJ Ana I. Baptista, Ph.D. Ironbound Community Corp. Clean Air Council Hearing April.
New Jersey Clean Air Council Public Hearing The Cumulative Health Impacts of Toxic Air Pollutants on Sensitive Subpopulations and the General Public Status.
Overview of Title VI and Environmental Justice. n Title VI Legislation and Regulations n Current Transportation Laws n Environmental Justice Executive.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
State and Local Initiatives to Combat Global Warming AB A Framework for Change James N. Goldstene California Air Resources Board October 22, 2008.
Environmental Justice at the MPCA Presenters: Kristie Ellickson and Monika Vadali The MPCA EJ Framework Workgroups 2014 Point Source work related to EJ.
I NTRODUCING C AL E NVIRO S CREEN 1.0 S IERRA W ATER W ORKGROUP S UMMIT – D EFINING D ISADVANTAGED C OMMUNITIES J UNE 13, 2013 Laura August, MPH Office.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
17.32 Environmental Politics Environmental Justice Is Environmental Policy Fair? Does it Matter?
Health Aspect of Disaster Risk Assessment Dr AA Abubakar Department of Community Medicine Ahmadu Bello University Zaria Nigeria.
CALIFORNIA’S CLIMATE ACTION: TRY EVERYTHING POSSIBLE ASHLEY CONRAD-SAYDAH DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR CLIMATE POLICY CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.
11/24/08ESPP-781 How should environmental risks and benefits be distributed? From questions of which nature to for whose benefit (or harm) Two kinds of.
Environmental Justice: Policies, Guidance, and Answers to Frequently Asked Questions FTA Region VII Civil Rights Training.
SCOPING MEETING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REQUIRED BY PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 3161 (b)(3) AND (4) (SENATE BILL 4) (PAVLEY) C ALIFORNIA D EPARTMENT.
The State of Equity in Metro Boston November 10, 2011 PolicyLink Equity Summit.
1 An Update on EPA Attainment Modeling Guidance for the 8- Hour Ozone NAAQS Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG November 16, 2005.
Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant Public Workshop Cal/EPA Headquarters Building Sierra Hearing Room Sacramento,
EPA’s Brownfields Program Megan Quinn U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization January 25, 2008.
Environmental Justice, Outreach & the Water Boards: WQCC 2014 Update Gita Kapahi Office of Public Participation 1 October 3, 2014.
Assisting Congress to Better Understand Environmental Justice Midterm Briefing Magdalena Dewane March 6, 2013 Advisor: Gail Suchman.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Environmental Health Informatics William Sonntag Office of Environmental Information U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Assessing the Public Health Impacts of Contaminated Sites Rick Kreutzer, M.D. California Department of Health Services.
1 Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to the Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation for the AB 2588 Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program.
Smart Growth Implementation Assistance State of California Fact Sheet More about Smart Growth Preliminary Project Goals.
A Comparison of 42 Local, National, and International HIA Guidelines Andrew L. Dannenberg, MD, MPH Katherine Hebert, MCRP Arthur M. Wendel, MD, MPH Sarah.
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Proposed Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations, and Proposed FY2007 Air Monitoring Guidance WESTAR Spring Business Meeting March 28, 2006.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 John Vandenberg Associate Director for Health National Center for Environmental Assessment.
Welcome Office of Radiation & Indoor Air (ORIA) Tribal Strategy and Plan National Tribal Forum May 21, 2012.
Inventory Needs and Legal Requirements Martin Johnson Emission Inventory Workshop Air Resources Board March 13, 2006.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Advisory Committee Kickoff Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California July 29, 2003 CAL/EPA.
Quantitative Assessment of Cumulative Impacts: Challenges and Progress Lauren Zeise Cal/EPA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment CAPCOA Workshop:
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Equity Impact Review Guide American Public Health Association November 5, 2013.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
M & E TOOLKIT Jennifer Bogle 11 November 2014 Household Water Treatment and Water Safety Plans International and Regional Landscape.
CAPCOA Jack Broadbent. Who We Are  35 Air Districts  Representing nearly 2,000 Air Quality professionals  Governing Board made of 14 APCOs  Coordinates.
What is a Public Health Assessment? “The evaluation of data and information on the release of harmful substances into the environment in order to assess.
2014 Program Priorities January 23, Outline Major 2014 Goals 2013 Accomplishments Major 2014 Activities Partnerships 2.
STAKEHOLDER CALL/MEETING TO DISCUSS AND PROVIDE INPUT ON ZEV INCENTIVE PROGRAM GUIDELINES CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD March 7,
Indoor Air Quality Update June 27, Indoor air quality reflects outdoor and indoor air pollution sources Improving outdoor air quality reduces indoor.
Health Effects of Air Pollution
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
Public Workshop UCLA March 4, 2005 Draft Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community and Health Perspective.
1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May 6, 2003.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
Lead Agency Viability Assessment Consistent with OPPAGA Report 04-65, DCF contracted with FMHI to assist in the design and implementation of a centralized.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Spatial Analysis of the Characteristics of Poverty in Alachua County Chris Graziano Nick Lehman Dani Cano.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
1 Public Workshop to Discuss Amendments to the AB 2588 “Hot Spots” Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation California Air Resources Board.
California Environmental Protection Agency Market Advisory Committee Public Conference call May 15, 2007.
EJSCREEN: Environmental Justice Screening Tool 1.
Opportunities and challenges for health impact assessment within the scope of environmental impact assessment Brian L. Cole, Dr.P.H. Health Impact Assessment.
Role of Environmental Justice in Land Use Planning Shankar B. Prasad, M.B.B.S. Community Health Advisor California Air Resources Board May 11, 2001 Statewide.
The Role of Public Participation in Advancing Environmental Justice.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
1 Staff Public Workshops Fall 2011 Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Management of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems San Luis Obispo: October.
Environmental Justice Presented to the Government-wide Transportation Policy Council Lisa D. Quiveors Chair, Federal Environmental Justice Interagency.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
K. Bruce Jones EPA Office of Research and Development U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Regional Vulnerability Assessment Advisory Panel Meeting October,
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
CEQA Guidelines & Thresholds Update
Status of the PM NAAQS Review
Presentation transcript:

California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (Cal-EnviroScreen) OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARD ASSESSMENT CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Presentation: CSAC Agriculture and Natural Resources Policy Committee Meeting. November 27, 2012

Program Origins in Environmental Justice  Statutory definition of EJ  “Environmental justice means the fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the development, adoption, implementation and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.” Gov. Code § (e), 1999  Cal/EPA’s responsibilities  Required development of interagency environmental justice strategy for Cal/EPA (completed 2004)  Required each of the Cal/EPA boards and departments to review, identify, and address program obstacles impeding the progress of environmental justice Public Resources Code §71113,

Basis of concern for cumulative impacts  Numerous studies have shown that multiple pollution sources are disproportionately concentrated in low- income communities with high-minority populations.  Studies have reported communities with certain socioeconomic factors (i.e. low-income, low- education) have increased sensitivity to pollution.  Combination of multiple pollutants and increased sensitivity in these communities can result in higher cumulative pollution impacts. 3

How We Got Here (Process )  California Environmental Justice Advisory Committee  Recommended cumulative impacts as an important EJ issue  Environmental Justice Action Plan (October 2004)  Called for guidance on cumulative impacts  CA Interagency Working Group on Environmental Justice  Adopted working definition for cumulative impacts  Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment  Designated lead on cumulative impacts guidance development  Convened a Work Group of external stakeholders to provide advice. 4

December 2010 Project Report  Described an approach to evaluating cumulative impacts across California.  Screening tool for comparing the cumulative impacts of multiple pollution sources in CA communities, while accounting for socioeconomic factors that that can increase a community’s vulnerability to pollution.  Identify communities with high cumulative impacts. Available on the OEHHA website at: 5

2012 Draft CalEnviroScreen Tool  Identifies 19 indicators of environmental and socioeconomic conditions.  Analyzes indicators in 1800 CA zip codes.  Presents a broad picture of the relative burdens communities face from environmental pollution.  Reflects a “work in progress”

Stakeholder Engagement Process for Cal-Enviroscreen  Conducted 12 public workshops  Cumulative Impacts Precautionary Approach (“CIPA”) Workgroup  7 Regions around the state  Business Communities, Local Government, Tribes  Academic workshop to receive detailed comments from experts in the field  Received numerous oral comments and questions (e.g., > 1000)  Presented to California Council for Environmental and Economic Balance, CAPCOA Board, others  Comment period ended October 16  Received 29 written submissions commenting on tool 7

Working Definition “Cumulative impacts means exposures, public health or environmental effects from the combined emissions and discharges in a geographic area, including environmental pollution from all sources, whether single or multi-media, routinely, accidentally, or otherwise released. Impacts will take into account sensitive populations and socioeconomic factors, where applicable and to the extent data are available.” -- Cal/EPA Interagency Working Group on Environmental Justice 8

Primary Components Burden of Pollution Exposures Public Health Effects Environmental Effects Population Characteristics Sensitive Populations Socioeconomic Factors 9

Interpretation of Major Terms Contact with pollution Exposures Disease and other health conditions that increases susceptibility to pollutants Public Health Effects Adverse environmental conditions caused by pollutants Environmental Effects Populations with biological traits that may magnify the effects of pollutant exposures Sensitive Populations Community characteristics that result in increased vulnerability to pollutants Socioeconomic Factors 10

Proposed Geographical Unit: ZIP Code A representation of ZIP codes, called ZCTAs (ZIP Code Tabulation Areas) is available from the Census Bureau. ZCTAs are referred to as ZIP codes in this presentation.  Familiar scale  Publicly established  Public recognition  Not too large to discern differences  Not too small  To lose relevant data (e.g., certain health data)

Components are Characterized by Indicators Pollution BurdenPopulation Characteristics Exposures Public Health Effects Environmental Effects Sensitive Populations Socio- economic Factors  Ozone concentrations  PM 2.5 concentrations  Traffic density  Pesticide use  Toxic releases from facilities  Drinking water quality*  Low birth weight rate  Asthma ER visit rate  Heart disease mortality rate*  Cancer Mortality rate*  * under development or revision  Clean-up sites (brownfields)  Leaking under- ground storage tanks and cleanups  Solid waste sites and facilities and hazardous waste facilities  Impaired water bodies  Prevalence of children  Prevalence of elderly  Educational attainment  Household income  Poverty  Percent non- white 12

Criteria for indicator selection  Provide a good measure of the contribution to the component  Pollution burden indicators should relate to issues that may be actionable by Cal/EPA  Population characteristic indicators should relate to demographic factors that may influence vulnerability to disease  Publicly available  Statewide and location-based information  Good quality data (e.g., covers the state, accurate, current) 13

Proposed model for aggregating components Cumulative Impact Exposures + Public Health Effects + Environmental Effects Sensitive Populations + Socioeconomic Factors 14

Range of Scores for Components ComponentRange of Possible Scores Exposures1-10 Environmental effects1-5 Public health effects1-5 Sensitive populations1-3 Socioeconomic factors1-3 Cumulative impact Considering revised scoring based on comments.

Indicator: Ozone  Air Resources Board’s Air Monitoring Network  Indicator: Daily maximum 8-hour ozone concentrations for the summer season  Interpolated from nearest monitors to geographic center of the ZIP code by ARB  Three year ( ) average  Assign a percentile (>0 – 100) to all California ZIP codes 16

Preliminary Statewide Map: Ozone 17

Preliminary Component Score: Exposures Indicators 18

Preliminary Component Score: Public Health Indicators 19

Preliminary Component Score: Environmental Effects Indicators 20

Preliminary Component Score: Sensitive Populations 21

Preliminary Component Score: Socioeconomic Factors 22

Some Potential Uses of Tool  To aid ongoing planning and decision-making within Cal/EPA  To provide a baseline of information  The tool is not  intended to be used as the sole determining factor in decision-making  to replace a formal risk assessment 23

SB 535 (De Leon, 2012) 24  Cal/EPA shall identify disadvantaged communities for investment opportunities based on geographic, socioeconomic, public health and environmental hazard criteria.  Department of Finance triennial investment plan for Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund must allocate at least 25 percent to projects that benefit these communities, and at least 10 percent to projects located in these communities.

Examples of Comments Received on the Methodology 25  Geographical unit: Consider using census tracts instead of ZIP codes  Components should be weighted differently  Consider different method than percentiles for scoring individual indicators  Consider additive rather than multiplicative model (to aggregate pollution burden and population characteristics)

Next Steps  Review Comments from the Public and Making Revisions  Revise indicators and analysis  Release a revised CalEnviroScreen for public comment early 2013  CIPA workgroup meeting  Consider comments  Finalize CalEnviroScreen early

How to learn more… 27 Project reports, meetings, and archive of public materials: Website s when new information is available or when meeting are announced: OEHHA’s listserv, select “Cumulative Impacts”