Building Better (and More) Physics Educators Beth A. Cunningham Executive Officer American Association of Physics Teachers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GenChem ABOR Learner-Centered Education 2009 General Chemistry Redesign Department of Chemistry University of Arizona.
Advertisements

The Common Core State Standards: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mathematical Education of Teachers.
The Urban Teacher Partnership A Collaboration of Metropolitan State College of Denver Denver Public Schools Mayor’s Office for Education and Children.
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) in Engineering Program Engineering Education NSF Awardees Conference-Sept , 2007 Mary Poats, Program Manager-RET.
EPAS: Elevating the Postsecondary Aspirations of Students! Using ACTs EPAS Data Effectively Glenn Beer Louisiana Tech University
Alabama PhysTEC Program J.W. Harrell, Stan Jones, Patrick LeClair, Tim Mewes, Dennis Sunal, Cynthia Sunal, Penni Wallace (TiR)
Evaluation EnAct Campuses Sonoma, Humboldt, Chico, San Francisco, San Jose, Fresno, Bakersfield, Pomona Presentation July 11, 2007 Public Works, Inc. Mikala.
The Florida Reading Initiative (FRI) is a research-based school wide reform effort committed to providing the professional development and follow up support.
+ Project IDEAL in Minnesota: Building a Community of ABE DL Practice Minnesota ABE DL Toolkit.
Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.
Preliminary Results of the Conference on Teacher Research Experiences April 2005 Hosted by the University of Rhode Island Office of Marine Programs Funded.
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
Faculty Learning Communities’ Impacts: Results of a National Survey Faculty Learning Communities’ Impacts: Results of a National Survey Andrea L. Beach,
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
Working Together to Prepare Urban Teachers Barbara Charness, Principal Sepulveda Middle School Los Angeles Unified Schools Nancy Prosenjak, Professor California.
Why get the SPIRIT? Outreach Partnerships to Improve Student Achievement in High Need School Districts Tom Babayan, SPIRIT Program Coordinator, UC Irvine.
CLASS PROJECT: CAREER PATHWAYS CSD 509J Mid-Year Update.
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
DRAFT Building Our Future 2017 Fulton County Schools Strategic Plan Name of Meeting Date.
Middle School Recommendations December Middle School Design Team (MSDT) 1. Support for the Middle School Model as Implemented in APS 2. Focus on.
What Can Districts and Schools Do to Make Professional Development Work? Andy Porter Vanderbilt University June, 2004.
OSEP Project Director’s Conference July, 2010 Presenters: Collaboration model: Kathleen Bradley, Therese Hogan, Debra Loomis and Srimani Chakravarthi (Associated.
Teaching College Geology in High School: The Concurrent Challenges and Opportunities of Dual Credit Programs to Departments of Geology Carl N. Drummond.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
1 Making the Case for Federal Support of the National Writing Project (An Evaluator’s Perspective) NWP Spring Meeting 2006 Inverness Research Associates.
Cindy M. Walker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Development and Publication Earth System Science in the Community.
The CS4Alabama CE21 Project Goals Alabama participation in current CS AP has been very low (with 220k HS students; 5200 US History and 120 Latin AP exams):
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition Forrest W. Parkay Chapter 13 Becoming a Professional Teacher Parkay ISBN: © 2013, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education,
SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS TEACHER INITIATIVE Improving the Undergraduate Pipeline to Math and Science Teaching Credentials Program Overview.
Diversity in Graduate Education: Reflections and Realities UGA Teaching Academy Academic Affairs Faculty Symposium Friday, March 27, 2015 Michelle Cook,
Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod, UWM Beth Schefelker, MPS 18 April 2008.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Texas Regional Collaboratives for Excellence in Science and Mathematics Teaching*: An Exemplary Texas MSP Program Gina S. Day Deputy Associate Commissioner,
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
U.S. Department of Education Mathematics and Science Partnerships: FY 2005 Summary.
Teacher Algebra Network: Our Model for Professional Development in Three Rural North Carolina Counties Presented by Katie J. Mawhinney and Tracie McLemore.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Talent Development Initiative: Cate Reed Allison McCarthy Education Committee February 8th, 2011.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
David Grosnick David Ober James Watson Neil Anthony Elaine Gwinn Jeff Sayers Mike Wolter Physics Teacher Education Coalition (PhysTEC) at Ball State University.
Noyce Program Annual Conference 8 July 2010 Washington, DC Know Your Audience: Marketing Strategies to Recruit Teachers Monica Plisch, American Physical.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Math and Science Partnership Program Approaches to State Longitudinal Evaluation March 21, 2011 San Francisco MSP Regional Meeting Patty O’Driscoll Public.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Conspicuous Excellence: Embracing Accountability, Documenting Impact & Building Trust Nita A. Paris, PhD, Associate.
Expanding Communications on the New T 3 TLC Program.
Career Academic Technical Institute (CATI) Division of Career-Technical Education TN State Department of Education 25th NACTEI New Orleans, 2005.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Columbus State University C ollege of Education and Health Professions PSC Program Review February 14-17, 2010.
NH Professional Development Center Network Task Force Report to State Board of Education on August 21, 2002.
MASTERING READING INSTRUCTION A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR FIRST GRADE PROFESSIONALS.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
Enhancing Employability for Student Success
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Southern Regional Education Board Annual Leadership Forum
Research on UTeach: Past, Present, and Future Research
Presentation transcript:

Building Better (and More) Physics Educators Beth A. Cunningham Executive Officer American Association of Physics Teachers

Why should we be concerned about who is teaching high school physics? A physics degree is not required for being an effective physics teacher but the most consistent and powerful predictor of student achievement in science and math is a teacher who is fully certified and has at least a bachelor's degree in the content area. (from Rising Above the Gathering Storm) The number of students taking high school physics is increasing nation wide. Physics is needed more and more for developing future technically proficient workforce and an educated populace. We need to be equitable and provide equal access to all students independent of socioeconomic background! 2

Need for High School Teachers 3

High School Classes Taught By Teacher with Degree in the Field Source: Schools and Staffing Survey 4

HS Physics Teacher Education Background 5

Number of Students and Teachers in High School Physics All U.S. High Schools 6

Physics Enrollment in U.S. High Schools by Type of Course, 1987 – 2009 (numbers in 1,000s) ^ Physics First was explicitly included in the list of courses for the first time on the survey. *Regular course taught using conceptual text. 7

Proportion of Students in Each Racial or Ethnic Group Taking Physics* All U.S. High Schools *A closer examination of the data reveals that these differences are likely driven more by socioeconomic factors than by race. 8

Proportion of HS Physics Teachers in Each Racial or Ethnic Group, All US High Schools 9

Proportion of Females among US High School Students All US High Schools Data for all high school students from US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics 10

Women among High School Physics Teachers 11

12

Location of PhysTEC teachers Teach within X miles of their institution 62% 50 miles 22% miles 16% >200 miles PhysTEC Teachers: 67 respondents 13

PhysTEC Project Goals Transform physics departments to engage in preparing physics teachers Demonstrate successful models for increasing the number of highly-qualified physics teachers Spread best-practice ideas throughout the physics teacher preparation community 14

PhysTEC Project National Coalition National conference Community leaders Topical workshops Sharing innovative ideas Broad dissemination 290 member institutions Demonstration Projects Comprehensive (< $300k)  All key elements  Teacher in Residence Targeted sites (< $75k)  Innovative ideas, smaller sites National models Institutional support Now 31 supported sites 15

16

PhysTEC Components Recruitment Teacher-in-Residence Course Reform Learning Assistants (exposure to teaching) Collaboration Teacher Advisory Groups Induction / Mentoring Sustainability 17

Key Element: Champion Promote/lead program from within Physics Dept. Contact with administration to build long-term support Faculty advocate Student advocate Obtain funding Bridge between Physics/Education/K-12 schools Knowledge of issues/literature Recruiting lead 18

PhysTEC Project Outcomes 19

20

PhysTEC Graduates Go On To Teach Physics Three year retention rate (PhysTEC): 76% Three year retention rate (All K-12): 74% (Source: DoEd) 21

PhysTEC Graduates Have Strong Content Knowledge 22

PhysTEC Sites Increase Diversity of Physics Teacher Workforce 23

24

New Solicitation 3 comprehensive, 3 (?) sites focused on recruiting majors Initial proposals Spring 2014 (RFP available on 3/31/14 and pre-proposals due 5/12/14, must be PhysTEC member) Final proposals Fall 2014 (deadline for those invited is 9/8/14) Sites begin Fall 2015 Extended timeline for more planning Opportunity to experiment 25

What About Teachers Already in the Field Teaching Physics or Assigned to Teach Physics? We can’t rely only on graduating more physics teachers in the near future to meet the need Most teachers of physics don’t have degrees in physics or physics education (“cross over” teachers) The first few years can be very challenging Many teachers leave the field after 3 – 5 years Most schools require continuous professional development Teachers learn best from peers 26

Designed to connect high school physics educators teaching physics for the first time and who desire additional guidance with experienced high school physics educators Is the “match.com” for new high school physics teachers to gain insight from master teachers and have a long term (1 year or more) relationship 27

Outcomes of eMentoring An evaluation of the first few years indicates that  over 90% of the Mentees who participated believe that having an eMentor has increased the likelihood that they will continue teaching  75% predicted that they would remain in teaching for four or more years. (50% predicted more than 10 years!) Planning to expand to “instant mentor” to assist new teachers with questions (“I need to know for tomorrow’s class”) 28

AAPT Physics Teaching Resource Agents (PTRA) Peer led profession development for in-service teachers of physics and physical science: workshops with teachers teaching teachers PD on physics content, teaching techniques based on research in physics education, technology Workshops are hands-on giving participants the opportunity to experience activities as their students would. Activities at a variety of levels from low tech to high tech. Institutes to develop teacher leaders (as PTRA’s) to offer PD Teachers develop teacher resources (Funded by NSF between 1986 and 2010 and with support from APS) 29

Impact on Content: Did they learn anything? N pre = 664 N post =

Gender Data 2010 Final NSF Report by EAT, Inc. 31

Average Percent Change 32

What Worked Partnerships between AAPT, university/college professors and PTRAs (workshops led by PTRAs) Offering multiple opportunities to attend training (rotate years, sites and topics) Predetermined and consistent curriculum (quality control) PTRAs trained in curriculum, pedagogy, and adult learning methods Assessments correlated to workshop objectives ABC: Activity Before Concept; Active learning Peer led professional development by AAPT certified master teachers 2010 Final NSF Report by EAT, Inc. 33

What Doesn’t Work Spray and Pray (Smorgasboard Curriculum)  Inconsistency in hours of training  Inconsistency in curriculum/topics taught Lack of storyline; discontinuity of Professional Development Isolated lecture Demonstrations/activities without applicable content Free equipment without content context or training Training teachers in equipment they don’t have 2010 Final NSF Report by EAT, Inc. 34

ComPADRE.org Is a network of free online resource collections supporting faculty, students, and teachers in Physics and Astronomy Education  Physics Front includes lesson plans for appropriate grade levels and type of physic class (e.g. Physics First, conceptual, etc)  Physics To Go has fun physics photos and articles  Physical Sciences Resource Center provides education resources and simulations by subject (classical mechanics, E&M, optics, etc) 35

AAPT has much to offer! American Journal of Physics The Physics Teacher Competitions for HS students Meetings (Summer in Minneapolis) Sections And more 36

Questions? For information about eMentoring and PTRA: For information about ComPADRE: For information about PhysTEC: 37