Developing a Rubric for the Design of Learning Spaces: Starting Points 4.17.06.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 May 29, 2012.
Advertisements

Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 October 15, 2012.
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Understanding By Design
Understanding by Design & Assessment
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Ackward esign. Teachers are designers. The effectiveness of their designs corresponds to whether they have accomplished their goals for the end users.
Information from Van de Walle (2004) And Wiggins and McTighe (2005)Jamar Pickreign, Ph.D Planning a Problem-Based Lesson John Van de Walle, offers.
An approach to curriculum designed to engage students in inquiry and uncovering ideas.
Curriculum & Instruction Webinar October 18, 2013.
Understanding by Design An Overview by Eduardo M. Valerio, Ph.D.
1 Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics Based on Understanding by Design By Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
Understanding by Design
AN OVERVIEW OF UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN The Pedagogy of Project Archaeology.
Lesson Planning Finding your way…
Connecting Theory and Practice seeing the forest and the trees with credit to Ansel Adams Aspens in New Mexico.
Understanding By Design
ED 3501: Curriculum and Instruction Section GHI - Fall Understanding by Design Understanding and Creating Effective Instructional Design.
Redding Elementary School Integrated Learning Experiences Summer 2011 Presentation created by Christopher Wermuth 2011.
SATURDAY, JANUARY 9, 2010 MARCIE TAYLOR-THOMA World History Writers’ Training.
UBD Backward Planning Understanding by Design - The Backward Planning Model Based on the work of Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Plan Backwards!
Understanding by Design
USING BACKWARD DESIGN FOR UNIT AND LESSON PLANS * Based on the thinking that if everyone has a clear picture of where they are going before they start,
Understanding By Design A Contemporary Approach to Curriculum Design.
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
York Public Schools Curriculum Design September 1, 2010 Toby Boss ESU 6.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Jacque Melin, Facilitator 1.
Using Understanding by Design
Understanding By Design Developing Standards-based Curriculum The Problem “Even good students don’t always display a deep understanding of what is taught.
Stage 3: Learning Activities and Performance Tasks Thursday, August 4th, 2010.
PLANNING for INQUIRY Backward Design Information to Knowledge Journey Wiggins and McTighe, Kuhlthau, Todd.
Understanding by Design From the work of Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe The 3 Stages of UBD Developing a Common Language - What is a Unit.
The Backward Design Process
Adapted From the Work and Wisdom of Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe, UBD 08/2002 Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD.
Understanding by Design a.k.a. Backward Design
Narrowing the Challenge: Revisiting Understanding by Design Cherie McCollough VaNTH-PER Professional Development June 1, 2004.
Matthew Birtel EDUC 503 FALL 2012 November 27, 2012.
York Public Schools Curriculum Design December 1, 2010 Toby Boss ESU 6.
UbD - Stage 3 Planning for Learning. Review Stage 1 : Identify Desired Results –Big Idea: Teach so that others may understand –Essential Question: Do.
Designing Cooperative Learning Applications Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota  Felder & Brent B Course Design  Wiggins & McTighe B Understanding.
Welcome to EDUC 461! Integrated Methods I: Processes Mercer University McDonough RAC.
Understanding By Design
Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD Copyright: 2002, Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
Understanding by Design, UbD - based on work by McTighe and Wiggins.
What is Earth Science by Design?. What is ESBD? A year-long program of professional development for middle school and high school level teachers of Earth.
Understanding by Design Developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) A.K.A.
CREATING PARTIALLY ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS. What’s important about how you learn?
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
Session One  Backward Design is a process of lesson planning created by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe and introduced in Understanding by Design (1998).
Understanding by Design grant wiggins & jay mctighe
A framework for redesign Adapted from Wiggins & McTighe, 2006 Understanding by Design.
LaSalle County Teacher Institute Day Oct. 11, 2013.
Backward Mapping... beginning with the end in mind... NSW Department of Education & Training NSW Public Schools – Leading the Way With.
HOW IS “WHERETO” LIKE AMERICAN IDOL? All rights reserved. This PowerPoint is intended for use in face- to-face presentation for Parkway School District,
Adapted From the Work and Wisdom of Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe, UBD 08/2002 Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD.
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 Session VI.
T-527 Fall 2005 Developing Curriculum for Deep Learning How is learning assessed? Ongoing assessment and educative evaluation 10 November 2005.
Understanding by Design Stage 3 Based on the work of: Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins Copyright (C) 1998 by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum.
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Understanding By Design by Wiggins & McTighe
Understanding By Design Introduction September 17th , 2009
Understanding By Design
UbD: Stages of Backward Design
Patchogue-Medford UbD Curriculum Group
Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics
Instructional Program Alignment
Presentation transcript:

Developing a Rubric for the Design of Learning Spaces: Starting Points

Build IT - The Design Process A version of the design process cycle developed an IT curriculum developed for a middle school girls after-school program of the Girls Incorporated of Alameda County

An Informal Design Assessment An assessment rubric design to capture the development of various design skills taught in an after-school community technology center program using the Understanding by Design (UbD) framework.

Understanding by Design Wiggins & McTighe Key Design QuestionDesign ConsiderationFilters (Design Criteria) What the Final Design Accomplishes Stage 1. What is worthy and requiring of understanding? National standards. State standards. District standards. Regional topic opportunities. Teacher expertise and interest. (and….) Enduring ideas. Opportunities for authentic, discipline-based work. Uncoverage. Engaging. Unit framed around enduring understandings and essential questions. Stage 2. What is evidence of understanding? Six facets of understanding. Continuum of assessment types. Valid. Reliable. Sufficient. Authentic work. Feasible. Student friendly. Unit anchored in credible and educationally vital evidence of the desired understandings. Stage 3. What learning experiences and teaching promote understanding, interest, and excellence? Research-based repertoire of learning and teaching strategies. Essential and enabling knowledge and skills. WHERE Where is it going? Hook the students. Explore and equip. Rethink and revise. Exhibit and evaluate. Coherent learning experiences and teaching that will evoke and develop the desired understandings, promote interest, and make excellent performance more likely.

Learning Space Design Malcolm Brown

Learn Space Design Rubric??? CafeMuseumParkPreschoolHS ClassroomZooLibrary Affordances/Constraints Expectations: what are people expecting when they go there? Is learning part of their expectations for their experience? Expectations: what does the institution/program expect visitors/participants to experience? Environmental factors: what’s going on in that space? What is the context? Who decided? Extensions: what happens beyond the space? How does this happen? Participation structures: Opportunities for interactions? collaboration? What can you measure? How can you measure the learning?

Or…Learning Space Design Rubric?? Space/setting (context) Identify Audiences & Needs/Goals/ Enduring Interactions/ PFL