TVCA Assessment Workshop Series: Understanding the THINK Rubric Celine Kavalec-Miller Jenny Britton Learning Evidence Team Valencia Community College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

Analyzing Student Work
Facilitator Notes Materials Needed: –PPT –4 How To support docs on each type of rubric –Rubrics: Other Points to Consider document.
1 SESSION 3 FORMAL ASSESSMENT TASKS CAT and IT ASSESSMENT TOOLS.
SENIOR SEMINARS Specifics & Example Performances CEPR Center for Educational Policy Research.
Wynne HARLEN Susana BORDA CARULLA Fibonacci European Training Session 5, March 21 st to 23 rd, 2012.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Minnesota State Community and Technical College Critical Thinking Assignment Example and Assessment.
Writing B. Finco. A little light reading! B. Finco.
Using Rubrics to Enhance Learning Connie Schroeder, Ph.D. Center for Instructional and Professional Development University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Qatar University College of Arts and Sciences Developing rubrics to assess courses Abdou Ndoye Fall 2010.
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
Looking at Texts from a Reader’s Point of View
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Dr. Robert Mayes University of Wyoming Science and Mathematics Teaching Center
Learning Outcomes from Report-Writing Unit
KPIs: Definition and Real Examples
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Essay Assessment Tasks
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Topic #3 - CRITICAL THINKING Key Evidence 1 Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
Assessment: Creating and Using Rubrics. Workshop Goals Review rubrics and parts of rubrics Use your assignment to create a rubric scale & dimension Peer.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Welcome Math Leaders Mac Scoring Training Year 17 …analyzing student thinking and improving instruction.
Critical and creative thinking Assessment Tool How could schools use the tool? Sharon Foster.
Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.
California State University East Bay
January 29, 2010ART Beach Retreat ART Beach Retreat 2010 Assessment Rubric for Critical Thinking First Scoring Session Summary ART Beach Retreat.
TNE Program Assessment Forum April 19 th, Glad you’re here!  Who’s Who… Design Team Representatives Program Assessment Team.
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment LO 1.1&1.2&1.3.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
Chapter 5 Building Assessment into Instruction Misti Foster
Threshold Concepts & Assessment Ahmed Alwan, American University of Sharjah Threshold Concepts For Information Literacy: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.
Assessment in Education Patricia O’Sullivan Office of Educational Development UAMS.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
General Information Iowa Writing Assessment The Riverside Publishing Company, 1994 $39.00: 25 test booklets, 25 response sheets 40 minutes to plan, write.
ATL’s in the Personal Project
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
English III team building. Team Training Camp Pick a mascot for your team Draw the mascot Add a team motto Add individual icons or symbols Come up with.
SHOW US YOUR RUBRICS A FACULTY DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP SERIES Material for this workshop comes from the Schreyer Institute for Innovation in Learning.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
http://at.gallaudet.edu/events/2007/waypoint 11 GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY Academic Affairs Waypoint Demo E-Scoring for Rubrics Celebrating the New.
BACKWARD DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT Course Design Intensive ~ Dr. Catherine D. Rawn June 2014 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial.
Identifying Assessments
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
More Than Multiple Choice Tests: Constructing Balanced Assessments Albemarle County Public Schools - October 2015.
MAVILLE ALASTRE-DIZON Philippine Normal University
Welcome!  Please complete the three “Do Now” posters.  There are nametags on the tables:  Please ensure that more than one district is represented at.
 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.
Rubrics: Using Performance Criteria to Evaluate Student Learning PERFORMANCE RATING PERFORMANCE CRITERIABeginning 1 Developing 2 Accomplished 3 Content.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 5: Provider Quality Assurance and Continuous Improvement 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville,
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
Learning Assessment Techniques
Descriptive Writing.
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Consider Your Audience
Implementing and reviewing additional admissions assessments
The Learning Experience Plan
Math Field Day Meeting #2 October 28, 2015
Internal Assessment 2016 IB Chemistry Year 2 HL.
General Education Assessment
PRMSP/AlACiMa Project
What Are Rubrics? Rubrics are components of:
Testing Writing Rio Darmasetiawan
A Research Companion to Principles and Standards
Presentation transcript:

TVCA Assessment Workshop Series: Understanding the THINK Rubric Celine Kavalec-Miller Jenny Britton Learning Evidence Team Valencia Community College

2 Preview of Workshop  Review assessment background  Examine the THINK rubric through application  Field test the THINK rubric

3 Ice Breaker  Write down your answers to these questions. l How would collecting student evidence help you as a teacher? l What is your experience with holistic scoring and using rubrics? l Why did you want to attend this workshop?.

4 Ice Breaker (cont.)  In small group, share your answers.  In the whole group: What kinds of things are we thinking about as a group?

5 Why Should We Collect Evidence of Student Learning?  Improve student learning  Identify patterns of strength and weakness in student performance  Use what we learn to re-design teaching/advising  Verify to various audiences that Valencia “adds value” to students and community

6 Mission/Purposes Learning Outcomes How well do we achieve our outcomes? Gather Evidence Interpret Evidence Enhance teaching/ learning; inform institutional decision- making, planning, budgeting Peggy Maki

7

8 Challenges of implementing large scale assessment  Creating a logistically fluid model  Ensuring creativity in assignment choice  Ensuring assessment data is not used inappropriately  Ensuring consistency

9 Benefits of Using Rubrics  Establishes clear expectations for students and assessors  Provides objective assessment of work by instructor and students  Ensures consistency in assessing and evaluating  Allows more accurate peer review and self- review

10 Becoming familiar with the THINK rubric  Two forms l Analytic (multicolored/landscape) Dimensions of quality/criteria (emphasis) Levels of achievement/scale l Holistic (orange/portrait) Levels of achievement/scale (emphasis) Dimension of quality /criteria

11 Working with the Analytic Rubric  Method l We will work with each criteria separately. l Locate the rubric, paragraphs, and the 5 criteria worksheets. Les Demoiselles d'Avignon by Pablo Picasso

12 The Five Criteria/Dimensions (THINK indicators) Analyzing data, ideas, principles and perspectives Applying facts, formulas, procedures and concepts Presenting multiple points of view Drawing well supported conclusions Synthesizing ideas into a coherent whole

13 Analyzing Data (green)  Read all criteria statements for this criteria.  Read the four paragraphs.  Rank each paragraph on your worksheet in the appropriate column, using1-4.  Provide a brief written explanation for your rank.

14 Applying Facts (Tan)  Read all criteria statements for the criteria.  Read the four paragraphs.  Rank each paragraph on your worksheet in the appropriate column, using 1-4.  Provide a brief written explanation for your rank.

15 Presenting Multiple Points of View (Blue)  Read all criteria statements for the criteria.  Read the four paragraphs.  Rank each paragraph on your worksheet in the appropriate column, using 1-4.  Provide a brief written explanation for your rank.

16 Drawing Conclusions (Yellow)  Read all criteria statements for the criteria.  Read the four paragraphs.  Rank each paragraph on your worksheet in the appropriate column, using 1-4.  Provide a brief written explanation for your rank.

17 Synthesizing Ideas (Pink)  Read all criteria statements for the criteria.  Read the four paragraphs.  Rank each paragraph on your worksheet in the appropriate column, using 1-4.  Provide a brief written explanation for your rank.

18 Why holistic scoring?  Writing is evidence of thinking (even in mathematics)  Holistic scoring offers a method that is: l Valid l Quick l Reliable (if trained)

19 Holistic Scoring: General Principles  Consider how the elements work together to form a total impression  Adopt the criteria of the think rubric to measure a performance, achieving consistency  Recognize that the rubric defines a range of performances (use full range)

20 Holistic Scoring: A Field Test l Read each paper once, quickly and thoroughly l Assign a score of 1-4 (one of each) Upper (3&4) or lower (1&2) Rank from lowest to highest

21 Holistic Scoring: A Field Test (cont.) l Do not mark on papers Saves time May prejudice a second reader l Comment on scoring sheet (purple) l When finished, wait quietly for others to finish

Discuss the range

23 Developing Expertise with the THINK Rubric  No experts exist on applying the THINK rubric  Expertise develops with use of the rubric  We need to be patient l with this process l with ourselves

24 Today’s Workshop  Reviewed assessment background  Examined the THINK rubric through application  Field tested the THINK rubric

25 Next THINK Workshop Building Powerful Critical Thinking Assignments East, Tues., Feb. 28, 8-105D West, Wed., March 1, Osceola, Friday, March 3, All workshops from 2-4 pm

Thank you for participating. Please fill out the workshop evaluation form.