Understanding the Rubric Presenters: Rhonda Pitts and Bridgette Blue June 18, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
Advertisements

C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Digging Deeper with DIBELS Data
Integration: LDC/MDC Strategies & the Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) SREB August 26, 2013 KDE Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Laying the Groundwork ISLN September 2012.
The Framework for Teaching: Digging Deeper August 27, 2012 Bernie Cleland & Duffy Miller
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Alternative Assessments FOUN 3100 Fall 2003 Sondra M. Parmer.
December 13, 2011 ICSD facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4.
Cooperative Learning Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement Compiled from: Classroom Instruction That Works! By: Robert J. Marzano,
HCPSS End-of-Year Teacher Evaluation Process April Leadership I.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Domain 1. Outcomes By the end of this session participants will: Gain a deeper understanding of Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Be able to apply their.
September 26,  Individual jot down  Partner talk  Table discussion  Whole group sharing.
Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
Lecturette 2: Analyzing Rubrics. Rubric Variations Rubrics can be based on category or criteria level descriptions. They also can be more analytical or.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Teacher Quality Standards Beginning of The Year Self-Assessment.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Strategies for Implementing the 5D+ Purpose and Student Engagement Dimensions in the Classroom Hosted by Julie Milder.
* Participants will establish that students have some very common misconceptions about the meaning and use of the equal sign * Participants will explore.
Session Materials  Wiki
Charlotte Danielson’s 2011 Framework for Teaching: Part 2 Laurie Gregory, Director of Curriculum April 8, 2013.
Criteria Charts for assessing students’ writing.  Effective assessors know that to improve student learning, they have to do more than just measure students'
Peer Observation & Connecting to the Kentucky Framework for Teaching.
Artifact Brainstorming Domains 1 and 4 Department of Professional & Organizational Development Howard County Public School System, 2014.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Alternative Assessment Chapter 8 David Goh. Factors Increasing Awareness and Development of Alternative Assessment Educational reform movement Goals 2000,
How to Effectively Communicate With Families A deeper understanding of component 4c: Communicating with Families.
Teacher Talk Based on what you know now about LDC... What would you expect to see if you walked into a classroom that was implementing LDC at what you.
COMPONENT 2B: ESTABLISHING A CULTURE FOR LEARNING Domain 2: The Classroom Environment.
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 2 Developed by Teaching.
Denver Public Schools Diving Into the Revised Framework Taking a Closer Look at I.3 Instructional Methods and Pacing.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
SDAIE Session 2 Universal Access/SDAIE Lesson Design Template
Welcome: BISD Teacher Evaluation System 8/26/2015 "A commitment to professional learning is important, not because teaching is of poor quality and must.
Engaging Students in Learning 3c. Outcomes: Participants will…  Deepen understanding of component 3C: Engaging Students in Learning;  Gain strategies.
SDAIE Session 2 Universal Access/SDAIE Lesson Design Template Title III Access to Core Professional Development Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and.
The Framework for Teaching Understanding the Levels of Instructional Practice.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Danielson Framework 3D – Using Assessment in Instruction.
The Scientific Method. The scientific method is the only scientific way accepted to back up a theory or idea. This is the method on which all research.
College Career Ready Conference Participants will  Review components of the Grade 3 and the Grades 4 and 5 Condensed Scoring Rubric for Prose Constructed.
July 11, 2013 DDM Technical Assistance and Networking Session.
The “Tricky Bits” Digging Deeper. Collaborative Code Everyone does all the work Limit sidebars Honor timeframes Silence, and discontinue use of, electronics.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Table of Specifications
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Framing Success with Effective Lesson Objectives and Demonstrations of Learning Introductions, logistics/housekeeping.
Analyzing Student Work & Formative Jurying
ABCs of Assessment: The Assessment System
Ensuring Success through Assessment – Involve Students
Transitioning from FIRST To The Systemic FFT Implementation
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Defining Effective and Identifying Observation Rubric Titles
Facilitator notes This session is designed for approximately 45 minutes. Each slide includes an approximate amount of time for the discussion/activity.
Presentation transcript:

Understanding the Rubric Presenters: Rhonda Pitts and Bridgette Blue June 18, 2012

Outcomes Participants will develop an understanding of the importance of rubrics in observing teacher’s performance Participants will dig deeper in their understanding of the language of the 8 component areas of the FFT rubric Participants will define the language of the rubric as it applies to teachers and students levels of performance

Warm-up Activity- Restaurant Rubric Fun Think about the criteria or performance levels that would cause a restaurant to be unsatisfactory, basic, proficient or distinguished. Let’s list those criteria. Place the restaurants that you go to in the correct category based on your criteria. Let’s talk about the data.

What is a Rubric? Read “The Advantages of a Rubric” article, individually In your reading, find the following: One sentence One phrase One word that speaks to you about rubrics. Let’s share.

Analyzing the Expectations Each table has been assigned a component: Read the performance levels for your assigned component and element. Using Hand-out # 1, record your understanding of the performance of the teacher and student based on the level (Unsatisfactory, Basic, Proficient and Distinguished) Share your notes with your tablemates. Chart the big idea for each level of performance at the component level. Be prepared to share out.

Think Abouts As we begin the next school year, what is important for teachers and administrators to communicate in regards to understanding the expectations and language of the Framework for Teaching Rubrics/Performance Levels? Can teachers and administrators identify the differences between each performance level and how do we ensure that teachers achieve at the highest levels of performance consistently?